Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS crash (5408)
I'm still seeing that tf2 items line failure to load etc on a server restart...and again I've seen several if not half a server of mine have clients crashing which to me says its something from the server. This hasn't happened until the recent big Xmas updatesomething is causing these issues as of last week. -Original Message- From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of doc Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 6:24 PM To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS crash (5408) Was there a recent update? Sometimes I find my server failing an update but trying to start anyways - getting stuck in a crash loop. Try to re-update and worst case scenario do a -verify_all just to make sense. Does this happen with plugins installed? According to the crash error (something about cannot connect to server, never saw that one) it doesn't look like it would be the root problem but it's something to consider none the less. On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Daniel Wiatr wrote: > Uploading dump (in-process) [proxy ''] /tmp/dumps/crash_ > 20111213204958_1.dmp success = no > error: Couldn't connect to server > ./hlds_run: line 321: 21015 Segmentation fault $HL_CMD > email debug.log to li...@valvesoftware.com Tue Dec 13 20:53:08 CET > 2011: Server restart in 10 seconds > > debug.log > -- > CRASH: Mon Dec 12 20:05:57 CET 2011 > Start Line: ./hlds_i686 -autorestart -game cstrike +maxplayers 26 +ip > 31.186.84.10 +port 27026 +sys_ticrate 300 +exec server.cfg +map > de_dust2 -pidfile /data/streamck/logs/175598.cs.pid End of crash > report > -- > -- > CRASH: Mon Dec 12 21:55:13 CET 2011 > Start Line: ./hlds_i686 -autorestart -game cstrike +maxplayers 26 +ip > 31.186.84.10 +port 27026 +sys_ticrate 300 +exec server.cfg +map > de_dust2 -pidfile /data/streamck/logs/175598.cs.pid End of crash > report > -- > -- > CRASH: Mon Dec 12 22:01:04 CET 2011 > Start Line: ./hlds_i686 -autorestart -game cstrike +maxplayers 26 +ip > 31.186.84.10 +port 27026 +sys_ticrate 300 +exec server.cfg +map > de_dust2 -pidfile /data/streamck/logs/175598.cs.pid End of crash > report > -- > -- > CRASH: Tue Dec 13 20:53:08 CET 2011 > Start Line: ./hlds_i686 -autorestart -game cstrike +maxplayers 26 +ip > 31.186.84.10 +port 27026 +sys_ticrate 300 +exec server.cfg +map > de_dust2 -pidfile /data/streamck/logs/175598.cs.pid End of crash > report > -- > > Please help me! > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS crash (5408)
Was there a recent update? Sometimes I find my server failing an update but trying to start anyways - getting stuck in a crash loop. Try to re-update and worst case scenario do a -verify_all just to make sense. Does this happen with plugins installed? According to the crash error (something about cannot connect to server, never saw that one) it doesn't look like it would be the root problem but it's something to consider none the less. On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Daniel Wiatr wrote: > Uploading dump (in-process) [proxy ''] > /tmp/dumps/crash_ > 20111213204958_1.dmp > success = no > error: Couldn't connect to server > ./hlds_run: line 321: 21015 Segmentation fault $HL_CMD > email debug.log to li...@valvesoftware.com > Tue Dec 13 20:53:08 CET 2011: Server restart in 10 seconds > > debug.log > -- > CRASH: Mon Dec 12 20:05:57 CET 2011 > Start Line: ./hlds_i686 -autorestart -game cstrike +maxplayers 26 +ip > 31.186.84.10 +port 27026 +sys_ticrate 300 +exec server.cfg +map de_dust2 > -pidfile /data/streamck/logs/175598.cs.pid > End of crash report > -- > -- > CRASH: Mon Dec 12 21:55:13 CET 2011 > Start Line: ./hlds_i686 -autorestart -game cstrike +maxplayers 26 +ip > 31.186.84.10 +port 27026 +sys_ticrate 300 +exec server.cfg +map de_dust2 > -pidfile /data/streamck/logs/175598.cs.pid > End of crash report > -- > -- > CRASH: Mon Dec 12 22:01:04 CET 2011 > Start Line: ./hlds_i686 -autorestart -game cstrike +maxplayers 26 +ip > 31.186.84.10 +port 27026 +sys_ticrate 300 +exec server.cfg +map de_dust2 > -pidfile /data/streamck/logs/175598.cs.pid > End of crash report > -- > -- > CRASH: Tue Dec 13 20:53:08 CET 2011 > Start Line: ./hlds_i686 -autorestart -game cstrike +maxplayers 26 +ip > 31.186.84.10 +port 27026 +sys_ticrate 300 +exec server.cfg +map de_dust2 > -pidfile /data/streamck/logs/175598.cs.pid > End of crash report > -- > > Please help me! > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins
This is where votekicks/bans work well. If I cannot tell someone is hacking but I've gotten enough "reputable complaints" then I will just start a banvote, but only ban for 2 or 3 days. If they ARE aimbotting then they probably will just assume they've been banned for ever and won't be coming back. in the rare case they aren't aimbotting however they might come bak and ask wtf is going on, which then you just admit what happened and state why you banned them - for suspicion of aimbotting. As long as you're transparent about your actions most people don't worry about being banned/kicked - either they like your server enough to rejoin when needed or they will never come back, and in that case you can just assume they were a random pub - and int he long haul of the game now being F2P you shouldn't worry about losing one or two people. On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Eric Riemers wrote: > On CSS its daily routine to get a few with SMAC. Don't know if that's > normal > but we almost never get a complaint on the forum. > > -Original Message- > From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com > [mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Andrew > Sent: donderdag 22 december 2011 22:56 > To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins > > Thanks all for the suggestions. SMAC with aimbot protection seems like a > good way to start, since I am already running sourcemod. > > Never thought to look for such a plugin. > > -Andrew > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:19 PM, AnAkIn . wrote: > > There is at least 1-2 cheaters detected per day with DBlocker ( > > http://dblocker.didrole.com/) on my server. Unfortunately, banning > > them is useless, they just create a new steam account every time. > > > > 2011/12/22 Andrew DeMerse > > > >> I just checked my SMAC logs, and only saw 1 false positive in the > >> past month. No confirmed. Maybe you're being targeted by the same > >> person on f2p accounts? > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Mike Johansen > wrote: > >> > >> > I myself haven't experienced an aimbotter for a few months, not > >> > since I installed SMAC (SourceMod Anti-Cheat) and enabled aimbot > >> > protection in > >> it. > >> > It does give a few false positives, but it has maybe banned one > >> > innocent player per 20 confirmed aimbotters. Which I find acceptable. > >> > > >> > -Original Message- > >> > From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com > >> > [mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of > >> > Andrew > >> > Sent: 22. desember 2011 21:46 > >> > To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list > >> > Subject: [hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins > >> > > >> > The last week or two I have seen a sharp uptick in the number of > >> > aimbot reports come in. Most often, they involve a spy using either > >> > the enforcer or the ambassador and a dead ringer. > >> > > >> > I try to take such accusations seriously, so I have spectated these > >> players > >> > and I have seen a few I would swear are legit complaints. > >> > Usually involving: consistent shots across large map spaces, > >> > against > >> scouts > >> > (headshots even), while jumping themselves. Most of them do not > >> > respond > >> to > >> > speech or chat, so I end up simply banning them to keep the other > >> > players from revolting. > >> > > >> > Anybody else seen this kind of trouble? Or have I simply been hit > >> > with a rash of really really good spy players lately who don't like to > talk. > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > -Andrew > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Andrew (Wave Admin) > >> > The Wave! > >> > 24/7 CTF > >> > 1/2 respawn times > >> > http://thewaveserver.com > >> > > >> > ___ > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > >> > archives, please visit: > >> > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > > >> > > >> > ___ > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > >> > archives, please visit: > >> > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > > >> ___ > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > >> archives, please visit: > >> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > AnAkIn > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > -- > Andrew (Wave Admin) > The Wave! > 24/7 CTF > 1/2 respawn times > http://thewaveserver.com > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cg
Re: [hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins
On CSS its daily routine to get a few with SMAC. Don't know if that's normal but we almost never get a complaint on the forum. -Original Message- From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Sent: donderdag 22 december 2011 22:56 To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins Thanks all for the suggestions. SMAC with aimbot protection seems like a good way to start, since I am already running sourcemod. Never thought to look for such a plugin. -Andrew On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:19 PM, AnAkIn . wrote: > There is at least 1-2 cheaters detected per day with DBlocker ( > http://dblocker.didrole.com/) on my server. Unfortunately, banning > them is useless, they just create a new steam account every time. > > 2011/12/22 Andrew DeMerse > >> I just checked my