[Hornlist] Pick-up notes

2008-05-04 Thread dlundeen
Herb Foster asked me to respond on this after there was a seeming
disagreement between passionate pedagogues:)  I've thought about this a
lot trying to see whether we might be saying seemingly opposite things,
but actually be in complete agreement.

Someone else in this discussion cited the F-f' octave leap in Strauss 1 as
an example; with two undergrads playing it for their juries, it provided a
laborabory:)  When I play that leap, I BEGIN the lower note without
emphasis, but then I deepen the note, i.e. move more air volume, but open
up my mouth-space and throat, so as not to make a crescendo, then I raise
the back of the tongue, shrinking the mouthspace, speeding up the air and
achieving the leap without "landing" on the upper note.  So yes, in effect
I end up playing the lower note "stronger" than the upper note.  And
here's the bottom line for me: playing the horn (and I think musical
instruments in general) is about doing the right thing HORIZONTALLY.  The
agogic (strong beat) accent that I was identifying as being essential to a
singing approach is a HORIZONTAL "accent", not a vertical one.  Vertical
thinking (other than for playing "together") is the enemy of vocal-style.

In this context, I'd like to point out that my belief is that the greatest
quality of Western art music is melody.  When we go to music school we
start being taught about "chords" and "Roman numerals" and are taught to
realize figured bass.  We look at other world musics and identify them as
not having harmonic language and so think that this is the defining
characteristic of Western music.  If you really look at the way "chords"
developed it has been the coincidental result of simultaneous melodies. 
For example we can see that the augmented 6th chord arose from chromatic
voice-leading.  Our musical heritage up until very recently has been based
on melody, and from plain-chant to Mozart to Mahler there is much to
support this argument.  Not that other elements of music are not
significant, compelling, interesting, whatever, but in the end, it's the
tune we end up whistling:)

Respectfully submitted,

Doug Lundeen
___
post: horn@music.memphis.edu
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music2.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] Pick-up notes

2008-04-20 Thread dlundeen
It seems to me that most melodies can have words added to them.  I'm sure
many of us do this when trying to teach our students how we want them to
phrase or to illustrate the emotional content.  A singer has to have a
very clear picture of the entire phrase before he starts, especially the
emphasis points to which the breath leads.  If the libretto has been set
effectively, the stressed syllables will fall on the strong beats, and the
words with the most emotive content will have the longest duration and be
sung with a "mezza di voce" i.e. slight swell (emphasis on slight, NOT
twah-twah), to make sure that the air continues to move forward rather
than become static.  Pick-up notes aren't thrown away, but neither are
they goals in a phrase, the strong beats and sustained notes are the
goals, and appogiaturae are especially important points of stress to which
the air must lead and "blossoom" through.  Frequently, students make the
highest note of the phrase the "goal" or are "confrontational" about the
first note regardless of its relative weight in the overall phrase, thus
leading to interpretations that frequently put the em-PHA-sis on the wrong
syl-LA-bel, which only serves to inhibit technical execution.


___
post: horn@music.memphis.edu
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music2.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] Hand in Telemann?

2008-03-13 Thread dlundeen
Refer to Tom Hebert's DMA dissertation about the Court Orchestra in
Dresden.  Around 1718 works by Heinichen, Pisendel, et al. start employing
notes outside the harmonic series beyond the F-natural and A natural.  I
don't know any players who can "lip" e-flats and a-flats in the staff into
tune.  I think we have to infer that at least in Dresden, an early form of
hand-stopping was in use by this date.  This would make sense, as far as
Hampel being someone, then, who was expanding on a technique that was
already being used in Dresden in the previous generation.  The fact that
Bach was living in the Saxon political and cultural region and had his
music performed in Dresden, would lead one to the conclusion that this
hand technique was known throughout Saxony and Thuringia.  Telemann was
the first choice for Bach's Leipzig position, surely he would have known
about this practice.

Handel is probably another issue.  One of the horn histories, I believe
Morely-Pegge discusses a reference to the remarkable feature that a horn
soloist gave a concert in the early 1750's and played in different keys on
the same instrument.  This may very well indicate that the crooked horn
was a novelty in England at that date, meaning that the horns in use
before then were fixed-pitch hunting horns.  Note that Handel's parts
differ harmonically from Bach's.  Handel never writes the d and a (above
the staff) as a sustained harmonic interval, but Bach does this all the
time.  This one feature out of many, leads me to believe that we should
use the hand in Bach and play bell's up for Handel.  I'd love to get a
chance to just let the Handel parts fly with the out-of-tune partials
adding "piquancy" rather than using the nodal venting, which is of course,
completely un-historic.



___
post: horn@music.memphis.edu
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music2.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] Horn in Ut

2007-12-02 Thread dlundeen
Just for the historical record.  "Ut" for "C" comes from the original
medieval notational system devised by Guido de Arezzo.  He noted that each
phrase of the hymn, Ut queant laxis began on a successive step higher (for
six steps).  This hymn became the basis for his hexachord solfege system,
which is the predecessor of our modern solfege scale.  He named each pitch
of the hexachord for the beginning syllable of the the line of text:

(Grout page 59 and following)
Ut queant laxis
Resonare fibris
Mira gestorum
Famuli tuorum
Solve polluti
Labii reatum, Sancte Joannes

(Grout page 59 and following)

I don't know when the "ut" got changed to "do."  Probably "do" is easier
to sing?

DL


___
post: horn@music.memphis.edu
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music2.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] soft playing

2007-12-01 Thread dlundeen
Agreed, we can suffer paralysis by analysis, and the bodily coordinations
necessary for achieving a reliable technique on the instrument must become
unconcious, but perhaps there are intellectual understandings that can be
helpful.  Also, we all learn differently.

I remember as a young player (with my C-1 mouthpiece:) ) I LOVED to play
loudly and hated when we would play Mozart and had to play even high-G
piano.  In fact, I remember we thought that composers who wrote soft and
high for the horn just didn't get what was great about the instrument:) 
It was always easier to play softer higher on my C-12, but I couldn't get
as fat a sound and it would "edge" sooner.  Perhaps examining why smaller
equipment would make soft playing easier provides a clue.

The most important thing to remember is that what one is doing on a brass
instrument is causing a standing wave to arise in the instrument.  As I
understand it the standing wave is both radiating out of the instrument's
bell and also reflecting back toward the player.  It is the relative
strength of this reflected wave that accounts for the sensation of
"resistance."  The lips, rather than making a sound or "buzzing" are
actually opening and closing like louvers at the frequency of the pitch
being produced.  (There were strobe photo films taken of Montreal Symphony
players on clear lucite mouthpieces a number of years ago that proved
this.)  The most efficient playing occurs when the air speed, volume and
pressure, lip contraction and reflected wave are in equillibrium for the
desired pitch and volume.  If one chooses very deep or large-bore
mouthpiece equipment, or a very large bell throat, or both, one reduces
the strength of the reflected wave, the reflected wave acting to some
degree as support for the lips.  This means that the lip contraction has
to do more of the work to resist the tendency of the lips to "prolapse"
into the mouthpiece.

I remember my soft playing used to be a "stifled" forte.  I came to
realize that soft playing requires a smaller lip opening and less air
volume and pressure.  Nowadays I try to think of releasing the mouthpiece
pressure when going from forte to piano to facilitate the contraction of
the lip opening, which in piano (and in the upper range) is much smaller
than the diameter of the mouthpiece rim.

Taking into account that everything is a compromise, if one doesn't have
the strongest chops in the world, or the practice time needed to maintain
an extremely robust embouchure, choosing equipment that favors a stronger
reflected wave can make the lower dynamics easier.  There will be a
sacrifice of fatness and "darkness" especially in the local environment
(i.e. what you hear right out of the bell).  That said, there are many
leading players who use smaller mouthpiece equipment and horns who are
capable of playing amazing orchestral fortissimi, but their setups don't
blow "freely" and there can be a fair amount of "noise" in the sound if
you listen to what's coming out of the bell.  However this "noise" does
not carry into the hall, the listener hears a virile sound with a
tremendous amount of "core."

Respectfully submitted,

Douglas Lundeen
Assoc. Prof. of Horn
Rutgers University
www.brassrootstrio.com


___
post: horn@music.memphis.edu
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music2.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] Giardinelli Mouthpieces

2007-11-28 Thread dlundeen
I grew up in the NYC Metro playing a large-bell silver horn starting on a
C-12 and moving to a C-1 later on and emulating the Chambers/Bloom
aesthetic with some success:)  At CCM years later, working on a DMA for
which I had to prepare 4 recitals, it occurred to me that I needed
different equipment for solo/chamber and bought an Alex Single-B that
Kendall Betts had on consignment with Walter Lawson.  It became
immediately obvious that the Alex needed a different mouthiece.  I used a
Schilke 30B for about 10 years until the narrowness of the diameter began
to feel restrictive.  I am told that as we get older, we need to go to
larger diameters and this has held true for me.  I think that Schilke 30B
had a 16.9mm inner diameter.  I first moved to an Orval from Stork with a
slightly narrow 17.5, then tried some other 17.5 Tilz models (Angerer,
McWilliam), 17.5 Paxman (4B, 4C with both standard and narrow rims) 17.5
Klier (various cups in the M and K series) and finally the
Halstead-Chidell line.  I've given a lot of these mouthpieces extensive
trials of at least a few months to several years (wary of the "honeymoon"
and backlash effects of changing equipment.)  I'm currently using the
Halstead Chidell AN (a large 17.5) rim and switching between the
20,21A,22A and 23A cups depending on which of my horns I'm using (ranging
from an Alex 107s compensating descant to a 303G full triple) and whether
I'm playing solo/recital or large orchestra.  I think it makes sense to
use a mouthpiece system that has a variety of rims that interchange with a
variety of cups.

Empirically, it has seemed to me that the rim has to fit the player and
the cup has to fit the horn.

Doug Lundeen
Brass Roots Trio
Assoc. Prof. of Horn
Rugers University
___
post: horn@music.memphis.edu
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music2.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] Graudate Study

2007-11-18 Thread dlundeen
Graduate Horn Opportunities for 2008-09

Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (close to NYC and Philadelphia)

1 or 2 MM - Awards up to full tuition plus $4K
1 or 2 DMA or Artist Diploma - Tuition plus minimum $6K

Instruction in orchestra, chamber, solo and original instrument. Studio
will provide Baroque and Classical natural horns by Lowell Greer and
Richard Seraphinoff. Good freelance playing opportunities.

Contact: Douglas Lundeen, Prof. of Horn - [EMAIL PROTECTED] rutgers.edu




___
post: horn@music.memphis.edu
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music2.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org