Re: [Hornlist] The moon and mars and the horn in F

2004-09-05 Thread Bill Tyler


Dan Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on how you look at it), those 
libraries already have parts, and are extremely unlikely to buy new 
ones just because horn players don't have one of the necessary basic 
skills of their craft. It's not as if creating parts in F requires some 
sort of advanced technology that's only recently been invented; 
transposed parts have been available for much standard repertoire for 
many, many years.

When given an option, I always prefer the original notation, for 
reasons already mentioned and discussed many times on this list, plus 
one other: My first opportunity to play principal horn in my 
undergraduate school's orchestra was on the Grieg Piano Concerto. I was 
given a transposed part and discovered the hard way in the first 
rehearsal that the little solo in the slow movement had a wrong note in 
it.

Dan


 

Definitely look over the transposed part as soon as you get it. Our orchestra did the 
Brahms 1st a few years ago, with the parts supplied by Luck's. I was playing third and 
had decided ahead of time to play the original part, so I had not looked at the 
transposed part. The 4th horn player called me before the first rehearsal and asked if 
those were the real notes in the 3rd movement. Whoever transposed the H Basso parts 
wrote them in bass clef (with 6 sharps) an octave too low, even for old notation. 
There were errors in the other movements, mostly articulations and dynamics ...  but 
catching them early saved a bunch of  rehearsal time.

Bill Tyler,  Memphis, 1980




-
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] Re: The moon and mars and the horn in F

2004-09-05 Thread jlmthompson

> subject: Re:The moon and mars and the horn in F
>
> > In one word?
> >
> > Tradition...

 Two words right back  .  21st Century

 Why then do we keep modernizing and improving the basic 'french horn'?
Why don't we then as far as tradition goes all go back to using natural
horns and inserting the C  or D or A or whatever crook as needed and have
our wave-like right hand fishing in and out of the bell as they did in the
past.  Let's do that with the different crooks and then put the music in the
Key of F and transpose it that way.  That could be our new tradition.  Sound
a bit inane?  To say we do it today because we did it in the past is to
foresake progressand yes, this would be in a good way.  Washing clothes
on a rock by a stream was tradition too but when something better came
along, the old was desserted.

>And what are you
> going to do when you're handed a part at rehearsal out of the library
> that's from an older set that only has the original parts?

Everyone who's reading this is doing so on a computer.  We don't have to for
example use a 'slide rule' or heaven forbid, work out mathematical problems
by hand anymore.  Do you?  The calculator/computer does it for us, so we can
move on to more 'advanced' and perplexing problems or a more advanced aspect
of the problem.  Sure it can make some lazy, but it can also make it so you
take your time and spend it on the 'next' level of the problem.  Ever have
an exposed or solo part in a odd key transposition or especially a run
that's going a mile a minute?  What are you concentrating on when the
pressure hits, the phrasing, the dynamics etc or maybe on just plain hitting
the right notes?
 I'm not talking about professionals who have the opportunity to spend
time each working day on multifacets of the horn.  I'm talking about the
vast majority who are on this list(not necessarily those who post here) and
who play in the majority of the musical organizations everywhere, amateurs
who maybe, just maybe practice 10+- hours a week.  Do we have the time to
encorporate, learn, digest and then utilize all the transpositions we need
to know?

> It's also budgetary   -- We may not be a so called 'solo' instrument but
what are we, 'chopped liver' or second class citizens?

___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Hornlist] The moon and mars and the horn in F

2004-09-05 Thread Dan Phillips
On Sep 5, 2004, at 2:56 PM, Peter Piorkowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Isn't there by now a  computer program that can be
used to put these odd transposing keyed pieces back into the key of
F for the horn and have it on manuscript
Sounds like a business opportunity. Think of all the orchestral,
operatic, and university libraries around the world you could sell
these parts to. Go for it!
___
Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on how you look at it), those 
libraries already have parts, and are extremely unlikely to buy new 
ones just because horn players don't have one of the necessary basic 
skills of their craft. It's not as if creating parts in F requires some 
sort of advanced technology that's only recently been invented; 
transposed parts have been available for much standard repertoire for 
many, many years.

When given an option, I always prefer the original notation, for 
reasons already mentioned and discussed many times on this list, plus 
one other: My first opportunity to play principal horn in my 
undergraduate school's orchestra was on the Grieg Piano Concerto. I was 
given a transposed part and discovered the hard way in the first 
rehearsal that the little solo in the slow movement had a wrong note in 
it.

Dan

Dan Phillips
Professor of Horn, University of Memphis
webmaster: http://music.memphis.edu
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


RE: [Hornlist] The moon and mars and the horn in F

2004-09-05 Thread Peter Piorkowski
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Isn't there by now a  computer program that can be
> used to put these odd transposing keyed pieces back into the key of
> F for the horn and have it on manuscript

Sounds like a business opportunity. Think of all the orchestral,
operatic, and university libraries around the world you could sell
these parts to. Go for it!
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


RE: [Hornlist] The moon and mars and the horn in F

2004-09-05 Thread John Pirtle
In another word?

Boredom...

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 12:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Hornlist] The moon and mars and the horn in F

In one word?

Tradition...

-William

In a message dated 9/4/2004 9:15:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Horn transposing is a nice science/art that a horn player has to have in
his/her bag of 'goodies', yada yada but sometimes it can be tedious and a
bit nerve racking especially when the pressure of the moment comes for an
exposed or solo part.  Isn't there by now a  computer program that can be
used to put these odd transposing keyed pieces back into the key of F for
the horn and have it on manuscript ready made for us to play.  We can put a
man on the moon and land on Mars, surely we can put the horn in F, and on
paper, can't we?
Jim
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/john.pirtle%40forsythwindquint
et.com


___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] replating valves

2004-09-05 Thread John Dutton
Bill writes:
You should reread my posting more carefully...

It does seem that you have researched the process.  Many were the brass 
instruments  I had to work on while in the Corps that had been improperly 
lapped either by hand drill or wobbly bench motor by well intending and 
otherwise fine repair persons-all of whom had been trained at respectable 
unnamed schools.  Many of these I had to replate/refit because of the 
ensuing loss of compression.  Have I the experience of more august members 
of the list? Not at all.  I guess I had just a little too much coffee the 
other day and leaped before I looked.

The Jack Attack!
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Hornlist] The moon and mars and the horn in F

2004-09-05 Thread Paul Mansur
On Sunday, September 5, 2004, at 12:14 AM, jlmthompson wrote:
Horn transposing is a nice science/art that a horn player has to have 
in
his/her bag of 'goodies', yada yada but sometimes it can be tedious 
and a
bit nerve racking especially when the pressure of the moment comes for 
an
exposed or solo part.  Isn't there by now a  computer program that can 
be
used to put these odd transposing keyed pieces back into the key of F 
for
the horn and have it on manuscript ready made for us to play.  We can 
put a
man on the moon and land on Mars, surely we can put the horn in F, and 
on
paper, can't we?
Jim

Sure we could.  But I don't want it done.  There are lessons to be 
learned in musicianship and style from playing non-transposed parts.  
First, they are easier to read; no flats or sharps to worry with.  
Second, hornists become better musicians from learning to play in all 
keys at sight.  And there is no real need to spend all that money on 
transposing horn parts!  It keeps music costs down a bit.  Sure it 
requires some effort; but who said playing a horn was going to be easy? 
 Aren't you smart enough and tough enough to learn something new?

CORdially,  Paul Mansur
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/pmansur%40bellsouth.net

___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Hornlist] Schmidt style horns

2004-09-05 Thread Chris Tedesco
I hear the Yamaha 863 is fine horn, although it's not really that old.  

Chris


--- Hurricane Chinooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Who currently makes Schmidt style horns?  I just got a vintage York
> Schmidt style horn and it has the most comfortable change valve of any
> horn I've played so far.  Also, the smoothness from one side of the horn
> to the other is wonderful.  What are the best playing older model
> Schmidt style horns out there?  Thanks.
> 
> Joyce Maley
> http://www.chinookdogs.com
> 
> 
> ___
> post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> unsubscribe or set options at
> http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/tedesccj%40yahoo.com
> 




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Hornlist] Replating of valves

2004-09-05 Thread william bamberg
You should reread my posting more carefully, how I use shims to set the 
minimum clearance between the rotor and the casing.  I should also point 
out that the human body is designed all wrong for maintaining a precise 
alignment when rotating two parts together.  Check the tool supply 
vendors for the files used to restoring the flat to a woodwind key hinge 
tube after swedging.  They can be ordered with and without handles.  If 
the shop you go to has handles, go to another shop.

With this setup I am able to use two hands to lift the horn up to a 
slowly rotating rotor.  I not only get much better feel and control, It 
allows me to use coarser grits initially without the danger of removing 
too much metal.  It also allows effective lapping with very small 
quantities of compound.

John Dutton wrote on 9/4/2004, 11:44 AM:

 >
 >
 > -Original Message-
 > For the lapping I do when I'm tightening bearings, I built a simple
 > set up
 > that lets me use my DeWalt drill to do the work.  Because I'll only have
 >  easy shot at the lapping,
 >
 > ***
 >
 > DO NOT USE A DRILL TO LAP VALVES!  A valve should be lapped for only the
 > distance it needs to travel.  By using the drill you are making more gap
 > than necessary.  This is especially true if either the casing or the
 > rotor
 > is not true and round as is the case with most horns.  I'm sure other
 > more
 > experienced techs (I am not worthy of a shingle to hang out) can give
 > better
 > reasons yet.  The drill method is most often employed by shops that do
 > school type horns and with the expected uneven results.
 >
 > The Jack Attack!
 > ___
 > post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > unsubscribe or set options at
 > http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/billbamberg%40aol.com
 >


___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] Re: Horn Digest, Vol 21, Issue 5

2004-09-05 Thread jgschreck
I play a Schmidt style horn made by Steve Lewis. It's a wonderful horn.

John Schreckengost

> --
> 
> message: 2
> date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 16:26:25 -0400
> from: Hurricane Chinooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> subject: [Hornlist] Schmidt style horns
> 
> Who currently makes Schmidt style horns?  I just got a vintage York
> Schmidt style horn and it has the most comfortable change valve of any
> horn I've played so far.  Also, the smoothness from one side of the horn
> to the other is wonderful.  What are the best playing older model
> Schmidt style horns out there?  Thanks.
> 
> Joyce Maley
> http://www.chinookdogs.com


___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] RE: NYC handhornists

2004-09-05 Thread John Dutton
-Original Message-
I need crooks for I think F and C at 440.

I guess it is worth a shot :-)



I have an "A" crook that's 440 ;-)

The Jack Attack!
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] Re: Replating of valves

2004-09-05 Thread John Dutton

When Walter Lawson taught me how to lap valves, he
said that the valve should spin freely through all
360 degrees of rotation.  If a valve is properly
lapped, one should be able to take the spindle,
spin the valve, and it should spin around freely
several times before it slows to a stop.

I have seen people lap valves so that they rotate
only 100 degrees or so, just enough to cover the
nintey degrees that is needed during actual
operation while playing the horn.  I'm presuming
that this is what jwdutton means.

Wilbert in SC

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> A valve should be lapped for only the
> distance it needs to travel.  
> 
> Could you clarify this, please?
> 
> WH
> ___

Wilbert is correct in interpretation of my words.  I agree that if a case
and rotor are true then lapping a valve by spinning will meet with the
desired results.  I am sure that Walter Lawson, Wes Hatch, et al would true
the casing with the proper tools before lapping the valve.  My admonishment
is more of the "measure twice (or thrice) before lapping once" kind.  Also,
I have seen quite a few valves improperly lapped with a drill while a tech
with the Marine Corps (not just USMC instruments).  In deference to Ray,
with the proper care and instruction it isn't necessarily hard to do but I
wouldn't start on my prized main horn as my first time out.  I'll take the
subtle hint and leave the admonishing to the acknowledged experts in the
field from now on.

The Jack Attack!
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] Duets/Trios/Quartets around Hickory, NC?

2004-09-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings -

I'll be in Hickory, North Carolina, for a week, starting Sept 13. If
anyone's interested in some duets, trios or quartets, please let me know.

Thanks,

Carlberg

Carlberg Jones
Guanajuato, Gto.
MEXICO




mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .


___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Hornlist] The moon and mars and the horn in F

2004-09-05 Thread christine williamson
You should stick with transposing your music; it's such a great skill to have. I love 
being able to transpose because I play in a few different types of groups some of 
which don't include F horn parts and I get handed tenor horn, trombone (bass & treble 
clefs), cello and even bassoon music. At first I had to work at it a bit but after a 
while it becomes second nature and I'm the only player who never misses out on a part 
to play. And you impress the others no end!! 
Chris W

- Original Message -
From: "jlmthompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 21:14:35 -0700
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Hornlist] The moon and mars and the horn in F

Re: Horn transposing is a nice science/art that a horn player has to have in
Re: his/her bag of 'goodies', yada yada but sometimes it can be tedious and a
Re: bit nerve racking especially when the pressure of the moment comes for an
Re: exposed or solo part.  Isn't there by now a  computer program that can be
Re: used to put these odd transposing keyed pieces back into the key of F for
Re: the horn and have it on manuscript ready made for us to play.  We can put a
Re: man on the moon and land on Mars, surely we can put the horn in F, and on
Re: paper, can't we?
Re: Jim
Re: 
Re: ___
Re: post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/cwill%40graffiti.net

-- 
___
Graffiti.net free e-mail @ www.graffiti.net
Check out our value-added Premium features, such as a 1 GB mailbox for just US$9.95 
per year!


Powered by Outblaze
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org