Re: [hlds_linux] [STEAM] Riot Shield
The sound issue is a definite problem I hear about everytime I am in the server. As far as the shield bug..I found out the one I was referring to earlier and it does work if done properly. Buy a shield with your knife out..no pistol. close the shield buy and pistol and it opens. From then on with shield open you still can't be hurt. Basics again. buy shield with knife close shield holding knife open with gun - Original Message - From: "Kevin J. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 10:42 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] [STEAM] Riot Shield > > > ->-Original Message- > ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Clark > ->Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 5:39 PM > ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [STEAM] Riot Shield > -> > -> > ->On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 04:21:19PM -0400, Kevin J. Anderson wrote: > ->> only reason I ask is that I dont take playing 1.6 on steam very > ->seriously, > ->> > ->> kev > -> > ->Why not? > > hmmm. well, couple reasons. The biggest is that every server I ever join > is usually full of really poor players, and its just too easy to go 30 and 5 > or whatever outlandishly high score. Then I get called a hacker, and what > not. > > Secondly, those bullet ricochet noises entirely annoy me... they seriously > make me want to plug my ears. In a firefight, it just goes crazy around > you. They are ok in DOD, because concentrated firefights dont happen as > offen as they do in cs, due to the way that teams spawn. But when you get a > full server of players meeting at various checkpoints in a map in cs, its > makes me want to toss my headphones off. > > thirdly, there also seems to be a sound caching issue in the client, because > new sounds tend to make the game "skip" consistently. I have never had > this issue in previous hl/cs versions, and have heard others talk about it > in servers as well. I have a high end pc, amd2100+, 512megs of ram, geforce > ti 4600, soundblaster live. > > so in other words, for various reasons, playing 1.6 isnt all that enjoyable > for me, a person who has played since a leaked beta1. ; ( > > kev > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Lan server Compaq Proliant 1600R Dual PII 300
I don't think that the difference would be noticable between LAN and internet. I've never tried it though, so I could be way wrong. On my xp2200 machine, i can have 12+ on my public, 10 on each private (2 privates), and 15 users connected to ventrilo with no issues. I honestly think you'll be fine with a 2GHZ machine running your servers. Note how ever this is all done with CS, no DOD. I don't know how itensive DOD is.. I only run CS servers. Joshua -Original Message- From: Jared Schwendeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Lan server Compaq Proliant 1600R Dual PII 300 -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Thanks to all who weighed in. Just to satiate my curiosity, how many users could connect? Would 12 be able to be on, anyone actually run something similar? Oh, and Joshua, yes these are those old 5U servers with the hot swappable SCSI drives on it. Would a LAN server need to be more, less powerful or the same as one that is connected to the Internet? I would think perhaps less because if you turn off the Internet (except for VAC) wouldn't you get less port scans, thus less network utilization? Thanks again for the advice. Jared Joshua Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Build the 2ghz box.. you can run 2 servers on it no problem. I run two private 5x5 servers and one public 20 slot server w\a ventrilo server with atleast 15 people connected at all time with no problems what so ever. This is on an XP2200 w\512megs of ram. Are these the old enormous proliants? That are like, something around the size of 6U? You can heat your home with those things man, I suppose thats one plus in the winter. LAN party with built in heater. Joshua -Original Message- From: Jared Schwendeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 8:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [hlds_linux] Lan server Compaq Proliant 1600R Dual PII 300 -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I know that most would say this is too slow, but I am hoping this might work. I have a friend I can get two Compaq Proliant 1600R Dual PII 300 w/160MB ECC memory and Ultra Wide 3 SCSI hdds. I would like to run these two servers (one DoD and one Cstrike) on my Lan for parties. I have anywhere from 12-20 clients in and on either or both servers ie. 2 5x5 matches, 1 dod 1 cs. I am aware of the `20-25 mhz rule per player, but if I bind hlds to just one cpu and the rest (hlguard, statsme) to the other and a third PC host the php stats, would this work? I thank you in advance for any advice you can give me. I can get each @$125 w/ shipping incl. Yes I do realize that I can darn near build a 2 Ghz machine for the same, but two servers on it? Plus I like the stability of an established server. Oh, and I plan on pumping the memory up to 512 MB. Thank you very much for your help. Jared - Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux - Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Natural Selection