SMAC logs, and only saw 1 false positive in the >> past month. No confirmed. Maybe you're being targeted by the same >> person on f2p accounts? >> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Mike Johansen wrote: >> >> > I myself haven't experienced an aimbotter for a few months, not >> > since I installed SMAC (SourceMod Anti-Cheat) and enabled aimbot >> > protection in >> it. >> > It does give a few false positives, but it has maybe banned one >> > innocent player per 20 confirmed aimbotters. Which I find acceptable. >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com >> > [mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of >> > Andrew >> > Sent: 22. desember 2011 21:46 >> > To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list >> > Subject: [hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins >> > >> > The last week or two I have seen a sharp uptick in the number of >> > aimbot reports come in. Most often, they involve a spy using either >> > the enforcer or the ambassador and a dead ringer. >> > >> > I try to take such accusations seriously, so I have spectated these >> players >> > and I have seen a few I would swear are legit complaints. >> > Usually involving: consistent shots across large map spaces, >> > against >> scouts >> > (headshots even), while jumping themselves. Most of them do not >> > respond >> to >> > speech or chat, so I end up simply banning them to keep the other >> > players from revolting. >> > >> > Anybody else seen this kind of trouble? Or have I simply been hit >> > with a rash of really really good spy players lately who don't like to talk. >> > >> > Thanks >> > -Andrew >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Andrew (Wave Admin) >> > The Wave! >> > 24/7 CTF >> > 1/2 respawn times >> > http://thewaveserver.com >> > >> > ___ >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >> > archives, please visit: >> > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > >> > >> > ___ >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >> > archives, please visit: >> > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > >> ___ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >> archives, please visit: >> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > AnAkIn > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -- Andrew (Wave Admin) The Wave! 24/7 CTF 1/2 respawn times http://thewaveserver.com ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins
On 22/12/2011 20:46, Andrew wrote: Anybody else seen this kind of trouble? Or have I simply been hit with a rash of really really good spy players lately who don't like to talk. It's difficult to say without seeing a demo ourselves. It's the Xmas holidays, kids are off school et al, perhaps that's why you're seeing more cheaters than usual. I tend not to expect to see a really skilled player playing on the same server as me. Statistically speaking it's unlikely. Firstly skilled players tend to play with and against other skilled players - they aren't randomly distributed across the servers. Secondly, even if they were randomly distributed, you probably wouldn't expect there to be enough of them for 1 per server. So whilst it certainly is not impossible, it's very improbable the world's best player happened to join the same server as me. That said, there are different degrees of ability. I regularly get accused of cheating. This isn't because I'm particularly good or skilled at TF2 though, it's because they are particularly bad at it. So you have to be very wary of false reports from people who can't play who decide that if they are killed a few times by the same player, or if they struggle to kill someone, it must be down to cheating. If someone appeared as though they were the world's best player on my server (in terms of score + ability) then I might think "hmm, they are cheating" - but I think I'm safe statistically from banning a skilled player and if I'm wrong, well, what's he doing on my server in the first place? Most cheaters won't look skilled though. They might get a lot of hits or headshots, but the way they play will look average, like everyone else. That's usually what I look for. Movement is perhaps the biggest difference between skilled and not. Moreso than aim. Because it's rare a truly skilled player will be good at aiming by itself and completely hopeless or average at other aspects of the game. Whereas that's almost a certainty with someone using an aimbot. Some classes that will be more apparent than others. After I've banned someone, I tend to google the steam id. Most cheats are banned somewhere else (or at least accused of it) and there's usually a forum thread somewhere to that end. Quite often cheaters will act out an immature role of being brilliant in chat. It's like they want to get caught or at least they want people to recognise their "skill" You mentioned silent ones though, so you can't tell from that. Here in the UK/EU I expect many people connecting to my server not to speak English, so I wouldn't read much into them not replying to chat. I noticed a couple on my server when I switched to cp_foundry the other day. Which I suppose is a lot in the same day, because I'd only banned a couple of people up to that point over several months. -- Dan ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins
Thanks all for the suggestions. SMAC with aimbot protection seems like a good way to start, since I am already running sourcemod. Never thought to look for such a plugin. -Andrew On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:19 PM, AnAkIn . wrote: > There is at least 1-2 cheaters detected per day with DBlocker ( > http://dblocker.didrole.com/) on my server. Unfortunately, banning them is > useless, they just create a new steam account every time. > > 2011/12/22 Andrew DeMerse > >> I just checked my SMAC logs, and only saw 1 false positive in the past >> month. No confirmed. Maybe you're being targeted by the same person on f2p >> accounts? >> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Mike Johansen wrote: >> >> > I myself haven't experienced an aimbotter for a few months, not since I >> > installed SMAC (SourceMod Anti-Cheat) and enabled aimbot protection in >> it. >> > It does give a few false positives, but it has maybe banned one innocent >> > player per 20 confirmed aimbotters. Which I find acceptable. >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com >> > [mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Andrew >> > Sent: 22. desember 2011 21:46 >> > To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list >> > Subject: [hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins >> > >> > The last week or two I have seen a sharp uptick in the number of aimbot >> > reports come in. Most often, they involve a spy using either the enforcer >> > or >> > the ambassador and a dead ringer. >> > >> > I try to take such accusations seriously, so I have spectated these >> players >> > and I have seen a few I would swear are legit complaints. >> > Usually involving: consistent shots across large map spaces, against >> scouts >> > (headshots even), while jumping themselves. Most of them do not respond >> to >> > speech or chat, so I end up simply banning them to keep the other players >> > from revolting. >> > >> > Anybody else seen this kind of trouble? Or have I simply been hit with a >> > rash of really really good spy players lately who don't like to talk. >> > >> > Thanks >> > -Andrew >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Andrew (Wave Admin) >> > The Wave! >> > 24/7 CTF >> > 1/2 respawn times >> > http://thewaveserver.com >> > >> > ___ >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> > please visit: >> > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > >> > >> > ___ >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> > please visit: >> > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > >> ___ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > AnAkIn > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -- Andrew (Wave Admin) The Wave! 24/7 CTF 1/2 respawn times http://thewaveserver.com ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins
There is at least 1-2 cheaters detected per day with DBlocker ( http://dblocker.didrole.com/) on my server. Unfortunately, banning them is useless, they just create a new steam account every time. 2011/12/22 Andrew DeMerse > I just checked my SMAC logs, and only saw 1 false positive in the past > month. No confirmed. Maybe you're being targeted by the same person on f2p > accounts? > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Mike Johansen wrote: > > > I myself haven't experienced an aimbotter for a few months, not since I > > installed SMAC (SourceMod Anti-Cheat) and enabled aimbot protection in > it. > > It does give a few false positives, but it has maybe banned one innocent > > player per 20 confirmed aimbotters. Which I find acceptable. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com > > [mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Andrew > > Sent: 22. desember 2011 21:46 > > To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list > > Subject: [hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins > > > > The last week or two I have seen a sharp uptick in the number of aimbot > > reports come in. Most often, they involve a spy using either the enforcer > > or > > the ambassador and a dead ringer. > > > > I try to take such accusations seriously, so I have spectated these > players > > and I have seen a few I would swear are legit complaints. > > Usually involving: consistent shots across large map spaces, against > scouts > > (headshots even), while jumping themselves. Most of them do not respond > to > > speech or chat, so I end up simply banning them to keep the other players > > from revolting. > > > > Anybody else seen this kind of trouble? Or have I simply been hit with a > > rash of really really good spy players lately who don't like to talk. > > > > Thanks > > -Andrew > > > > > > -- > > Andrew (Wave Admin) > > The Wave! > > 24/7 CTF > > 1/2 respawn times > > http://thewaveserver.com > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- Best regards, AnAkIn ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins
I just checked my SMAC logs, and only saw 1 false positive in the past month. No confirmed. Maybe you're being targeted by the same person on f2p accounts? On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Mike Johansen wrote: > I myself haven't experienced an aimbotter for a few months, not since I > installed SMAC (SourceMod Anti-Cheat) and enabled aimbot protection in it. > It does give a few false positives, but it has maybe banned one innocent > player per 20 confirmed aimbotters. Which I find acceptable. > > -Original Message- > From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com > [mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Andrew > Sent: 22. desember 2011 21:46 > To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list > Subject: [hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins > > The last week or two I have seen a sharp uptick in the number of aimbot > reports come in. Most often, they involve a spy using either the enforcer > or > the ambassador and a dead ringer. > > I try to take such accusations seriously, so I have spectated these players > and I have seen a few I would swear are legit complaints. > Usually involving: consistent shots across large map spaces, against scouts > (headshots even), while jumping themselves. Most of them do not respond to > speech or chat, so I end up simply banning them to keep the other players > from revolting. > > Anybody else seen this kind of trouble? Or have I simply been hit with a > rash of really really good spy players lately who don't like to talk. > > Thanks > -Andrew > > > -- > Andrew (Wave Admin) > The Wave! > 24/7 CTF > 1/2 respawn times > http://thewaveserver.com > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins
I myself haven't experienced an aimbotter for a few months, not since I installed SMAC (SourceMod Anti-Cheat) and enabled aimbot protection in it. It does give a few false positives, but it has maybe banned one innocent player per 20 confirmed aimbotters. Which I find acceptable. -Original Message- From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Sent: 22. desember 2011 21:46 To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list Subject: [hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins The last week or two I have seen a sharp uptick in the number of aimbot reports come in. Most often, they involve a spy using either the enforcer or the ambassador and a dead ringer. I try to take such accusations seriously, so I have spectated these players and I have seen a few I would swear are legit complaints. Usually involving: consistent shots across large map spaces, against scouts (headshots even), while jumping themselves. Most of them do not respond to speech or chat, so I end up simply banning them to keep the other players from revolting. Anybody else seen this kind of trouble? Or have I simply been hit with a rash of really really good spy players lately who don't like to talk. Thanks -Andrew -- Andrew (Wave Admin) The Wave! 24/7 CTF 1/2 respawn times http://thewaveserver.com ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] CS:S and DoD:S client updates
Ah! Well, thanks for the heads up on the fix for the client. Kyle. On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > No, this update is not required for servers. There are no changes as far > as servers are concerned. > > -Eric > > > -Original Message- > From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto: > hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Kyle Sanderson > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 1:02 PM > To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CS:S and DoD:S client updates > > Is this update required for servers? > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Eric Smith >wrote: > > > We've released client updates for CS:S and DoD:S to fix the in-game > > overview maps. Some shared files were updated so the server binaries were > > also updated, but there aren't actually any changes on the server side of > > things. > > > > -Eric > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] CS:S and DoD:S client updates
