Re: [hlds_linux] Counterstrike Source DDos Attack !!! NO JOKE !!!
I would like to see this file, I have been looking for something to work on with iptables for a while now. 2009/1/18 Tony Paloma : > I can't download the file because the limit was reached. Can you upload it > somewhere else so I can check out what it's doing with Wireshark? ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] L4D mapcycle
It is designed for lobby as the main way to connect and set-up, they just need to get the balance right ^_^ give it time. 2008/11/18 Flubber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That's kind of crappy each time people got to vote, since you can't select > who is joining your community server once you re in, it can get messy. I > don't even talk of serverrestarting on efault map when the campaign is over. > > 2008/11/18 Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> In the demo you could vote to change restart etc >> >> HTH >> >> >> 2008/11/18 Rich Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > I've not been able to check on the full game - on the demo you were >> > just connected directly to the server with no lobby so you got the >> > default map the server was running. >> > >> > 2008/11/18 Jordy van Wolferen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> That is true, but what if you connect with the by ip / steam group, do >> >> you get a lobby when the server is empty? >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Adam Nowacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Servers will change a map to whatever was set in the lobby. >> >>> >> >>> Rich Adam wrote: >> >>>> I'm using the default settings for maplist and mapcycle (chapters and >> >>>> full map list respectively) >> >>>> >> >>>> My server resets to the hospital map when it's empty or a round ends, >> >>>> I thought the farm maps we're the first maps in the campaign? >> >>>> >> >>>> "L 11/18/2008 - 09:56:53: Reloading original map >> l4d_hospital01_apartment" >> >>>> >> >>>> 2008/11/18 Jordy van Wolferen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>>>> Hey, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I got 2 questions: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> 1) >> >>>>> Is it best to put all maps in the mapcycle.txt like this: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> l4d_farm01_hilltop >> >>>>> l4d_farm02_traintunnel >> >>>>> l4d_farm03_bridge >> >>>>> l4d_farm04_barn >> >>>>> l4d_farm05_cornfield >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Or do you only need the l4d_farm01_hilltop to start that campaign? >> >>>>> If all people leave from the servers, does it start the campaign all >> >>>>> over, when you only have the 1st map of the campaign in the mapcycle? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> 2) >> >>>>> Is it possible to have different mapcycles with forked servers? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> thanks >> >>>>> >> >>>>> ___ >> >>>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >> archives, please visit: >> >>>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> ___ >> >>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> >>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ___ >> >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >>> >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> >> > >> > ___ >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > >> >> ___ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] L4D mapcycle
In the demo you could vote to change restart etc HTH 2008/11/18 Rich Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I've not been able to check on the full game - on the demo you were > just connected directly to the server with no lobby so you got the > default map the server was running. > > 2008/11/18 Jordy van Wolferen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> That is true, but what if you connect with the by ip / steam group, do >> you get a lobby when the server is empty? >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Adam Nowacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Servers will change a map to whatever was set in the lobby. >>> >>> Rich Adam wrote: I'm using the default settings for maplist and mapcycle (chapters and full map list respectively) My server resets to the hospital map when it's empty or a round ends, I thought the farm maps we're the first maps in the campaign? "L 11/18/2008 - 09:56:53: Reloading original map l4d_hospital01_apartment" 2008/11/18 Jordy van Wolferen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hey, > > I got 2 questions: > > 1) > Is it best to put all maps in the mapcycle.txt like this: > > l4d_farm01_hilltop > l4d_farm02_traintunnel > l4d_farm03_bridge > l4d_farm04_barn > l4d_farm05_cornfield > > Or do you only need the l4d_farm01_hilltop to start that campaign? > If all people leave from the servers, does it start the campaign all > over, when you only have the 1st map of the campaign in the mapcycle? > > 2) > Is it possible to have different mapcycles with forked servers? > > thanks > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>> please visit: >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >>> >> >> ___ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Left 4 Dead is now available
