Re: MXI running authorised

2008-08-29 Thread Rob Scott
The old freeware MXI 4.3 is linked AC(1) - however during initialization 
determines if it is indeed running in such a way that it can invoke APF 
authorised services. For batch mode, the only requirement is that it is running 
from an APF authorised library - for ISPF and REXX it also has further checks 
to make (e.g. is MXITSF in AUTHTSF?)

If MXI 4.3 determines that it is running authorised then it enables certain 
functions that would otherwise be disabled (cross-memory functions, certain 
displays that depend on supervisor/non-key8 invocation).

You can still download the last genlevel MXI 4.3 from www.cbttape.org

Please be aware that MXI 4.3 has been frozen and is not being developed or 
enhanced anymore. As new levels of z/OS and hardware are released certain 
displays are beginning to have problems or not work at all - e.g. the DASD 
display on z/OS 1.10 does not handle EAV volumes at all well.

MXI 4.3 has been replaced by a commerical product called MXI Generation II (or 
MXI G2 for short).

If you are using MXI in anything other that hobbyist/curiosity mode, I would 
suggest that you consider replacing MXI 4.3 with MXI G2 as this is the only 
version of MXI that supports things like 64-bit, EAV DASD, PAV, zIIPs and zAAPs.


Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John 
McKown
Sent: 29 August 2008 01:16
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MXI running authorised

On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Anthony Fletcher wrote:

 Do any listers have any knowledge of downsides to running the free MXI
 authorised? By default it runs unauthorised.


If it runs without authorization, why bother to run it authorized?
Principle of least access should apply, I would think.

By authorized, do you mean APF authorized? As in, linked AC=1 and in an APF 
library? Or do you mean something else, like some sort of RACF authorization?

--
Q: What do theoretical physicists drink beer from?
A: An EIN stein.

Maranatha!
John McKown

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



MXI running authorised

2008-08-28 Thread Anthony Fletcher
Do any listers have any knowledge of downsides to running the free MXI
authorised? By default it runs unauthorised.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: MXI running authorised

2008-08-28 Thread John McKown
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Anthony Fletcher wrote:

 Do any listers have any knowledge of downsides to running the free MXI
 authorised? By default it runs unauthorised.
 

If it runs without authorization, why bother to run it authorized? 
Principle of least access should apply, I would think.

By authorized, do you mean APF authorized? As in, linked AC=1 and in an 
APF library? Or do you mean something else, like some sort of RACF 
authorization?

-- 
Q: What do theoretical physicists drink beer from?
A: An EIN stein.

Maranatha!
John McKown

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html