Re: Need to figure out what WEB SERVICE CWXN is trying to access
Thanks, I've posted the same to that list. I think the maint level is not related to my qustion, I am trying to dig out something from CICS SO domain in the dump. ---Original--- From: "Lizette Koehler"Date: 2017/8/8 13:13:36 To: "IBM-MAIN" ; Subject: Re: Need to figure out what WEB SERVICE CWXN is trying to access There is a CICS List that may be able to assist you better. To join, if you have not done so, go to this URL CICShttp://www.listserv.uga.edu/archives/cics-l.html Second, it would be helpful to provide more information. What version of z/OS are you running What version of CICS are you running What Web services are creating this issue. What actions have you taken so far to research your issue? Do you have on all maintenance needed on z/OS, TCPIP, CICS, SOAP? Does this link help? https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGMGV_3.1.0/com.ibm.cics.ts31.doc/dfhe5/dfhe5zc.htm Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Michael Tai > Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 9:46 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Need to figure out what WEB SERVICE CWXN is trying to access > > Hi, > > 1. There're a number of CWXN running which led to SOS in ECDSA. A dump was > taken. Is there a way to figure out the web service a specific CWXN task is > trying to access from the dump? (CICS internal trace is turned off). > > 2. Is there a way to extract the SOAP message from the dump? Since CICS trace > is turned off. I can't extract them from SO 02 02 SOCK RECEIVE trace entry. > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Need to figure out what WEB SERVICE CWXN is trying to access
There is a CICS List that may be able to assist you better. To join, if you have not done so, go to this URL CICShttp://www.listserv.uga.edu/archives/cics-l.html Second, it would be helpful to provide more information. What version of z/OS are you running What version of CICS are you running What Web services are creating this issue. What actions have you taken so far to research your issue? Do you have on all maintenance needed on z/OS, TCPIP, CICS, SOAP? Does this link help? https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGMGV_3.1.0/com.ibm.cics.ts31.doc/dfhe5/dfhe5zc.htm Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Michael Tai > Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 9:46 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Need to figure out what WEB SERVICE CWXN is trying to access > > Hi, > > 1. There're a number of CWXN running which led to SOS in ECDSA. A dump was > taken. Is there a way to figure out the web service a specific CWXN task is > trying to access from the dump? (CICS internal trace is turned off). > > 2. Is there a way to extract the SOAP message from the dump? Since CICS trace > is turned off. I can't extract them from SO 02 02 SOCK RECEIVE trace entry. > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Need to figure out what web service CWXN trying to access
1. A number of CWXN running in the system led to SOS, a dump was taken. Need to figure out what web service is trying to access. (CICS Internal trace was turned off) 2. Is there a way to extact SOAP message from the dump, SO 0202 SOCK RECEIVE can't be used since internal trace was turned off. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Need to figure out what WEB SERVICE CWXN is trying to access
Hi, 1. There're a number of CWXN running which led to SOS in ECDSA. A dump was taken. Is there a way to figure out the web service a specific CWXN task is trying to access from the dump? (CICS internal trace is turned off). 2. Is there a way to extract the SOAP message from the dump? Since CICS trace is turned off. I can't extract them from SO 02 02 SOCK RECEIVE trace entry. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OS Secure FTP Question
I agree, HTTPS is much easier to both implement and use. IBM supplies the directions on every order in ShopZSeries (off on the right side). I think they also tell you right in each shipment, but I could be wrong. Brian -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Various 052 abends with LINKAGE=SYSTEM calls in SRB
Thanks that's what I thought > On Aug 7, 2017, at 9:30 PM, Jim Mulderwrote: > >It should not be possible to get a 052 abend from VSMLOC, > unless some rogue code on your system has messed with the > System Function Table so that the wrong PC number is being issued, > or some rogue code on your system has messes with the Entry Table Entry > for the VSMLOC PC so that something other than the VSMLOC service > routine is being invoked by the VSMLOC PC. > > Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. > Poughkeepsie NY > >> From: Joe Reichman >> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> Date: 08/07/2017 09:24 PM >> Subject: Various 052 abends with LINKAGE=SYSTEM calls in SRB >> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > >> I am getting intermittent abends with a couple of macros that use >> linkage=system in a SRB > >> The first is with AXSET macro >> >>LAR2,1 Give us the >>AXSET AX=(R2) Power >>XRR8,8 Clear r8 >>ICM R8,B'0011',NOW.HASID Get Server Asid >>SSAR R8Set secondary Asid >> >> The reason code for the AXSET is 0101 >> >> The Abends happens (sometimes) after the PC 0(14) call in the AXSET >> >> To other is in the VSMLOC macro again after the PC 0(14) The reason > code in >> the VSMLOC is 0103 >> >> From my understanding there is no restriction using LINKAGE=SYSTEM in a > SRB > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Various 052 abends with LINKAGE=SYSTEM calls in SRB
It should not be possible to get a 052 abend from VSMLOC, unless some rogue code on your system has messed with the System Function Table so that the wrong PC number is being issued, or some rogue code on your system has messes with the Entry Table Entry for the VSMLOC PC so that something other than the VSMLOC service routine is being invoked by the VSMLOC PC. Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie NY > From: Joe Reichman> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 08/07/2017 09:24 PM > Subject: Various 052 abends with LINKAGE=SYSTEM calls in SRB > Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > I am getting intermittent abends with a couple of macros that use > linkage=system in a SRB > The first is with AXSET macro > > LAR2,1 Give us the > AXSET AX=(R2) Power > XRR8,8 Clear r8 > ICM R8,B'0011',NOW.HASID Get Server Asid > SSAR R8Set secondary Asid > > The reason code for the AXSET is 0101 > > The Abends happens (sometimes) after the PC 0(14) call in the AXSET > > To other is in the VSMLOC macro again after the PC 0(14) The reason code in > the VSMLOC is 0103 > > From my understanding there is no restriction using LINKAGE=SYSTEM in a SRB -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: How to find the Global zone names in SMP/E via REXX
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 16:13:01 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote: >I have a requirement to create a process that is dependent on knowing the >TLIB/DLIB zone names from the Global CSI. > >At this time, I do not see any type of ADDRESS SMPEXEC or other API process to >do the extract. > Alas, the API supports Assembler, Cobol, C, ... (I've modified and used the C sample in SAMPLIB), but not Rexx. The problem concerns a requirement that that the caller supply pointers in control blocks whereas Rexx is pointer-challenged. RFE opportunity? Compare ICSF, which has a Rexx-friendly API. >So I am guessing I will need to run an SMPE Process to do a listzone then parse >the output for the names I need. > I can only suggest running an ADDRESS LINKMVS and scraping the SMPLIST, as you guess. >Unless someone has an easier way to do this, this is the process I will take. > >This process will eventually do a copyzone or mergezone. Just trying to >automate the process so the user does not need to tell the REXX that much >information other than the GLOBAL CSI. -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Various 052 abends with LINKAGE=SYSTEM calls in SRB
Hi I am getting intermittent abends with a couple of macros that use linkage=system in a SRB The first is with AXSET macro LAR2,1 Give us the AXSET AX=(R2) Power XRR8,8 Clear r8 ICM R8,B'0011',NOW.HASID Get Server Asid SSAR R8Set secondary Asid The reason code for the AXSET is 0101 The Abends happens (sometimes) after the PC 0(14) call in the AXSET To other is in the VSMLOC macro again after the PC 0(14) The reason code in the VSMLOC is 0103 >From my understanding there is no restriction using LINKAGE=SYSTEM in a SRB Thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
How to find the Global zone names in SMP/E via REXX
I have a requirement to create a process that is dependent on knowing the TLIB/DLIB zone names from the Global CSI. At this time, I do not see any type of ADDRESS SMPEXEC or other API process to do the extract. So I am guessing I will need to run an SMPE Process to do a listzone then parse the output for the names I need. Unless someone has an easier way to do this, this is the process I will take. This process will eventually do a copyzone or mergezone. Just trying to automate the process so the user does not need to tell the REXX that much information other than the GLOBAL CSI. Any thoughts or suggestions are appreciated. Lizette Koehler statistics: A precise and logical method for stating a half-truth inaccurately -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Need referral - Websphere script w/o passwords
This is regarding Websphere. I've inherited a WAS platform with scripts containing passwords in clear text. I have to remediate this, and came to ibm-main for advice. This is on AIX. I normally manage DB2 on Z, and just accepted the WAS area. Can anyone refer me to a manual, Redbook, or best practice for options? Encrypted pw file? System parm for NOPASSWORD? Any information or referral is appreciated. Thanks, Linda -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: base64 encoding (was Curse you, L-Soft!)
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 03:45:08PM -0500, Joel C. Ewing wrote: > > As an experiment, I will try adding some "unusual" characters (like > degree ° and check__✔) to force Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit and see > what the list does to this message.__ > (antiquated) MacOS Mail.app seems to force Q-P. On Linux, mutt seems nicer, and e...@univie.ac.at respects and echoes that. I'll try: Cc: e...@univie.ac.at Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit and see what happens. Apologies for all the tests, gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: base64 encoding (was Curse you, L-Soft!)
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 15:45:08 -0500, Joel C. Ewing wrote: > > As an experiment, I will try adding some "unusual" characters (like >degree ° and check__✔) to force Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit and see >what the list does to this message.__ > It came to me as: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 ... Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Don't know which M?A did me the "favor". Pervasive timidity, almost phobic. [How] does it appear in your outbox? Do you have REPRO ON? how did it get reflected to you? And when I mail something to a mainframe, it often arrives as: charset=USASCII when it has clearly been translated to EBCDIC. If a MTA/MDA is going to perform such a conversion, it ought to adjust the MIME headers to agree. -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: base64 encoding (was Curse you, L-Soft!)
On 08/07/2017 01:54 PM, David W Noon wrote: > On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 13:08:20 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht > (elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za) wrote about "Re: Curse you, L-Soft!" > (in <6156763411207138.wa.elardus.engelbrechtsita.co...@listserv.ua.edu>): > >> Paul Gilmartin wrote: >> >>> I can neither submit an SR to L-Soft nor rant on the L-Soft mailing list >>> because I'm not a registered L-Soft customer. >> I feel your pain. I also wanted to moan and b*tch about base 64 encoding >> amongst other things, but ... > Sometimes Base64 or other binary-safe encoding is required by RFC. E.g, base64 can be required for the message body when message headers say it is encoded with "charset=UTF-8" or some other 8-bit encoding and it gets sent to a recipient mail server that responds it is unable to support 8bitMIME. For that to happen implies some system in the chain of servers handling the email is running software that is over a decade old, or for some reason has deliberately been configured to disable 8bitMIME support. Then again maybe it's really a header of "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit" (some characters contain non-zero 8th bit) that triggers the problem rather than just charset UTF-8, which might explain the rareness of the problem despite common usage of UTF-8 these days. It is highly unlikely the end user "submitted" the email using a base64 encoding of the message text, but rather that it was just submitted with UTF-8 and some server in the path taken by the email to the ibm-main list forced the usage of base64 to constrain the message to 7-bit characters. My email client (Thunderbird under Fedora Linux) sends charset UTF-8 by default, but the headers also contain "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit", unless I actually include some UTF-8 characters that require a non-zero 8th bit, in which case it sends "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit". I know the messages I send to another of my email accounts with UTF-8 and Transfer-Encoding 8bit do not get transformed to base64, nor do my normal posts to IBM-main with charset UTF-8 and Transfer-Encoding 7bit. As an experiment, I will try adding some "unusual" characters (like degree ° and check__✔) to force Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit and see what the list does to this message.__ Joel C. Ewing ... -- Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Vector processing instructions
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 15:03:00 -0400, Steve Smith wrote: >Maybe you could show your code. MP and DP can be tricky, but when you >CVDG the high D-word, you'd then multiply it by >9,223,372,036,854,775,808, then by 2 (or something equivalent). Add >to what you CVDG from the low D-word. > >Of course, this will overflow if the value is too large for 31 digits, >and may get PD multiply exceptions for much less. You may have to do >some weaseling to make it work. Brute force would be multiplying the >converted high D-word by 2 64 times. > ... which still overflows. Need to break the converted high D-word (which can not exceed 20 digits) into two 10-bit chunks; multiply each by 2**64 (at most 30 digits), break the bottom one into tswo 10-digit pieces; add the top 10 dights to the converted top half; and string everything together. This is simulating long multiplication. -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Vector processing instructions
