Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-08 Thread Thomas Kern
I set up several new transfer templates to cover the common but not default
formats for my transfers. I have an BIN-F80, BIN-F4096, TXT-F80, etc. 

Go to Edit | Preferences | Transfers | MVS and then you can type in a new
name for your template, then fill in the details and click on SAVE.
 
/Tom Kern


On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:25:54 -0400, Pinnacle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Can anybody tell me how to turn off the bleeping RECFM(V) that PCOMM insists
>on adding to every binary transfer to the mainframe?  Never mind that this
>is a brain-dead option, but I've been up, down, and sideways through that
>brain-dead dialog, and I can't find it.  I also tried Extra, but it looks
>like the PCOMM and Extra developers got together to create the same
>brain-dead file transfer dialog.   I just love the way they populate the PC
>filename into the MVS filename field, but you can't just overtype, n.
>You have to type the MVS name into another file box and hit Apply.
>Brilliant!  I'm forced to do this because my client uses Citrix and these
>are the only supported emulators.  I don't know how you guys that have to
>use PCOMM and Extra can stand it.  Thank God for Vista.
>
>There, I feel better now.
>Tom Conley

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-08 Thread Jerry Durbin
I switched to FTP after attempting to use PCOMM - less forehead botox exercises 
& less stress.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Pinnacle
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 9:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

Can anybody tell me how to turn off the bleeping RECFM(V) that PCOMM insists on 
adding to every binary transfer to the mainframe?  Never mind that this is a 
brain-dead option, but I've been up, down, and sideways through that brain-dead 
dialog, and I can't find it.  I also tried Extra, but it looks like the PCOMM 
and Extra developers got together to create the same
brain-dead file transfer dialog.   I just love the way they populate the PC
filename into the MVS filename field, but you can't just overtype, n.
You have to type the MVS name into another file box and hit Apply.
Brilliant!  I'm forced to do this because my client uses Citrix and these are 
the only supported emulators.  I don't know how you guys that have to use PCOMM 
and Extra can stand it.  Thank God for Vista.

There, I feel better now.
Tom Conley

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-08 Thread Edward Jaffe

Pinnacle wrote:
... I don't know how you guys that have to use PCOMM and Extra can 
stand it.  Thank God for Vista.


On those extremely rare occasions when I use IND$FILE, I open a Windows 
Command Prompt and issue the SEND or RECEIVE command directly. GUI be 
damned!


--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-08 Thread Dave Salt
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Can anybody tell me how to turn off the bleeping 
> RECFM(V) that PCOMM insists > on adding to every binary transfer to the 
> mainframe? 
 
LOL, I remember going through the same pain. I eventually gave up and started 
using the ISPF Workstation Agent (WSA), and I've never looked back. It is by 
far the easiest way to perform file transfers, and always works exactly the 
same way no matter which type of emulator you're using. If you haven't tried it 
or don't know how to set it up, let me know. It's very easy, and once you've 
done it file transfers are a breeze! Plus, there are other benefits such as 
being able to edit mainframe files on the PC and edit PC files on the mainframe 
(etc). But even if you don't use those features, it's worth setting up the WSA 
just for the file transfer feature alone.
 
HTH, Dave SaltSee the new SimpList(tm) rollover image at:   
http://www.mackinney.com/products/SIM/simplist.htm   
_
Try Chicktionary, a game that tests how many words you can form from the 
letters given. Find this and more puzzles at Live Search Games!
http://g.msn.ca/ca55/207
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-08 Thread Gary Green
Well, I use Attachmate all the time and I upload FB files all the time...

If no one else can assist, I'll login and force my brain cells to remember how 
I do it.


 On Tue Jul  8 11:25 , Pinnacle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:

>Can anybody tell me how to turn off the bleeping RECFM(V) that PCOMM insists 
>on adding to every binary transfer to the mainframe?  Never mind that this 
>is a brain-dead option, but I've been up, down, and sideways through that 
>brain-dead dialog, and I can't find it.  I also tried Extra, but it looks 
>like the PCOMM and Extra developers got together to create the same 
>brain-dead file transfer dialog.   I just love the way they populate the PC 
>filename into the MVS filename field, but you can't just overtype, n. 
>You have to type the MVS name into another file box and hit Apply. 
>Brilliant!  I'm forced to do this because my client uses Citrix and these 
>are the only supported emulators.  I don't know how you guys that have to 
>use PCOMM and Extra can stand it.  Thank God for Vista.
>
>There, I feel better now.
>Tom Conley 
>
>--
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
>Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-08 Thread Bruno Sugliani
Tale it easy 
Do it the old way like in SYS1.PARMLIB
go to the profile of your session ( something.WS in your pcomm directory)
mine is here : 
F:\Program Files\IBM\Personal Communications\private
edit it with notepad or whatever and change the V to a F in the 
XferTypesMVSx=
for example 
XferTypesMVS2=binary~( RECFM(V)  ) 
make it F 
Now it is hard coded ! 
or add a new line with your own parms 
And don't forget to document it as a usermod :-)) 
But then FTP is so much faster ! 

Bruno Sugliani 
zxnetconsult(at)free(dot)fr

On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:25:54 -0400, Pinnacle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Can anybody tell me how to turn off the bleeping RECFM(V) that PCOMM insists
>on adding to every binary transfer to the mainframe?  Never mind that this
>is a brain-dead option, but I've been up, down, and sideways through that
>brain-dead dialog, and I can't find it.  I also tried Extra, but it looks
>like the PCOMM and Extra developers got together to create the same
>brain-dead file transfer dialog.   I just love the way they populate the PC
>filename into the MVS filename field, but you can't just overtype, n.
>You have to type the MVS name into another file box and hit Apply.
>Brilliant!  I'm forced to do this because my client uses Citrix and these
>are the only supported emulators.  I don't know how you guys that have to
>use PCOMM and Extra can stand it.  Thank God for Vista.
>
>There, I feel better now.
>Tom Conley
>
>--
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
>Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-08 Thread Roger Bolan
Like most things, it is easy once you know the trick.

I use PCOMM all the time for uploading and downloading to z/VM and z/OS 
systems.  I tried FTP and WSA but PCOMM is easier once you have it set up.

First, I have my customized toolbar.  I can't remember if the default one 
has icons on it for upload and download, but mine does.

Click the upload icon, and then click Options at the bottom of the "Send 
files to Host" window.  Then you can define named sets of transfer options 
for all your different systems.  So, for MVS/TSO, I have predefined 
everything I commonly use.  For example, I have a transfer type for 
MVS/TSO called "tersed" which automatically preallocates a file for me 
with recfm=fixed lrecl=1024 blksize=27648 and the right number of primary 
and secondary cylinders. 
Now, back out of Options and click the Templates button.   I really like 
this.  You can predefine your needs for renaming the files automatically 
as you upload them.  For example, I have a template for PC files with 
names like *=1.*=2.*=3.*=4.*=5.trs that automatically get renamed to 
p*=1.*=4.*=5.trs and use the tersed transfer type.   When I upload files 
from a customer that have names of the pattern 
nn,xxx,yyy.name1.name2.trs where nn, xxx, and yyy are all numeric 
only and therefore illegal on MVS, I get pnn.name1.name2.trs as a 
tersed file on the host.  So now I can select whole bunches of these from 
a folder and upload them all at once with no manual renaming and no manual 
pre allocating of files and no additional SITE commands to issue. 

Once you define the transfer types and templates you use all the time, you 
can upload or download any number of files with just a few clicks and have 
all that renaming and DCB attribute stuff taken care of for you. 

Roger Bolan
infoprint.com

Boulder, Colorado, USA 


P Think before you print 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-08 Thread Barbara Nitz
Glad I am not the only one who uses PCOMM for ftp I had set up the 
templates with the different dcb and space stuff ages ago, and I am quite happy 
using it.My problem is that I keep forgetting what name is what setup and 
have to go take a look every time. But that's older age for you :-(

Regards, Barbara Nitz
-- 
Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten 
Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-09 Thread J R
I used PCOMM for many years, but never really liked it.  
Its settings are non-intuitive and it usually chooses the 
wrong ones for you.  
It can be very, very slow.  
It has a tendency to break in the middle of large transfers.  
 
Once I found Seagull FTP, I never willingly[1] went back.  
Its user interface is excellent.  It handles everything I've 
ever asked of it.  Large transfers are fast and reliable.  
It's free!  
 
[1]  You are at the mercy of whomever owns "FTP".  They 
have to PERMIT you access to that resource which, BTW, 
is in the OMVS segment, so you need one of those too.  
 
