Re: [HOT] Map-a-thon getting 509 Bandwidth Exceeded error

2015-06-21 Thread Nicholas Doiron
Hi Mikel,

I sent the IP address to the osm-dev IRC chat about 24 hours ago. Maybe
someone can dig it up?

I should note that I was running an app to review our users' changesets and
count features added. This may have pushed us over a short-term throttling
limit, but not the longer-term daily limits.
https://github.com/mapmeld/osm-scorekeeper

There are three more organic factors which affected our downloading:
- our new mappers panned and zoomed over a large area, downloading more data
- our area is dense with buildings data
- our area has many Mongolian gers, which are circular ways

I was under the impression that people *can* request a reset, if an admin
is online, but admins currently can't schedule or whitelist IPs ahead of
time.

If there's anyone who would look over the C++ for the rate limiter

and explain it to a web-stack developer like myself, please contact me
off-list.

-- Nick Doiron

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Mikel Maron  wrote:

> Nick
>
> Yes, this is probably due to a shared IP address for that lab. This
> problem has been seen before at mapathons, but usually with much higher
> number of users. Usually, the rate-limiting will ease off after a time, so
> it should've been available again later.
>
> The OSMF Operations team won't currently make exceptions to the
> rate-limiting policy. But they do think it should be an unusually high
> volume situation to trip the bandwidth limits. I think it's worth asking if
> one of them will investigate more closely to see if there was something
> unusual in the situation of your mapathon. Do you have the IP address for
> the mapathon venue?
>
> -Mikel
>
> * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
>
>
>
>   On Saturday, June 20, 2015 1:45 AM, Nicholas Doiron <
> ni...@codeforamerica.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm working with The Asia Foundation to run an OpenStreetMap map-a-thon in
> Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. We have 17 teams of 3 people, mostly students and
> city planners, mapping unplanned areas of the city (ger districts)
>
> At 3:30pm local time, we got a 509 Bandwidth Exceeded error on most teams'
> machines, so we had to end our first day early.  No one's data is lost, but
> we can't download existing data into iD, so every map area looks blank.
> There was a risk we would add the same building many times.
>
> Is there a way for us to re-enabling editing before tomorrow morning? And
> keep the gates open for another 48 hours or so?
> I'll do my part by closing a couple of apps (including Show Me The Way
> from OSM Labs) which were running at the time
>
> Regards,
> Nick Doiron
>
> ___
> HOT mailing list
> HOT@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
>
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] Map-a-thon getting 509 Bandwidth Exceeded error

2015-06-21 Thread Mikel Maron
Nick
Yes, this is probably due to a shared IP address for that lab. This problem has 
been seen before at mapathons, but usually with much higher number of users. 
Usually, the rate-limiting will ease off after a time, so it should've been 
available again later.
The OSMF Operations team won't currently make exceptions to the rate-limiting 
policy. But they do think it should be an unusually high volume situation to 
trip the bandwidth limits. I think it's worth asking if one of them will 
investigate more closely to see if there was something unusual in the situation 
of your mapathon. Do you have the IP address for the mapathon venue?
-Mikel * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron 


 On Saturday, June 20, 2015 1:45 AM, Nicholas Doiron 
 wrote:
   
 

 Hi,
I'm working with The Asia Foundation to run an OpenStreetMap map-a-thon in 
Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. We have 17 teams of 3 people, mostly students and city 
planners, mapping unplanned areas of the city (ger districts)
At 3:30pm local time, we got a 509 Bandwidth Exceeded error on most teams' 
machines, so we had to end our first day early.  No one's data is lost, but we 
can't download existing data into iD, so every map area looks blank.  There was 
a risk we would add the same building many times.
Is there a way for us to re-enabling editing before tomorrow morning? And keep 
the gates open for another 48 hours or so?I'll do my part by closing a couple 
of apps (including Show Me The Way from OSM Labs) which were running at the time
Regards,Nick Doiron
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


 
  ___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] zebra crossing

2015-06-21 Thread Suzan Reed
We found a in #1047. It was a node of building. They seem to be Easter Eggs. 

