Re: [hlds_linux] Server config
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] MP vs XP line are two different types of AMD processors. I am not commenting anymore on this subject. GOODLUCK! On 11/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Quoting Krillins World <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Research shows the tickrates are capped for AMD processors at 500. > > I can verify this is not the case when using MP2200+ or MP2400+ cpus. > > Jeff Love > Burgh Gaming > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Server config
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] We are sorry to say here but AMD is your downfall here as well as not enough of memory. You should increase your RAM. The tickrate issuse has to do with your CPU. We recomend you get Intel Processors if you plan on upgrading. You take your chances if you get a variation of AMD 64 bit chips. Research shows the tickrates are capped for AMD processors at 500. Something about Multimedia Extentions built in on Intel Chips (MMX standard these days) vs the AMD. But you mainly need more RAM on your PCs if anything. 1-2GB should help ease the work off your CPU from swap RAM drive (AKA Pagefile.sys to those windows server ops). Runing more than one server with this configuration is not recomended. Especally not with Counter-Strike Source. This is a sample of one of our server.cfg files for linux. (Stock mainly) (EDITED FOR POST) > hostname "YOUR SERVER NAME" > > rcon_password "YoUrPaSsWoRd" > > exec banned.cfg > > exec listip.cfg > > mp_logdetail 0 > > mp_logmessages 0 > > mp_timelimit 20 > > mp_autokick 1 > > mp_autoteambalance 1 > > mp_c4timer 30 > > mp_flashlight 0 > > mp_footsteps 1 > > mp_forcechasecam 0 > > mp_freezetime 3 > > mp_friendlyfire 0 > > mp_hostagepenalty 4 > > mp_limitteams 1 > > mp_roundtime 4 > > mp_tkpunish 0 > > sv_restartround 1 > > sv_maxspeed 320 > > sv_proxies 1 > > allow_spectators 90 > > mp_startmoney 4000 > > mp_chattime 5 > > sv_allowupload 1 > > sv_voiceenable 1 > > sv_alltalk 1 > > sv_voicequality 5 > > sv_voicecodec voice_speex > > pausable 0 > > decalfrequency 40 > > mp_falldamage 0 > > sv_aim 0 > > sv_cheats 0 > > sv_maxrate > > sv_minrate 3500 > > sv_lan 0 > > sv_contact "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > sv_region 0 > Hope this was enough information and it was helpful! Goodluck, Krillin On 11/13/06, Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 90% of the boxes run gentoo 2006.1, and the rest debian sarge.. i > didnt notice much performance difference between distros > > also, 90% of those are 2ghz amd athlonxp's with 512mb ram > > ive created realtime kernels using the -cks patchset and 1000hz timer > frequency with the cfq scheduler > > the internet connection is a 100/100mbit dedicated line which is > basically used for CS and a couple of medium-traffic web sites > > i forgot to mention that 1000 ticrate with pingboost 3 gives the > players much lower ping and so on, but it puts far too much load on > the machines > > i figure better machines will give a better playing environment, but > it seems strange that these machines (some ~3ghz p4 and a couple of > amd64s) can't perform better than this > > 13 nov 2006 kl. 16.15 skrev Krillins World: > > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > What OS are you using? And what are the specs of the server you > > host on? And > > also, what is your Upstream? > > > > Krillin > > > > > > On 11/13/06, Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Oops, i forgot to add that this is for CS 1.6, not source > >> also, the problem is that ticrate 100 without pingboost gives the > >> players 30-40 ping, while ticrate 1000 with pingboost puts too much > >> load on the servers when there are 10+ players online > >> > >> i would like as low ping/good hitboxes as possible with as little > >> load on the servers as possible > >> > >> 13 nov 2006 kl. 16.04 skrev Jonathan: > >> > >>> hello there, > >>> > >>> i've been trying to tweak my config settings to the best without > >>> really > >>> making them any better.. so im just wondering if you could be so > >>> kind to > >>> post your server configs in here, so i could take a look at them? :) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ___ > >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > >>> archives, please visit: > >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > >> > >> ___ > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > >> archives, > >> please visit: > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > > -- > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > archives, please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Server config
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] What OS are you using? And what are the specs of the server you host on? And also, what is your Upstream? Krillin On 11/13/06, Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oops, i forgot to add that this is for CS 1.6, not source > also, the problem is that ticrate 100 without pingboost gives the > players 30-40 ping, while ticrate 1000 with pingboost puts too much > load on the servers when there are 10+ players online > > i would like as low ping/good hitboxes as possible with as little > load on the servers as possible > > 13 nov 2006 kl. 16.04 skrev Jonathan: > > > hello there, > > > > i've been trying to tweak my config settings to the best without > > really > > making them any better.. so im just wondering if you could be so > > kind to > > post your server configs in here, so i could take a look at them? :) > > > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > archives, please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] server hardware