 
> Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:04:38 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> 
> Glad I am not the only one who uses PCOMM for ftp 
>I had set up the templates with the different dcb and space 
>stuff ages ago, and I am quite happy using it.
>My problem is that I keep forgetting what name is what setup 
> and have to go take a look every time. But that's older age for you :-(
> 
> Regards, Barbara Nitz
 
 
 
 
_
Need to know now? Get instant answers with Windows Live Messenger.
http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/connect_your_way.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_messenger_072008
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-09 Thread Roger Bolan
Hmm.   Maybe it's not age.  Maybe they just need better names.  :-) 

Roger Bolan

IBM Mainframe Discussion List  wrote on 07/08/2008 
11:04:38 PM:

> Glad I am not the only one who uses PCOMM for ftp I had set up 
> the templates with the different dcb and space stuff ages ago, and I
> am quite happy using it.My problem is that I keep forgetting 
> what name is what setup and have to go take a look every time. But 
> that's older age for you :-(
> 
> Regards, Barbara Nitz

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-09 Thread Roger Bolan
I learned a good trick only a few years ago that made PCOMM much faster 
for me.   Apparently it goes to the DNS for name resolution often (like 
every "packet" of some kind).  Changing the definitions of my links for my 
sessions from using names to the actual numeric IP addresses allows PCOMM 
to bypass those DNS name resolutions and everything uploaded much faster. 

You can also go into the General tab in the  File Transfer Settings and 
optimize the Packet Size and File Transfer Timeout for your needs. 

Roger Bolan

infoprint.com
Boulder, Colorado, USA 

P Think before you print 

IBM Mainframe Discussion List  wrote on 07/09/2008 
06:36:47 AM:

> I used PCOMM for many years, but never really liked it. 
> Its settings are non-intuitive and it usually chooses the 
> wrong ones for you. 
> It can be very, very slow. 
> It has a tendency to break in the middle of large transfers. 
> 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-09 Thread David Alcock
> I don't know how you guys that have to
> use PCOMM and Extra can stand it.  Thank 
> God for Vista.

I don't know how you guys that have to use IND$FILE can stand
it.  Thank God for TCP/IP FTP. 
 
I prefer my data transfer in TCP/IP packets instead of
IND$FILE's ancient screen scraper kludge.  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-09 Thread Don Leahy
I don't know how you guys can stand FTP when WSA is available.  :-)

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:58 PM, David Alcock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't know how you guys that have to
>> use PCOMM and Extra can stand it.  Thank
>> God for Vista.
>
> I don't know how you guys that have to use IND$FILE can stand
> it.  Thank God for TCP/IP FTP.
>
> I prefer my data transfer in TCP/IP packets instead of
> IND$FILE's ancient screen scraper kludge.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-09 Thread Edward Jaffe

David Alcock wrote:

I prefer my data transfer in TCP/IP packets instead of
IND$FILE's ancient screen scraper kludge.
  


For modern 3270 emulators, IND$FILE does not use a "screen scraper" 
kludge. Rather, the transfer is done using structured fields.


--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-09 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 2:38 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)
> 
> David Alcock wrote:
> > I prefer my data transfer in TCP/IP packets instead of
> > IND$FILE's ancient screen scraper kludge.
> >   
> 
> For modern 3270 emulators, IND$FILE does not use a "screen scraper" 
> kludge. Rather, the transfer is done using structured fields.
> 
> -- 
> Edward E Jaffe

The biggest problem that I have with IND$FILE is that it can be
interrupted by a SEND command coming from the operator or another TSO
user (or NOTIFY= from a job completing).

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or confidential.  It is for intended addressee(s) only.  If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is
strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal
offense.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing
it.  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: PCOMM file xfer question (and rant)

2008-07-09 Thread Roger Bolan
Hmm.  I remember that problem too, but I haven't seen it happen in years.  
I don't remember changing anything myself to make it go away, but I might 
have forgotten.  Of course both the z/OS systems and my own workstation 
have been upgraded several times since the last time I saw it so who knows 
what changed? 

One problem I did have with IND$FILE was trying to invoke it from oddly 
sized custom sessions I had made, like 62 by 160, and using ISPF option 6 
for the commands.  It would blow up.  The cure for that was to nuke the 
old *.ws files I had carried over from my old systems and create fresh 
ones using PCOMM 5.8. 

Roger Bolan

IBM Mainframe Discussion List  wrote on 07/09/2008 
01:39:28 PM:


> The biggest problem that I have with IND$FILE is that it can be
> interrupted by a SEND command coming from the operator or another TSO
> user (or NOTIFY= from a job completing).
> 
> --
> John McKown

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html