Re: corrupt zip files

2012-05-05 Thread Ken Hume, IBM

Having just done this, I speak from experience

Almost every file transfer product will transfer either text or binary. 
Most have a feature that will make a choice for you. I used the "make a 
choice for me" option and wound up scrambling the three files I had 
transmitted. I changed the format to binary and everything worked as it 
should.


Ken Hume
IBM PD Tools Client Advocate
(720)396-7776
kph...@us.ibm.com


On 5/5/2012 7:54 AM, Paul Edwards wrote:

I have a zip file that appears to have been produced using pkzip for z/OS.

However, it looks like it has been transmitted using some sort of text 
protocol, because the high bit has been stripped from most bytes, and some 
other bytes appear to have been translated. e.g. I think x'0a' in the input 
file has been mangled to x'b6' on the way. Does anyone know what software would 
do a translation like that?

I believe these characters:


0A 1060
0D 0
12 1044
14 0
15 0
1C 0
1E 0
24 1030
7F 0

are being mapped to these:


81 576
9C 361
A7 645
B6 527
BF 284
E0 249
E9 644
F2 718

Except for x'0d' which I think is just being deleted. This belief comes from 
counting (see below) occurrences of the various bytes in a largish (80k) file.

Here is a small file that shows the problem:

00 504B0304 B6000600 08006455 22405746 PKdU"@WF

That x'b6' above should be x'0a' I think (that's more normal). Apparently some 
protocol doesn't think that x'0a' will make it through, so translates it in 
advance.

10 30447A00 2802 0800 5851 0Dz...(...XQ
20 46303130 38313510 310A4330 0C447740 F010815.1.C0.Dw@
...
A0 504B0102 780BB600 06000800 64552240 PK..x...dU"@
B0 57463044 7A00 2802 08003401 WF0Dz...(.4.
C0  0100  5851 ..XQ
D0 46303130 38316500 30016973 7976 F01081e.0.isyp..

This x'69737970' is really (once high bit is added back) x'E9F3F9F0' ie 'Z390' 
ie something that pkzip for z/OS inserts.

E0 00014000 00050002 1600 04022800 ..@...(.
F0 06005C00 08000700 0501 00070006 ..\.
000100 4B00 05000740 004B 00064462 ..K@.@Db
000110 52707073 40404040 40404040 40404040 Rpps
000120 40404040 40404040 40400A @@.

Does anyone have any idea what protocol (ftp, sftp, winscp, kermit, 
connect:direct, http) would affect data in this manner? I've never seen 
mangling like that before.

Thanks.  Paul.




00 594
01 698
02 740
03 488
04 749
05 697
06 536
07 526
08 545
09 854
0A 1060
0B 597
0C 641
0D 0
0E 608
0F 639
10 817
11 679
12 1044
13 641
14 0
15 0
16 621
17 533
18 554
19 611
1A 517
1B 555
1C 0
1D 612
1E 0
1F 639
20 731
21 592
22 607
23 549
24 1030
25 546
26 565
27 618
28 490
29 602
2A 436
2B 684
2C 629
2D 706
2E 589
2F 667
30 547
31 815
32 670
33 530
34 569
35 598
36 570
37 619
38 723
39 572
3A 508
3B 626
3C 676
3D 626
3E 615
3F 621
40 687
41 598
42 636
43 557
44 752
45 579
46 645
47 813
48 849
49 837
4A 617
4B 563
4C 587
4D 532
4E 618
4F 705
50 538
51 541
52 553
53 573
54 467
55 416
56 653
57 681
58 727
59 599
5A 560
5B 344
5C 611
5D 293
5E 663
5F 552
60 578
61 562
62 608
63 814
64 649
65 711
66 515
67 660
68 484
69 506
6A 528
6B 627
6C 773
6D 646
6E 627
6F 599
70 602
71 657
72 636
73 620
74 521
75 516
76 732
77 631
78 596
79 715
7A 551
7B 718
7C 621
7D 606
7E 630
7F 0
80 0
81 576
82 0
83 0
84 0
85 0
86 0
87 0
88 0
89 0
8A 0
8B 0
8C 0
8D 0
8E 0
8F 0
90 0
91 0
92 0
93 0
94 0
95 0
96 0
97 0
98 0
99 0
9A 0
9B 0
9C 361
9D 0
9E 0
9F 0
A0 0
A1 0
A2 0
A3 0
A4 0
A5 0
A6 0
A7 645
A8 0
A9 0
AA 0
AB 0
AC 0
AD 0
AE 0
AF 0
B0 0
B1 0
B2 0
B3 0
B4 0
B5 0
B6 527
B7 0
B8 0
B9 0
BA 0
BB 0
BC 0
BD 0
BE 0
BF 284
C0 0
C1 0
C2 0
C3 0
C4 0
C5 0
C6 0
C7 0
C8 0
C9 0
CA 0
CB 0
CC 0
CD 0
CE 0
CF 0
D0 0
D1 0
D2 0
D3 0
D4 0
D5 0
D6 0
D7 0
D8 0
D9 0
DA 0
DB 0
DC 0
DD 0
DE 0
DF 0
E0 249
E1 0
E2 0
E3 0
E4 0
E5 0
E6 0
E7 0
E8 0
E9 644
EA 0
EB 0
EC 0
ED 0
EE 0
EF 0
F0 0
F1 0
F2 718
F3 0
F4 0
F5 0
F6 0
F7 0
F8 0
F9 0
FA 0
FB 0
FC 0
FD 0
FE 0
FF 0

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: NaSpa / Share / z/OS or any mainframe groups

2012-04-03 Thread Ken Hume, IBM

There was a group called SSLUG. Seven St. Louis Users Group.

It was a CA-7 Users Group that expanded to include most everything z 
related.


I have no idea if they are still around or not.

You should have seen their secret handshake.

Ken Hume
IBM PD Tools Client Advocate
(720)396-7776
kph...@us.ibm.com


On 4/3/2012 11:34 AM, Brown, Larry - RD, St. Louis, MO wrote:

Jim, St. Louis Computer Measurement Group (CMG) has quarterly meetings with 
lots of good z/OS, z/VM and z/Linux presentations.  
http://regions.cmg.org/regions/stlcmg/index.html

Larry Brown

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Jim Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 12:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: NaSpa / Share / z/OS or any mainframe groups

Are there any z/OS or related groups, meetings or anything
else in the STL, MO area ??.

Jim

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN





This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for 
the intended recipients. Any unauthorized interception of this message or the 
use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the law and 
subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have 
received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the email 
immediately.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Pre-Friday fun: Halon dumps and POK Resets

2012-03-22 Thread Ken Hume, IBM

Before I joined IBM I worked for a mid sized company near Atlanta.

We had our electrical company install a UPS. They got everything 
installed and decided, mid day on a working day, to test the system.


The hit the button and the ENTIRE building went dark.

Oops.

Ken Hume
IBM PD Tools Client Advocate
(720)396-7776
kph...@us.ibm.com


On 3/22/2012 11:33 AM, zMan wrote:

So over the years I've heard a few good stories about accidental (or
deliberate) Halon dumps and BRS pressings. Like operators playing Frisbee
in the machine room and discovering that the Halon button really, really
needs a cover on it...

Who else has stories to share?


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What’s going on in the redbooks site?

2012-02-03 Thread Ken Hume, IBM
We inside IBM use Firefox. I had to close the tab where I had opened the 
old book. Not just refresh it, close it.


I opened the link again from my IBM home page and it pulled in the 
newest version of the book.


What did we ever do before the internet came along.

As always, if you have any PD Tools questions, let me know.

Ken Hume
IBM PD Tools Client Advocate
(720)396-7776
kph...@us.ibm.com


On 2/3/2012 10:50 AM, Jan Vanbrabant wrote:

Hi Ken.

Yep, got it.
But  as with the other redbook I had problems with, I had to change my
browser from Chrome into IE.
So Google's Chrome definitely works with a kind of cache, a too long
lasting cache ...
I'll try to find out if that's a bug or some option which can be turnned on
or off.

*THANK YOU* for your intervention behind the scenes!
Jan

PS
Besides this inconvenience, the godd thing about Chrome is that it's much
faster than IE.


On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Ken Hume, IBM  wrote:


Hello All!!

The PD Tools Redbook has been restored. The date on the new book is
January 2012.

Enjoy!!

Ken Hume
IBM PD Tools Client Advocate
(720)396-7776
kph...@us.ibm.com


On 2/2/2012 12:54 PM, Jan Vanbrabant wrote:


Hi Rex, Mike, Jay,

Pbm solved.

I changed my Chrome browser into Internet Explorer and   d*ash-01 of the
JES3 ABC*  downloaded in a perfect way.
Probably something hanging around in some Chrome cache

Thanks for your hints&   tips.
Jan



On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:22 PM, J R   wrote:

  I originally had the problem with the ABCs of z/OS Vol.13

but that resolved itself after a couple of days or so.

I subsequently had, and still have, the same problem
with the Problem Determination Tools for z/OS.


  >   Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:22:46 +0100


From: vanbrabant...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: What’s going on in the redbooks site?
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu

Well not with me, Rex.
Still  getting the -00 version of June 2009.

I may be downloading from a not updated shadow server ?!
Or something wrong with my laptop?

Future will tell.   ;-)
Jan



On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Pommier, Rex R.
**wrote:

  Jan,

Did they just fix it?  I'm currently downloading the "-1" version  of


the
ABC book.

Rex


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jan Vanbrabant
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 7:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: What’s going on in the redbooks site?

Hi,

*What’s going on in the redbooks site?*

*
*

SG24-7717-*01* ABCs of zOS System Programming Volume 13

Advertised Publish data  27 January 2012, last updated 30 January 2012

I have been trying to download the SG24-7717-01 for a couple of days
already, but I consistently end up with the SG24-7717-*00* (June 2009)
version.

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/**abstracts/sg247717.html<http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247717.html>




*Idem ditto with *

SG24-7918-*01* IBM Problem Determination Tools for z/OS

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/**abstracts/sg247918.html<http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247918.html>

Advertised Publish Date – 24 january 2012

Ending up with SG24-7918-*00* of September  2010


I dropped a message on the redbooks site.


jan

  --**--**

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

  --**--**

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--**--**--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What’s going on in the redbooks site?

2012-02-03 Thread Ken Hume, IBM

Hello All!!

The PD Tools Redbook has been restored. The date on the new book is 
January 2012.


Enjoy!!

Ken Hume
IBM PD Tools Client Advocate
(720)396-7776
kph...@us.ibm.com


On 2/2/2012 12:54 PM, Jan Vanbrabant wrote:

Hi Rex, Mike, Jay,

Pbm solved.

I changed my Chrome browser into Internet Explorer and   d*ash-01 of the
JES3 ABC*  downloaded in a perfect way.
Probably something hanging around in some Chrome cache

Thanks for your hints&  tips.
Jan



On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:22 PM, J R  wrote:


I originally had the problem with the ABCs of z/OS Vol.13
but that resolved itself after a couple of days or so.

I subsequently had, and still have, the same problem
with the Problem Determination Tools for z/OS.


  >  Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:22:46 +0100

From: vanbrabant...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: What’s going on in the redbooks site?
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu

Well not with me, Rex.
Still  getting the -00 version of June 2009.

I may be downloading from a not updated shadow server ?!
Or something wrong with my laptop?

Future will tell.   ;-)
Jan



On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Pommier, Rex R.
wrote:


Jan,

Did they just fix it?  I'm currently downloading the "-1" version  of

the

ABC book.

Rex


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jan Vanbrabant
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 7:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: What’s going on in the redbooks site?

Hi,

*What’s going on in the redbooks site?*

*
*

SG24-7717-*01* ABCs of zOS System Programming Volume 13

Advertised Publish data  27 January 2012, last updated 30 January 2012

I have been trying to download the SG24-7717-01 for a couple of days
already, but I consistently end up with the SG24-7717-*00* (June 2009)
version.

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247717.html




*Idem ditto with *

SG24-7918-*01* IBM Problem Determination Tools for z/OS

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247918.html

Advertised Publish Date – 24 january 2012

Ending up with SG24-7918-*00* of September  2010


I dropped a message on the redbooks site.


jan


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What’s going on in the redbooks site?

2012-02-02 Thread Ken Hume, IBM

Hi all,

The problem with the PD Tools book has been reported.

If you want to see it now you can either select the "View as HTML" 
button or drop me a note and I'll get you a copy via email.


Ken Hume
IBM PD Tools Client Advocate
(720)396-7776
kph...@us.ibm.com


On 2/2/2012 12:22 PM, J R wrote:

I originally had the problem with the ABCs of z/OS Vol.13
but that resolved itself after a couple of days or so.

I subsequently had, and still have, the same problem
with the Problem Determination Tools for z/OS.


  >  Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:22:46 +0100

From: vanbrabant...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: What’s going on in the redbooks site?
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu

Well not with me, Rex.
Still  getting the -00 version of June 2009.

I may be downloading from a not updated shadow server ?!
Or something wrong with my laptop?

Future will tell.   ;-)
Jan



On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Pommier, Rex R.
wrote:


Jan,

Did they just fix it?  I'm currently downloading the "-1" version  of the
ABC book.

Rex


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jan Vanbrabant
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 7:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: What’s going on in the redbooks site?

Hi,

*What’s going on in the redbooks site?*

*
*

SG24-7717-*01* ABCs of zOS System Programming Volume 13

Advertised Publish data  27 January 2012, last updated 30 January 2012

I have been trying to download the SG24-7717-01 for a couple of days
already, but I consistently end up with the SG24-7717-*00* (June 2009)
version.

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247717.html




*Idem ditto with *

SG24-7918-*01* IBM Problem Determination Tools for z/OS

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247918.html

Advertised Publish Date – 24 january 2012

Ending up with SG24-7918-*00* of September  2010


I dropped a message on the redbooks site.


jan



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What’s going on in the redbooks site?

2012-02-02 Thread Ken Hume, IBM

Drop me a note and I'll get you the current PD Tools book if it's urgent.

Ken Hume
IBM PD Tools Client Advocate
(720)396-7776
kph...@us.ibm.com


On 2/2/2012 7:50 AM, Pommier, Rex R. wrote:

Problem determination tools is still the old one.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Jan Vanbrabant
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 7:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: What’s going on in the redbooks site?

Hi,

*What’s going on in the redbooks site?*

*
*

SG24-7717-*01* ABCs of zOS System Programming Volume 13

Advertised Publish data  27 January 2012, last updated 30 January 2012

I have been trying to download the SG24-7717-01 for a couple of days
already, but I consistently end up with the SG24-7717-*00* (June 2009)
version.

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247717.html




*Idem ditto with *

SG24-7918-*01* IBM Problem Determination Tools for z/OS

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247918.html

Advertised Publish Date – 24 january 2012

Ending up with SG24-7918-*00* of September  2010


I dropped a message on the redbooks site.


jan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

The information contained in this e-mail may contain confidential and/or 
privileged information and is intended for the sole use of the intended 
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited and that you will be held responsible for any such 
unauthorized activity, including liability for any resulting damages. As 
appropriate, such incident(s) may also be reported to law enforcement. If you 
received this e-mail in error, please reply to sender and destroy or delete the 
message and any attachments. Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Terminology RE: USS

2011-11-18 Thread Ken Hume IBM

We always called the * a "splat".

Ken Hume
IBM PD Tools Client Advocate
(720)396-7776
kph...@us.ibm.com


On 11/18/2011 7:02 AM, McKown, John wrote:

Since it is now Friday, how about

/ is a solidus, aka a slash
\ is a reverse solidus, aka a backslash
# is an octhothrope, aka a hash mark or pound sign. Not to be confused with "pound 
sterling" sign.
! is a "bang" - I learned that long ago in college on a Xerox Sigma 7 system.
#! is normally pronounced "shebang" in UNIX. I guess a verbal slurring of "hash 
bang" together.

When speaking, I often say "square bracket" and "curly brace" (open or close) just 
because people often don't know a brace from a bracket from a parenthesis. And let's not even talk about 
carets ^. And what is the proper word for that PL/1 "not" sign ¬ ?

I never heard of "broken brackets" for<  and>. Just "less than" and "greater 
than".

--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT

Administrative Services Group

HealthMarkets®

9151 Boulevard 26 . N. Richland Hills . TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone .
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com . www.HealthMarkets.com

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or 
proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 
HealthMarkets® is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the 
insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance 
Company®, Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA 
Life and Health Insurance Company.SM




-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 4:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: USS


Brackets? Oh, you mean parentheses: ( )
Brackets are: [ ] (not "square brackets", just "brackets")
Braces are: { } (not "curly braces", just "braces")

Another common use for obscure terms.

When I was in high school English brackets was an acceptable term.
When I took FORTRAN brackets was an acceptable term.
When I took C square brackets and curly (brackets or braces)
were acceptable terms.
My profs used them.
Why, after almost 40 years, why do we have more retroactve
corrections?

Like that other TLA, that shall remain nameless, even though
it was used for almost 15 years before some self-appointed
pedants started taking upon themselves to preach.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: disclosing "business" information on the internet

2011-07-28 Thread Ken Hume IBM

Frank,

From your website

"FirstBank has a full-time software developer position available for a 
.NET software developer. Responsibilities include analysis, design, 
coding, and testing of new multi-tier applications as well as enhancing 
existing applications in a team environment.


Applicant must have at least two years of professional experience with 
C# or Delphi. Applicant needs strong Delphi or C# skills with some 
ADO.NET (preferably with Oracle's ODP.NET). Experience with IIS, XML, 
WCF, SQL, ASP.NET, AJAX, or web services is a plus."


That, and the java position you have open tells folks a lot about what 
you have there. I'm sure you have advertised for positions that require 
z/OS and COBOL experience.


I think they are over reacting a bit.

Ken Hume
IBM PD Tools Client Advocate
(720)396-7776
kph...@us.ibm.com


On 7/28/2011 12:20 PM, Frank Swarbrick wrote:

Here's something that I think may be of general interest.

Our information security officer sent the following to my manager:  "The content 
Frank is positing does not appear to be specific to our environment.  However, I am 
concern by the fact he posts his position, where he works, and phone number.  This 
creates some social engineering risk, as well as discloses information about the 
operating systems we use.  Who can I talk with to ask Frank to remove information related 
to where he works on this conversation thread and future ones?"

Are these concerns justified or just paranoia?

I like posting this information because I've received useful contacts and 
information based on it.  I'm curious what policies other businesses have.

Frank



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: An upbeat story

2011-06-14 Thread Ken Hume IBM

There is a company in GA that does that as well.

The difference is that they hire tech school students after 1 year in 
tech school. The "kids" work part time and go to school full time. Once 
they graduate with an agreed upon GPA, they become "real" employees.


It's AMAZING how at the longevity they have. It seems that most of their 
IT staff has only had one IT job.


Ken

On 6/14/2011 10:06 AM, Steve Comstock wrote:

Last week I taught a COBOL class for five days at a
small company up in Boulder. They have a refreshing
approach that I thought was pretty cool, and I wanted
to pass it on.

This company (I'll call it 'A') is a subsidiary of a
large transportation company ('B'). Although they are
small, they run z/OS 1.12, use COBOL 4.2, and so on.

* Each Spring for the last two years they go to the local
  university career day and talk with students about to
  graduate

* Eventually they settle on four to hire

* Then, they make their job offer through a contracting
  company ('C') with the understanding if they work out
  after a trial period, they will be hired to work
  directly by 'A'

* But what's cool is: a) they only interview students
  with little or no IS / IT background and b) even
  though the students will technically be employees of
  'C', 'A' arranges to train them

  The training is done by a mix of in-house people,
  myself, colleagues, even competitors


The result is a small cadre of new employees entering
each year, sort of 'raised' in the local IT culture.


The new employees are solid and quickly productive, and
they have a long lasting loyalty to the company. The
current employees are, generally, pleased to see the
company expanding the workforce (after all, the new
kids are lower on the totem pole, as it were).


Although the program is new, it seems to be working very
well (I had a chance to talk with some of last year's
new hires as well as a few managers).

So somebody is hiring for z/OS applications developers.
I consider that to be a little good news anyway.



--
Ken Hume
IBM PD Tools Client Advocate
(720)396-7776
kph...@us.ibm.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM APA GUI: Password Case?

2011-06-06 Thread Ken Hume IBM

Hi John,

Drop me an email at kph...@us.ibm.com

I need to check something.

Ken Hume

On 6/6/2011 12:31 PM, Chase, John wrote:

Hi, All,



Recently installed the IBM Application Performance Analyzer ("APA")
v11.1, and today tried installing the Eclipse Plug-in for its GUI
interface to the IBM CICS Explorer.  Everything went "slam dunk" until
time to establish a connection and log in.



At that point, two of us tried and failed for "invalid password" (using
our RACF passwords).  First thought I had was that perhaps the GUI is
forcing our passwords to all uppercase (we have mixed-case passwords
enabled and required here).  However, I cannot find anything anywhere to
indicate whether that might be the problem.  There are no configuration
options anywhere that we can find that would seem to affect password
case.



We tried various of the documented Security configuration options for
the APA Listener STC on z/OS (v1.11), but those documented in the APA
Customization Guide do not work at all (the Listener won't even start).



Anybody have any ideas we could try?



TIA,



 -jc-




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html