"An Easter egg is an intentional inside joke, hidden message, or feature in an 
interactive work such as a computer program, video game or DVD menu screen." 
Wikipedia


On Jun 21, 2015, at 5:57 PM, john whelan wrote:

Can we do anything about this?

Thanks John

On 21 June 2015 at 20:08, Marcos Oliveira  wrote:
You are indeed right John, if you select a node belonging to a highway the 
crosswalk element appears in the tagging list. The result gives you an element 
with both highway=crossing and crossing=zebra tags.

2015-06-21 23:50 GMT+01:00 john whelan :
That's what is being tagged.  Quite often on paths or footways or even tracks 
in very remote parts of the world.  I've seen maybe four in West Africa, one or 
two have turned up in Nepal, recently one appeared in Bangladesh.

Cheerio John 

On 21 June 2015 at 18:45, Mike Thompson  wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Zebra_crossing

Is this what is being mapped?

Mike

On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 1:59 PM, john whelan  wrote:
I'm seeing a number of these on different projects.  They could be put in for 
fun but I suspect there are too many,they seem to come from inexperienced 
mappers I suspect using iD.

A possible undocumented feature or too easy to add? There seems often to be two 
tags involved on the node which would be unlikely if it was done for fun.

Thoughts?

Thanks John

___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot




___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot




-- 
Um Abraço,
Marcos Oliveira

___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] zebra crossing

2015-06-21 Thread Bryan Housel
Hi John,
I’m happy to change the preset in iD to make it more clear.   Maybe we should 
just offer 2 presets that differentiate between “Marked Crosswalk” (aka 
`crossing=zebra`) and “Unmarked Crossing”?

This is an odd one because “Zebra Crossing” seems to be a well known thing in 
British English, but is unknown in American English.  In the United States 
people were asking me for a crosswalk preset, and we saw new mappers skipping 
crosswalks entirely because they didn’t know that `crossing=zebra` was the 
correct thing. Also, at the time the OSM wiki was confusing - it seemed to 
imply that all crossings were zebras - not sure if that is still the situation.

Thanks, Bryan



> On Jun 21, 2015, at 8:57 PM, john whelan  wrote:
> 
> Can we do anything about this?
> 
> Thanks John
> 
> On 21 June 2015 at 20:08, Marcos Oliveira  > wrote:
> You are indeed right John, if you select a node belonging to a highway the 
> crosswalk element appears in the tagging list. The result gives you an 
> element with both highway=crossing and crossing=zebra tags.
> 
> 2015-06-21 23:50 GMT+01:00 john whelan  >:
> That's what is being tagged.  Quite often on paths or footways or even tracks 
> in very remote parts of the world.  I've seen maybe four in West Africa, one 
> or two have turned up in Nepal, recently one appeared in Bangladesh.
> 
> Cheerio John 
> 
> On 21 June 2015 at 18:45, Mike Thompson  > wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Zebra_crossing 
> 
> 
> Is this what is being mapped?
> 
> Mike
> 
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 1:59 PM, john whelan  > wrote:
> I'm seeing a number of these on different projects.  They could be put in for 
> fun but I suspect there are too many,they seem to come from inexperienced 
> mappers I suspect using iD.
> 
> A possible undocumented feature or too easy to add? There seems often to be 
> two tags involved on the node which would be unlikely if it was done for fun.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Thanks John
> 
> ___
> HOT mailing list
> HOT@openstreetmap.org 
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> HOT mailing list
> HOT@openstreetmap.org 
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Um Abraço,
> Marcos Oliveira
> 
> ___
> HOT mailing list
> HOT@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] zebra crossing

2015-06-21 Thread john whelan
Can we do anything about this?

Thanks John

On 21 June 2015 at 20:08, Marcos Oliveira 
wrote:

> You are indeed right John, if you select a node belonging to a highway the
> crosswalk element appears in the tagging list. The result gives you an
> element with both highway=crossing and crossing=zebra tags.
>
> 2015-06-21 23:50 GMT+01:00 john whelan :
>
>> That's what is being tagged.  Quite often on paths or footways or even
>> tracks in very remote parts of the world.  I've seen maybe four in West
>> Africa, one or two have turned up in Nepal, recently one appeared in
>> Bangladesh.
>>
>> Cheerio John
>>
>> On 21 June 2015 at 18:45, Mike Thompson  wrote:
>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Zebra_crossing
>>>
>>> Is this what is being mapped?
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 1:59 PM, john whelan 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 I'm seeing a number of these on different projects.  They could be put
 in for fun but I suspect there are too many,they seem to come from
 inexperienced mappers I suspect using iD.

 A possible undocumented feature or too easy to add? There seems often
 to be two tags involved on the node which would be unlikely if it was done
 for fun.

 Thoughts?

 Thanks John

 ___
 HOT mailing list
 HOT@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


>>>
>>
>> ___
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Um Abraço,
> Marcos Oliveira
>
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] zebra crossing

2015-06-21 Thread Marcos Oliveira
You are indeed right John, if you select a node belonging to a highway the
crosswalk element appears in the tagging list. The result gives you an
element with both highway=crossing and crossing=zebra tags.

2015-06-21 23:50 GMT+01:00 john whelan :

> That's what is being tagged.  Quite often on paths or footways or even
> tracks in very remote parts of the world.  I've seen maybe four in West
> Africa, one or two have turned up in Nepal, recently one appeared in
> Bangladesh.
>
> Cheerio John
>
> On 21 June 2015 at 18:45, Mike Thompson  wrote:
>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Zebra_crossing
>>
>> Is this what is being mapped?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 1:59 PM, john whelan 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm seeing a number of these on different projects.  They could be put
>>> in for fun but I suspect there are too many,they seem to come from
>>> inexperienced mappers I suspect using iD.
>>>
>>> A possible undocumented feature or too easy to add? There seems often to
>>> be two tags involved on the node which would be unlikely if it was done for
>>> fun.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Thanks John
>>>
>>> ___
>>> HOT mailing list
>>> HOT@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ___
> HOT mailing list
> HOT@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>


-- 
Um Abraço,
Marcos Oliveira
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] zebra crossing

2015-06-21 Thread john whelan
That's what is being tagged.  Quite often on paths or footways or even
tracks in very remote parts of the world.  I've seen maybe four in West
Africa, one or two have turned up in Nepal, recently one appeared in
Bangladesh.

Cheerio John

On 21 June 2015 at 18:45, Mike Thompson  wrote:

> https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Zebra_crossing
>
> Is this what is being mapped?
>
> Mike
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 1:59 PM, john whelan 
> wrote:
>
>> I'm seeing a number of these on different projects.  They could be put in
>> for fun but I suspect there are too many,they seem to come from
>> inexperienced mappers I suspect using iD.
>>
>> A possible undocumented feature or too easy to add? There seems often to
>> be two tags involved on the node which would be unlikely if it was done for
>> fun.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks John
>>
>> ___
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>>
>
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


Re: [HOT] zebra crossing

2015-06-21 Thread Mike Thompson
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Zebra_crossing

Is this what is being mapped?

Mike

On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 1:59 PM, john whelan  wrote:

> I'm seeing a number of these on different projects.  They could be put in
> for fun but I suspect there are too many,they seem to come from
> inexperienced mappers I suspect using iD.
>
> A possible undocumented feature or too easy to add? There seems often to
> be two tags involved on the node which would be unlikely if it was done for
> fun.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks John
>
> ___
> HOT mailing list
> HOT@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


[HOT] zebra crossing

2015-06-21 Thread john whelan
I'm seeing a number of these on different projects.  They could be put in
for fun but I suspect there are too many,they seem to come from
inexperienced mappers I suspect using iD.

A possible undocumented feature or too easy to add? There seems often to be
two tags involved on the node which would be unlikely if it was done for
fun.

Thoughts?

Thanks John
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot