Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Translators requested for Hugin 2012.0 release
>> I'm just working on the last few strings (using the new changeset) and >> stumbled over "Removes all control points, which are in masks". Do we >> need a comma here, > > Don't know exactly. Maybe a native speaker can help. Ah, I thought I suggested that in my first round of typos. Yes, the comma should go away. I'm torn whether it should be "which" or "that" though, but leaning toward "that". Gareth -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Translators requested for Hugin 2012.0 release
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 11:11 -0700, T. Modes wrote: > On 7 Aug., 22:36, zarl wrote: > > and (technically) I hope this doesn't remove points > > from include masks... (does it?) > > It does. > If you use only the part from one image, it does not need to be > aligned with part of other images, which does not show up in the final > pano. > Also include mask are used to fix moving object, parallax errors or > the like. In this case you don't need control points in this areas. > Further, it is an optional command, it not called automatically. > Or have you an other use case, I did not consider? > > Thomas > But if there are no control points in the include mask would that not make that area more likely to produce stitching and alignment errors since you are forcing that area to be used but are removing the points that are used to calculate how to warp and blend that area of the image with other images? If you use both include and exclude masks on the same image to force only the included area to be used you may not want control points in the exclude masks but you do need them in the include mask. You could do all your control points manually but if the image with masks overlaps with a lot of other images that could take a long time. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
[hugin-ptx] Re: Translators requested for Hugin 2012.0 release
Hi Carl, On 7 Aug., 22:36, zarl wrote: > I'm just working on the last few strings (using the new changeset) and > stumbled over "Removes all control points, which are in masks". Do we > need a comma here, Don't know exactly. Maybe a native speaker can help. > and (technically) I hope this doesn't remove points > from include masks... (does it?) It does. If you use only the part from one image, it does not need to be aligned with part of other images, which does not show up in the final pano. Also include mask are used to fix moving object, parallax errors or the like. In this case you don't need control points in this areas. Further, it is an optional command, it not called automatically. Or have you an other use case, I did not consider? Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
[hugin-ptx] Re: cpfind hangs after fed 360 images
I left it open for the night and now it is sitting at "Optimizing Variables" phase - so I would like some pointers how to cut optimizer time, too. I have a number of videos I would like to convert to panoramas, but this kind of performance makes it impossible :( -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