Good to hear CPU usage is coming down. I never tried it after i tried when it first came out and it was unusable to me. So how about the bandwidth compared to like CS? Thanks Jeremy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric (Deacon) Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 10:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Natural Selection David Sharpe wrote: > however ns v2.0 is out on July 31st and greatly reduces server resources. Heh...NS has been reducing server resources to nothing for a while now :) -- Eric (the Deacon remix) "But I don't want to be a pie; I hate gravy!" -Babs (Chicken Run) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Steam server segv
Should be quite a basic one if it cant bind the port it doesnt like it much :P STEAM Auth Server WARNING: UDP_OpenSocket: port: 27695 bind: Address already in use FATAL ERROR (shutting down): Couldn't allocate dedicated server IP port 27695. Segmentation fault (core dumped) Add "-debug" to the ./hlds_run command line to generate a debug.log to help with solving this problem ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] How many RPM Packages do you have installed?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa |wc -l 236 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] [STEAM] Riot Shield
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 10:42:21PM -0400, Kevin J. Anderson wrote: > ->On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 04:21:19PM -0400, Kevin J. Anderson wrote: > ->> only reason I ask is that I dont take playing 1.6 on steam very > ->seriously, > ->> > ->> kev > -> > ->Why not? > > hmmm. well, couple reasons. The biggest is that every server I ever join > is usually full of really poor players, and its just too easy to go 30 and 5 > or whatever outlandishly high score. Then I get called a hacker, and what > not. > > Secondly, those bullet ricochet noises entirely annoy me... they seriously > make me want to plug my ears. In a firefight, it just goes crazy around > you. They are ok in DOD, because concentrated firefights dont happen as > offen as they do in cs, due to the way that teams spawn. But when you get a > full server of players meeting at various checkpoints in a map in cs, its > makes me want to toss my headphones off. > > thirdly, there also seems to be a sound caching issue in the client, because > new sounds tend to make the game "skip" consistently. I have never had > this issue in previous hl/cs versions, and have heard others talk about it > in servers as well. I have a high end pc, amd2100+, 512megs of ram, geforce > ti 4600, soundblaster live. > > so in other words, for various reasons, playing 1.6 isnt all that enjoyable > for me, a person who has played since a leaked beta1. ; ( > > kev This is why I asked, yours/our feedback about the beta _is important_. I'm be fairly sure the guys at valve do pay attention to us =D I'm still waiting for the steam client to update itself so I can play on the beta server I'm running =( My Internet connection from home isn't the best... might bring my machine to work and hurry it up a little =P Sux when ya setup a server and aren't the first person to play on it =) -- James. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Natural Selection
David Sharpe wrote: however ns v2.0 is out on July 31st and greatly reduces server resources. Heh...NS has been reducing server resources to nothing for a while now :) -- Eric (the Deacon remix) "But I don't want to be a pie; I hate gravy!" -Babs (Chicken Run) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] [STEAM] Riot Shield
->-Original Message- ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Clark ->Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 5:39 PM ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [STEAM] Riot Shield -> -> ->On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 04:21:19PM -0400, Kevin J. Anderson wrote: ->> only reason I ask is that I dont take playing 1.6 on steam very ->seriously, ->> ->> kev -> ->Why not? hmmm. well, couple reasons. The biggest is that every server I ever join is usually full of really poor players, and its just too easy to go 30 and 5 or whatever outlandishly high score. Then I get called a hacker, and what not. Secondly, those bullet ricochet noises entirely annoy me... they seriously make me want to plug my ears. In a firefight, it just goes crazy around you. They are ok in DOD, because concentrated firefights dont happen as offen as they do in cs, due to the way that teams spawn. But when you get a full server of players meeting at various checkpoints in a map in cs, its makes me want to toss my headphones off. thirdly, there also seems to be a sound caching issue in the client, because new sounds tend to make the game "skip" consistently. I have never had this issue in previous hl/cs versions, and have heard others talk about it in servers as well. I have a high end pc, amd2100+, 512megs of ram, geforce ti 4600, soundblaster live. so in other words, for various reasons, playing 1.6 isnt all that enjoyable for me, a person who has played since a leaked beta1. ; ( kev ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Data Center / Colo