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] If you use Fedora Core X (just Red Hat's free version for all thoes cheapos out there) you may as well just run your servers on Windows server OS prefered. Our findings with Fedora Core X vs Windows is Fedora Core X doesn't use as much resources as Windows. But only by a very small fraction <6-8%. If you want a really good Linux OS for a server no matter what configurations you aquire use *MANDRIVA*! Low over head with resources giving linux servers a 20-26% boost over other Linux distros. Not to mention we get a peek if 950 FPS to as low as 450. And yes, even those cheapo's can get the free version of this as well if their wallet is too thin for the $76 USD price tag it holds for the middle version of the three. We've been using Mandriva since 3/2005 when we made the switch from Windows and which we had done so sooner and we will never go back! Krillin On 11/13/06, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fedora Core > > > > > > Radar DA-UK wrote: > > I take delivery of a new Intel SR2500 twin 5150 2U server newx week for > > DoD:S > > what distro do you think I sould be putting on it ?? > > > > Any hints and tip would be great > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 4:48 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] server hardware > > > > > >> so you would suggest this > >> View Pic > >> > >>* Intel Xeon 5130 Woodcrest 2.0GHz Socket 771 2U Passive Processor > >> is it worth doing a dual 2 core I would be better just getting as more > >> powerful ? > >> > >> On 11/11/06, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> At 08:54 AM 11/11/2006, John wrote: > >>> >I am thinking of buying a new server and I was wondering what would > be > >>> >the best hardware choice > >>> > > >>> >I would like at least 4 32 player dods servers on on box lets assume > >>> >bandwidth is no problem > >>> > > >>> >I was thinking of getting this (just based on price)so any > suggestions > >>> >are welcomed > >>> > > >>> >cpu 2x > >>> >Intel Xeon EM64T 3.2 Irwindale 3.2GHz 2MB L2 Cache Socket 604 2U > >>> >Passive Processor > >>> > > >>> >MB > >>> >Intel SE7520BD2SATAD2 Dual Socket 603/604 Intel E7520 SSI EEB 3.0 > >>> >Server Motherboard > >>> > > >>> >What do you think would be possible with this setup or could you > >>> >recommend something better > >>> > >>> > >>> You'd be much better off not buying any 7xxx series chipsets; if > >>> you're going intel, pick up a woodcrest or get amd.. > >>> > >>> FWIW 7xxx chipsets have too many problems, and HT on those cpu's > >>> causing issues (i think some chipset errata tries to make the HT route > >>> IRQ's) > >>> > >>> G. Stanley > >>> Engineering (AS36352) > >>> Velocity Servers, INC > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~gary > >>> > >>> > >>> ___ > >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >>> please visit: > >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >>> > >> > >> ___ > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >> please visit: > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > __ NOD32 1862 (20061110) Information __ > > > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] VAC secured
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Piece of crap? Just because they calls it VALVe ANTI-CHEAT doesn't mean that is it in the sence of the word. Plugins like Cheating-Death with true Anti-Cheats ditorants. VAC is and always will a detector more than a ditorant. Don't believe me, look into your self smart***. Krillin On 11/12/06, J. Laws - Hi-Definition Gaming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Really? Tell me, please, what VAC stands for. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Krillins World [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 2:00 PM > To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC secured > > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] VAC is not nor ever has > been an "Anti-Cheat" program. From what we gathered in the many years of > running secure HL1 & HL2 servers is, VAC is just a detection and reporting > tool. If VAC detects a certian signature from a hack running while their > client is running it reports it to the secure center where it is > investigated then the steamid of the user is placed on a global ban list > which prevents these hacker and cheaters from playing in SECURE servers > for > one full year. These players are also known as "VAC Banned Players." > > As for your issue there was a serious problem with a few of the earlier > version of the HLDS that they call Stdio Builds. It appears as if the > server > you are having issue with is too far out of date to handle the changes in > the VAC module. Add the -autoupdate to the launch of the server and let > them > update accordingly. You may have to reupdate your steam as many changed to > the ./steam module have evolved when it comes to the updating process > which > appears is what happened to your old troubled server of v1.1.2.5/Stdio > 3213. > We used to have very many VAC issues with the version of 3421 and had to > revert back to an older version of 3327. > > Best Reguarrds, > Krillin > > On 11/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I have been experiencing this problem with one of my servers for quite > > some time now. I have 3 CS 1.6 servers running on a linux dedicated > > server box. They all run the same versions of amxx and meta mod and > > are configured basically the same . VAC drops constantly from one of > > the servers, the other 2 run secured all the time without any problems. > > > > The only difference I have noticed in the servers thus far is that the > > 2 servers that do not have any VAC issues run version v1.1.2.5/Stdio > > 3651 secure while the server which has constant issues of VAC dropping > > runs version v1.1.2.5/Stdio 3213 secure. I have been searching high > > and low for answers as to what the Stdio number indicates and if/how > > this may be relative to my VAC issue to no avail. If anyone can please > > enlighten me as to what the Stdio number is indicative of or has any > > suggestions on the issues of why VAC drops constantly from only 1 > > server it would be most welcome and very appreciated. :) > > > > > > > > Kym > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've also been having problems lately with our CS 1.6 servers - they > > load > > > up > > > and secure themselves, but after a few hours VAC is either switching > > > itself off, or there's a new cheat that takes it off. > > > > > > Either way it makes it hard to maintain cheat free servers if > > > cheaters > > can > > > just disable the anti cheat... > > > > > > Has anyone else had this problem? > > > > > > -Scott > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > > archives, please visit: > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > -- > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] VAC secured
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] VAC is not nor ever has been an "Anti-Cheat" program. From what we gathered in the many years of running secure HL1 & HL2 servers is, VAC is just a detection and reporting tool. If VAC detects a certian signature from a hack running while their client is running it reports it to the secure center where it is investigated then the steamid of the user is placed on a global ban list which prevents these hacker and cheaters from playing in SECURE servers for one full year. These players are also known as "VAC Banned Players." As for your issue there was a serious problem with a few of the earlier version of the HLDS that they call Stdio Builds. It appears as if the server you are having issue with is too far out of date to handle the changes in the VAC module. Add the -autoupdate to the launch of the server and let them update accordingly. You may have to reupdate your steam as many changed to the ./steam module have evolved when it comes to the updating process which appears is what happened to your old troubled server of v1.1.2.5/Stdio 3213. We used to have very many VAC issues with the version of 3421 and had to revert back to an older version of 3327. Best Reguarrds, Krillin On 11/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have been experiencing this problem with one of my servers for quite > some time now. I have 3 CS 1.6 servers running on a linux dedicated server > box. They all run the same versions of amxx and meta mod and are > configured basically the same . VAC drops constantly from one of the > servers, the other 2 run secured all the time without any problems. > > The only difference I have noticed in the servers thus far is that the 2 > servers that do not have any VAC issues run version v1.1.2.5/Stdio 3651 > secure while the server which has constant issues of VAC dropping runs > version v1.1.2.5/Stdio 3213 secure. I have been searching high and low for > answers as to what the Stdio number indicates and if/how this may be > relative to my VAC issue to no avail. If anyone can please enlighten me as > to what the Stdio number is indicative of or has any suggestions on the > issues of why VAC drops constantly from only 1 server it would be most > welcome and very appreciated. :) > > > > Kym > > > Hi, > > > > I've also been having problems lately with our CS 1.6 servers - they > load > > up > > and secure themselves, but after a few hours VAC is either switching > > itself > > off, or there's a new cheat that takes it off. > > > > Either way it makes it hard to maintain cheat free servers if cheaters > can > > just disable the anti cheat... > > > > Has anyone else had this problem? > > > > -Scott > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] [URGENT] Compression failure while updating and ./hlds_run vanishes
