Re: IBM Patents efforts to justify offshoring

2009-03-31 Thread Kirk Wolf
I briefly read the patent application, and I notice that it doesn't seem to
mention if the model includes back-testing / accuracy measurements.  Hmmm.

BTW: Rumor is that IBM has a massive supercomputing grid running a secret AI
application called Blue Patent Shoes that automatically generates process
/ methods patents.



On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:


 http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9130750source=NLT_PM
 (watch the wrap)

 March 30, 2009 (Computerworld) IBM last week filed a patent application for
 an offshore outsourcing methodology that is intended to help companies
 minimize the financial risks associated with sending work overseas.

 The patent application describes a computer-driven approach for putting
 values on both the quantitative and qualitative attributes of a global
 resource sourcing strategy. For instance, the methodology takes into
 account the language skills and morale of offshore workers, as well as a
 list of the hard numbers involved in setting up an offshore operation,
 including labor rates and currency valuations.

 In short, IBM is attempting to reduce offshoring considerations to a
 mathematic model — or, in the words of the application, a robust and
 reusable sourcing template for identifying and analyzing global resource
 pools.

 For IBM itself, the patent filing couldn't be any timelier. The company
 submitted the application to the U.S. Patent  Trademark Office last
 Thursday, the same day it confirmed that it is eliminating more jobs in its
 North American operations.

 IBM didn't disclose any details about the planned cutbacks, but
 allia...@ibm, a union local that isn't recognized as an official
 bargaining unit, has said it expects between 4,000 and 5,000 workers to be
 let go. The union thinks the cuts are part of a plan by IBM to send more
 jobs overseas, following an earlier round of reductions in January.

 In the patent application, IBM said the described methodology allows
 decision-makers to conveniently trade off one or more qualitatively defined
 levels between one or more factors in terms of quantifiable, direct, costs.

 The methodology also looks at some scary assumptions as part of its
 mathematical models — scary, that is, if you're a U.S.-based IT worker. In a
 hypothetical assessment, the application sets up an example that includes a
 company having 50% of resources in China by 2010.

 Here's an example of the specific metrics that the methodology takes into
 account:

 Suppose that employees hired in country A possess level 1 communication
 skills, while employees in country B possess level 2 skills.
 Additionally, suppose that the job satisfaction of employees hired in
 country A is rated to be at level 2, while that of employees hired in
 country B is rated at level 1. In this case, a lower score implies higher
 job satisfaction.
 Since communication skill levels and job satisfaction levels can't be
 directly compared, it's useful to quantify in terms of cost the differences
 between the levels, both within the same factor and across different ones.
 The patent application explains why IBM thinks it's important to look at a
 broad range of variables when making global sourcing decisions. By simply
 looking at wages and material costs, the organization may indirectly
 increase other costs such as those associated with poorer quality workers
 and/or materials, IBM said. That could include loss of customers, lower
 productivity, increased product returns and higher worker attrition, the
 company said, adding that a company needs to consider both direct and
 indirect costs associated with its resources.

 This isn't the first time that IBM has filed for a patent related to an
 offshoring methodology. An application filed in 2007 described a
 software-driven approach for identifying at least a portion of a
 human-resource within an organization for outsourcing.




 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM Patents

2006-04-17 Thread Avram Friedman
Just to clarify something,
Incase any one ever finds them selfs in this situation.
In the USA a patent can never be removed after application.
Once applyed for the patent is present forever.
   A patent can be
 application abandoned
 overturned
 expired
 rejected
 transfered
 granted
 etc

None of these things remove a patent, just change its status ... its still 
there.

I am sure there are a lot of reasons for this, perhaps one of them is to 
limit the effectiveness of someone else, after the original application to 
apply for the same thing.

I did a quick search at the US patent office for granted patents that 
contain the word IBM and the word Bathroom since 1974.

The search page is http://patft1.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html

got 104 hits

I did not search the applied but published data base
nor did I search the trademark data base

Don't think IBM and Bathroom do not appear together in patent 
applications!!!


On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:22:26 -0400, Jon Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Eliminated.  Heh.  They couldn't resist it.

Jon


snip
IBM has quietly eliminated a patent it received on a method for 
determining
who gets to use the bathroom next.
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
=

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM Patents

2006-04-17 Thread Barry Schwarz
But the vast majority of IBM references are by other applicants to IBM 
publications and to non-IBM publications that happen to have IBM in the title.
   
  The vast majority of bathroom references are in the explanatory sections in 
phrases like ...the system is idle when the trader is away from the terminal 
(e.g., using the bathroom)...
   
  Using the search page you found, there are 572 patents with IBM in the 
assignee name (some are shared with other assignees) and none contain the word 
bathroom in any field.

Avram Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I did a quick search at the US patent office for granted patents that 
contain the word IBM and the word Bathroom since 1974.

The search page is http://patft1.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html

got 104 hits

I did not search the applied but published data base
nor did I search the trademark data base
   
  Don't think IBM and Bathroom do not appear together in patent 
applications!!!


-
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM Patents

2006-04-12 Thread Jon Brock
Eliminated.  Heh.  They couldn't resist it.

Jon


snip
IBM has quietly eliminated a patent it received on a method for determining
who gets to use the bathroom next. 
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM Patents

2006-04-11 Thread Ted MacNEIL
This wasn't new.
Nor does it have anything to do with mainframes.

-
-teD

O-KAY! BLUE! JAYS!
Let's PLAY! BALL!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html