I love up people! Thank you for all your time and great thinking ^_^ 2008/11/18 Jason Ruymen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Left 4 Dead is now available, which also means that the demo is no long > available. So if you would like to run a dedicated server, please run > hldsupdatetool with the game parameter with "left4dead". > > Jason > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] L4D does not support Athlon XP CPU
Yeah this is for Linux only ^_^ Silly developpers 2008/11/13 Rick Payton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Is this under Linux only? I tried running an L4D demo server at home on > my Windows Server 2003 machine, which runs an Athlon XP 2500 and nforce2 > motherboard. It started, and ran, and I died horribly by multiple > zombies. > > mauirixxx > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 11:42 PM > To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com > Subject: [hlds_linux] L4D does not support Athlon XP CPU > > After upgrading the gcc and glibc libraries on a debian, the l4d server > still did not start. > > I just took the hard drive of the machine in another machine (from > nforce2 Athlon XP to nforce4 AMD64), the server starts. > > Remember how long tf2 developpers corrected the Athlon XP bug in the > linux server. > > Waiting for a new version of the l4d server (with AMD Athlon XP > support). > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Unable to Update
I run "./steam" and get this error. "Checking bootstrapper version ... Getting version 34 of Steam HLDS Update Tool tar: Source: Not found in archive tar: Server/srcds_1: Not found in archive tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors Downloading. . . . . . . . . . .update failed, please run "tar xzUf LinuxHldsUpdateTool_34.pkg" to install the latest steam binary" Okay that's fine, so I run "tar xzUf LinuxHldsUpdateTool_34.pkg" then it returns me back to the command line. I try to run "./steam" again but get the same error. Any Ideas? Pete ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Unable to Update
I run "./steam" and get this error. "Checking bootstrapper version ... Getting version 34 of Steam HLDS Update Tool tar: Source: Not found in archive tar: Server/srcds_1: Not found in archive tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors Downloading. . . . . . . . . . .update failed, please run "tar xzUf LinuxHldsUpdateTool_34.pkg" to install the latest steam binary" Okay that's fine, so I run "tar xzUf LinuxHldsUpdateTool_34.pkg" then it returns me back to the command line. I try to run "./steam" again but get the same error. Any Ideas? Pete ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Let us set sv_infinite_ammo 1 in server config.
Sorry that wasn't meant to happen 2008/11/13 Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I run "./steam" and get this error. > > Checking bootstrapper version ... > Getting version 34 of Steam HLDS Update Tool > tar: Source: Not found in archive > tar: Server/srcds_1: Not found in archive > tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors > Downloading. . . . . . . . . . .update failed, please run "tar xzUf > LinuxHldsUpdateTool_34.pkg" to install the latest steam binary > > > Okay that's fine, so I run "tar xzUf LinuxHldsUpdateTool_34.pkg" then > it returns me back to the command line. I try to run "./steam" again > but get the same error. > > Any Ideas? > Pete > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Let us set sv_infinite_ammo 1 in server config.
I run "./steam" and get this error. Checking bootstrapper version ... Getting version 34 of Steam HLDS Update Tool tar: Source: Not found in archive tar: Server/srcds_1: Not found in archive tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors Downloading. . . . . . . . . . .update failed, please run "tar xzUf LinuxHldsUpdateTool_34.pkg" to install the latest steam binary Okay that's fine, so I run "tar xzUf LinuxHldsUpdateTool_34.pkg" then it returns me back to the command line. I try to run "./steam" again but get the same error. Any Ideas? Pete ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Let us set sv_infinite_ammo 1 in server config.
I don't see why not I belive people have played on other maps that are not in the demo. Also with the AI Director .. well wooo laet the fun begin ^_* 2008/11/13 Patrick Shelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I respect all the opinions in here - lets us have mods - please no mods etc, > but will we be able to map for this pretty soon? > > im in the throws of mapping an undergroound military bunker 'along the > lines' of the hive in res evil 1 - so can valve state whether we will be > able to map for this soon? > > Regards, > > Patrick > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Lots of ports (Is this normal?)
I rember reading around somehwere that l4d uses random ports, so maybe this is the reason. But I wasent really looking into it so I could have got the wrong idea. HTH 2008/11/12 David A. Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Possible bug, perhaps? > > - Dave > > Antoine Libert wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 21:34, David A. Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have a single-instance L4D server (no forks) running on a specific IP >>> address. When the server first started it bound to the normal ports >>> (TCP 27015, and UDP 27005, 27015, 27020) and not much else. But after >>> running for a few days, it's now bound to 47 UDP ports: >>> >>> [lots of ports] >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm experiencing the same thing on my dedi too... >> > > -- > > Dave Parker > Utica College > Integrated Information Technology Services > (315) 792-3229 > Registered Linux User #408177 > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Let us set sv_infinite_ammo 1 in server config.
If they do implement the server browser like in other games, they should enable an option where the user can select to play on vanilla servers. Or just allow lobby to connect to vanilla servers and no Mod that will solve any problem of lobby people haveing to downlaod mods etc. Pete ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Left 4 Dead Demo Update Available
Just out of interest can you tell me what you did in the network layer? Also not sure if this is the right place or if it has been fixed. When you start a lobby and then start searching for servers then stop it it doesn't re-enabled the menu again. Pete 2008/11/11 Saint K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Drawn too fast conclusion. Even after a reboot it now directly enters the > 100% CPU load for some odd reason. > > Cheers > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Saint K. > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 10:32 AM > To: 'Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list' > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Left 4 Dead Demo Update Available > > It's a bit silly imo as you'd expect it to just number on. > > Anyhow, I can live with it :) > > Another question, 2 actually; > > 1. -fork is not available on windows, is this correct? > 2. This morning I noticed the main process from the -fork was stuck in 101% > CPU load. I had to reboot it to become normal again. Anyone els noticed > this? > > Cheers, > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 8:36 AM > To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Left 4 Dead Demo Update Available > > As far as the cfg issue, that may very well be a bug. > > The port issue is not a bug. That is to get around the SourceTV port. > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Saint K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The -fork is now messed up. >> >> It go's like this: >> >> Server 1: 27015 >> Server 2: 27016 >> Server 3: 27017 >> Server 4: 27018 >> Server 6: 27019 <-- cfg for serv 6 assigned to server which is 5th in row >> Server 5: 27025 <-- still 27020 isn't used but 27025 for the 6th instance. >> >> Cheers, >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason >> Ruymen >> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 1:57 AM >> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list; >> hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: [hlds_linux] Left 4 Dead Demo Update Available >> >> A required update for the Left 4 Dead Demo Dedicated Server has been >> released. Please run hldsupdatetool to receive the update. The specific >> changes include: >> >> - Tuned matchmaking to provide better search results >> - Added UI to host a game on a local server >> - Improvements and performance optimizations to network layer >> - Improved handling of unsupported graphics hardware >> - Fixed a rare crash when kicking people from lobby >> - Fixes for demo exploits >> - Localization fixes >> - Increase automatic port range when running a Linux dedicated server with >> -fork >> >> Jason >> >> ___ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> >> ___ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Left 4 Dead -Matchmaking - please bring back theserver list
Hheh I should read more sorry ^^ 2008/11/6 Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > open console and type in 'openserverviwer' or just open and it will > show up at the bottom. > and it will list all the games under custom. > > HTH > > 2008/11/6 Mark - hlds list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Chris Brunelle wrote: >>> At the very least if your implementing something new retain the old >>> functionality as well. >>> >>> - >> Yep, give us a server browser, with an added button that says, "Find me >> a game!" for people who want to use matchmaking... best of both worlds. >> >> ___ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Left 4 Dead -Matchmaking - please bring back theserver list