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Nope! On 11/4/06, Ondřej Hošek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > *sigh* > > It is obvious from the call of the ./steam command that he's installing > it into the current (i.e. ".") directory. > > The fact that ./hlds_run doesn't run is because ./steam deleted it -- > probably due to that compression failure. > > If hlds_run doesn't even get the smallest chance to run (because it > doesn't exist), changing the arguments will help exactly ZERO. > > And once more, in case the three sentences above were too complicated: > 1. 'hlds_run' is in absolutely the same directory as 'steam'. > 2. 'steam' encounters an error and deletes 'hlds_run'. > 3. When 'hlds_run' doesn't exist, it doesn't give a damn about what you > put after './hlds_run', be it "-binary ./hlds_amd" or "-i_am_so_great". > > Clear? > > ~~ Ondra > > Krillins World wrote: > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > By reading this error "./hlds_run: No such file or directory" tells me > you > > are not running the server from where your installation resides! You may > > want to try to run the program where your installation files reside. (IE > > /home/youraccount/hlds/hlds_l [or where your files are installed]) > > > > Also, use hlds_run with the proper syntax. Using the -binary option > forces > > your command to run the particular binary for your computer totally > > bypassing the auto detection of the processor you use. Try using the > proper > > syntax from the proper directory. As I recall the AMD Opteron is a > **64** > > bit processor, so stop telling your server to run the 32 bit process > maybe > > it will not close or vanish as you say. > > > > Start here first then report any issues you may be having. > > > > On 10/28/06, Hans Vos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm trying to update some of our Counter-Strike 1.6 game servers. We > are > >> experiencing the following problems. If test this on a Gentoo based > >> server and Ubutu based server. Both are dual AMD Opteron servers (a > >> single core 244 model and dual core 275 model). > >> > >> 1. Compression failure? > >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] hlds $ ./steam -command update -game cstrike -dir . > >> Checking bootstrapper version ... > >> Updating Installation > >> Checking/Installing 'Counter-Strike Base Content' version 17 > >> > >> Updating 'Linux Server Engine' from version 35 to version 36 > >> Downloading: .\core_i386.so > >> Downloading: .\engine_amd.so > >> Compression Failure > >> > >> 2. ./hlds_run vanishes > >> > >> Immediately after the message above, I tried starting the game server > >> again. Please note, this server was operating normally before trying to > >> update it. > >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] hlds $ ./hlds_run -binary ./hlds_amd -game cstrike > >> -pingboost 2 -secure -port 27015 +ip 1.2.3.4 +servercfgfile "server.cfg > " > >> +mapchangecfgfile "server.cfg" +maxplayers 14 +map de_dust2 > >> -bash: ./hlds_run: No such file or directory > >> > >> Is there a solutions for these problems? > >> > >> -- > >> Kind regards, > >> > >> Hans Vos > >> > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] [URGENT] Compression failure while updating and ./hlds_run vanishes
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] By reading this error "./hlds_run: No such file or directory" tells me you are not running the server from where your installation resides! You may want to try to run the program where your installation files reside. (IE /home/youraccount/hlds/hlds_l [or where your files are installed]) Also, use hlds_run with the proper syntax. Using the -binary option forces your command to run the particular binary for your computer totally bypassing the auto detection of the processor you use. Try using the proper syntax from the proper directory. As I recall the AMD Opteron is a **64** bit processor, so stop telling your server to run the 32 bit process maybe it will not close or vanish as you say. Start here first then report any issues you may be having. On 10/28/06, Hans Vos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to update some of our Counter-Strike 1.6 game servers. We are > experiencing the following problems. If test this on a Gentoo based > server and Ubutu based server. Both are dual AMD Opteron servers (a > single core 244 model and dual core 275 model). > > 1. Compression failure? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] hlds $ ./steam -command update -game cstrike -dir . > Checking bootstrapper version ... > Updating Installation > Checking/Installing 'Counter-Strike Base Content' version 17 > > Updating 'Linux Server Engine' from version 35 to version 36 > Downloading: .\core_i386.so > Downloading: .\engine_amd.so > Compression Failure > > 2. ./hlds_run vanishes > > Immediately after the message above, I tried starting the game server > again. Please note, this server was operating normally before trying to > update it. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] hlds $ ./hlds_run -binary ./hlds_amd -game cstrike > -pingboost 2 -secure -port 27015 +ip 1.2.3.4 +servercfgfile "server.cfg" > +mapchangecfgfile "server.cfg" +maxplayers 14 +map de_dust2 > -bash: ./hlds_run: No such file or directory > > Is there a solutions for these problems? > > -- > Kind regards, > > Hans Vos > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Half-Life 1 Dedicated server update