im still getting the issue ... and you ? 2011/12/22 Eric Smith > No, this update is not required for servers. There are no changes as far > as servers are concerned. > > -Eric > > > -Original Message- > From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto: > hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Kyle Sanderson > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 1:02 PM > To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CS:S and DoD:S client updates > > Is this update required for servers? > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Eric Smith >wrote: > > > We've released client updates for CS:S and DoD:S to fix the in-game > > overview maps. Some shared files were updated so the server binaries were > > also updated, but there aren't actually any changes on the server side of > > things. > > > > -Eric > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] CS:S and DoD:S client updates
No, this update is not required for servers. There are no changes as far as servers are concerned. -Eric -Original Message- From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Kyle Sanderson Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 1:02 PM To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CS:S and DoD:S client updates Is this update required for servers? On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > We've released client updates for CS:S and DoD:S to fix the in-game > overview maps. Some shared files were updated so the server binaries were > also updated, but there aren't actually any changes on the server side of > things. > > -Eric > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] CS:S and DoD:S client updates
thanks boss! -Original Message- From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Eric Smith Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 12:58 PM To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list; 'Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list' Subject: [hlds_linux] CS:S and DoD:S client updates We've released client updates for CS:S and DoD:S to fix the in-game overview maps. Some shared files were updated so the server binaries were also updated, but there aren't actually any changes on the server side of things. -Eric ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] CS:S and DoD:S client updates
Is this update required for servers? On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > We've released client updates for CS:S and DoD:S to fix the in-game > overview maps. Some shared files were updated so the server binaries were > also updated, but there aren't actually any changes on the server side of > things. > > -Eric > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] CS:S and DoD:S client updates
We've released client updates for CS:S and DoD:S to fix the in-game overview maps. Some shared files were updated so the server binaries were also updated, but there aren't actually any changes on the server side of things. -Eric ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Question for more experienced admins
The last week or two I have seen a sharp uptick in the number of aimbot reports come in. Most often, they involve a spy using either the enforcer or the ambassador and a dead ringer. I try to take such accusations seriously, so I have spectated these players and I have seen a few I would swear are legit complaints. Usually involving: consistent shots across large map spaces, against scouts (headshots even), while jumping themselves. Most of them do not respond to speech or chat, so I end up simply banning them to keep the other players from revolting. Anybody else seen this kind of trouble? Or have I simply been hit with a rash of really really good spy players lately who don't like to talk. Thanks -Andrew -- Andrew (Wave Admin) The Wave! 24/7 CTF 1/2 respawn times http://thewaveserver.com ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] HLDS crash (5408)
Uploading dump (in-process) [proxy ''] /tmp/dumps/crash_ 20111213204958_1.dmp success = no error: Couldn't connect to server ./hlds_run: line 321: 21015 Segmentation fault $HL_CMD email debug.log to li...@valvesoftware.com Tue Dec 13 20:53:08 CET 2011: Server restart in 10 seconds debug.log -- CRASH: Mon Dec 12 20:05:57 CET 2011 Start Line: ./hlds_i686 -autorestart -game cstrike +maxplayers 26 +ip 31.186.84.10 +port 27026 +sys_ticrate 300 +exec server.cfg +map de_dust2 -pidfile /data/streamck/logs/175598.cs.pid End of crash report -- -- CRASH: Mon Dec 12 21:55:13 CET 2011 Start Line: ./hlds_i686 -autorestart -game cstrike +maxplayers 26 +ip 31.186.84.10 +port 27026 +sys_ticrate 300 +exec server.cfg +map de_dust2 -pidfile /data/streamck/logs/175598.cs.pid End of crash report -- -- CRASH: Mon Dec 12 22:01:04 CET 2011 Start Line: ./hlds_i686 -autorestart -game cstrike +maxplayers 26 +ip 31.186.84.10 +port 27026 +sys_ticrate 300 +exec server.cfg +map de_dust2 -pidfile /data/streamck/logs/175598.cs.pid End of crash report -- -- CRASH: Tue Dec 13 20:53:08 CET 2011 Start Line: ./hlds_i686 -autorestart -game cstrike +maxplayers 26 +ip 31.186.84.10 +port 27026 +sys_ticrate 300 +exec server.cfg +map de_dust2 -pidfile /data/streamck/logs/175598.cs.pid End of crash report -- Please help me! ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
