RE: [Hornlist] haydn concerto piano reduction

2004-08-09 Thread Hans Pizka
Sorry, Amy, if Scott uses the scores available on the market (edited bz
Edmond Leloir - former KaWe  or the other score from Musica Rara) instead of
any score from complete Haydn Works (I do not know it yet), he is breaching
the copyright law, as he is using copyrighted materal. If he travels to
Germany to see the set of parts from the Oettingen Wallerstein Collection,
writing his own score & making his own piano reduction from material he
prepared himself, well, no objection at all. But the two scores mentioned
above, are protected, as Leloir & von Pringsheim invested a lot of work to
eliminate writing errors, set better clear phrasings etc.

Jumping on board of a car which is running well, is too easy.

Greetings from near Shangri-la

Hans

+++

> If Scott has done his own piano reduction from the full score, however,
> he's not breaking copyright, is he?  
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Hans Pizka
> Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 7:36 PM
> To: The Horn List
> Subject: Re: [Hornlist] haydn concerto piano reduction
> 
> Hello Scott,
> 
> the piano reduction for that double concerto is not #out of print since
> long#, very sorry, it is available at any time in Edmond Leloirs
> reduction
> >from the original score, which is protected under copyright. It is K.100
> or
> K.099 as full score & the parts are available as well.
> 
> Greetings
> Prof.Hans Pizka, on tour in Yuennan South Western China heading for
> Shangri-la.
> 
> ___
> post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> unsubscribe or set options at
> http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/gix3514%40gmx.at
> 

-- 
SigfridFafner the under ground horn player from Vienna

NEU: WLAN-Router f?r 0,- EUR* - auch f?r DSL-Wechsler!
GMX DSL = superg?nstig & kabellos http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] Re: Horn Digest, Vol 20, Issue 9 Vibrato

2004-08-09 Thread claude . benson



What is your opinion on using vibrato with the horn?

I used vibrato once on a horn solo passage during a collage performance. Miles
"Mity" Johnson, the St. Olaf Band director and a fellow horn player, looked at
me sternly and said, "Don't ever do that again."  I complied except when mocking
excessive vibrato from sax players.

Claude Benson





___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Hornlist] haydn concerto piano reduction

2004-08-09 Thread Sean R. Kirkpatrick
Scott,
Don't be so hasty in withdrawing your own reduction. You may indeed be 
able to offer your reduction without any problem.

First of all, according to US copyright law, anything published prior to 
1923 is in the public domain (see 
http://www.unc.edu/~unclng/public-d.htm). So if the score from which 
your reduction was taken was first published before that (and I'll wager 
the chances are that good that it was), you're in the clear.

But what if it wasn't published before '23? Original works of art are 
generally protected by copyright law for some period of time after the 
artists death. Currently, that period is 70 years, though this varies 
quite a bit depending on when the work was first published. (see above 
URI.)  After this interval, the work passes into the public domain and 
it is freely available for anyone to do with as they like. You may 
recall that horrible disco "Hooked on Classics" thing some years ago, in 
which all of the "oldies" were trashed - I'm sure Beethoven was turning 
in his grave! Nonetheless, this was perfectly legal as the tunes used 
were in the public domain.

During the period of copyright protection, the copyright owner has 
complete authority over all aspects of his or her work, including 
performance rights (ever heard of ASCAP? They protect members works from 
being performed without having paid the appropriate performance fee and 
can be quite nasty about it), reproduction rights, and the right to 
produce so-called "derivative" works, such as arrangements and 
transcriptions.

Here's an example: Many of us in America wish that America the Beautiful 
was our national song - it's so much more descriptive of the country and 
is much more musical than the Star Spangled Banner. AtB is in the public 
domain, so anyone can take that tune and make their own arrangement of 
it. Carmen Dragon did exactly that, and wrote one of the most stunning 
orchestra/band arrangments that I've ever played. While the original 
tune is in the public domain, Dragon's arrangement of it is subject to 
copyright protection. If I wanted to rearrange his version for horn 
quartet, I'd have to ask his permission (or rather his estate's 
permission as he has passed on) or I'd be subject to civil action.

In Haydn's case, it's clear that any original copyright that Haydn has 
long since expired. If you were to work from his original score, you 
could offer your reduction without any fear of liability, regardless of 
whether someone else offered a similar reduction. However, if you were 
working from some publisher's score, things would be a bit more murky. 
You'd have to check to see what the dates of publication were but a new 
transcription or rearrangement is probably encumbered, and you'd need to 
ask permission to base your work on it.

Note that the existance of a protected publication in someone elses 
catalog does not mean that you can't publish your own. You simply have 
to make sure that you base your work on something that is not protected. 
So while Leloirs reduction may still be available, that does not 
necessrily preclude you from making and offering your own.

In the final analysis, you should look at the exposure that you might 
face were you to offer your reduction. Your exposure from Leloirs is 
zero, unless you make your reduction from theirs. If you take the 
reduction from Haydn's original score, your exposure from Haydn is zero. 
Neither Leloirs or anyone else has a claim simply because you make a 
similar arrangement from a public domain source. The only exposure that 
I can see is if you take your reduction from some other publisher's 
score. (And even then, if that other score is a note-for-note 
reproduction of the original, it's not protected either - only "new" 
material can be copyrighted!)

Last note: I'm not an attorney, but for business and professional 
reasons, I've studied copyright law quite extensively. One thing I've 
learned is that there is more confusion about what copyright allows and 
what it doesn't. Check out 
http://www.law.cornell.edu/topics/copyright.html for more detailed 
information.

   Sean
message: 5
date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 14:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
from: Scott Pappal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
subject: Re: [Hornlist] haydn concerto piano reduction
All and professor Pizka:
I appreciate the information - and since I don't want
to violate any copyright laws, I must withdraw my
offer of the piano reduction to this concerto. Thank
you for the update!
Scott in Altoona
 

___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] Hose "A" can you "C"

2004-08-09 Thread HornCabbage
John K wrote

As a piano tuner with more than twenty years 
experience I can tell you that it is impossible to 
tune a piano properly with a pair of scissors.

**
Not so fast, John.  The scissors I buy at the
local store come from China, so they are tuned
to A = 445, instead of 440.  But after I use them 
for a while, they're no longer sharp at all, making
them perfect for tuning my piano.

Gotta go,
Cabbage
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Hornlist] Hose "A" Can You See?

2004-08-09 Thread Valkhorn
Hahaha, nevertheless it'd be in D.

I suppose those would be for those 4th Hosaphone parts that were in Symphonie 
Fantastique, but were later whited out when Berlioz realised they were just 
too difficult to tune. Making a Hoseaphone sharp is easy. But, adding tubing to 
make it flatter is hard.

Of course this was before the valved/slide Hoseaphone I suppose. And it was 
before PVC.

-William

In a message dated 8/9/2004 9:19:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That would then make the 25+ foot hose be pitched in D basso? Whoo! I shudder
to think of navigating those close partials.

Herb Foster
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] thanks

2004-08-09 Thread David Jewell
My thanks to all who helped with my CB liner notes request.  I have them, and can now 
rest easier, knowing what track I am listening to.  I would reccommend this cd to all, 
but since it is out of print, it is hard to track down.  Maybe if we all put enough 
pressure on PHillips records, they may reissue it, along with the out of print Hermann 
Baumann cds.
Paxmaha


-
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Hornlist] Hose "A" Can You See?

2004-08-09 Thread Herbert Foster
That would then make the 25+ foot hose be pitched in D basso? Whoo! I shudder
to think of navigating those close partials.

Herb Foster
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Well if a D hose is 14 feet, than double that length would still be a D horn
> 
> That would make it 28 feet, and so 25 feet would be close enough to work. If 
> anything it might be on the sharp side though hehe
> 
> -William
> 
> In a message dated 8/8/2004 10:51:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This seems wrong to me.   My F hosepipe horn is a bit over 12 feet.  To 
> be in D it would need to be extended quite a bit, likely about 14 feet, 
> I'd guess, or more.  It is a small bore, however, less than a half inch 
> bore, about 7/16ths as I recall.  I have a plastic funnel on the end 
> and a bit of 3/8 copper tubing as a receiver on the mouthpiece end.
> 
> Paul Mansur
> ___
> post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> unsubscribe or set options at
> http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/herb_foster%40yahoo.com
> 




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


RE: [Hornlist] haydn concerto piano reduction

2004-08-09 Thread McBeth, Amy J
If Scott has done his own piano reduction from the full score, however,
he's not breaking copyright, is he?  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Hans Pizka
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 7:36 PM
To: The Horn List
Subject: Re: [Hornlist] haydn concerto piano reduction

Hello Scott,

the piano reduction for that double concerto is not #out of print since
long#, very sorry, it is available at any time in Edmond Leloirs
reduction
from the original score, which is protected under copyright. It is K.100
or
K.099 as full score & the parts are available as well.

Greetings
Prof.Hans Pizka, on tour in Yuennan South Western China heading for
Shangri-la.

___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org