Re: No SMF 74(4)

2009-01-22 Thread Patrick Falcone
I was unaware that RMF III was required to get the 74(4)'s. I have recently 
assumed this duty and will probably just go after the LPAR's that are part of 
the plex and that alone will be enough to keep me busy for quite a while.

--- On Wed, 1/21/09, Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com wrote:

From: Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
Subject: Re: No SMF 74(4)
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 6:04 PM

Having stated that 74(4) is required for *all* LPARs, I need to back peddle
a bit. As I understand the process, 74(4) is needed to establish the
'qualifying sysplex function' in terms of usage of the relevant
structure.
For example, if you claim GRS star as the qualifying function, then you
need 74(4) to show that all purported sysplex members do indeed use
ISGLOCK.

If you have other nonmember LPARs running on any of the CECs in the
mix--either monoplex members or members of a different sysplex--then it's
not clear to me why you would need 74(4) records from the noncandidate
LPARs. If an LPAR is not offered up for verification, then who cares what
structures if any it uses?

On the other hand, gathering 74(4) from *all* LPARs may in the end be
easier than getting someone to sign off with data gathered selectively.  I
took the easy way out and submitted data from all LPARs. Such a wuss.

.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com


   
 Patrick Falcone   
 patrick.falcone7 
 @VERIZON.NET  To 
 Sent by: IBM  IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Mainframe  cc 
 Discussion List   
 ibm-m...@bama.ua Subject 
 .edu Re: No SMF 74(4)
   
   
 01/21/2009 09:44  
 AM
   
   
 Please respond to 
   IBM Mainframe   
  Discussion List  
 ibm-m...@bama.ua 
   .edu   
   
   




(@#*(*#E)!
Thanks Mark and yes, right on Skip.


From: Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com
Subject: Re: No SMF 74(4)
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 4:39 PM


On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:32:26 -0800, Patrick Falcone
patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:

Can't seem to find type 74(4) after adding a new member to the plex.
Any
not obvious, or obvious, reasons? Seems to be in SMF/RMF.


Doesn't that come from RMF III?  Is RMFGAT running?

Mark
--
Mark Zelden

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


No SMF 74(4)

2009-01-21 Thread Patrick Falcone
Can't seem to find type 74(4) after adding a new member to the plex. Any not 
obvious, or obvious, reasons? Seems to be in SMF/RMF.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: No SMF 74(4)

2009-01-21 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:32:26 -0800, Patrick Falcone
patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:

Can't seem to find type 74(4) after adding a new member to the plex. Any
not obvious, or obvious, reasons? Seems to be in SMF/RMF.


Doesn't that come from RMF III?  Is RMFGAT running?

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:mark.zel...@zurichna.com
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: No SMF 74(4)

2009-01-21 Thread Skip Robinson
Yes, RMF III. 74(4) is required for the sysplex verification package that
qualifies a customer for sysplex discount. We had to run RMFGAT on all
LPARs long enough to gather the data.

.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com


   
 Mark Zelden   
 mark.zel...@zuri 
 CHNA.COM  To 
 Sent by: IBM  IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Mainframe  cc 
 Discussion List   
 ibm-m...@bama.ua Subject 
 .edu Re: No SMF 74(4)
   
   
 01/21/2009 08:39  
 AM
   
   
 Please respond to 
   IBM Mainframe   
  Discussion List  
 ibm-m...@bama.ua 
   .edu   
   
   




On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:32:26 -0800, Patrick Falcone
patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:

Can't seem to find type 74(4) after adding a new member to the plex. Any
not obvious, or obvious, reasons? Seems to be in SMF/RMF.


Doesn't that come from RMF III?  Is RMFGAT running?

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:mark.zel...@zurichna.com
z/OS Systems Programming expert at
http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: No SMF 74(4)

2009-01-21 Thread Patrick Falcone
(@#*(*#E)! 
 
Thanks Mark and yes, right on Skip.


From: Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com
Subject: Re: No SMF 74(4)
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 4:39 PM


On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:32:26 -0800, Patrick Falcone
patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:

Can't seem to find type 74(4) after adding a new member to the plex.
Any
not obvious, or obvious, reasons? Seems to be in SMF/RMF.


Doesn't that come from RMF III?  Is RMFGAT running?

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:mark.zel...@zurichna.com
z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: No SMF 74(4)

2009-01-21 Thread Skip Robinson
Having stated that 74(4) is required for *all* LPARs, I need to back peddle
a bit. As I understand the process, 74(4) is needed to establish the
'qualifying sysplex function' in terms of usage of the relevant structure.
For example, if you claim GRS star as the qualifying function, then you
need 74(4) to show that all purported sysplex members do indeed use
ISGLOCK.

If you have other nonmember LPARs running on any of the CECs in the
mix--either monoplex members or members of a different sysplex--then it's
not clear to me why you would need 74(4) records from the noncandidate
LPARs. If an LPAR is not offered up for verification, then who cares what
structures if any it uses?

On the other hand, gathering 74(4) from *all* LPARs may in the end be
easier than getting someone to sign off with data gathered selectively.  I
took the easy way out and submitted data from all LPARs. Such a wuss.

.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com


   
 Patrick Falcone   
 patrick.falcone7 
 @VERIZON.NET  To 
 Sent by: IBM  IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Mainframe  cc 
 Discussion List   
 ibm-m...@bama.ua Subject 
 .edu Re: No SMF 74(4)
   
   
 01/21/2009 09:44  
 AM
   
   
 Please respond to 
   IBM Mainframe   
  Discussion List  
 ibm-m...@bama.ua 
   .edu   
   
   




(@#*(*#E)!
Thanks Mark and yes, right on Skip.


From: Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com
Subject: Re: No SMF 74(4)
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 4:39 PM


On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:32:26 -0800, Patrick Falcone
patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:

Can't seem to find type 74(4) after adding a new member to the plex.
Any
not obvious, or obvious, reasons? Seems to be in SMF/RMF.


Doesn't that come from RMF III?  Is RMFGAT running?

Mark
--
Mark Zelden

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html