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] #1 The Electronic Protection Act was something I learmed in college some 5 years ago. Not sure but it just may be USA standards. #2 The account used for my dedicated server is not FREE there are PAID packages on the account (Thought I needed to when I wanted to host condition zero server) #3 Linux Distros (as you call them) all run off the same base engine. U N I X so what is the problem? On the lighter side, thank you for getting back to me and explaining what this error means. I am very busy at the time so I will look into trying this solution sometime over the weekend when my server is not so busy Thanks Krillin On 10/26/06, Ondřej Hošek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1. What is this Electronic Protection Act you speak of? I can't find it > *anywhere*. > 2. Valve's consumer-oriented support team never supported the dedicated > server. Remember: they're consumer-oriented and you pay nil for the > dedicated server. > 3. How the *HELL* do you want Valve to support every single Linux > distribution version with all its quirks and distro-specific patches? > > Ahem. Let me switch from scathing mode to help-in-best-intentions mode. > > The error you're getting is probably related to your system. "double > free or corruption" means that someone called "malloc", used the memory > and then used "free" twice... or the so-called "malloc arena" has been > thrashed. Try the following: > > 1. Make sure you have the newest version of glibc. > 2. Try re-downloading hldsupdatetool.bin and unpacking it again. This > will give you an ancient version of the Steam binary which *might* even > work. > 3. If all else fails, get yourself a blank hard drive, install a > different Linux distro on it and see if you still have problems. If you > do, it's probably a hardware bug; if not, then Mandriva is to blame. > > ~~ Ondra > > Krillins World wrote: > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > Where do we linux admins get this new update? STEAM will not update on > our > > newly Mandriva 2006 Powerpack systems since July of 2006. No one can > answer > > why. All I get from support is *DEDICATED SERVERS ARE NOT SUPPORTED*. > > According to the Electronic Protection Act you are required to support > all > > forms of electronic software in which you release. The STEAM update just > > aborts with a very odd unheard of and UNSEARCHABLE error as seen below. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] hlds1_l]$ ./steam > > Checking bootstrapper version ... > > *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x086303f8 *** > > Aborted > > > > > > On 10/25/06, Alfred Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> We have released an update to the Half-Life 1 dedicated server (for all > >> mods). Run the hldsupdatetool to get this update. > >> > >> This update fixes win32 server staying on the first CPU of a multi-core > >> machine and fixes some timing problems with Steam3 login on Linux. > >> > >> - Alfred > >> > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] srcds CS -beta server freeze -problem
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Beta? Get up to speed. Beta has been outdated since what, last year? On 10/26/06, Teemu Ollilainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I discovered a bug with the linux version of the new CS:Source beta > release. The server freezes after about 10-20 minutes of play for > about 2-3 minutes. During this time you cannot type into console and > the server drops all clients. After the freeze is over - everything > goes back to normal. This was / is not a problem with the "normal" > release of CS:Source. > > First i thought this was a problem with my plugins (mani_admin_plugin > and etb), but after a lot of testing - disabling the plugins only > postponed the freeze for 5-10 minutes. > > I am running the srcds server with AMD Athlon XP running @ 2.0Ghz > (1GB)and Debian linux. > > I updated kernel to 2.6.18-cks1. This did not solve the problem. And I > tested the beta-release with clean install without any addons nor bots > - it just freezes. > > Any ideas what could be done about this`? > > Best regards, > Teemu Ollilainen (alias Seppo) > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Half-Life 1 Dedicated server update
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Where do we linux admins get this new update? STEAM will not update on our newly Mandriva 2006 Powerpack systems since July of 2006. No one can answer why. All I get from support is *DEDICATED SERVERS ARE NOT SUPPORTED*. According to the Electronic Protection Act you are required to support all forms of electronic software in which you release. The STEAM update just aborts with a very odd unheard of and UNSEARCHABLE error as seen below. [EMAIL PROTECTED] hlds1_l]$ ./steam Checking bootstrapper version ... *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x086303f8 *** Aborted On 10/25/06, Alfred Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have released an update to the Half-Life 1 dedicated server (for all > mods). Run the hldsupdatetool to get this update. > > This update fixes win32 server staying on the first CPU of a multi-core > machine and fixes some timing problems with Steam3 login on Linux. > > - Alfred > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
