RE: [Hornlist] RE: Cryogenicall Frozen horn

2005-04-28 Thread Robert Osmun
Hi List,

I usually try to avoid controversy or blatant advertising on the horn list
but I feel I need to respond to the comments made by THE VOICE regarding
cryogenic processing. His unsupported remarks are a direct attack on my
integrity and have no place on this list.

If Mr. THE VOICE reads our promotional literature carefully he will notice
that nowhere do we make specific claims for the results to be obtained by
cryogenically processing. What we do say, and I reiterate here, is that we,
and over 99% of the several hundred customers who have had instruments
processed by us, feel that the instruments were improved and that the
process was worth the time and the money. The effects of cryogenic
processing are subtle and definitely fall into the last five per cent of
horn modifications, for players looking to get as much as they can from
their equipment. It's not for student instruments or for casual (I don't
mean amateur) players. The tests recently undertaken at Tufts University by
Selmer, utilizing a panel of high school students and weekend warriors are a
case in point. You don't get smart answers by asking dumb questions.

Since Mr. THE VOICE writes under a pseudonym we have no way of knowing what
qualifications he has for making his attack. I have to suspect that he's an
engineer or a science type who knows that the physical changes that take
place in steel when cryogenically treated have no parallel in brass.
Therefore he concludes that, since he hasn't measured any change, none has
taken place. (Remember, these are the same guys who proved that the material
or thickness of an instrument has no effect on the sound.) It seems to me
that, when confronted by an unexplained phenomenon that has been confirmed
by many experienced musicians, the thoughtful scientist would be looking for
an experiment to explain it, not casually dismissing it as a scam.

Those of us who have spent years working to improve instruments and the
playing experience for our customers work in a subtle realm and deal in
differences in instruments and playing qualities that are invisible and
inaudible to the laymen, or even to many musicians. Indeed, a lot of the
tonal differences we sweat over don't travel much past the podium. Lots of
good players can't hear (or are indifferent to) loose valves, red brass,
garlands, (pitch), etc., but that doesn't mean that everyone should ignore
these qualities. Cryogenics is one more arrow in the quiver.

A candidate for a job in a professional orchestra (not Chicago, New York,
Boston, just a small regional orchestra) will have to audition against
100-200 people to win his job. That's just the number who the audition
committee actually hears, not all the applicants. Those are pretty tough
odds. Studies of stress have shown that being a principal horn player is one
of the most stressful of jobs. These people need the best and most finely
tuned equipment they can get. Don't ask me to throw away a valuable tool
without a better supported analysis than the one presented here.

Bob Osmun
www.osmun.com



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of THE
VOICE OF THE GUILD
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:16 PM
To: hornlist
Subject: [Hornlist] RE: Cryogenicall Frozen horn

from: Steve Freides [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subject: [Hornlist] Cryogenically Frozen horn

I was poking around looking at used horns on the Internet and found one that
said the horn had been cryogenically frozen by Osmun - could anyone
explain this process to me, please? (The horn wasn't for sale at Osmun, it
was at Dillon Music in NJ.)

Steve,
 Cryogenically freezing a horn is a proven method of removing money from
your pocket. Enjoy the rest of the posts, but this is the truth.
 
THE VOICE
___
post: horn@music.memphis.edu
unsubscribe or set options at
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/rosmun%40osmun.com

___
post: horn@music.memphis.edu
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


RE: [Hornlist] RE: Cryogenicall Frozen horn

2005-04-28 Thread Alan Cole
Dear Friends,
I don't know the identity of the mystery E-Mailer  I have no dog in this 
particular fight.  Still  all, I believe it's possible Mr. or Ms. Voice 
was just poking fun (as folks do on this list sometimes) rather than 
attacking integrity -- pretty much like pointing out that Walt Disney would 
spare no expense in the pursuit of making money.

However that may be (or possibly may not be), I strongly suspect (on the 
basis of no analysis  zero experience) that it would be advisable for most 
of us who are in operational contact with brass instruments to spend more 
time practicing them  less money freezing them.  If I'm wrong, it's not 
for the 1st time.

In my case, I'm guessing the tangible benefit I would get from cryogenic 
treatment of my horn would be about the same as the tangible benefit I 
would get from taking a couple of ibuprofen tablets before a performance, I 
don't know.

The main thing about cryogenic treatment I don't understand is whether it 
can be reversed.  That is, suppose I have my Josef Lidl compensating double 
horn or my Holton Farkas Model full double horn treated cryogenically  
after the treatment I decide the horn plays worse than before the 
treatment.  How do I get the cryogenic treatment undone?  Heating beyond a 
certain point would melt the solder, no?

I'm guessing that nothing can be done to reverse cryogenic treatment of 
brass instruments.  If I have my horn frozen  don't like the result, all I 
can do is sell off the treated horn  buy an untreated replacement.  Then 
again, when I list the treated horn on eBay, I can sing the praises of its 
cryogenic enhancement to bid up the price.

And despite the fact I have no dog in the cryogenics fight, I do have 
experience with Osmun Brass -- positive experience.  Years ago I bought 1 
of their close-out Yamaha YHR-666 horns for $1,050 brand new.  Great 
horn.  Great deal.  Shucks, they're going for more than that nowadays after 
20+ years of use -- when you can even find 1 at all (they're becoming 
semi-rare).  I gave the horn to my then-teenage son, who gave up horn after 
a couple of years  sold the YHR-666 (for more than Osmun Brass charged for 
it new)  used the proceeds to buy a rock  roll electronic keyboard 
instrument.  So it goes.

-- Alan Cole, rank amateur
   McLean (Fairfax County), Virginia, USA.
~
I feel I need to respond to the comments made by THE VOICE regarding 
cryogenic processing. His unsupported remarks are a direct attack on my 
integrity and have no place on this list.

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.4 - Release Date: 4/27/2005
___
post: horn@music.memphis.edu
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Hornlist] RE: Cryogenicall Frozen horn

2005-04-28 Thread billbamberg
I am an engineer, and I don't find it difficult to believe a small improvement 
can be had through the process.  My suspicion is that the low temperature 
contraction generates forces that can stretch stresses out of parts that may 
have been forced to mate during assembly.  With a little thought, it should be 
possible to duplicate that condition and directly measure the effect of 
cryogenic cooling.  It wouldn't surprise me if the effect comes from 
differential cooling, in which case, running the instrument through the cycle 
several times, rather tha soaking, might have more effect.  This theory also 
predicts that some horns will respond more than others.
 
When doing product engineering, there are a never ending string of problems 
that must be solved.  Gross problems must be solved first before the more 
subtle ones are recognizable above the noise.  Cryogenics isn't going to make a 
noticible difference unless the horn is pretty well debugged to start with.
 
If you want to try something that I have found can make a huge difference to a 
factory horn, buy an adjustible blade, 15/32 reamer, from McMaster-Carr, and 
open up all the internal solder joints to a full .468 bore.  I'm beginning to 
believe the small constrictions of the bore define distinct resonating chambers 
that subtly color the overtones.  You'll be amazed at how much crud come out 
before a .468 ball will pass.
 
-Original Message-
From: Robert Osmun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'THE VOICE OF THE GUILD' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'The Horn List' 
horn@music.memphis.edu
Sent: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:32:26 -0400
Subject: RE: [Hornlist] RE: Cryogenicall Frozen horn


Hi List,

I usually try to avoid controversy or blatant advertising on the horn list
but I feel I need to respond to the comments made by THE VOICE regarding
cryogenic processing. His unsupported remarks are a direct attack on my
integrity and have no place on this list.

If Mr. THE VOICE reads our promotional literature carefully he will notice
that nowhere do we make specific claims for the results to be obtained by
cryogenically processing. What we do say, and I reiterate here, is that we,
and over 99% of the several hundred customers who have had instruments
processed by us, feel that the instruments were improved and that the
process was worth the time and the money. The effects of cryogenic
processing are subtle and definitely fall into the last five per cent of
horn modifications, for players looking to get as much as they can from
their equipment. It's not for student instruments or for casual (I don't
mean amateur) players. The tests recently undertaken at Tufts University by
Selmer, utilizing a panel of high school students and weekend warriors are a
case in point. You don't get smart answers by asking dumb questions.

Since Mr. THE VOICE writes under a pseudonym we have no way of knowing what
qualifications he has for making his attack. I have to suspect that he's an
engineer or a science type who knows that the physical changes that take
place in steel when cryogenically treated have no parallel in brass.
Therefore he concludes that, since he hasn't measured any change, none has
taken place. (Remember, these are the same guys who proved that the material
or thickness of an instrument has no effect on the sound.) It seems to me
that, when confronted by an unexplained phenomenon that has been confirmed
by many experienced musicians, the thoughtful scientist would be looking for
an experiment to explain it, not casually dismissing it as a scam.

Those of us who have spent years working to improve instruments and the
playing experience for our customers work in a subtle realm and deal in
differences in instruments and playing qualities that are invisible and
inaudible to the laymen, or even to many musicians. Indeed, a lot of the
tonal differences we sweat over don't travel much past the podium. Lots of
good players can't hear (or are indifferent to) loose valves, red brass,
garlands, (pitch), etc., but that doesn't mean that everyone should ignore
these qualities. Cryogenics is one more arrow in the quiver.

A candidate for a job in a professional orchestra (not Chicago, New York,
Boston, just a small regional orchestra) will have to audition against
100-200 people to win his job. That's just the number who the audition
committee actually hears, not all the applicants. Those are pretty tough
odds. Studies of stress have shown that being a principal horn player is one
of the most stressful of jobs. These people need the best and most finely
tuned equipment they can get. Don't ask me to throw away a valuable tool
without a better supported analysis than the one presented here.

Bob Osmun
www.osmun.com



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of THE
VOICE OF THE GUILD
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:16 PM
To: hornlist
Subject: [Hornlist] RE: Cryogenicall Frozen horn

from: Steve Freides [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subject: [Hornlist

RE: [Hornlist] RE: Cryogenicall Frozen horn

2005-04-28 Thread Chris Tedesco
There was a 667V listed, and sold I assume, on hornplayer.net that said it had
been cryogenically frozen.  I emailed the seller and asked him about it and he
said it did make a difference.  Whether or not it was improvement was
subjective, but he said it definetly didn't make it any worse.  He said that he
had it done after the horn was fairly well broken in, so the effects were
expectedly less dramatic.  

Exactly like it says on the Resonance Enhancement page, he said the effects
were easily felt but sort of hard to describe.  

Now I wonder, would this process work on a lacquered horn?  


Chris
--- Pandolfi, Orlando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Having tested horns that underwent this process both before and after,
 there is undoubtedly a difference.  Some horns were much improved, in my
 opinion.  Other horns didn't seem to need the process.  As for the horn
 on the internet...who is to say?  Nevertheless, I would not be quite so
 dismissive. 
 
 O.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
 Of THE VOICE OF THE GUILD
 Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:16 PM
 To: hornlist
 Subject: [Hornlist] RE: Cryogenicall Frozen horn
 
 from: Steve Freides [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 subject: [Hornlist] Cryogenically Frozen horn
 
 I was poking around looking at used horns on the Internet and found one
 that
 said the horn had been cryogenically frozen by Osmun - could anyone
 explain this process to me, please? (The horn wasn't for sale at Osmun,
 it
 was at Dillon Music in NJ.)
 
 Steve,
  Cryogenically freezing a horn is a proven method of removing money
 from your pocket. Enjoy the rest of the posts, but this is the truth.
  
 THE VOICE
 ___
 post: horn@music.memphis.edu
 unsubscribe or set options at
 http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/pandolfi%40deerfield.edu
 ___
 post: horn@music.memphis.edu
 unsubscribe or set options at
 http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/tedesccj%40yahoo.com
 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
post: horn@music.memphis.edu
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


RE: [Hornlist] RE: Cryogenicall Frozen horn

2005-04-28 Thread Bill Gross
Osmun folks could probably answer better, but I would think the process
would cause the lacquer to fall off.  Difference in thermal coefficients
between the metal and the lacquer would cause differential dimension changes
causing the bond between the metal and lacquer to fail.  Or so I would
think. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chris Tedesco
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 12:32 PM
To: The Horn List
Subject: RE: [Hornlist] RE: Cryogenicall Frozen horn

There was a 667V listed, and sold I assume, on hornplayer.net that said it
had
been cryogenically frozen.  I emailed the seller and asked him about it and
he
said it did make a difference.  Whether or not it was improvement was
subjective, but he said it definetly didn't make it any worse.  He said that
he
had it done after the horn was fairly well broken in, so the effects were
expectedly less dramatic.  

Exactly like it says on the Resonance Enhancement page, he said the effects
were easily felt but sort of hard to describe.  

Now I wonder, would this process work on a lacquered horn?  


Chris
--- Pandolfi, Orlando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Having tested horns that underwent this process both before and after,
 there is undoubtedly a difference.  Some horns were much improved, in my
 opinion.  Other horns didn't seem to need the process.  As for the horn
 on the internet...who is to say?  Nevertheless, I would not be quite so
 dismissive. 
 
 O.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
 Of THE VOICE OF THE GUILD
 Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:16 PM
 To: hornlist
 Subject: [Hornlist] RE: Cryogenicall Frozen horn
 
 from: Steve Freides [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 subject: [Hornlist] Cryogenically Frozen horn
 
 I was poking around looking at used horns on the Internet and found one
 that
 said the horn had been cryogenically frozen by Osmun - could anyone
 explain this process to me, please? (The horn wasn't for sale at Osmun,
 it
 was at Dillon Music in NJ.)
 
 Steve,
  Cryogenically freezing a horn is a proven method of removing money
 from your pocket. Enjoy the rest of the posts, but this is the truth.
  
 THE VOICE
 ___
 post: horn@music.memphis.edu
 unsubscribe or set options at
 http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/pandolfi%40deerfield.edu
 ___
 post: horn@music.memphis.edu
 unsubscribe or set options at
 http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/tedesccj%40yahoo.com
 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
post: horn@music.memphis.edu
unsubscribe or set options at
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/bgross%40airmail.net


___
post: horn@music.memphis.edu
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] RE: Cryogenicall Frozen horn

2005-04-27 Thread THE VOICE OF THE GUILD
from: Steve Freides [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subject: [Hornlist] Cryogenically Frozen horn

I was poking around looking at used horns on the Internet and found one that
said the horn had been cryogenically frozen by Osmun - could anyone
explain this process to me, please? (The horn wasn't for sale at Osmun, it
was at Dillon Music in NJ.)

Steve,
 Cryogenically freezing a horn is a proven method of removing money
from your pocket. Enjoy the rest of the posts, but this is the truth.
 
THE VOICE
___
post: horn@music.memphis.edu
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org