Re: CA11 and Datacom errors in SYSPLEX - Any ideas?

[Robert Justice]

The CA-11 support folks are pointing at Datacom, and the Datacom folks
back at CA-11.

That's one of my biggest complaints with this whole CA11/datacom nightmare,
the new release of CA11 is FORCING us to go to datacom but when you try to
ask a question or anything about how this all ties together, it's been too
much of the well, you need to talk to this other group.

Sorry, rant mode off now.
Hopefully you had your issue resolved.

I'm still holding out hope for an alternative product to CA11. (and
anything else that might use datacom).

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Re: CA11 and Datacom errors in SYSPLEX - Any ideas?

[Jon Brock]

When you initialize the FXX for Datacom, you specify the number of tasks to 
allocate for force usage (for lack of a better term).  

If you are everything has been clean up to this point, the best bet would be to 
reinitialize the FXX, specifying a higher number of tasks.  If you have had any 
problems you might want to back out, you can try decreasing the number of tasks 
specified in the Datacom startup parameters.

Jon



snip
We just put up CA11 3.0 with the new Datacom interface.  Datacom starts up 
fine, but when we try to start CA11 on some of the systems, we get the 
following:

DCOM:DB01201I - RESTART, LOG NOT OPEN, NO ACTION REQUIRED
DCOM:DB01217I - RESTART, INSUFFICIENT FORCE (FXX) TASKS  
DCOM:DB01208E - RESTART, COMPLETE WITH ERROR(S)  
IAT1600 JOB DCOM (JOB21694) BYTES EXCEEDED   
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html