RE: [Hornlist] Wagner's anti-Semitism

2004-07-04 Thread Paul Kampen
Message text written by The Horn List
Protestants beat catholics in Ireland,

Dear Prof and List

This was a particularly fascinating and informative posting - the reason
why I enjoy some of the Non horn related messages most of all.

However, this comment must be treated with caution.  In the early 70s I
shared a flat  with two colleagues from Belfast;  they were very close
friends.  One was a Catholic and one a Protestant and they said that they
would never dare to visit each other at home as both families had very hard
line views.  They both said that 'The Troubles' (which were then at their
height) had little to do with religion and much more to do with politics.

The history of Ireland is very complex and has become clouded by a lot of
myths and legends (Cromwell at Drogheda - he hated the Irish and massacred
the population - true or false?).  This has been compounded by what seems
to modern people as the stupidity and arrogance of absentee landlords and
British Governments. But on the other hand, the agricultural methods and
the dividing of land holdings between successive generations of sons could
not support the growing population of Ireland in the 19th century any more
than it could in the Highlands of Scotland.  But that does not excuse the
brutal 'Highland Clearances'.  Take the Easter Rising in Dublin - its
leaders were a joke to most Dubliners;  that is until the British
government executed them and turned them into martyrs.  But there again, if
it was not for WW1, Ireland would have been given its rightful independence
in full (no partition).  But actually, if that had happened, would the
majority of the  north's population have accepted that? What about General
Sir Hubert Gough (a dashing cavalry officer who 'masterminded' the
Passchendaele campaign, got sacked for the disaster that followed and lived
into the 1950s wracked with guilt and writing self-justifying books) who
had led the 'Curragh' revolt of like minded Northern Irish army officers
just before WW1.

I think that we have got into very dangerous waters here!

Regards

Paul Kampen
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


RE: [Hornlist] Wagner's anti-Semitism

2004-06-29 Thread Jonathan West

 As a human being, Wagner was a disgusting man. But what an artist.

There lies the main issue. It seems to me that various points follow on from
this.

1. It is possible to be a great artist and at the same time to be a complete
shit. It is even surprisingly common!

2. It is a valid field of study to determine in what way and to what extent
Wagner's personal/political views influenced his art. It is also valid to
study what effect his art had on subsequent politics. Art does affect other
aspects of life.

3. It is necessary (in my view) to consider Wagner's views and behaviour in
the context of his time. It is generally a mistake to condemn people for
acting in a way that was within the range of normal behaviour of their time
when standards have changed since then. (I have not myself made sufficient
study of Wagner's life to express an opinion on whether his behaviour and
views were repulsive by the standards of his day.)

4. Even the most repulsive people can enjoy great art, and it is not of
itself a condemnation of Wagner that his music was used for evil purposes,
though it can affect the way it is perceived by future generations.

5. Because of all of this, it is a matter of personal opinion as to what
extent Wagner's anti-semitism undermines the value of his art, and people
can genuinely and honestly disagree on this point.

There are those who refuse any association with Wagner's music because of
his views and because of the uses to which his music was put. Some people
treat the art in isolation and enjoy it for its own sake. Others enjoy and
appreciate the art, but nonetheless feel some degree of discomfort in their
knowledge of the views of the composer and the purposes the music has been
used for.

All these are reasonable responses, and I would like to point out to
everyone on the list that simply because somebody else has a different view,
it doesn't of itself mean that they are wrong. It simply means that they are
bringing a different set of experiences to the issue, and that those
experiences are causing them to apply their values to the issue in a
different way.

This is a discussion that will run for as long as Wagner's music remains
known.

Jonathan West

___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


RE: [Hornlist] Wagner's anti-Semitism

2004-06-29 Thread Hans Pizka
While I can agree with you on most points I might ask you one thing:

Were the composers of the German  Austrian Marching music anti-Semitic,
just because their compositions were used by any SS-brass band ? No,
they weren´t, as even the hornists of an SS-brass band or a fire guard
band blew straight into the horn while the sounds escaped cracked quite
often. There was a difference indeed, as the cracking horn player of the
SS-brass band had to stand guard for another night perhaps, or if he
cracked too often, he was transferred to the front troupes.

You cannot say, that the music influences politics, but I agree, that
the right emphatic music can be abused  became abused often, to
enthusiasm common people as well as people of high education. The world
is some kind of irrational, special in the music or around the music.

You also should consider - you did it to a greater extent already - that
there is a big difference between anti Judaism (related to religion) and
anti Zionism (a mere political issue).

You also might consider, that despite of Wagners´s anti judaistic
speeches  writings, many German speaking people of Jewish tradition
became enthusiastic about Wagner´s artistic creation. Some of them
became great interpreters of his art as singers or conductors (e.g.
Levi). Hans Richter was an anti semite , but he had reason which you
might understand if you read about the music politics at the Vienna
Imperial Opera House around 1900 with all the intrigues which culminated
by replacing Richter by Gustav Mahler. So it was just personal hate.

We could discuss this topic for weeks, but it might be better to return
to enjoy Wagner´s music. I enjoy reading the facsimiles of his scores in
all their perfection, created by a most imperfect human being.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jonathan West
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 10:13 AM
To: The Horn List
Subject: RE: [Hornlist] Wagner's anti-Semitism


 As a human being, Wagner was a disgusting man. But what an artist.

There lies the main issue. It seems to me that various points follow on
from
this.

1

___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Hornlist] Wagner's anti-Semitism

2004-06-29 Thread Paul Mansur
On Tuesday, June 29, 2004, at 08:40 AM, Hans Pizka wrote:

As a human being, Wagner was a disgusting man. But what an artist.
There lies the main issue. It seems to me that various points follow on
from
this.
One of my favorite readings is a short chapter on Wagner found in Of 
Men and Music, a series of Deems Taylor's critiques collected into book 
form.  This little critique of Wagner is entitled: The Monster.  It's 
worth finding it and reading it, friends.

Cheers,  Paul Mansur
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


[Hornlist] Wagner's anti-Semitism

2004-06-28 Thread RossTE
Herr Professor Pizka asks:

 Seriously, why do so many of you point on Wagner as an anti-Semite (he
 was, off course)  not to his perfect dramatic music

The reaction the Professor refers to is almost instinctive with me as well, 
because Wagner presents an ethical challenge. Looking at his music only, as the 
Professor states, Wagner produced incredible music -- music that at times is 
almost rapturous. 

But as a human being, Wagner was horrific. He was not only anti-Semitic, but 
also cuckolded several friends in the course of his frequent adulteries, and 
he skipped out on his debts numerous times. So the question is, how can such 
beauty arise from such slime, such utter filth? Is there no connection between 
the beautiful and the ethical? Certainly not with Wagner, at any rate.


The Professor also states:

 His anti-Semitism has nothing to do with his operatic creations. 

This statement is more problematic. The Britannica states that evidence of 
anti-Semitism in his operas was increasingly documented in the late 20th 
century.  Others disagree. But the sagas, and particularly the Ring, contained 
German folklore, about the alleged origins of the German peoples, and to Wagner, 
that definitely excluded the Jews. 

Moreover, of course, the Nazis found a spiritual father in Wagner's music. 
That should not be too surprising, especially considering that Wagner is 
credited with coining two of the most horrid of expressions ever to befoul human 
language: the Jewish problem, and the final solution -- by which he meant the 
disappearance of Jews and Judaism. There are also his vile writings on 
Judaism. In a Das Judenthum in der Musik, Wagner wrote that Jewish music lacks all 
expression, is marked by coldness and indifference, triviality and nonsense. The 
Jew, he claimed, has no true passion to impel him to artistic creation. The 
Jewish composer, according to Wagner, makes a confused heap of the forms and 
styles of all ages and masters. To admit a Jew into the world of art results in 
pernicious consequences. Wagner spoke of the harmful influence of Jewry on 
the morality of the nation, adding that the subversive power of Jewry stands in 
contrast to the German psyche. He spoke of the involuntary repellence 
possessed for us by the nature and personality of the Jews, so as to vindicate that 
instinctive dislike which we plainly recognize as stronger and more 
overpowering than our conscious zeal to rid ourselves thereof, and said Jews were 
freaks of nature.

All these ideas, together with the ultranationalistic character of his 
operas, especially The Ring, provided a seedbed for Nazi ideology and cultural 
ideas. 

It is also difficult to separate the music from the anti-Semitism, because 
Wagner considered himself a philosopher first, and a composer only second. 

There is an inconsistency on this issue -- Wagner was not the only rabid 
anti-Semite among composers. Bruchner and Chopin were also. Carl Orff was a a 
self-declared, card-holding Nazi. Carmina Burana was composed in 1937 expressly 
for the leaders of the Nazi regime.

Richard Strauss in his actions was anti-Semitic, although perhaps more out of 
an amoral pragmatism. Appointed head of the Reichsmusikkammer in 1933; in his 
two years there he managed to get all performing Jewish artists removed from 
public view. At the same time however, he apparently was willing to work with 
a Jewish librettist, Stefan Zweig. He also refused the Nazi authorities when 
they asked him to rewrite the Midsummer Night's Dream, which they wanted in 
order to rid it of its composer's Jewish name. Orff, by contrast, agreed to do it 
(but it wasn't done, in the end).

This less-than-fully vigorous approach to anti-Semitism also distinguishes 
Strauss from others such as Von Karajan.  Von Karajan became a Nazi early on, in 
1933, and promptly excluded all Jewish musicians. 

But it was Wagner's music that the Nazis enthusiastically embraced; it was 
Wagner's music that accompanied the Nazi horrors. And since music touches the 
emotions so strongly, it is difficult to separate our emotional reactions to 
Wagner as a person from Wagner solely as a musical composer. 

Ross Taylor
Tacoma, Washington








___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org


RE: [Hornlist] Wagner's anti-Semitism

2004-06-28 Thread Hans Pizka
 of the 19th century culminating in the holocaust,
yes, but this is a historic fact. Today´s generation in Europe wants
peace, peace  peace again, living all together in peaceful
understanding  respecting each other including the cultural differences
or facettes. - Mendelssohn has gained the high importance in the music,
he deserves. Mahler is equally popular to other composers.

Ooops, I forgot Bruckner, who you also mentioned as anti semitic. I
cannot feel any anti Semitism in his art. May-be he was a bit anti
semitic as most catholics are, but this is a phenomenon each other.
Jewish don’t like catholics much, Protestants beat catholics in Ireland,
muslim fight with Hindu, muslim fight with Buddhists, etc. All is human.

I beg you just one thing, Ross, do not play Wagner, Strauss, Bruckner,
Orff or Mozart , leave them alone, .. if you hate them. De mortuis
nihil nisi bene.

=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 7:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Hornlist] Wagner's anti-Semitism

___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/hans.pizka%40t-online.de

___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at 
http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org