open console and type in 'openserverviwer' or just open and it will show up at the bottom. and it will list all the games under custom. HTH 2008/11/6 Mark - hlds list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Chris Brunelle wrote: >> At the very least if your implementing something new retain the old >> functionality as well. >> >> - > Yep, give us a server browser, with an added button that says, "Find me > a game!" for people who want to use matchmaking... best of both worlds. > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] [hlds] Left 4 Dead -Matchmaking
I shoudl think you will be able to go on fried server or just enter the IP etc There will be a way to play with your friends and the server you want 2008/11/6 Nick Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Are we going to beable to play on our own server? > Lets say I run a l4d server in my colo and am 1ms away from it. > I would want to play on that server. Can me and 3 friends connect to my > server by IP or do we HAVE to use the matchmaking system and just get > put on a random box? > > > Eric Smith wrote: >> You'll setup the MOTD and banner ad by editing the attached .txt files >> (which are in the Left4Dead folder) to point at your images. >> >> -Eric >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Lyons >> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 5:35 PM >> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list >> Subject: Re: [hlds] Left 4 Dead -Matchmaking >> >> Can we get some specs on the banner please? >> >> Size, file type, size restrictions etc... >> >> Eric Smith wrote: >> >>> Left 4 Dead will use the new matchmaking system we've been working >>> on. >>> >>> The new matchmaking system replaces the traditional server browser. >>> By running a public dedicated server your server will be added to a >>> list of servers available for clients to use when playing. Games are >>> started from a Game Lobby by clients, who are then connected to a >>> dedicated server when they start the game. When they're done, your >>> server is added back to the list of available servers. Clients will >>> be able to "Quick Match", "Play Online", and "Play With Friends" when >>> they want to play a game. >>> >>> You will still have access to the traditional Message of the Day for >>> your server. For Left 4 Dead, we've added a banner ad you can create >>> that will be displayed to clients when they're playing on your >>> server. There is also a ranking system to show the popularity of >>> your server. >>> >>> This is the first version of what we've been working on, and we're >>> going to want feedback from all of you once things start turning up >>> tomorrow. >>> >>> -Eric >>> >>> >>> >>> ___ To unsubscribe, edit >>> your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Lyons (Bsc CS & Soft Eng) >> Content Administrator, Internode Systems >> 150 Grenfell St, Adelaide SA 5000 >> Ph: (08) 8228 2877 >> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> WWW: www.internode.com.au >> "In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice; In >> practice, there is." >> >> ___ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds >> >> >> >> ___ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] howto install CS:S and EP2 Content for garrysmod
I did not know that Garry had released the GMod files? ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Speakeasy security module wont load no matter what
It's funny that 64bit binaries aren't supported, yet e-frag STILL use them. Servers of a friends haven't had VAC on them for well over a week now and e-frag won't fix it. They claim it's "VALVEs problem"... Yet i've told my friend, tell them it's THEIR problem and they need to use 32bit binaries. Server companies who know jack about how to run the server properly annoy me so much. I got banned from their silly forums because I told them how to fix the error, but they don't like being told what is right. Just like to let paying customers suffer by having terrible support and no VAC of any sort on their servers. Sort it out e-frag, your servers should be using VAC2, that means using 32bit binaries! and LinuxPenguin... unlucky on that matter, I think vac is totally dead now. So it's 32bit all the way. - Original Message - From: "linux penguin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 11:11 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Speakeasy security module wont load no matter what -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] So if i run 32 bit binary on a AMD64(with a 64 bit OS) is that gonna downgrade the performance of my hlds server? On 2/14/07, Ben Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You can only run a 32-bit binary on a 32-bit OS... a 64-bit binary will ONLY work on a 64-bit OS with a 64-bit processor. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Forsberg Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 5:46 PM To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Speakeasy security module wont load no matter what - Original Message - From: "linux penguin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Some ppl said here that its better to run the 32 bit binary on a 32 bit OS. True/False? --- False, imo. At least your OS and any supporting processes will gain whatever advantages there are from a 64bit processor. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux __ NOD32 2058 (20070213) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Stable Server Setup
Kernel v. Linux server10 2.6.11-1.27_FC3smp #1 SMP Tue May 17 20:38:05 EDT 2005 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Cheers, - Original Message - From: "Ian mu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 8:01 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Stable Server Setup -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] What kernel version are you running? On 10/16/05, Pete Clifford [sl1ps] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Hi, I've had my own dedicated box with a company for a while and was running just a Battlefield2 server. However, i've decided to host a couple of CounterStrike 1.6 servers - (just them, no BF2 server). But just 2 CS 1.6 servers on a dual opteron 64 seem to be extremely unstable with players(both novices and experienced alike) complaining of high pings and lack of bullet registery. I run 2 HLTVs, each connected to each server, no spec slots. I've tried quite a few things that people have suggested - highering and lowering the sys_ticrate and/or putting pingboost 1/2/3 on... Just makes the FPS of the server jump around from 60-(insert ticrate here..)... Surely 2 CS 1.6 servers on a very good box wouldn't be so unstable? Not sure if the following will help, but someone said it 'might'.. top - 21:07:33 up 54 days, 13:10, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Tasks: 56 total, 1 running, 55 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu0 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 100.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si Cpu1 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 100.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si Mem: 2056548k total, 1727116k used, 329432k free, 106972k buffers Swap: 2040244k total, 208k used, 2040036k free, 1364616k cached Can tell i'm new to all this :) Any help appreciated Pete -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Stable Server Setup
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Hi, I've had my own dedicated box with a company for a while and was running just a Battlefield2 server. However, i've decided to host a couple of CounterStrike 1.6 servers - (just them, no BF2 server). But just 2 CS 1.6 servers on a dual opteron 64 seem to be extremely unstable with players(both novices and experienced alike) complaining of high pings and lack of bullet registery. I run 2 HLTVs, each connected to each server, no spec slots. I've tried quite a few things that people have suggested - highering and lowering the sys_ticrate and/or putting pingboost 1/2/3 on... Just makes the FPS of the server jump around from 60-(insert ticrate here..)... Surely 2 CS 1.6 servers on a very good box wouldn't be so unstable? Not sure if the following will help, but someone said it 'might'.. top - 21:07:33 up 54 days, 13:10, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Tasks: 56 total, 1 running, 55 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu0 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 100.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si Cpu1 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 100.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si Mem: 2056548k total, 1727116k used, 329432k free, 106972k buffers Swap: 2040244k total, 208k used, 2040036k free, 1364616k cached Can tell i'm new to all this :) Any help appreciated Pete -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS Timing issue on AMD64
This is quite an interesting topic for me - I don't know the inner workings of why a server will or won't run at a certain fps - but I still find it an odd issue. I run 4 Servers on a dualOpteron64 1gb box, I was TOLD, use Pingboost 3 and sys_ticrate 1 for the best performance... I knew for a fact that was bull, so I kept the ticrate at 250 - a constant 250 fps on a server is better than a 1000fps then 100 fps and everything in-between all the time on a server. However, my servers STILL fluctuate, 100-120-200-199-250-140 etc, i've tried it with just pingboost 2 aswell... 