Re: [hlds_linux] [CS:SOURCE] Ports usage problems

2004-10-14 Thread Thiesson Johann
I made some tests with differents ports for hltv_port and clientport:
if $port < 27000 and $port > 28000, no port are opened.

I'll use this to disable HLTV.

Thanks.

--
DjoDjo

On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 10:56:12AM -0700, Alfred Reynolds wrote:
> 27021 is the main server port. 27020 is the HLTV server. TCP 27021 is
> the rcon server. 27005 is the client port (and is used by the HTLV
> server for relaying). You can use +hltv_port x and +clientport y to
> change the bound HLTV ports.
>
> - Alfred
>
> > The problem is really anoying, when you have several servers on the
> > same box.
> > Can we image that a single srcds process bind a single port ?
> >
> > Please can we have an explanation ? Alfred ?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 08:38:23PM +0200, Jesper S?rensen wrote:
> > > Michael McKoy wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure why port 27005 is bound. Traditionally this would be
> > > > the client port, so the server shouldn't be opening it. I don't
> > > > know what the 27020 port is but it might be related to the built
> > > > in HLTV? One of these ports handles server queries though, I
> > > > think.
> > > >
> > > > The TCP port is rcon, of course.
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've lots of problems with srcds port binding.
> > > > > I just found that a single srcds process had 3 UDP ports
> > > > > openned.
> > > > >
> > > > > falcon:~# netstat -ap | grep 9660
> > > > > tcp  0 0 falcon:27021  *:* LISTEN 9660/srcds_amd
> > > > > udp 110352 0 falcon:27020  *:*9660/srcds_amd
> > > > > udp  0 0 falcon:27021  *:*9660/srcds_amd
> > > > > udp  0 0 falcon:27005  *:*9660/srcds_amd
> > > > >
> > > > > The port option ont the HL command line is "-port 27021".
> > > > >
> > > > > Can anyone explain me why the port 27020 is used by the same
> > > > > process ? Can we disable this? And the port 27005 ?
> > > > > I have another server on the port 27020, so that's a problem.
> > > > >
> > > > > Second thing, when the asked port is in use, I dont want that
> > > > > the srcds server automatically bind another free port. Is it
> > > > > possible ?
> > > > > I can't find any benefit from this feature.
> > > > > If the port 21 is in use, does an FTP server automatically use
> > > > > the port 22 ? :/
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks !
> > > >
> > > This is what I get on a windows box :
> > > TCPx.x.x.x:27015  0.0.0.0:0  LISTENING
> > > UDP0.0.0.0:27005  *:*
> > > UDP0.0.0.0:27007  *:*
> > > UDP0.0.0.0:27015  *:*
> > > UDP0.0.0.0:27020  *:*
> > >
> > > The TCP is for RCON, but the rest - Not a clue.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


RE: [hlds_linux] [CS:SOURCE] Ports usage problems

2004-10-14 Thread Alfred Reynolds
27021 is the main server port. 27020 is the HLTV server. TCP 27021 is
the rcon server. 27005 is the client port (and is used by the HTLV
server for relaying). You can use +hltv_port x and +clientport y to
change the bound HLTV ports.

- Alfred

Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DjoDjo
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 10:01 AM To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [CS:SOURCE]
Ports usage problems

