ADATA RECORD LAYOUTS

[Kenneth J. Kripke]

For the record layouts, see High Level Assembler for z/OS & z/VM & z/VSE
Programmer's Guide, Version 1 Release 6 in Appendix C

kennethkri...@gmail.com  


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[Dale R. Smith]

On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 17:28:16 -0400, william giannelli  
wrote:

>I just want to see replies to my posts…..

So use the Web Interface to look at only entries you want to see:  
http://listserv.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=IBM-MAIN

Change your Listserv setting to NOMAIL.

-- 
Dale R. Smith

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[Arthur]

On 15 Mar 2019 14:28:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main 
(Message-ID:) 
billgianne...@gmail.com (william giannelli) wrote:



I just want to see replies to my posts…..


It's possible you shouldn't have asked this question. It 
sounds as though you want to ask questions and get answers 
without otherwise participating. If you get only responses 
to your questions, you'll never see or reply to other 
people's questions that you might know the answer to. You 
also won't see all of the other good information that shows 
up here. And, as already pointed out, you won't see the 
answers to the same question you have that was asked by 
someone else and already answered.


Some people remember those who take without giving, and 
won't respond to their questions.


Now, it's possible that you normally browse the Listserv 
via the web interface and do, in fact, read (and maybe 
reply to) more than just your own Q But that is 
certainly not implied by the way you asked your question. 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[Tom Brennan]

I'm thinking of my high-school Philosophy class where we tried to figure 
out if some particular action was good or evil.  One approach was to 
look at the action and ask, "What if everybody did it?"


On 3/15/2019 2:28 PM, william giannelli wrote:

I just want to see replies to my posts…..


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[retired mainframer]

Put a special sequence of characters in the subject of your post and configure 
your mail reader to flush any IBM-MAIN messages without this sequence.  
Unfortunately, this will also cause you to miss any replies from people who 
respond to the digest without updating the title.

Set your account to NOMAIL.  When you wish to ask a question, set it to MAIL, 
post your question, wait for a few days while people reply, and then set it 
back to NOMAIL.  You will receive more mail those few days than just the 
responses to your question but it should not be too onerous to hit the delete 
key.

Set your account to NOMAIL permanently and browse threads you start via the 
archives.

Any of these approaches will cause you to miss the fact that someone posted a 
question almost identical to yours and already received an answer.  Reponses to 
redundant questions frequently result in a recommendation to search the 
archives.

> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On
> Behalf Of william giannelli
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 2:28 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?
> 
> I just want to see replies to my posts…..

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[william giannelli]

I just want to see replies to my posts…..

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 2:23 PM g...@gabegold.com  wrote:

> This surely isn't what you want/mean -- but related -- long ago I had the
> idea for list-owner command "SET username BOZO". That would be a list
> option so idiots only see their posts (so they know list works) and no
> others (so they think list has dried up) and wander away. Similar to
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_banning
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: New look and linking for V2.3 product documentation PDFs

[Seymour J Metz]

The right answer to the wrong question. If you read the reference you cited, 
you will note that "MATHML" can refer to either 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MathML#Presentation_MathML or to 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MathML#Content_MathML.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Pew, Curtis G 
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 2:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New look and linking for V2.3 product documentation PDFs

On Mar 15, 2019, at 11:27 AM, Seymour J Metz 
mailto:sme...@gmu.edu>> wrote:

That raises one of my standard question templates: what do they mean by 
"MATHML"? Usually the answer to such question is "The minimum we can get away 
with", but one can always hope.


https://secure-web.cisco.com/1yjGPzXyoL9FyCuqh25vKPXrqNf59Fsy_kzSs_-IB3aWdj9Z-6NGvvbyQOqbhy19OSZiPLZMb25_HpUt2ZKYbmpsDPbKsQJUHd-P5wEWnGFyCjDl-AFX6CD3iqBC28_Dt6Gr92grR5vxf43UfC2Ta1SBz0r9L5-gsg_y4bY9TNoFHZOpoo1n7N1c79YUejV1zydSJH3zqQSwNYpSUGwZFgfPVO-Z2tyFFImcciqwo07xzov-ONUtmmYqcYYvHr0uNOMmm6Rfmiv2F5NIaKMT5ZH12BdJHYOGBJi_b2D4rt3VUICTcd_qGFgPO1pSWuHuuilqc2WvUyxiouuCHXysbknxwKvFJXWLTdB6oFkauMqywWFAHQ3HBXJcOvwUouPUcu8o4FyRRWO9Ah283O-rdx5BmhgowVsSYt8pk5iP4xbJ3-6_O0cUqiGMK10NhGvla/https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FMathML
 maybe?


--
Pew, Curtis G
curtis@austin.utexas.edu






--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: New look and linking for V2.3 product documentation PDFs

[Pew, Curtis G]

On Mar 15, 2019, at 11:27 AM, Seymour J Metz 
mailto:sme...@gmu.edu>> wrote:

That raises one of my standard question templates: what do they mean by 
"MATHML"? Usually the answer to such question is "The minimum we can get away 
with", but one can always hope.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MathML maybe?


--
Pew, Curtis G
curtis@austin.utexas.edu






--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: New look and linking for V2.3 product documentation PDFs

[Susan Shumway]

Thanks, Wendell! FWIW, this thread is simply full of constructive 
feedback that I actually always love receiving. I haven't felt beaten 
upon on here in at least a few years. ;-) Even if I do again at some 
point, I'll know that it stems from frustration with one of our outputs 
and therefore identifies room for content improvement.


I'm glad to hear that you like the new PDFs. After I got used to them, I 
think even I prefer the new style over the old one. We just apparently 
need to rework some specific pieces of source to ensure that it all 
renders well, and the feedback in this thread has been fantastic for 
pinpointing those instances.


-Sue Shumway


On 3/15/2019 10:27 AM, Wendell Lovewell wrote:

Hi Sue,

I know we've beaten on you pretty badly here.  So now that I've had time to use 
some of them, I thought I'd say that I really like the look of the new PDFs.  
You can't please all the people all the time, and you could never please all of 
us any of the time!   Thanks for working so diligently to improve them.

Best regards,
Wendell Lovewell

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



--
Sue Shumway
z/OS Product Documentation Lead
IBM Poughkeepsie
chale...@us.ibm.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[g...@gabegold.com]

This surely isn't what you want/mean -- but related -- long ago I had the idea 
for list-owner command "SET username BOZO". That would be a list option so 
idiots only see their posts (so they know list works) and no others (so they 
think list has dried up) and wander away. Similar to 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_banning

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: SMPe "rollout" of maintenance

[Jesse 1 Robinson]

We have needed to manage/maintain multiple releases of "MVS" for decades. We 
always create a new CSI for each release and tie all components to that CSI 
with DSN qualifier(s). There is NO mix-n-match. The main motivator is that 
while a CSI can have multiple TARGET and DLIB zones, it can have only one 
GLOBAL zone. For any given APAR, two different z/OS releases may or may not get 
multiple PTFs depending on FMID: not all components are necessarily updated in 
each z/OS package. Moreover, we install each ServerPac into its own CSI. With 
multiple sysprogs doing the work, I can't imagine mushing different releases 
into a single CSI. 

OTOH we stick with a single CSI throughout the life of a single release. PTFs 
get installed in one place.   

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Seymour J Metz
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 10:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: SMPe "rollout" of maintenance

That's how I like to operate, with one variation: I prefer to rotate among 
sysres sets rather than cloning and deleting, and I don't dedicate a sysres set 
to one LPAR except when I'm in the process of promoting a testing a new level. 


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Brian Westerman 
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 4:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPe "rollout" of maintenance

I have a target zone for each sysres set and a dlib zone for each dlib set.  If 
I need to add maint (even just one ptf) to a res system, but don't want to 
change an already existing one, I clone the existing sysres set and target zone 
and zoneedit the pack names.  My catalogs are always set up to use ** and 
IEASYMxx so that nothing gets messed up.

I maintain lots of sites and literally hundreds of zones this way.  When I no 
longer need one, I scratch the sysres set and the dlib set and delete the 
zones.  It's a pretty solid way to handle things.

If anything happens due to maintenance, I always have something to fall back to 
without having to change anything except the IPL volume and the load parms.

Brian

On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:55:02 +, Seymour J Metz  wrote:

>What happens when you are testing a new service level and you need to install  
>PTF on the production system? If you apply it to the test system and copy, 
>then you be running the new service level before you've finished testing it.
>
>
>--
>Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
>
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on 
>behalf of Carmen Vitullo 
>Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 2:24 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: SMPe "rollout" of maintenance
>
>It really depends, I've never been stuck in a situation when I needed 
>to do this, if so;
>
>I'll apply to SMP target, copy to TEST SYSRES, TEST, and move to PROD 
>copied to the alternate SYSRES. my small 3 LPAR PLEX shares the SYSRES, 
>so migration is copy to SYSRES(A), IPL test from that SYSRES, TEST, IPL 
>PRODA from SYSRES(A), IPL PRODB from SYSRES(A). if another ptf is 
>required it will be applied, and very rare occasions, that SYSRES will 
>be IPL'd in test. then copied to the OTHER SYSRES SYSRES(B). I've not, 
>so far had a requirement that I need to maintain a third SYSRES or 
>multiple target zones for the OS
>
>I am prolly not making this sound easy and not posting this correctly, but I 
>have a documented process that I've been using for many years that works well, 
>even in a TEST PLEX / PROD PLEX 6 LPAR environment.
>difference now is I have a smaller environment and this methodology lends 
>itself well to these maint process.
>if needed I have a third SYRES available in my back pocket
>
>
>Carmen Vitullo
>
>- Original Message -
>
>From: "Seymour J Metz" 
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 1:09:01 PM
>Subject: Re: SMPe "rollout" of maintenance
>
>That lets you install a PTF on the sysres that matches your target zone, but 
>what happens if you need the PTF on a different sysres?
>
>
>--
>Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
>
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on 
>behalf of Carmen Vitullo 
>Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 2:03 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: SMPe "rollout" of maintenance
>
>I've seen so many different ways to do this, for me they easiest way; I 
>maintain one CSI for ZOS, and one target zone, I maintain different levels of 
>the base/maint on different SYSRES volumes, give me a way back if needed and 
>the ability to apply those one-off's and test and move to an alternate SYSRES.
>much more to it but I think you get the point.
>everything I apply and copy is kept updated in an Excel spreadsheet
>
>Carmen Vitullo
>
>- Original Message -
>
>From: "Tom Marchant" 

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

[Vinoth M]

Thanks all for your info, I’ll be opening a PMR.


On Friday, March 15, 2019, Jesse 1 Robinson  wrote:

> I can't guess what this particular error is about, but in general your
> first action should be to look here:
>
> "GIM69168E ** HFSCOPY PROCESSING TO THE SIGYHFS LIBRARY FAILED FOR HFS
> IGYCOB2J
>  IN SYSMOD JADB62H. THE RETURN CODE (12) EXCEEDED THE
> ALLOWABLE
>  VALUE. DATE 19.074 - TIME 02:41:58 - SEQUENCE NUMBER
> 68."
>
> The key is "SEQUENCE NUMBER 68". SYSPRINT segments are utility
> messages listed in the output and identified by an arbitrary sequence
> number. It can frankly be a PITA to find this segment in a large APPLY, but
> it will often tell you exactly what went wrong. In any case you should read
> the segment before hitting the PMR/ETR button. This advice pertains to any
> install/utility problem during APPLY.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Vinoth
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 5:06 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade
>
> Hi,
>
> I have ordered COBOL V6.2 CBPDO package and received the package to my
> Global zone and when i was trying apply i could see the below GIM messages
> and i couldn't get much info from the ibm site, have anyone faced the
> similar issue. we are upgrading from V6.1 to V6.2
>
> Below is the apply statement from the job
>
> APPLY
>S(HADB620,JADB62H,JADB621)
>FORFMID(HADB620,JADB62H,JADB621)
>BYPASS(HOLDSYSTEM)  .
>
>
> GIM69168E ** HFSCOPY PROCESSING TO THE SIGYHFS LIBRARY FAILED FOR HFS
> IGYCOB2J
>  IN SYSMOD JADB62H. THE RETURN CODE (12) EXCEEDED THE
> ALLOWABLE
>  VALUE. DATE 19.074 - TIME 02:41:58 - SEQUENCE NUMBER 68.
>
> GIM30216IAPPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD JADB62H. SYSTEM UTILITY
>
>  PROCESSING FAILED FOR AN ELEMENT IN JADB62H.
>
> GIM30225E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI52163. PROCESSING FAILED
> FOR
>  SYSMOD JADB62H, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER FMID
> OPERAND.
> GIM30223E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI53355. PROCESSING FAILED
> FOR
>  SYSMOD UI52163, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++IF REQ OPERAND.
>
> GIM30225E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI53358. PROCESSING FAILED
> FOR
>  SYSMOD JADB62H, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER FMID
> OPERAND.
> GIM30223E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI54511. PROCESSING FAILED
> FOR
>  SYSMOD UI53355, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++IF REQ OPERAND.
>
> GIM30219E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI56120. PROCESSING FAILED
> FOR
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[Susan Shumway]

I sometimes use Google Groups to access a thread because, for example, 
it displays all responses chronologically regardless of the thread 
branching - makes it easier to print or forward complete feedback from 
you all. I poked around there and found an "Email updates to me" topic 
option that *might* accomplish what you're looking for.


To give it a try, go to a topic (e.g., the URL for this one is 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bit.listserv.ibm-main/qlwJxFzmo_Q 
), click that tiny down arrow under the topic title (the hover text 
calls it "Topic options"), and select "Email updates to me." I clicked 
it and see that it doesn't seem to have any additional options, so I 
suspect it just emails your Google account every time there's a new post 
in a thread. It's worth a shot, I guess.


-Sue Shumway


On 3/15/2019 1:12 PM, Jousma, David wrote:

I *think* what he is asking for is what other forums (apple comes to mind), is that when 
you submit a question, or reply to a question, you are automatically 
"subscribed" to that thread, and get any and all updates via email to that 
thread.   I don’t think that LISTSERV has a way to do that.

_
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI  49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of zMan
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 1:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

I believe you can email LISTSERV with:

SET IBM-MAIN NARCISSIST

OK, just kidding...but seriously, what is the point here?

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 11:31 AM Bill Giannelli 
wrote:


A HIGHLY TECHNICAL question here..
How do I get emails of only my posts and not ALL the posts from everyone?
thanks
Bill

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL 
EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



--
Sue Shumway
z/OS Product Documentation Lead
IBM Poughkeepsie
chale...@us.ibm.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[Gord Tomlin]

On 2019-03-15 12:25, Steve Smith wrote:

Not sure going 100% output-only is a great way to participate, but otoh, I
can see the appeal.


If only there was a reliable way to detect topic drift and stop 
off-topic replies from being sent... ;)


--

Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507
Support: https://actionsoftware.com/support/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[Jousma, David]

I *think* what he is asking for is what other forums (apple comes to mind), is 
that when you submit a question, or reply to a question, you are automatically 
"subscribed" to that thread, and get any and all updates via email to that 
thread.   I don’t think that LISTSERV has a way to do that.

_
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI  49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of zMan
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 1:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

I believe you can email LISTSERV with:

SET IBM-MAIN NARCISSIST

OK, just kidding...but seriously, what is the point here?

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 11:31 AM Bill Giannelli 
wrote:

> A HIGHLY TECHNICAL question here..
> How do I get emails of only my posts and not ALL the posts from everyone?
> thanks
> Bill
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL 
EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

VCHID for Hipersocket

[Gilson Cesar de Oliveira]

We are upgrading our boxes from zEC12 to z13.

One of the interfaces we have been using is Hipersocket and for z/13, manuals 
say that for Hipersocket, the VCHID (Virtual Channel Id) should be at the range 
of 7E0-7FF.
We have used CHPID Mapping Tools and the IODF generated for this channel set 
the VCHID 7C0.

Does anyone know if it is correct or do we have to change the VCHID in HCD 
using the range recommended in the manual (7E0-7FF).

Please, if someone could help we appreciate that.

Regards,


Gilson Cesar

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

[Jesse 1 Robinson]

I can't guess what this particular error is about, but in general your first 
action should be to look here:

"GIM69168E ** HFSCOPY PROCESSING TO THE SIGYHFS LIBRARY FAILED FOR HFS IGYCOB2J
 IN SYSMOD JADB62H. THE RETURN CODE (12) EXCEEDED THE ALLOWABLE   
 VALUE. DATE 19.074 - TIME 02:41:58 - SEQUENCE NUMBER 68." 

The key is "SEQUENCE NUMBER 68". SYSPRINT segments are utility messages 
listed in the output and identified by an arbitrary sequence number. It can 
frankly be a PITA to find this segment in a large APPLY, but it will often tell 
you exactly what went wrong. In any case you should read the segment before 
hitting the PMR/ETR button. This advice pertains to any install/utility problem 
during APPLY. 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Vinoth
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 5:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

Hi, 

I have ordered COBOL V6.2 CBPDO package and received the package to my Global 
zone and when i was trying apply i could see the below GIM messages and i 
couldn't get much info from the ibm site, have anyone faced the similar issue. 
we are upgrading from V6.1 to V6.2

Below is the apply statement from the job

APPLY  
   S(HADB620,JADB62H,JADB621)  
   FORFMID(HADB620,JADB62H,JADB621)
   BYPASS(HOLDSYSTEM)  .   


GIM69168E ** HFSCOPY PROCESSING TO THE SIGYHFS LIBRARY FAILED FOR HFS IGYCOB2J
 IN SYSMOD JADB62H. THE RETURN CODE (12) EXCEEDED THE ALLOWABLE   
 VALUE. DATE 19.074 - TIME 02:41:58 - SEQUENCE NUMBER 68. 
GIM30216IAPPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD JADB62H. SYSTEM UTILITY   
 PROCESSING FAILED FOR AN ELEMENT IN JADB62H. 
GIM30225E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI52163. PROCESSING FAILED FOR
 SYSMOD JADB62H, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER FMID OPERAND.   
GIM30223E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI53355. PROCESSING FAILED FOR
 SYSMOD UI52163, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++IF REQ OPERAND. 
GIM30225E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI53358. PROCESSING FAILED FOR
 SYSMOD JADB62H, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER FMID OPERAND.   
GIM30223E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI54511. PROCESSING FAILED FOR
 SYSMOD UI53355, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++IF REQ OPERAND. 
GIM30219E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI56120. PROCESSING FAILED FOR

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[zMan]

I believe you can email LISTSERV with:

SET IBM-MAIN NARCISSIST

OK, just kidding...but seriously, what is the point here?

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 11:31 AM Bill Giannelli 
wrote:

> A HIGHLY TECHNICAL question here..
> How do I get emails of only my posts and not ALL the posts from everyone?
> thanks
> Bill
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


-- 
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[Paul Gilmartin]

On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 09:45:46 -0700, retired mainframer wrote:

>A highly philosophical response here...
> 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solipsism

>If you don't see anyone else's posts, how would you know to respond?
>
>If you originate a question, how would you see the answers?

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[retired mainframer]

A highly philosophical response here...

If you don't see anyone else's posts, how would you know to respond?

If you originate a question, how would you see the answers?

> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On
> Behalf Of Bill Giannelli
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 8:31 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?
> 
> A HIGHLY TECHNICAL question here..
> How do I get emails of only my posts and not ALL the posts from everyone?
> thanks
> Bill
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

[Allan Kielstra]

Please open a PMR against COBOL V6.2.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[Paul Gilmartin]

On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:25:53 -0400, Steve Smith wrote:

>That would be your "Sent" folder, and just set up a rule to trash all
>incoming from IBM-MAIN.
> 
That's slightly different from automatic Cc: which woule place them
in your inbox after a long round trip.

Or you could tell LISTSERV to SET IBM-MAIN NOMAIL.

>Not sure going 100% output-only is a great way to participate, but otoh, I
>can see the appeal.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[Charles Mills]

Write Only Memory? CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity.
 Original message From: Steve Smith  Date: 
3/15/19  9:25 AM  (GMT-07:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Highly 
technical question - how do I only get my posts? That would be your "Sent" 
folder, and just set up a rule to trash allincoming from IBM-MAIN.Not sure 
going 100% output-only is a great way to participate, but otoh, Ican see the 
appeal.sasOn Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 11:59 AM Paul Gilmartin 
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 
11:48:45 -0400, Gord Tomlin wrote:>> >On 2019-03-15 11:31, Bill Giannelli 
wrote:> >> A HIGHLY TECHNICAL question here..> >> How do I get emails 
of only my posts and not ALL the posts from> everyone?> >> Why?  Interesting.  
You can use REPRO=NO to exclude your own posts,> but I know of no way to 
exclude all others.>> >I use a separate email address for IBM-related 
listservs, and I> >configure my email client to automatically cc myself on my 
posts.> >> You might send email to  with body:> 
search * in IBM-MAIN where sender contains billgianne...@gmail.com> from 
2019-01-01> HELP> INFO REFCARD>> ... and it will tell you:> ...>
 To order a copy of these postings, send the following command:>   
GETPOST IBM-MAIN 252541 252545 252582 252584 252637>> -- gil>> 
--> For 
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,> send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN>-- 
sas--For 
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: New look and linking for V2.3 product documentation PDFs

[Seymour J Metz]

That raises one of my standard question templates: what do they mean by 
"MATHML"? Usually the answer to such question is "The minimum we can get away 
with", but one can always hope.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 7:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New look and linking for V2.3 product documentation PDFs

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:35:31 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:

>... (I want Bookie back!)
>
Interesting that the pdfinfo tells me:
Antenna House PDF Output Library 6.5.1119 (Linux64)
... and:

https://secure-web.cisco.com/1lp7CwE25DnCEBgDiU1n4CN9LwIvKrotYAhLhtiCfkl2UxsR0ln5TEYafPVLZpVvVa_6c0E_qaWUds4V4ULSLVUvkDwLmkl82MCYC-gxi8ZhQa84mBu0EVv5BcIa9Qdd2VWv3F6ikkgQfjW5dAEaoSpSxlkBjZ9_5nm-4GhdByoSScnO0ODFiGEqCbIE-yCwz_dd7uE_Du3hhBcG1Sy30b4SFv9aSuGlsDS_cDsFthV5KE1Y9u4Zo3epUuTJoZ3SevqxLx9IUgfoWhvzbmwiy2Q390q1DDBlWl1Gw2AvzGcqJCN-g58HUpIgCyHfOVV-JBXP3jKzp7yCGx0gRMIrCKcxve0bAnSTuRjMvQz68pywP6QT4NXhDgmpbreyRC1Pr63j2EaubbTD5YPCyP9xRtZ0ViiD_G8pCUy_GIqlCI1neattsMs44yktMeMeXyZsj/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.antennahouse.com%2F
... suggests that they were converted from something else.  Word?  Bookie?  ...?

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[Steve Smith]

That would be your "Sent" folder, and just set up a rule to trash all
incoming from IBM-MAIN.

Not sure going 100% output-only is a great way to participate, but otoh, I
can see the appeal.

sas


On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 11:59 AM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:48:45 -0400, Gord Tomlin wrote:
>
> >On 2019-03-15 11:31, Bill Giannelli wrote:
> >> A HIGHLY TECHNICAL question here..
> >> How do I get emails of only my posts and not ALL the posts from
> everyone?
> >
> Why?  Interesting.  You can use REPRO=NO to exclude your own posts,
> but I know of no way to exclude all others.
>
> >I use a separate email address for IBM-related listservs, and I
> >configure my email client to automatically cc myself on my posts.
> >
> You might send email to  with body:
> search * in IBM-MAIN where sender contains billgianne...@gmail.com
> from 2019-01-01
> HELP
> INFO REFCARD
>
> ... and it will tell you:
> ...
> To order a copy of these postings, send the following command:
>   GETPOST IBM-MAIN 252541 252545 252582 252584 252637
>
> -- gil
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


-- 
sas

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[Paul Gilmartin]

On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:48:45 -0400, Gord Tomlin wrote:

>On 2019-03-15 11:31, Bill Giannelli wrote:
>> A HIGHLY TECHNICAL question here..
>> How do I get emails of only my posts and not ALL the posts from everyone?
>
Why?  Interesting.  You can use REPRO=NO to exclude your own posts,
but I know of no way to exclude all others.

>I use a separate email address for IBM-related listservs, and I
>configure my email client to automatically cc myself on my posts.
>
You might send email to  with body:
search * in IBM-MAIN where sender contains billgianne...@gmail.com from 
2019-01-01
HELP
INFO REFCARD

... and it will tell you:
...
To order a copy of these postings, send the following command:
  GETPOST IBM-MAIN 252541 252545 252582 252584 252637

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[Gord Tomlin]

On 2019-03-15 11:31, Bill Giannelli wrote:

A HIGHLY TECHNICAL question here..
How do I get emails of only my posts and not ALL the posts from everyone?
thanks


I use a separate email address for IBM-related listservs, and I 
configure my email client to automatically cc myself on my posts.


--

Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507
Support: https://actionsoftware.com/support/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Highly technical question - how do I only get my posts?

[Bill Giannelli]

A HIGHLY TECHNICAL question here..
How do I get emails of only my posts and not ALL the posts from everyone?
thanks
Bill

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

[Jousma, David]

Yes.  It is one of the steps in the Program Directory.

_
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI  49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Vinoth Meenakshi
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 10:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

FMIDS seems to be for Cobol base and i didnt run IGYISMKD and  is this required 
for Enterprise Cobole V6 versions?

//IKJEFT1A EXEC PGM=IKJEFT1A  
//SYSEXEC DD DISP=SHR,
//  DSN=#smphlq.HADB620.F3
//*   
//*SYSEXEC DD UNIT=SYSALLDA,VOL=SER=#tvol,DISP=SHR,   
//*  DSN=#hlq.SIGYSAMP
//*   
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN DD *
PROF MSGID
IGYMKDIR #PathPrefix  
/*

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL 
EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: New look and linking for V2.3 product documentation PDFs

[Mike Shaw]

On 3/14/2019 10:18 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 21:40:18 -0400, Mike Shaw at QUICKREF wrote:

> 

QUICKREF, too?

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



No Gil, we convert everything from PDF or HTML to text and then store it 
in our DB.


Mike Shaw
MVS/QuickRef Support Group
Chicago-Soft, Ltd

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: New look and linking for V2.3 product documentation PDFs

[Wendell Lovewell]

Hi Sue, 

I know we've beaten on you pretty badly here.  So now that I've had time to use 
some of them, I thought I'd say that I really like the look of the new PDFs.  
You can't please all the people all the time, and you could never please all of 
us any of the time!   Thanks for working so diligently to improve them.

Best regards,
Wendell Lovewell

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

[Vinoth Meenakshi]

FMIDS seems to be for Cobol base and i didnt run IGYISMKD and  is this required 
for Enterprise Cobole V6 versions?

//IKJEFT1A EXEC PGM=IKJEFT1A  
//SYSEXEC DD DISP=SHR,
//  DSN=#smphlq.HADB620.F3
//*   
//*SYSEXEC DD UNIT=SYSALLDA,VOL=SER=#tvol,DISP=SHR,   
//*  DSN=#hlq.SIGYSAMP
//*   
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN DD *
PROF MSGID
IGYMKDIR #PathPrefix  
/*

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Sysadata record types for HLASM

[Mike LaMartina]

AASMMAC1(ASMADATA)

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Joseph Reichman
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 6:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Sysadata record types for HLASM

Would anyone know where I could find documentation for this 


Thanks 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Sysadata record types for HLASM

[Joseph Reichman]

Would anyone know where I could find documentation for this 


Thanks 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

[Jousma, David]

Did you run job IGYISMKD before the apply?   Also, you are failing on the FMID 
for what looks like Japanese support.  Do you need that?

_
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI  49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Vinoth Meenakshi
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 8:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

when i searched for reason code 0594003D its sounds 

BPXFVLKP 10/27/17   
 
JRDirNotFound: A directory in the pathname was not found
  

 
Action: One of the directories specified was not found.  Verify that the name 
specified is spelled correctly.
***  
*** 
   
Here is BPXPRINT.

1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 65.
 BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SMP2 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO BINARY HFS 
FILE /SYTIX1/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2/bin/IBM/IGYACT
 .
1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 66.
 BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SMP2 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO BINARY HFS 
FILE /SYTIX1/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2/bin/IBM/IGYCHK
 JA.
1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 67.
 BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SMP2 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO BINARY HFS 
FILE /SYTIX1/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2/bin/IBM/IGYCKA
 CT.
1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 68.
 BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SMP2 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO TEXT HFS 
FILE /SYTIX1/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2/bin/IBM/IGYCOB2J
 .
 BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0081, REASON CODE 0594003D.  A LINK FAILED FOR LINK 
NAME /SYTIX1/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2/bin/IBM/../../li
 b/nls/msg/Ja_J.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL 
EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

[Vinoth Meenakshi]

when i searched for reason code 0594003D its sounds 

BPXFVLKP 10/27/17   
 
JRDirNotFound: A directory in the pathname was not found
  

 
Action: One of the directories specified was not found.  Verify that the name 
specified is spelled correctly.
***  
*** 
   
Here is BPXPRINT.

1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 65.
 BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SMP2 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO BINARY HFS 
FILE /SYTIX1/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2/bin/IBM/IGYACT
 .
1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 66.
 BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SMP2 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO BINARY HFS 
FILE /SYTIX1/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2/bin/IBM/IGYCHK
 JA.
1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 67.
 BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SMP2 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO BINARY HFS 
FILE /SYTIX1/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2/bin/IBM/IGYCKA
 CT.
1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 68.
 BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SMP2 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO TEXT HFS 
FILE /SYTIX1/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2/bin/IBM/IGYCOB2J
 .
 BPXF140E RETURN CODE 0081, REASON CODE 0594003D.  A LINK FAILED FOR LINK 
NAME /SYTIX1/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2/bin/IBM/../../li
 b/nls/msg/Ja_J.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

[David Spiegel]

Maybe your /SYSX/usr/lpp is MOUNTYd as R/O?

On 2019-03-15 08:29, Vinoth Meenakshi wrote:
> Yes, i followed and created a directory /SYSX/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2 and 
> changed the DDDEF as /SYSX/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2 and ran the apply and 
> still face the same error.
>
> we are planning to have only one version and all both 6.2/6.1 fmids are in 
> ERROR state on SMPE.
>
> Please let me know is there anything that needs to updated and i didnt see 
> specific ones on the migration guide/holddata.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> .
>


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

[Jousma, David]

Please post the text, including the error message from the BPXPRINT DD 
statement.  

_
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI  49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Vinoth Meenakshi
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 8:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

Yes, i followed and created a directory /SYSX/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2 and 
changed the DDDEF as /SYSX/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2 and ran the apply and 
still face the same error.

we are planning to have only one version and all both 6.2/6.1 fmids are in 
ERROR state on SMPE.

Please let me know is there anything that needs to updated and i didnt see 
specific ones on the migration guide/holddata.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL 
EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

[Vinoth Meenakshi]

Yes, i followed and created a directory /SYSX/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2 and 
changed the DDDEF as /SYSX/usr/lpp/IBM/cobol/igyv6r2 and ran the apply and 
still face the same error.

we are planning to have only one version and all both 6.2/6.1 fmids are in 
ERROR state on SMPE.

Please let me know is there anything that needs to updated and i didnt see 
specific ones on the migration guide/holddata.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

[Jousma, David]

Did you follow the instructions in the Program directory for allocating, 
mounting, and creating the proper directory structure?  Also, just so you know, 
if you have a prior version of Ent COB installed, it will be deleted.   If you 
need both around, install the new one in its own target and dlib zones with 
different dataset names.

_
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI  49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Vinoth
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 8:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

Hi, 

I have ordered COBOL V6.2 CBPDO package and received the package to my Global 
zone and when i was trying apply i could see the below GIM messages and i 
couldn't get much info from the ibm site, have anyone faced the similar issue. 
we are upgrading from V6.1 to V6.2

Below is the apply statement from the job

APPLY  
   S(HADB620,JADB62H,JADB621)  
   FORFMID(HADB620,JADB62H,JADB621)
   BYPASS(HOLDSYSTEM)  .   


GIM69168E ** HFSCOPY PROCESSING TO THE SIGYHFS LIBRARY FAILED FOR HFS IGYCOB2J
 IN SYSMOD JADB62H. THE RETURN CODE (12) EXCEEDED THE ALLOWABLE   
 VALUE. DATE 19.074 - TIME 02:41:58 - SEQUENCE NUMBER 68. 
GIM30216IAPPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD JADB62H. SYSTEM UTILITY   
 PROCESSING FAILED FOR AN ELEMENT IN JADB62H. 
GIM30225E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI52163. PROCESSING FAILED FOR
 SYSMOD JADB62H, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER FMID OPERAND.   
GIM30223E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI53355. PROCESSING FAILED FOR
 SYSMOD UI52163, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++IF REQ OPERAND. 
GIM30225E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI53358. PROCESSING FAILED FOR
 SYSMOD JADB62H, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER FMID OPERAND.   
GIM30223E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI54511. PROCESSING FAILED FOR
 SYSMOD UI53355, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++IF REQ OPERAND. 
GIM30219E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI56120. PROCESSING FAILED FOR

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL 
EMAIL**

**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected 
emails**

This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

GIM69168E messages on COBOL V6.2 upgrade

[Vinoth]

Hi, 

I have ordered COBOL V6.2 CBPDO package and received the package to my Global 
zone and when i was trying apply i could see the below GIM messages and i 
couldn't get much info from the ibm site, have anyone faced the similar issue. 
we are upgrading from V6.1 to V6.2

Below is the apply statement from the job

APPLY  
   S(HADB620,JADB62H,JADB621)  
   FORFMID(HADB620,JADB62H,JADB621)
   BYPASS(HOLDSYSTEM)  .   


GIM69168E ** HFSCOPY PROCESSING TO THE SIGYHFS LIBRARY FAILED FOR HFS IGYCOB2J
 IN SYSMOD JADB62H. THE RETURN CODE (12) EXCEEDED THE ALLOWABLE   
 VALUE. DATE 19.074 - TIME 02:41:58 - SEQUENCE NUMBER 68. 
GIM30216IAPPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD JADB62H. SYSTEM UTILITY   
 PROCESSING FAILED FOR AN ELEMENT IN JADB62H. 
GIM30225E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI52163. PROCESSING FAILED FOR
 SYSMOD JADB62H, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER FMID OPERAND.   
GIM30223E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI53355. PROCESSING FAILED FOR
 SYSMOD UI52163, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++IF REQ OPERAND. 
GIM30225E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI53358. PROCESSING FAILED FOR
 SYSMOD JADB62H, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER FMID OPERAND.   
GIM30223E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI54511. PROCESSING FAILED FOR
 SYSMOD UI53355, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++IF REQ OPERAND. 
GIM30219E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI56120. PROCESSING FAILED FOR

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: IBM SFG - Your Opinion

[Sasso, Len]

We just upgraded to Co:Z SFTP Version 5.5.0.

Thank You!

Len Sasso
System Administrator
General Dynamics Information Technology
327 Columbia TPKE
Rensselaer, NY 12144

Phone: (518) 257-4209
Cell: (518) 894-0879
Fax: (518) 257-4300
len.sa...@gdit.com
URL: www.gdit.com



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Kirk Wolf
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 4:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SFG - Your Opinion

IBM z/OS OpenSSH is included with z/OS, and it includes SFTP.

Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Techologies
http://dovetail.com
PS> if you need z/OS data sets, spool files, etc, etc, you can also use
Co:Z SFTP, which does SMF, console notification logging, exits, etc, etc.

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 2:32 PM Sasso, Len  wrote:

> We will be doing SFTP.  IBM is installing and we will be working with
> them to implement. We just got Connect:Direct about 1.5 years ago. We
> are getting SFG/SI, SSP, SEAS and CC.  Yes, there sure are "a lot of pieces."
>
>
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

This electronic message transmission contains information from CSRA that may be 
attorney-client privileged, proprietary or confidential. The information in 
this message is intended only for use by the individual(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you believe you have received this message in error, please 
contact me immediately and be aware that any use, disclosure, copying or 
distribution of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. NOTE: 
Regardless of content, this email shall not operate to bind CSRA to any order 
or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government 
initiative expressly permitting the use of email for such purpose.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Software volume category

[R.S.]

Kees,
You explained how it works, thank you for your help.
It does not differ to much for real tapes.
I also use DEVSUP custom-defined categories for library (volume) 
partitioning purposes.

Does it answer my questions? Unfortunately no.  :-(
(My questions are for better understanding, education. I don't have any 
problem to solve)


BTW: I also use separate categories for PRIVATE volumes, but I was told 
by some IBM-er it is not needed, since PRIVATE volume can be mounted 
only on Volume Specific Mount Request = by the volser. Categories are 
necessary for Non-Specific Volume Request ("hey, ATL, give *some* tape 
for output").



Regards
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






W dniu 2019-03-15 o 08:43, Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM pisze:

The TS7700 VTS uses categories, not in private or scratchpools. Each virtual 
tape has a category.

The OS (z/OS, z/VM, z/TPF) issues a 'mount from category ' when it needs a 
scratch tape.
When a tape is written, the OS changes the category to 'its' private category.

When the tapemanagement system scratches a tape, it is changed to 'its' scratch 
category.

These categories are defined in DEVUPxx and can be different per system or 
Sysplex or OS. This way, each OS can have its own set of scratch and private 
tapes.

e.g.
our Prod Sysplex has:
MEDIA1=0011,
MEDIA2=0012,
ERROR=001E,
PRIVATE=001F,

Out Test Sysplex has:
MEDIA1=0111,
MEDIA2=0112,
ERROR=011E,
PRIVATE=011F,

Does this answer your question?
Kees.



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: 14 March, 2019 18:37
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Software volume category

I mean SMS-managed tapes, and possible entries in DEVSUPxx member, for
example default
MEDIA11 =000B
(this is default for JC media, also called EATC)

Question: where the category is recorded?
AFAIR it is recorde in the ATL, that means Library Manager (PC inside
the library).
However is it recorded anywhere on z/OS side?
Neither VOLCAT, nor RMM show this value.

Q2: Is there any difference between ISMF.2. (Volume - Mountable tape)
information and output from IDCAMS LISTCAT VOLENTRY(Vvolser) ?
Of course I don't mean visual aspects, rather source of information.
LISTCAT takes info from VOLCAT, what about ISMF panels? Is there any
complementary information, i.e. recorded in SMS CDS?

Q3: What is the purpose of volume categories? Is it specific for just
z/OS (mainframe systems) or it is something widely used by ATLs?
Is there any table describing default categories including media JD and
JE or it does not make any sense, because this media is not supported in
z/OS?
(note: JE media is for TS1160 which is not supported in z/OS neither
directly, nor as VTS backend)

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland





==

Jeśli nie jesteś adresatem tej wiadomości:

- powiadom nas o tym w mailu zwrotnym (dziękujemy!),
- usuń trwale tę wiadomość (i wszystkie kopie, które wydrukowałeś lub zapisałeś 
na dysku).
Wiadomość ta może zawierać chronione prawem informacje, które może wykorzystać 
tylko adresat.Przypominamy, że każdy, kto rozpowszechnia (kopiuje, rozprowadza) 
tę wiadomość lub podejmuje podobne działania, narusza prawo i może podlegać 
karze.

mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 
Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. 
Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS 025237, 
NIP: 526-021-50-88. Kapitał zakładowy (opłacony w całości) według stanu na 
01.01.2018 r. wynosi 169.248.488 złotych.

If you are not the addressee of this message:

- let us know by replying to this e-mail (thank you!),
- delete this message permanently (including all the copies which you have 
printed out or saved).
This message may contain legally protected information, which may be used 
exclusively by the addressee.Please be reminded that anyone who disseminates 
(copies, distributes) this message or takes any similar action, violates the 
law and may be penalised.

mBank S.A. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 
Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. District Court for the Capital 
City of Warsaw, 12th Commercial Division of the National Court Register, KRS 
025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Fully paid-up share capital amounting to PLN 
169,248,488 as at 1 January 2018.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Software volume category

[Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM]

The TS7700 VTS uses categories, not in private or scratchpools. Each virtual 
tape has a category.

The OS (z/OS, z/VM, z/TPF) issues a 'mount from category ' when it needs a 
scratch tape.
When a tape is written, the OS changes the category to 'its' private category.

When the tapemanagement system scratches a tape, it is changed to 'its' scratch 
category. 

These categories are defined in DEVUPxx and can be different per system or 
Sysplex or OS. This way, each OS can have its own set of scratch and private 
tapes.

e.g.
our Prod Sysplex has:
MEDIA1=0011,  
MEDIA2=0012,  
ERROR=001E,   
PRIVATE=001F,

Out Test Sysplex has:
MEDIA1=0111,  
MEDIA2=0112,  
ERROR=011E,   
PRIVATE=011F,

Does this answer your question?
Kees.


> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of R.S.
> Sent: 14 March, 2019 18:37
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Software volume category
> 
> I mean SMS-managed tapes, and possible entries in DEVSUPxx member, for
> example default
> MEDIA11 =000B
> (this is default for JC media, also called EATC)
> 
> Question: where the category is recorded?
> AFAIR it is recorde in the ATL, that means Library Manager (PC inside
> the library).
> However is it recorded anywhere on z/OS side?
> Neither VOLCAT, nor RMM show this value.
> 
> Q2: Is there any difference between ISMF.2. (Volume - Mountable tape)
> information and output from IDCAMS LISTCAT VOLENTRY(Vvolser) ?
> Of course I don't mean visual aspects, rather source of information.
> LISTCAT takes info from VOLCAT, what about ISMF panels? Is there any
> complementary information, i.e. recorded in SMS CDS?
> 
> Q3: What is the purpose of volume categories? Is it specific for just
> z/OS (mainframe systems) or it is something widely used by ATLs?
> Is there any table describing default categories including media JD and
> JE or it does not make any sense, because this media is not supported in
> z/OS?
> (note: JE media is for TS1160 which is not supported in z/OS neither
> directly, nor as VTS backend)
> 
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Lodz, Poland
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ==
> 
> Jeśli nie jesteś adresatem tej wiadomości:
> 
> - powiadom nas o tym w mailu zwrotnym (dziękujemy!),
> - usuń trwale tę wiadomość (i wszystkie kopie, które wydrukowałeś lub
> zapisałeś na dysku).
> Wiadomość ta może zawierać chronione prawem informacje, które może
> wykorzystać tylko adresat.Przypominamy, że każdy, kto rozpowszechnia
> (kopiuje, rozprowadza) tę wiadomość lub podejmuje podobne działania,
> narusza prawo i może podlegać karze.
> 
> mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950
> Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st.
> Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS
> 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Kapitał zakładowy (opłacony w całości)
> według stanu na 01.01.2018 r. wynosi 169.248.488 złotych.
> 
> If you are not the addressee of this message:
> 
> - let us know by replying to this e-mail (thank you!),
> - delete this message permanently (including all the copies which you
> have printed out or saved).
> This message may contain legally protected information, which may be
> used exclusively by the addressee.Please be reminded that anyone who
> disseminates (copies, distributes) this message or takes any similar
> action, violates the law and may be penalised.
> 
> mBank S.A. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-
> 950 Warszawa,www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. District Court for
> the Capital City of Warsaw, 12th Commercial Division of the National
> Court Register, KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Fully paid-up share
> capital amounting to PLN 169,248,488 as at 1 January 2018.
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is