1 of the servers is running the CSDM mod - is there any recommended settings for something running a mod like that? Any help is appreciated - please come talk to me if you could help me run them all at an optimal-stable setting at #sl1ps.com on quakenet cheers. - Original Message - From: "Mike Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 7:01 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS Timing issue on AMD64 You can acheive 1000FPS with a pingboost of 2. I never run pingboost >2 and i have never seen this problem on any of my servers. A pingboost of 3 might keep the FPS at 1000 more often, but as anyone who has owned/run a 1000FPS server knows, the FPS is far from stable anyways. Marcel wrote: Hi, Some people want servers with 1000FPS (I know that's nonsense, but they want it) and you only get it with pingboost 3 and a high sys_ticrate. It would be great when someone has a solution for this problem. This "Timing issue" also happened on a P4 with Fedora. BTW: It's sys_ticrate (not sys_tickrate). It's also enough when you add "sys_ticrate 500" to your server.cfg. - Marcel | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hlds_linux- | [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 1:55 PM | To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com | Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS Timing issue on AMD64 | | | Remove Pingboost and add | | -sys_tickrate 500 | | to your start-parameters... | | Don't know why everyone is thinking high settings in tickrate AND | pingboost are producing an optimum performance? I'm running several | servers on two AMD64 machines with a maximum of sys_tickrate 200 and NO | pingboost in addition. The servers never have a performance problem... | | | hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com schrieb am 13.09.05 13:43:44: | > | > Hi, | > | > I also noticed this problem on some machines when pingboost is enabled. | As a | > workaround you just have to disable pingboost. | > | > I don't know if there is a real solution for this. | > | > - Marcel | > | > | -Original Message- | > | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hlds_linux- | > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fr0x Fr0x | > | Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 11:29 PM | > | To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com | > | Subject: [hlds_linux] HLDS Timing issue on AMD64 | > | | > | Hello, | > | | > | I am running HLDS (with no addon) on an AMD64 3000+ processor. | > | The OS is Debian Sarge 3.1, here is the uname -a output: | > | - Linux localhost 2.6.12.5 #1 Tue Aug 16 15:04:49 CEST 2005 x86_64 | > | GNU/Linux | > | I am experiencing some problems in game. | > | Sometimes, the weapon swichting becomes twice as fast as normal, bomb | > | difusing takes only 4 seconds instead of 10 (without diffuse kit), | > | reloading becomes also faster, and the bomb is exploding also about | twice | > | times earlier than it should. (The bomb sound is also not regular) | > | The map time is correct and the round time too. | > | The server is running with pingboost 3, sys_ticrate 1, here are | the | > | versions: | > | - Checking/Installing 'Counter-Strike Base Content' version 16 | > | - Checking/Installing 'Linux Server Engine' version 21 | > | - Checking/Installing 'Half-Life Base Content' version 8 | > | The following libs are installed on the server: | > | - ia32 1.4 | > | - glibc 2.3.2 | > | How to fix that problem please? | > | | > | Thanks | > | | > | Alexandre | > | | > | _ | > | Bénéficiez de 250 Mo de stockage avec MSN Hotmail | > | http://g.msn.fr/FR1001/866 | > | | > | | > | ___ | > | To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, | > | please visit: | > | http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux | > | > | > ___ | > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, | please visit: | > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux | | | | ___ | To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, | please visit: | http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftwa
Re: [hlds_linux] Hlds crash very often ????
m0gely wrote: fred e wrote: I'm using slackware with kernel 2.6.5. Then Pete's link on the AMXx site is not the answer. i don't know. i have run fedora and amx and it's always crashed, adminmod is fine. suse 9.1 with amx is fine. others on that thread have debian sarge crashing. i think it's just some version of a library or kernel screwing it, maybe slackware has the same version. pete ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Hlds crash very often ????
fred e wrote: CRASH: Mon Nov 29 18:21:30 CET 2004 Start Line: ./hlds_i686 -game cstrike +sv_stats 0 +maxplayers 25 +ip 82.149.32.244 +logsdir logs27015 +port 27015 +map de_dust2 -deb ug -autoupdate -pidfile hlds.1967.pid Core was generated by `./hlds_i686 -game cstrike +sv_stats 0 +maxplayers 25 +ip 82.149.32.244 +logsdir'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x439db096 in ?? () #0 0x439db096 in ?? () End of crash report I have metamod 1.17.3 and amx 0.9.9. take a look at http://www.amxmodx.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=8150 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] TFC Server Install Keeps failing.
Zak Haque wrote: Tried it, failed. Thanx for the reply. Delete your ~/.steam/ClientRegistry.blob, change directory to the game server dir and try the update again with "-dir ." on the command line. what about InstallRecord.blob? deleting that fixed it for me. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
