Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
:-/. Guess I'll have to go ahead and try 2.4.19 and see if it makes a difference. Justin - Original Message - From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Justin Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:49 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > no real noticable difference. > > > --On Thursday, 20 February 2003 9:50 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Any status on your situation? I'm curious if that kernel made a > > difference. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:34 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > >> haven't noticed much difference, but don't have many people playing at > >> the moment. > >> > >> > >> > >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 9:31 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > Did it make a difference? I think that kernel only had security > >> > enhancements. > >> > > >> > - Original Message - > >> > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:59 PM > >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> > > >> > > >> >> it upgraded to > >> >> 2.4.18-24.7.x > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 8:32 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. > >> >> > > >> >> > - Original Message - > >> >> > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM > >> >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I'm just updating one of my systems from > >> >> >> 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> So i'll let you know when its done :) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Matt. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting > >> >> >> > better > >> > :). > >> >> >> > I think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Justin > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > - Original Message - > >> >> >> > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > >> >> >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it > > worked > >> >> > great. > >> >> >> >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> - Original Message - > >> >> >> >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Howdy, > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are > >> >> >> >> > > hosted remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
no real noticable difference. --On Thursday, 20 February 2003 9:50 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Any status on your situation? I'm curious if that kernel made a difference. - Original Message - From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:34 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf haven't noticed much difference, but don't have many people playing at the moment. --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 9:31 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did it make a difference? I think that kernel only had security > enhancements. > > - Original Message - > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:59 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > >> it upgraded to >> 2.4.18-24.7.x >> >> >> >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 8:32 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. >> > >> > - Original Message - >> > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf >> > >> > >> >> >> >> I'm just updating one of my systems from >> >> 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) >> >> >> >> So i'll let you know when its done :) >> >> >> >> Matt. >> >> >> >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting >> >> > better > :). >> >> > I think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. >> >> > >> >> > Justin >> >> > >> >> > - Original Message - >> >> > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM >> >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked >> > great. >> >> >> As with anything, mileage may vary. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> >> >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM >> >> >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Howdy, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are >> >> >> > > hosted remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm >> >> >> > > screwed. What kinds of issues were you having? Were you >> >> >> > > using an rpm or > source? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped > up... >> >> >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some >> > daemons >> >> >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did >> >> >> > not load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, but >> >> >> > like i said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try >> >> >> > too hard to correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of >> >> >> > the kernel would be better? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have > a >> > lot >> >> >> > > > > better luck. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I > had >> >> >> > > > more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian >> >> >> > > > anyway :D (heh, i am looking for any excuse to get rid of >> >> >> > > > redhat from my network... i cant stand it :D ) >> >
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Any status on your situation? I'm curious if that kernel made a difference. - Original Message - From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:34 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > haven't noticed much difference, but don't have many people playing at the > moment. > > > > --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 9:31 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Did it make a difference? I think that kernel only had security > > enhancements. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:59 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > >> it upgraded to > >> 2.4.18-24.7.x > >> > >> > >> > >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 8:32 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. > >> > > >> > - Original Message - > >> > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM > >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> I'm just updating one of my systems from > >> >> 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > >> >> > >> >> So i'll let you know when its done :) > >> >> > >> >> Matt. > >> >> > >> >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting better > > :). > >> >> > I think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > >> >> > > >> >> > Justin > >> >> > > >> >> > - Original Message - > >> >> > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > >> >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked > >> > great. > >> >> >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> - Original Message - > >> >> >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > >> >> >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Howdy, > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted > >> >> >> > > remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. > >> >> >> > > What kinds of issues were you having? Were you using an rpm or > > source? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped > > up... > >> >> >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some > >> > daemons > >> >> >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did > >> >> >> > not load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, but > >> >> >> > like i said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try too > >> >> >> > hard to correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of the > >> >> >> > kernel would be better? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have > > a > >> > lot > >> >> >> > > > > better luck. > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I > > had > >> >>
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Yesterday I setup a new 7.3 box with the latest kernel. Same problem. I reverted to my trusty 2.4.9-34 and things are great again. I know... broken record, but it works for me (across several machines running P4's, a celeron, an xp 2100 and a dual PIII). All react the same way. I just have to do a --force to get the older kernel rpm in there. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > the most uptodate version. But i have tried with all versions and Get this > problem with all > > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:53 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > we use 8.0 on our dual xeon machine and experience similar problems. We're > > looking at debian as the next alternative > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Haspers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:32 PM > > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > Does everyone experiencing this lag/performance issue using RH 7.2 or > 7.3? > > > Does this problem only occurs with 7.2? Someone tried RH8? > > > > > > What would be the best OS for hosting the HLDS? We currently use 7.3 but > > > with some Xeon machines we are experiencing strange lag (freezes for a > > > second sometimes). > > > > > > -----Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Justin > > > Mitchell > > > Sent: woensdag 19 februari 2003 2:32 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > > > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm just updating one of my systems from > > > > 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > > > > > > > > So i'll let you know when its done :) > > > > > > > > Matt. > > > > > > > > --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting better > :). > > I > > > > > think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > > > > > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked > > > great. > > > > >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> - Original Message - > > > > >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > > > > >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Howdy, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted > > > > >> > > remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. > What > > > > >> > > kinds of issues were you having? Were you using an rpm or > source? > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped > > up... > > > > >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some > > > daemons > > > > >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did > > not > > > > >> > load. i guess all things that
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
the most uptodate version. But i have tried with all versions and Get this problem with all - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:53 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > we use 8.0 on our dual xeon machine and experience similar problems. We're > looking at debian as the next alternative > > - Original Message - > From: "Haspers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:32 PM > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > Does everyone experiencing this lag/performance issue using RH 7.2 or 7.3? > > Does this problem only occurs with 7.2? Someone tried RH8? > > > > What would be the best OS for hosting the HLDS? We currently use 7.3 but > > with some Xeon machines we are experiencing strange lag (freezes for a > > second sometimes). > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Justin > > Mitchell > > Sent: woensdag 19 februari 2003 2:32 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. > > > > ----- Original Message - > > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > > > > I'm just updating one of my systems from > > > 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > > > > > > So i'll let you know when its done :) > > > > > > Matt. > > > > > > --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting better :). > I > > > > think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > > > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > > > > > >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked > > great. > > > >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> - Original Message - > > > >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > > > >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Howdy, > > > >> > > > > >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted > > > >> > > remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. What > > > >> > > kinds of issues were you having? Were you using an rpm or source? > > > >> > > > > >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped > up... > > > >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some > > daemons > > > >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did > not > > > >> > load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, but like i > > > >> > said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try too hard to > > > >> > correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of the kernel would be > > > >> > better? > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have a > > lot > > > >> > > > > better luck. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I > had > > > >> > > > more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian anyway :D > > > >> > > > (heh, i am looking for any excuse to get rid of redhat from my > > > >> > > > network... i cant stand it :D ) > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Cheers, > > > >> >
RE: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Which kernel do you use? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 20 februari 2003 15:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf we use 8.0 on our dual xeon machine and experience similar problems. We're looking at debian as the next alternative - Original Message - From: "Haspers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:32 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > Does everyone experiencing this lag/performance issue using RH 7.2 or 7.3? > Does this problem only occurs with 7.2? Someone tried RH8? > > What would be the best OS for hosting the HLDS? We currently use 7.3 but > with some Xeon machines we are experiencing strange lag (freezes for a > second sometimes). > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Justin > Mitchell > Sent: woensdag 19 februari 2003 2:32 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. > > - Original Message - > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > I'm just updating one of my systems from > > 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > > > > So i'll let you know when its done :) > > > > Matt. > > > > --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting better :). I > > > think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > > >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked > great. > > >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > > >> > > >> > > >> - Original Message - > > >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > > >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > >> > > >> > > >> > Howdy, > > >> > > > >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted > > >> > > remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. What > > >> > > kinds of issues were you having? Were you using an rpm or source? > > >> > > > >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped up... > > >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some > daemons > > >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did not > > >> > load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, but like i > > >> > said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try too hard to > > >> > correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of the kernel would be > > >> > better? > > >> > > > >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have a > lot > > >> > > > > better luck. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I had > > >> > > > more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian anyway :D > > >> > > > (heh, i am looking for any excuse to get rid of redhat from my > > >> > > > network... i cant stand it :D ) > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Cheers, > > >> > > > >> > James Mclean > > >> > vOrTeX > > >> > GamingSA.com Lead Admin > > >> > ___ > > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, > > >> please visit: > > >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> __
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
we use 8.0 on our dual xeon machine and experience similar problems. We're looking at debian as the next alternative - Original Message - From: "Haspers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:32 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > Does everyone experiencing this lag/performance issue using RH 7.2 or 7.3? > Does this problem only occurs with 7.2? Someone tried RH8? > > What would be the best OS for hosting the HLDS? We currently use 7.3 but > with some Xeon machines we are experiencing strange lag (freezes for a > second sometimes). > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Justin > Mitchell > Sent: woensdag 19 februari 2003 2:32 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. > > - Original Message - > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > I'm just updating one of my systems from > > 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > > > > So i'll let you know when its done :) > > > > Matt. > > > > --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting better :). I > > > think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > > > >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked > great. > > >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > > >> > > >> > > >> - Original Message - > > >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > > >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > >> > > >> > > >> > Howdy, > > >> > > > >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted > > >> > > remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. What > > >> > > kinds of issues were you having? Were you using an rpm or source? > > >> > > > >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped up... > > >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some > daemons > > >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did not > > >> > load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, but like i > > >> > said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try too hard to > > >> > correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of the kernel would be > > >> > better? > > >> > > > >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have a > lot > > >> > > > > better luck. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I had > > >> > > > more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian anyway :D > > >> > > > (heh, i am looking for any excuse to get rid of redhat from my > > >> > > > network... i cant stand it :D ) > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Cheers, > > >> > > > >> > James Mclean > > >> > vOrTeX > > >> > GamingSA.com Lead Admin > > >> > ___ > > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, > > >> please visit: > > >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ___ > > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > > please visit: > > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > >> > > > > > > ___ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Does everyone experiencing this lag/performance issue using RH 7.2 or 7.3? Does this problem only occurs with 7.2? Someone tried RH8? What would be the best OS for hosting the HLDS? We currently use 7.3 but with some Xeon machines we are experiencing strange lag (freezes for a second sometimes). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Justin Mitchell Sent: woensdag 19 februari 2003 2:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. - Original Message - From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > I'm just updating one of my systems from > 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > > So i'll let you know when its done :) > > Matt. > > --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting better :). I > > think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > > > > Justin > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked great. > >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > >> > >> > >> - Original Message - > >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> > >> > >> > Howdy, > >> > > >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted > >> > > remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. What > >> > > kinds of issues were you having? Were you using an rpm or source? > >> > > >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped up... > >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some daemons > >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did not > >> > load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, but like i > >> > said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try too hard to > >> > correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of the kernel would be > >> > better? > >> > > >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have a lot > >> > > > > better luck. > >> > > > > >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I had > >> > > > more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian anyway :D > >> > > > (heh, i am looking for any excuse to get rid of redhat from my > >> > > > network... i cant stand it :D ) > >> > > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > > >> > James Mclean > >> > vOrTeX > >> > GamingSA.com Lead Admin > >> > ___ > >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >> please visit: > >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> ___ > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Is it this much trouble with linux? Gah, I just love FreeBSD then... rock solid... /Bjorn On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Matthew Watson wrote: > haven't noticed much difference, but don't have many people playing at the > moment. > > > > --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 9:31 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Did it make a difference? I think that kernel only had security > > enhancements. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:59 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > >> it upgraded to > >> 2.4.18-24.7.x > >> > >> > >> > >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 8:32 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > What version of redhat? The latest 7.2 kernel is still a 2.4.18. > >> > > >> > - Original Message - > >> > From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:00 PM > >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> I'm just updating one of my systems from > >> >> 2.4.18-3 to, whatever is the latest (via up2date) > >> >> > >> >> So i'll let you know when its done :) > >> >> > >> >> Matt. > >> >> > >> >> --On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 7:56 PM -0500 Justin Mitchell > >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Ohh, so the bug is just in 2.4.18? Every post keeps getting better > > :). > >> >> > I think I'll wait a few more and see what else turns up. > >> >> > > >> >> > Justin > >> >> > > >> >> > - Original Message - > >> >> > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:52 PM > >> >> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> I went the fast and easy way and used the 2.4.19 rpm and it worked > >> > great. > >> >> >> As with anything, mileage may vary. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> - Original Message - > >> >> >> From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:36 PM > >> >> >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Howdy, > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted > >> >> >> > > remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. > >> >> >> > > What kinds of issues were you having? Were you using an rpm or > > source? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I built from source, and all sorts of strange problems cropped > > up... > >> >> >> > bash didnt work correctly (would not show files on a ls), some > >> > daemons > >> >> >> > did not start (syslog), and initially the network card module did > >> >> >> > not load. i guess all things that could have been prevented, but > >> >> >> > like i said i wanted to kill off redhat anyway so didnt try too > >> >> >> > hard to correct the problems. Perhaps an RPM install of the > >> >> >> > kernel would be better? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have > > a > >> > lot > >> >> >> > > > > better luck. > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I > > had > >> >> >> > > > more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian anyway > >> >> >> > > > :D (heh, i am l
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Eek, kernel troubles are not what I need. My boxes are hosted remotely, so if I kernel compile goes bad then I'm screwed. What kinds of issues were you having? Were you using an rpm or source? Justin - Original Message - From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:20 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > Howdy, > > > > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have a lot > > better luck. > > I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I had more > troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian anyway :D (heh, i am > looking for any excuse to get rid of redhat from my network... i cant > stand it :D ) > > > > Howdy, > > > > > > Running multiple HLDS on RedHat with a Pentium P4 CPU (perhaps its a > > > linux 2.4 kernel issue, rather than a RedHat issue) had been brought > > > up a few times over the past month, it seems that there is a problem > > > that causes multiple HLDS processes to use more CPU than they need, > > > and lag the servers... > > > > > > I had this problem with one of my CS League servers also (redhat > > > 7.3, 2.4.18 kernel, 1.6Ghz P4, 512 DDR RAM), so i pulled it out, and > > > started again with Debian 3.0 (running a 2.2 kernel), my servers are > > > now lag-free, and my players are happy :) > > > Cheers, > > James Mclean > vOrTeX > GamingSA.com Lead Admin > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
vOrTeX said: > Running multiple HLDS on RedHat with a Pentium P4 CPU (perhaps its a > linux 2.4 kernel issue, rather than a RedHat issue) had been brought up > a few times over the past month, it seems that there is a problem that > causes multiple HLDS processes to use more CPU than they need, and lag > the servers... > > I had this problem with one of my CS League servers also (redhat 7.3, > 2.4.18 kernel, 1.6Ghz P4, 512 DDR RAM), so i pulled it out, and started > again with Debian 3.0 (running a 2.2 kernel), my servers are now > lag-free, and my players are happy :) I've run two instances on a 2.4.18 kernel without this problem so it's not kernel-specific. I would assume, then, that it has more to do with RedHat, which I wasn't using. -Mad -- I'd rather have a bottle in front a me than a frontal lobottleme [sic] - James Murray on Drinking (after being released from the Sherbrooke Centre Psychiatric Facility) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Howdy, > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have a lot > better luck. I tried 2.4.9 on the box before I replaced it with Debian, I had more troubles than it was worth, and I prefer Debian anyway :D (heh, i am looking for any excuse to get rid of redhat from my network... i cant stand it :D ) > > Howdy, > > > > Running multiple HLDS on RedHat with a Pentium P4 CPU (perhaps its a > > linux 2.4 kernel issue, rather than a RedHat issue) had been brought > > up a few times over the past month, it seems that there is a problem > > that causes multiple HLDS processes to use more CPU than they need, > > and lag the servers... > > > > I had this problem with one of my CS League servers also (redhat > > 7.3, 2.4.18 kernel, 1.6Ghz P4, 512 DDR RAM), so i pulled it out, and > > started again with Debian 3.0 (running a 2.2 kernel), my servers are > > now lag-free, and my players are happy :) Cheers, James Mclean vOrTeX GamingSA.com Lead Admin ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Wow... very good to know I was wondering why my freebsd boxes outperformed redhat by so much. Justin - Original Message - From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:13 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have a lot better > luck. > > > - Original Message - > From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:07 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > > > > > Howdy, > > > > Running multiple HLDS on RedHat with a Pentium P4 CPU (perhaps its a > > linux 2.4 kernel issue, rather than a RedHat issue) had been brought up > > a few times over the past month, it seems that there is a problem that > > causes multiple HLDS processes to use more CPU than they need, and lag > > the servers... > > > > I had this problem with one of my CS League servers also (redhat 7.3, > > 2.4.18 kernel, 1.6Ghz P4, 512 DDR RAM), so i pulled it out, and started > > again with Debian 3.0 (running a 2.2 kernel), my servers are now > > lag-free, and my players are happy :) > > > > On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 00:59:38 +0100 > > "Timothy Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have a very strange problem of cpu use. > > > > > > If I ran 2 or more HL servers, the cpu is totally used. If only one > > > server is started, cpu is only use by 20%. > > > > > > 2 serveurs <> 2 * 20% cpu ! > > > > > > I run HL server on a redhat linux distrib (7.2, kernel 2.4.19). The > > > box is a P4 with 1GB RAM. > > > > > > Anyone has this problem ? > > > > > > Timothy > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > James Mclean > > vOrTeX > > GamingSA.com Lead Admin > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Try the 2.4.9 series kernel with redhat and you should have a lot better luck. - Original Message - From: "vOrTeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:07 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf > > Howdy, > > Running multiple HLDS on RedHat with a Pentium P4 CPU (perhaps its a > linux 2.4 kernel issue, rather than a RedHat issue) had been brought up > a few times over the past month, it seems that there is a problem that > causes multiple HLDS processes to use more CPU than they need, and lag > the servers... > > I had this problem with one of my CS League servers also (redhat 7.3, > 2.4.18 kernel, 1.6Ghz P4, 512 DDR RAM), so i pulled it out, and started > again with Debian 3.0 (running a 2.2 kernel), my servers are now > lag-free, and my players are happy :) > > On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 00:59:38 +0100 > "Timothy Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a very strange problem of cpu use. > > > > If I ran 2 or more HL servers, the cpu is totally used. If only one > > server is started, cpu is only use by 20%. > > > > 2 serveurs <> 2 * 20% cpu ! > > > > I run HL server on a redhat linux distrib (7.2, kernel 2.4.19). The > > box is a P4 with 1GB RAM. > > > > Anyone has this problem ? > > > > Timothy > > > Cheers, > > James Mclean > vOrTeX > GamingSA.com Lead Admin > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] serveur Perf
Howdy, Running multiple HLDS on RedHat with a Pentium P4 CPU (perhaps its a linux 2.4 kernel issue, rather than a RedHat issue) had been brought up a few times over the past month, it seems that there is a problem that causes multiple HLDS processes to use more CPU than they need, and lag the servers... I had this problem with one of my CS League servers also (redhat 7.3, 2.4.18 kernel, 1.6Ghz P4, 512 DDR RAM), so i pulled it out, and started again with Debian 3.0 (running a 2.2 kernel), my servers are now lag-free, and my players are happy :) On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 00:59:38 +0100 "Timothy Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a very strange problem of cpu use. > > If I ran 2 or more HL servers, the cpu is totally used. If only one > server is started, cpu is only use by 20%. > > 2 serveurs <> 2 * 20% cpu ! > > I run HL server on a redhat linux distrib (7.2, kernel 2.4.19). The > box is a P4 with 1GB RAM. > > Anyone has this problem ? > > Timothy Cheers, James Mclean vOrTeX GamingSA.com Lead Admin ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