I was there about a year and a half ago doing non-gameserver related stuff and I was pretty disappointed at them. They were on SAAVIS on the time and their NOC was pretty unhelpful. They may or may not have improved since then. I do remember their NOC being pretty unhelpful and unexperienced, though. At 12:56 PM 7/10/2003 -0700, you wrote: Has anyone used CalPOP as a colo? Have you heard anything about them? What do you think about their network? http://calpop.com/colocation.html http://calpop.com/bandwidth.html Thanks for any feedback. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] HLTV Banner/Logo
On Friday, July 11, 2003 11:47 AM [GMT+1200=NZT], Tony Di Schino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > // hltv.wad contains the HLTV banner and my be different on each proxy > // banner format should be 240x48, 256 colors (same like player logo > in pldecal.wad) > // decalfile "hltv.wad" > This is a spray decal, if you log in as a commentator on HLTV then you can spray this logo on the walls. > > // hltv.tga will be shown instead of the default HLTV logo in > spectator GUI > // bannerfile "hltv.tga" > This is the logo displayed at the top left of the HLTV GUI. -Simon ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] How many RPM Packages do you have installed?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa | wc -l 386 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa | wc -l 567 Quite the difference between 2 boxes I thought were pretty much identical. Im guessing 100+ are probably X stuff completely not necessary on game server. - Original Message - From: "J. Wintermantel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 6:32 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] How many RPM Packages do you have installed? > On Friday, July 11, 2003 12:14 AM [GMT+1=CET], > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So how many rpm packages does everyone else have installed on their > > RH HLDS > > boxes? Just wondering. > > > > Thanks > > Jeremy > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [~] # rpm -qa | wc -l > 277 > > RH 7, only running as server / router, no gui > > jwm > > -- > http://server.counter-strike.net > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] How many RPM Packages do you have installed?
Wow I need to do some optimization looks like :P Anyway you could output the list of rpms to a text file and email it to me? if not don't worry, just a thought. Thanks Jeremy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of J. Wintermantel Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 5:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] How many RPM Packages do you have installed? On Friday, July 11, 2003 12:14 AM [GMT+1=CET], [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So how many rpm packages does everyone else have installed on their > RH HLDS > boxes? Just wondering. > > Thanks > Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [~] # rpm -qa | wc -l 277 RH 7, only running as server / router, no gui jwm -- http://server.counter-strike.net ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] HLTV Banner/Logo
In searching the hlds_linux list, I find one occurence (about a year ago) where some one inquired on the location of the hltv.tga and hltv.wad files (no hits in the win32 archive). the person didn't get an answer... I don't see these files in any of my folders. I'm just going to try and drop them in and see what happens. however, im a little unclear on the difference of these two files. // hltv.wad contains the HLTV banner and my be different on each proxy // banner format should be 240x48, 256 colors (same like player logo in pldecal.wad) // decalfile "hltv.wad" // hltv.tga will be shown instead of the default HLTV logo in spectator GUI // bannerfile "hltv.tga" both of these descriptions sound like they could be the file that is used to display where the default HLTV logo is displayed... which file do I actually need to display in the spectator gui? it sounds like the tga file, but then what is the wad file for? it says it is the banner, and that could also be the logo in the GUI... is there a definitive source for HLTV info somewhere? Thx, Tony ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Off Topic - How many RPM Packages do you have installed?
> I was taking a look around the RHN and notice something I hadn't seen > before. I can browse a list of every package I have installed on my RH > machines. To my amazement it was right at or over 500 installed packages. > I > thought my install was pretty clean. Turns out all kinds of stuff was > installed, just not running. Well I went through them all and got the # of > packages down to 414. Some things I knew could go like httpd and sendmail, are you sure you want to get rid of your MTA? It can be a nice ting to have. Say for your intrusion detection software, cron ... etc. But if you feel like it go a head rpm -e glibc --nodeps > and other I knew had to stay being used for the os itself. Then there were > so many that were on the edge of whether they would be needed by any > current > software that has to be there I just left them to be same. > > So how many rpm packages does everyone else have installed on their RH > HLDS > boxes? Just wondering. Box1$ rpm -qva | wc -l 548 Box2$ rpm -qva | wc -l 476 Box3$ rpm -qva | wc -l 551 I roll my own rpms from time to time. Box2 is a new install and haven't had the chance to grow like the two others. --- marius ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] How many RPM Packages do you have installed?
On Friday, July 11, 2003 12:14 AM [GMT+1=CET], [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So how many rpm packages does everyone else have installed on their > RH HLDS > boxes? Just wondering. > > Thanks > Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [~] # rpm -qa | wc -l 277 RH 7, only running as server / router, no gui jwm -- http://server.counter-strike.net ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] How many RPM Packages do you have installed?
I was taking a look around the RHN and notice something I hadn't seen before. I can browse a list of every package I have installed on my RH machines. To my amazement it was right at or over 500 installed packages. I thought my install was pretty clean. Turns out all kinds of stuff was installed, just not running. Well I went through them all and got the # of packages down to 414. Some things I knew could go like httpd and sendmail, and other I knew had to stay being used for the os itself. Then there were so many that were on the edge of whether they would be needed by any current software that has to be there I just left them to be same. So how many rpm packages does everyone else have installed on their RH HLDS boxes? Just wondering. Thanks Jeremy ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] [STEAM] Riot Shield
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 04:21:19PM -0400, Kevin J. Anderson wrote: > only reason I ask is that I dont take playing 1.6 on steam very seriously, > > kev Why not? -- James. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] [STEAM] Riot Shield
We plan to release a fix for this (and a couple other shield bugs) soon. Douglas R Taber wrote: > I'm sure others running the steam BETA have noticed this, but just > incase it hasn't made its way to others and VALVe already. It seems as > though everyone and their brother has found the most recent riotshield > bug which allows players to carry a rifle but still be protected by > an invicible riotshield. > > I'm just curious if VALVE can give us a status on a fix for this bug, > since it makes it virtually impossible to kill anyone exploiting it. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Re: Many WONIDs, Many IPs
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I thought I'd just chip in with any information and let you know that I run off of the same ISP this guy does -- SBC DSL. Via them, yeah, it is very simple to change your ip and/or subnet, all you have to do is power down your DSL modem and power it back up and you have a new IP. Guy sure seems like a moron, though. A suggestion is have an am/mm plugin (write it) that writes a small something to his config and checks if it's in the config of the user, and if it is, ban that wonid and IP, so long as he doesn't notice it in his config you'll get him every time. >"A player came into my server today, Tk'd, got banned by ATAC, but keeps >coming back with new WON ID and Different IPs in different subnets. He >kept coming back with same name so I added to HLG Nameban, but he >started tweaking it... It is as tho he has decided to target my >server... >he came in orignially with >64.252.3.246 >I banned like 3 diff wonids from this IP. Finally, I banned that IP. He >came back in with a new won and IP: >64.252.2.97 >I banned the subnet 64.252.2.0 right off the bat, though I dont like to >ban subnets. Then he comes back in with the follwoing IP: >64.252.7.250 >one of my admins banned three diff wonids from this IP... I havent >banned the subnet yet, because I want to see how long this is going to >go on >Regardless, is it normally that easy for a DHCP cable/DSL client to >change their subnet? >L0630024.log:L 06/30/2003 - 13:06:35: "[tsc]FlashBaNg<1908><80059><>" >connected, address "64.252.3.246:43620" >L0630024.log:L 06/30/2003 - 13:13:39: "[tsc]FlashBaNg<1911><2182701><>" >connected, address "64.252.2.97:43620" >L0630024.log:L 06/30/2003 - 13:16:55: "[tsc]FlashBaNg<1913><80059><>" >connected, address "64.252.2.97:43620" >L0630025.log:L 06/30/2003 - 13:35:23: "[tsc]FlashBaNg<1925><1232190><>" >connected, address "64.252.7.250:43620" -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] [STEAM] Riot Shield
->-Original Message- ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniel ->Stroven ->Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 5:05 PM ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [STEAM] Riot Shield -> -> ->I think there are other exploits to the shield myself as well. ->Ive noticed ->that some players (same ones all the time), are able to stop bullets even ->when the shield is opened for them to fire. They do not even ->need to close ->the shield in combat. Ive even seen the shield give protection ->to a player ->from behind. Like if you aim for the back and head, it would be deflected ->like if you were facing the shield. This does not happen all the ->time, but ->it has enough times for me to notice it. Personally, I think the shield ->should either be reduced in its defense or allow the Ts to buy a terrorist ->version of the shield. As it stand now, besides any bugs in the ->shield and ->its uses, it it far to much of an advantage. yeah, I looked on the steam forums, and it seems that there is an easy exploit to be protected even when your gun is out. so that at least is a known bug kev ->From: "Douglas R Taber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:22 PM ->Subject: [hlds_linux] [STEAM] Riot Shield -> -> ->> I'm sure others running the steam BETA have noticed this, but just ->> incase it hasn't made its way to others and VALVe already. It seems as ->> though everyone and their brother has found the most recent riotshield ->> bug which allows players to carry a rifle but still be protected by an ->> invicible riotshield. ->> ->> I'm just curious if VALVE can give us a status on a fix for this bug, ->> since it makes it virtually impossible to kill anyone exploiting it. ->> -- ->> ->> ___ ->> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, ->please visit: ->> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ->> -> -> ->___ ->To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list ->archives, please visit: ->http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] Data Center / Colo
Thus spaketh [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:03 PM : Don't use them... they are using mostly cogent and their : NOC is a pig sty. Their NOC has 0 security and no : working AC last I heard. On that note, is there a reasonable colo host you could recommend? I'm currently running a box at FDC Servers (www.fdcservers.net) and also plagued by wretched Cogent/Yipes connectivity. -- Tim Dear HLDS, Want a better list? Learn some etiquette: http://webdesign-l.com/policies.html. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] [STEAM] Riot Shield
I think there are other exploits to the shield myself as well. Ive noticed that some players (same ones all the time), are able to stop bullets even when the shield is opened for them to fire. They do not even need to close the shield in combat. Ive even seen the shield give protection to a player from behind. Like if you aim for the back and head, it would be deflected like if you were facing the shield. This does not happen all the time, but it has enough times for me to notice it. Personally, I think the shield should either be reduced in its defense or allow the Ts to buy a terrorist version of the shield. As it stand now, besides any bugs in the shield and its uses, it it far to much of an advantage. - Original Message - From: "Douglas R Taber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:22 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] [STEAM] Riot Shield > I'm sure others running the steam BETA have noticed this, but just > incase it hasn't made its way to others and VALVe already. It seems as > though everyone and their brother has found the most recent riotshield > bug which allows players to carry a rifle but still be protected by an > invicible riotshield. > > I'm just curious if VALVE can give us a status on a fix for this bug, > since it makes it virtually impossible to kill anyone exploiting it. > -- > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