> The problem is really anoying, when you have several servers on the
> same box.
> Can we image that a single srcds process bind a single port ?
>
> Please can we have an explanation ? Alfred ?
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 08:38:23PM +0200, Jesper S?rensen wrote:
> > Michael McKoy wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not sure why port 27005 is bound. Traditionally this would be
> > > the client port, so the server shouldn't be opening it. I don't
> > > know what the 27020 port is but it might be related to the built
> > > in HLTV? One of these ports handles server queries though, I
> > > think.
> > >
> > > The TCP port is rcon, of course.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I've lots of problems with srcds port binding.
> > > > I just found that a single srcds process had 3 UDP ports
> > > > openned.
> > > >
> > > > falcon:~# netstat -ap | grep 9660
> > > > tcp  0 0 falcon:27021  *:* LISTEN 9660/srcds_amd
> > > > udp 110352 0 falcon:27020  *:*9660/srcds_amd
> > > > udp  0 0 falcon:27021  *:*9660/srcds_amd
> > > > udp  0 0 falcon:27005  *:*9660/srcds_amd
> > > >
> > > > The port option ont the HL command line is "-port 27021".
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone explain me why the port 27020 is used by the same
> > > > process ? Can we disable this? And the port 27005 ?
> > > > I have another server on the port 27020, so that's a problem.
> > > >
> > > > Second thing, when the asked port is in use, I dont want that
> > > > the srcds server automatically bind another free port. Is it
> > > > possible ?
> > > > I can't find any benefit from this feature.
> > > > If the port 21 is in use, does an FTP server automatically use
> > > > the port 22 ? :/
> > > >
> > > > Thanks !
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > DjoDjo
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > > > archives, please visit:
> > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > > archives, please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > This is what I get on a windows box :
> > TCPx.x.x.x:27015  0.0.0.0:0  LISTENING
> > UDP0.0.0.0:27005  *:*
> > UDP0.0.0.0:27007  *:*
> > UDP0.0.0.0:27015  *:*
> > UDP0.0.0.0:27020  *:*
> >
> > The TCP is for RCON, but the rest - Not a clue.
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives, please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re[2]: [hlds_linux] [CS:SOURCE] Ports usage problems

2004-10-14 Thread Michael Madsen
*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***
>The problem is really anoying, when you have several servers on the same
>box.
>Can we image that a single srcds process bind a single port ?

Commands to change the ports do exist, but they have no effect when changed.

"hltv_port" = "0" ( def. "12" ) <- Don't know why the default port would be 12, when 
it is stuck to 27020 or whichever port is available after this one.
 - Host HLTV port

"clientport" = "0"
 - Host game client port

If these commands would just work, I guess everyones problems are over :)

Regards,

Michael Madsen
http://www.gamelaunch.dk


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] [CS:SOURCE] Ports usage problems

2004-10-14 Thread DjoDjo

The problem is really anoying, when you have several servers on the same
box.
Can we image that a single srcds process bind a single port ?

Please can we have an explanation ? Alfred ?

--
DjoDjo

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 08:38:23PM +0200, Jesper S?rensen wrote:
> Michael McKoy wrote:
>
> >I'm not sure why port 27005 is bound. Traditionally this would be the
> >client port, so the server shouldn't be opening it. I don't know what
> >the
> >27020 port is but it might be related to the built in HLTV? One of these
> >ports handles server queries though, I think.
> >
> >The TCP port is rcon, of course.
> >
> >
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I've lots of problems with srcds port binding.
> >>I just found that a single srcds process had 3 UDP ports openned.
> >>
> >>falcon:~# netstat -ap | grep 9660
> >>tcp  0 0 falcon:27021  *:* LISTEN 9660/srcds_amd
> >>udp 110352 0 falcon:27020  *:*9660/srcds_amd
> >>udp  0 0 falcon:27021  *:*9660/srcds_amd
> >>udp  0 0 falcon:27005  *:*9660/srcds_amd
> >>
> >>The port option ont the HL command line is "-port 27021".
> >>
> >>Can anyone explain me why the port 27020 is used by the same process ?
> >>Can we disable this?
> >>And the port 27005 ?
> >>I have another server on the port 27020, so that's a problem.
> >>
> >>Second thing, when the asked port is in use, I dont want that the srcds
> >>server automatically bind another free port. Is it possible ?
> >>I can't find any benefit from this feature.
> >>If the port 21 is in use, does an FTP server automatically use the port
> >>22 ? :/
> >>
> >>Thanks !
> >>
> >>--
> >>DjoDjo
> >>
> >>___
> >>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> >>please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >___
> >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> >please visit:
> >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
> >.
> >
> >
> >
> This is what I get on a windows box :
> TCPx.x.x.x:27015  0.0.0.0:0  LISTENING
> UDP0.0.0.0:27005  *:*
> UDP0.0.0.0:27007  *:*
> UDP0.0.0.0:27015  *:*
> UDP0.0.0.0:27020  *:*
>
> The TCP is for RCON, but the rest - Not a clue.

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] [CS:SOURCE] Ports usage problems

2004-10-13 Thread Jesper Sørensen
Michael McKoy wrote:
I'm not sure why port 27005 is bound. Traditionally this would be the
client port, so the server shouldn't be opening it. I don't know what the
27020 port is but it might be related to the built in HLTV? One of these
ports handles server queries though, I think.
The TCP port is rcon, of course.

Hi,
I've lots of problems with srcds port binding.
I just found that a single srcds process had 3 UDP ports openned.
falcon:~# netstat -ap | grep 9660
tcp  0 0 falcon:27021  *:* LISTEN 9660/srcds_amd
udp 110352 0 falcon:27020  *:*9660/srcds_amd
udp  0 0 falcon:27021  *:*9660/srcds_amd
udp  0 0 falcon:27005  *:*9660/srcds_amd
The port option ont the HL command line is "-port 27021".
Can anyone explain me why the port 27020 is used by the same process ?
Can we disable this?
And the port 27005 ?
I have another server on the port 27020, so that's a problem.
Second thing, when the asked port is in use, I dont want that the srcds
server automatically bind another free port. Is it possible ?
I can't find any benefit from this feature.
If the port 21 is in use, does an FTP server automatically use the port
22 ? :/
Thanks !
--
DjoDjo
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
.

This is what I get on a windows box :
TCPx.x.x.x:27015  0.0.0.0:0  LISTENING
UDP0.0.0.0:27005  *:*
UDP0.0.0.0:27007  *:*
UDP0.0.0.0:27015  *:*
UDP0.0.0.0:27020  *:*
The TCP is for RCON, but the rest - Not a clue.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] [CS:SOURCE] Ports usage problems

2004-10-13 Thread Michael McKoy
I'm not sure why port 27005 is bound. Traditionally this would be the
client port, so the server shouldn't be opening it. I don't know what the
27020 port is but it might be related to the built in HLTV? One of these
ports handles server queries though, I think.

The TCP port is rcon, of course.

> Hi,
>
> I've lots of problems with srcds port binding.
> I just found that a single srcds process had 3 UDP ports openned.
>
> falcon:~# netstat -ap | grep 9660
> tcp  0 0 falcon:27021  *:* LISTEN 9660/srcds_amd
> udp 110352 0 falcon:27020  *:*9660/srcds_amd
> udp  0 0 falcon:27021  *:*9660/srcds_amd
> udp  0 0 falcon:27005  *:*9660/srcds_amd
>
> The port option ont the HL command line is "-port 27021".
>
> Can anyone explain me why the port 27020 is used by the same process ?
> Can we disable this?
> And the port 27005 ?
> I have another server on the port 27020, so that's a problem.
>
> Second thing, when the asked port is in use, I dont want that the srcds
> server automatically bind another free port. Is it possible ?
> I can't find any benefit from this feature.
> If the port 21 is in use, does an FTP server automatically use the port
> 22 ? :/
>
> Thanks !
>
> --
> DjoDjo
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux




___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


[hlds_linux] [CS:SOURCE] Ports usage problems

2004-10-13 Thread DjoDjo
Hi,

I've lots of problems with srcds port binding.
I just found that a single srcds process had 3 UDP ports openned.

falcon:~# netstat -ap | grep 9660
tcp  0 0 falcon:27021  *:* LISTEN 9660/srcds_amd
udp 110352 0 falcon:27020  *:*9660/srcds_amd
udp  0 0 falcon:27021  *:*9660/srcds_amd
udp  0 0 falcon:27005  *:*9660/srcds_amd

The port option ont the HL command line is "-port 27021".

Can anyone explain me why the port 27020 is used by the same process ?
Can we disable this?
And the port 27005 ?
I have another server on the port 27020, so that's a problem.

Second thing, when the asked port is in use, I dont want that the srcds
server automatically bind another free port. Is it possible ?
I can't find any benefit from this feature.
If the port 21 is in use, does an FTP server automatically use the port
22 ? :/

Thanks !

--
DjoDjo

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux