Fw: JES2 displays captured via batch
Kenneth Klein - Forwarded by Kenneth Klein/T00/TMMNA on 03/15/2012 08:37 AM - Kenneth Klein/T00/TMMNA 03/15/2012 08:34 AM To IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu cc Subject Re: JES2 displays captured via batch * start of jcl //BATCH1EXEC PGM=IRXJCL,PARM='@SYSCMD CMD($DQ)' //SYSEXEC DD DSN=A2T.MASTER.EXEC,DISP=(SHR) //SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=* //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* end of jcl, start of output @SYSCMD operands : CMD($DQ) SDSF HCE status : established RC=00 -- ISFEXEC options : ( VERBOSE) Original command : /$DQ SDSF short message: COMMAND ISSUED SDSF long message: ISF754I Command 'SET CONSOLE' generated from associated variable ISFCONS. SDSF long message: ISF754I Command 'SET DELAY' generated from associated variable ISFDELAY. SDSF long message: ISF769I System command issued, command text: $DQ. SDSF long message: ISF766I Request completed, status: COMMAND ISSUED. SDSF long message: ISFMSG2.5 SDSF ULOG messages: CP1Y 2012075 08:32:17.55 ISF031I CONSOLE A2T ACTIVATED CP1Y 2012075 08:32:17.55-$DQ CP1Y 2012075 08:32:17.55 $HASP643274 PPU LOCAL ANY CP1Y 2012075 08:32:17.56 $HASP646 4.1019 PERCENT SPOOL UTILIZATION ISFULOG.5 ISFULOG.6 ISFULOG.7 ISFULOG.8 ISFULOG.9 Command result: RC=00 System command issued, response received from the EMCS console. -- SDSF HCE status : revoked RC=00 I forget where I got @SYSCMD but a google search should turn it up. Else contact me and I will send it. Kenneth Klein Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu 03/14/2012 04:14 PM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu To IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu cc Subject Re: JES2 displays captured via batch Can a batch job capture the results of a JES2 command into a sequential dataset $dq $HASP647 6 XEQ S ZOS1 $HASP644 8 OUT ZOS1 $HASP643904 PPU LOCAL ANY $HASP646 15.8046 PERCENT SPOOL UTILIZATION Tim, You will need to use the SDSF REXX interface to invoke the console or use the SDSF Batch function that captures SYSLOG. I am not sure there are other options. The other option is to scan syslog after it is written to dasd. Lizette -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: 1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed.
z/OS V1R10.0 MVS Planning Operations SA22-7601-09 z/OS® console support can be operated in one of two modes: shared mode |and distributed mode. | IPL option | IEASYSxx and IPL prompt CON= parameter: | | CON=(...,DISTRIBUTED) to operate in DISTRIBUTED mode | CON=(...,SHARED) to continue to operate in SHARED mode In a future release, the ability to operate in shared mode will be removed. Kenneth Klein John McKown joa...@swbell.net Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu 06/14/2011 11:57 AM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu To IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu cc Subject Re: 1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed. never heard of either. where is that specified? On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:18 -0400, Ken Klein wrote: Interesting John, as we are migrating v.10 to v.12 as well. But we are still running con=shared and not con=(distributed,... Did you go to distributed with your consoles? Kenneth Klein kenneth klein tema toyota com John McKown joa...@swbell.net Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu 06/13/2011 04:35 PM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu To IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu cc Subject 1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed. Someone asked what PTFs I missed that stopped our 1.10 to 1.12 upgrade. APAR OA32522. PTF ua54267 for 1.12 and ua54265 on 1.10 . I had neither one applied. This is my first sysplex upgrade and I am ignorant. Our test sysplex is a singe image sysplex and my usual tests showed no problems. I really don't much like our basic, 2 image, sysplex. It was forced due to politics. And the programmers still don't have want they argued for: a guaranteed amount of CPU during month end. They used to be in low importance WLM classes in an initiator. Now the initiators in their image are usually all drained to give their CPU to production. The only one who likes it is my manager, for system level testing of z/OS and program products. -- John McKown Maranatha! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: 1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed.
Interesting John, as we are migrating v.10 to v.12 as well. But we are still running con=shared and not con=(distributed,... Did you go to distributed with your consoles? Kenneth Klein kenneth klein tema toyota com John McKown joa...@swbell.net Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu 06/13/2011 04:35 PM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu To IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu cc Subject 1.12 upgrade, required PTFs I missed. Someone asked what PTFs I missed that stopped our 1.10 to 1.12 upgrade. APAR OA32522. PTF ua54267 for 1.12 and ua54265 on 1.10 . I had neither one applied. This is my first sysplex upgrade and I am ignorant. Our test sysplex is a singe image sysplex and my usual tests showed no problems. I really don't much like our basic, 2 image, sysplex. It was forced due to politics. And the programmers still don't have want they argued for: a guaranteed amount of CPU during month end. They used to be in low importance WLM classes in an initiator. Now the initiators in their image are usually all drained to give their CPU to production. The only one who likes it is my manager, for system level testing of z/OS and program products. -- John McKown Maranatha! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
RMM and Tivoli Tape Optimizer and 1999/365
Anybody figured out how to copy uncataloged and yet live tapes, i. e. tapes that have files with a retention date or expiration date of '1999/365'? (And thanks, CA) Kenneth Klein -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: FMID descriptions
That rexx exec does not work for me. Where should it be executed? Option 6? From within the smp dialog? How does it find this table? Anything easier to use out there? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