Maybe you could show your code. MP and DP can be tricky, but when you CVDG the high D-word, you'd then multiply it by 9,223,372,036,854,775,808, then by 2 (or something equivalent). Add to what you CVDG from the low D-word. Of course, this will overflow if the value is too large for 31 digits, and may get PD multiply exceptions for much less. You may have to do some weaseling to make it work. Brute force would be multiplying the converted high D-word by 2 64 times. sas On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 11:17:05 -0500, Todd Arnold wrote: > >>I got this answer from someone else at IBM, who is an expert in the vector >>instructions: >>"Currently to convert a 128-bit singed/unsigned integer in a vector register >>to a packed decimal value you must store the value to memory and use the >>standard integer conversion instruction CVBG to convert 64-bits at a time. >>... >> > Does "someone else" suggest working right-to-left or left-to-right? And > there's > a trick needed to cross the boundary since 2**64 is not a power of 10. Would > I > find an example if I RTFM PoOps? > >>... A full 128-bit value will not fit into a 31-digit decimal number." >> > ... a tautology, since > 2**127: 170141183460469231731687303715884105728 > ... is greater than > 10**31:1000 > > -- gil > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- sas -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Curse you, L-Soft!
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 13:08:20 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht (elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za) wrote about "Re: Curse you, L-Soft!" (in <6156763411207138.wa.elardus.engelbrechtsita.co...@listserv.ua.edu>): > Paul Gilmartin wrote: > >> I can neither submit an SR to L-Soft nor rant on the L-Soft mailing list >> because I'm not a registered L-Soft customer. > > I feel your pain. I also wanted to moan and b*tch about base 64 encoding > amongst other things, but ... Sometimes Base64 or other binary-safe encoding is required by RFC. >> o When I attempt to reply to a submitter rather than to the list, my >> message is usually bounced by Rules at the recipients MTA. It might help >> greatly if LISTSERV added a proper "Sender:" header. > > Uh, I'm not understanding you? What is MTA? I only respond via web-page, not > via my own e-mail client software like Outlook. Else, I just copy and paste > the sender's address manually, a real PITA, but there is not really an > alternative AFAIK. MTA = Mail Transfer Agent This is/are the SMTP server(s) used to move email around. [snip] > But I have a gut feeling it is about the poster own e-mail attributes to > L-Soft which causes much grief to you and perhaps others too. > > I don't blame them too. Perhaps my OWN (and yours too) posting is causing > trouble to them too... Using a fully RFC-compliant MUA can cause many problems for those who use "cowboy coded" MUAs. And to complete the email glossary: MUA = Mail User Agent (your mail reader) MDA = Mail Delivery Agent (the server from which your MUA downloads mail) -- Regards, Dave [RLU #314465] *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* david.w.n...@googlemail.com (David W Noon) *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Curse you, L-Soft!
Paul Gilmartin wrote: >I can neither submit an SR to L-Soft nor rant on the L-Soft mailing list >because I'm not a registered L-Soft customer. I feel your pain. I also wanted to moan and b*tch about base 64 encoding amongst other things, but ... >o When I attempt to reply to a submitter rather than to the list, my message >is usually bounced by Rules at the recipients MTA. It might help greatly if >LISTSERV added a proper "Sender:" header. Uh, I'm not understanding you? What is MTA? I only respond via web-page, not via my own e-mail client software like Outlook. Else, I just copy and paste the sender's address manually, a real PITA, but there is not really an alternative AFAIK. >o A "&" digraph is always escaped incorrectly. This is news to me. Hmmm interesting. >o When I Reply and Quote a message submitted with base64 encoding, the quoted >text appears in unrendered base64. Sad! I copy the text in a web page, then go to the page where I can compose a message and paste text and then finish my composing work. There is a IBM-MAIN member which text I always copy and paste, because of base64 encoding. You also complained about him in the past. >o There's no option to compose using a monospaced font, making composing >tabular information such as code fragments needlessly difficult. I usually use a Notepad to compose text with monospaced font in Notepad, then I paste that text in the compose window on the IBM-MAIn webpage composing page. The same goes for text in my 3270 emulator. I agree all of above is a real PITA! But no complaining about that will help you or me or others Grrr... But I have a gut feeling it is about the poster own e-mail attributes to L-Soft which causes much grief to you and perhaps others too. I don't blame them too. Perhaps my OWN (and yours too) posting is causing trouble to them too... Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Curse you, L-Soft!
I can neither submit an SR to L-Soft nor rant on the L-Soft mailing list because I'm not a registered L-Soft customer. And no owner of a LISTSERV to which I subscribe seems interested in championing my cause. So, I'll vent here (again). Mostly about composing or replying via the Web interface. o When I attempt to reply to a submitter rather than to the list, my message is usually bounced by Rules at the recipients MTA. It might help greatly if LISTSERV added a proper "Sender:" header. o A "&&" digraph is always escaped incorrectly. o When I Reply and Quote a message submitted with base64 encoding, the quoted text appears in unrendered base64. Sad! o There's no option to compose using a monospaced font, making composing tabular information such as code fragments needlessly difficult. G, gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Vector processing instructions
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 11:17:05 -0500, Todd Arnold wrote: >I got this answer from someone else at IBM, who is an expert in the vector >instructions: >"Currently to convert a 128-bit singed/unsigned integer in a vector register >to a packed decimal value you must store the value to memory and use the >standard integer conversion instruction CVBG to convert 64-bits at a time. ... > Does "someone else" suggest working right-to-left or left-to-right? And there's a trick needed to cross the boundary since 2**64 is not a power of 10. Would I find an example if I RTFM PoOps? >... A full 128-bit value will not fit into a 31-digit decimal number." > ... a tautology, since 2**127: 170141183460469231731687303715884105728 ... is greater than 10**31:1000 -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Vector processing instructions
Thanks Todd. I think you are referring to CVDG which is what I had used but didn't yield the expected results. Splitting a 128bit binary integer into 2 64bits and then a CVDG didn't convert it as expected. I will probably try that out again. I used Java Big Integer for a simple 128bit arithmetic and the outputs from z13 and Java did not match. On Mon, 8/7/17, Todd Arnoldwrote: Subject: Re: Vector processing instructions To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: Monday, August 7, 2017, 4:17 PM I got this answer from someone else at IBM, who is an expert in the vector instructions: "Currently to convert a 128-bit singed/unsigned integer in a vector register to a packed decimal value you must store the value to memory and use the standard integer conversion instruction CVBG to convert 64-bits at a time. A full 128-bit value will not fit into a 31-digit decimal number." -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Vector processing instructions
I got this answer from someone else at IBM, who is an expert in the vector instructions: "Currently to convert a 128-bit singed/unsigned integer in a vector register to a packed decimal value you must store the value to memory and use the standard integer conversion instruction CVBG to convert 64-bits at a time. A full 128-bit value will not fit into a 31-digit decimal number." -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OS Secure FTP Question
On 8/7/2017 9:13 AM, Veryl Ellis wrote: I'm attempting to setup a secure FTP so I get PUT/RSU maintenance via FTP and move away from requesting tape. Can someone tell me if I should use; GeoTrust Global CA Or GeoTrust Global CA 2 You want GeoTrust Global CA (serial number 02 34 56). I suggest you refer to the following for more help: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.gim3000/dsetups.htm I also suggest you use HTTPS instead of FTPS. Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IEC026I - 637-BC
Buckton, T. (Theo) wrote: >We have 40 mod-54s and 90 mod-27s - all sms managed. The program tool is >ICETOOL. The volumes are most of the time empty only in use by temp data >sets. I might have to monitor the usage during execution. This is totally different from your QA system with only mod-54. I would concur with Sri and also suggest that you try to avoid concatenation with referback. This problem is not limited to ICETOOL but with any tool / program. Alternatively, it would be interesting what ICETOOL statement you have, perhaps a more elegant solution is available for you. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: list of cobol load modules and their cobol version
I can offer you a utility type program It "reads" in a PDS/PDSE containing load modules/program objects and it uses the DESERV and IEWBIND API"s to list all csects in the objects and what compiler/product was used to build it. This what your looking for? Shout if it is and I can mail you either source and or load offline. Should be easy to wrap in a REXX. again input is a loadlib output is written to a DD (FB80) in format first line for a program is LMODNAME datetime and userid amode rmode Followed by one line for each csect it contains and it compiler product. The utility program just contains an array of IBM product numbers - I dont cater for all! it also contains a list of exclusion csects you dont want reported on see below Example output. MAXSTOR 160926160926ABNB529J 31ANY MAXSTOR MAXSTOR 160926160926HL ASM V2 31 24 MYCODE 160302160302ABNB529Y 31ANY MYCODE 160302160302C Z/OS R2 MIN 24 MYCODE TIEB160302160302C Z/OS R2 MIN 24 MYCODE EDCINPL 110318160302HL ASM V2MIN 24 NEILTIME170724170724ABNB529J 31ANY NEILTIMENEILTIME170724170724HL ASM V2 31 24 NHM997D 170203170203ABNB529J 31ANY NHM997D NHM997D 170203170203Ent Cobol V6 MIN 24 NHM997D DLM010 120514170203HL ASM V2MIN 24 NHM997D DLM010170203 .DLM010 MIN 24 NHM997DE170130170130ABNB529J 31ANY NHM997DENHM997DE170130170130Ent Cobol V6 MIN 24 NICKTEST170504170504ABNB529N 31ANY NICKTESTNICKTEST170504170504Ent Cobol V4 MIN 24 NICKTESTNICKTEST 170504ä.NICKTEST MIN 24 NICKTSTA170504170504ABNB529N 31ANY NICKTSTANICKTSTA170504170504Ent Cobol V4 MIN 24 NICKTSTANICKTSTA 170504ä.NICKTSTA MIN 24 NICKTSTB170504170504ABNB529N 31ANY NICKTSTBNICKTSTB170504170504Ent Cobol V4 MIN 24 NICKTSTBNICKTSTB 170504ä.NICKTSTB MIN 24 Product codes and exclusion arrays 000468 PROD_MAX DCF'24' LUCKY FOR SOME 000469 PROD_IDS DCCL28'360SAS037 FORTRAN ' 1 000470 DCCL28'40CB1 COBOL ' 2 000471 DCCL28'566528408 HEWLH096 ' 3 000472 DCCL28'566895801 COBOL II ' 4 000473 DCCL28'566896201 ASM H V2 ' 5 000474 DCCL28'569623400 HL ASM V2 ' 6 000475 DCCL28'5734-F02 FORTRAN ' 7 000476 DCCL28'5734-PL1 PL/I ' 8 000477 DCCL28'5734AS100 ASM H V1.5 ' 9 000478 DCCL28'5740CB103 OS/VS COBOL ' 10 000479 DCCL28'5741SC103 ASM F ' 11 000480 DCCL28'5752SC104 IEWL ' 12 000481 DCCL28'5655G5300 ENT COBOL FOR Z/0S' 13 000482 DCCL28'566895807 COBOL/370 ' 14 000483 DCCL28'5648A2500 COBOL FOR OS/390 ' 15 000484 DCCL28'5688040 C/370 COMPILER V1 ' 16 000485 DCCL28'5688187 C/370 COMPILER V2 ' 17 000486 DCCL28'5688216 SAA AD/CYCLE C/370' 18 000487 DCCL28'5645001 C/C++ OS/390 R2 ' 19 000488 DCCL28'5647A01 C/C++ OS/390 R4 ' 20 000489 DCCL28'5694A01 C Z/OS R2 ' 21 000490 DCCL28'5655G5300 Ent Cobol V3 ' 22 000491 DCCL28'5655S7100 Ent Cobol V4 ' 23 000492 DCCL28'5655EC6 Ent Cobol V6 ' 24 000493 EXCL_MAX DCF'4' 000494 EXCL_LIS DCXL2'0003',CL3'CEE' 000495 DCXL2'0003',CL3'IGZ' 000496 DCXL2'0004',CL4'IEWB' 000497 DCXL2'0002',CL2'@@' -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN