Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Which EXIF data does Hugin need?

2011-11-07 Thread Gnome Nomad

Thomas Pryds wrote:

2011/11/4 kfj _...@yahoo.com mailto:k...@yahoo.com

Are you sure you ran the optimizer after generating the CPs? Having
the CPs per se doesn't 'move' the images, only after optimization they
have y, p and r values to spread them out on the panosphere. Try
optimizing once with the default setting and take it from there.


On the contrary, I'm sure I *didn't* run the optimizer. Also, I'm sure I 
didn't do so the other times when I used the assistant and the images 
did find their place on the panosphere, but now that I know I have to, 
everything seems to work for me again :-)


I believe the assistant runs optimization as part of its process. At 
least it always seems to do that for me.


--
Gnome Nomad
gnomeno...@gmail.com
wandering the landscape of god
http://www.cafepress.com/otherend/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and 
other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx


Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Which EXIF data does Hugin need?

2011-11-07 Thread Ian Tindale
This page http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/DC210/DC210Acgi.HTM says
that the zoom range is the 135 film equivalent of 29-58mm. Assuming these
were shot as wide as the zoom went, it might be a safe assumption that it
is 29mm with a multiplier of 1. At least, that’s where I’d start.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx


Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Which EXIF data does Hugin need?

2011-11-07 Thread Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola)
Yes, usually it optimizes, but sometimes, when it doesn't find CPs on all
images I guess the optimization is not done. It gives a message that it
found some separated groups of images or something like that. In this case
you will need to mark some more CPs manually and then optimize.

Cheers,

Carlos E G Carvalho (Cartola)
http://cartola.org/360



2011/11/7 Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com

 Thomas Pryds wrote:

 2011/11/4 kfj _...@yahoo.com mailto:k...@yahoo.com

Are you sure you ran the optimizer after generating the CPs? Having
the CPs per se doesn't 'move' the images, only after optimization they
have y, p and r values to spread them out on the panosphere. Try
optimizing once with the default setting and take it from there.


 On the contrary, I'm sure I *didn't* run the optimizer. Also, I'm sure I
 didn't do so the other times when I used the assistant and the images did
 find their place on the panosphere, but now that I know I have to,
 everything seems to work for me again :-)


 I believe the assistant runs optimization as part of its process. At least
 it always seems to do that for me.

 --
 Gnome Nomad
 gnomeno...@gmail.com
 wandering the landscape of god
 http://www.cafepress.com/**otherend/ http://www.cafepress.com/otherend/

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
 A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
 http://wiki.panotools.org/**Hugin_FAQhttp://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
 To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscribe@**
 googlegroups.com hugin-ptx%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
 group/hugin-ptx http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx


Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Which EXIF data does Hugin need?

2011-11-07 Thread Gnome Nomad
I had that happen just this past Saturday. Turned out that the last 
frame had only about 20-30 pixel overlap with the previous one. So I 
loaded the images, then manually added some control points between the 
last frame and its predecessor. Then I ran the Assistant on it and 
everything optimized just fine.


Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola) wrote:
Yes, usually it optimizes, but sometimes, when it doesn't find CPs on 
all images I guess the optimization is not done. It gives a message that 
it found some separated groups of images or something like that. In this 
case you will need to mark some more CPs manually and then optimize.


Cheers,

Carlos E G Carvalho (Cartola)
http://cartola.org/360

2011/11/7 Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com mailto:gnomeno...@gmail.com

Thomas Pryds wrote:

2011/11/4 kfj _...@yahoo.com mailto:k...@yahoo.com
mailto:k...@yahoo.com mailto:k...@yahoo.com

   Are you sure you ran the optimizer after generating the CPs?
Having
   the CPs per se doesn't 'move' the images, only after
optimization they
   have y, p and r values to spread them out on the panosphere. Try
   optimizing once with the default setting and take it from there.


On the contrary, I'm sure I *didn't* run the optimizer. Also,
I'm sure I didn't do so the other times when I used the
assistant and the images did find their place on the panosphere,
but now that I know I have to, everything seems to work for me
again :-)


I believe the assistant runs optimization as part of its process. At
least it always seems to do that for me.



--
Gnome Nomad
gnomeno...@gmail.com
wandering the landscape of god
http://www.cafepress.com/otherend/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and 
other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx


Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Which EXIF data does Hugin need?

2011-11-05 Thread Thomas Pryds
2011/11/4 kfj _...@yahoo.com

 Are you sure you ran the optimizer after generating the CPs? Having
 the CPs per se doesn't 'move' the images, only after optimization they
 have y, p and r values to spread them out on the panosphere. Try
 optimizing once with the default setting and take it from there.


On the contrary, I'm sure I *didn't* run the optimizer. Also, I'm sure I
didn't do so the other times when I used the assistant and the images did
find their place on the panosphere, but now that I know I have to,
everything seems to work for me again :-)

Thanks!
Thomas

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx