Re: Sam Golob articles are now directly online
Thanks, Sam. But it's 2023. Can't the "articles" folder (also) contain a single ZIP file, so that all the contents can be downloaded in one file? Thanks. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: FW: OPS/MVS
In addition to RACF, there is a layer of security rules refresh within OPSMVS itself. Don't know the specifics of it, but the OPS/MVS docs will surely cover it. - KB --- Original Message --- On Thursday, February 23rd, 2023 at 4:53 AM, Shawn Prenevost wrote: > Another consideration is that OPS/MVS can also be configured to make SAF > calls for specific access. This can be all SAF or a mix of SAF and OPS )SEC > rules. > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023, 11:25 AM Steve Beaver st...@stevebeaver.com wrote: > > > Thanks Bill > > > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > > Behalf Of William J Bishop > > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 10:24 AM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: Re: FW: OPS/MVS > > > > It has been a while since I supported OPS/MVS, but where I was, there was a > > security environment built with OPS Rules. It was based upon the userid of > > the requestor and was set to allow or disallow functions with OPS/MVS. > > > > I think the rules dataset we used ended in 'security.rules'. > > > > We would update the appropriate member(s) and then deactivate and > > reactivate them. Make sure you reset them to auto-enable. > > > > You may have to enable them via console commands as you may not have all > > the authority to work within the SPF application. > > > > Bill Bishop > > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:16 AM Steve Beaver st...@stevebeaver.com > > wrote: > > > > > I'm in a shop that the person that setup OPS/MVS is gone. > > > > > > So I went looking and found that the SYSTEM is using FACILITY. > > > > > > What am I missing? It's has to be something minor and stupid > > > > > > From: Beaver, Steve > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 10:07 AM > > > Subject: OPS/MVS > > > > > > Current OPSVIEW command not authorized - ATTEMPTED OPSMVS SYSVIEW PANEL > > > ACCESS BY A819822 REJECTED, > > > > > > Also since I am the SYSPROG and have SPECIAL. I have added myself to > > > with > > > READ > > > > > > FACILITY OPSAOF > > > > > > FACILITY OPSBRW > > > > > > FACILITY OPSCMD > > > > > > FACILITY OPSCTL > > > > > > FACILITY OPSDOM > > > > > > FACILITY OPSEPI > > > > > > FACILITY OPSGLOBAL > > > > > > FACILITY OPSHFI > > > > > > FACILITY OPSLOG > > > > > > FACILITY OPSOSF > > > > > > FACILITY OPSPARM > > > > > > FACILITY OPSREPLY > > > > > > FACILITY OPSREQ > > > > > > FACILITY OPSRMT > > > > > > FACILITY OPSSMTBL > > > > > > FACILITY OPSSSMTBL > > > > > > FACILITY OPSWTO > > > > > > What am I missing, and I also the logoff/Logon > > > > > > -- > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Sam Golob articles are now directly online
Ditto! On 2/22/2023 5:20 PM, Steve Horein wrote: Thank you for this and everything else you do! It is truly appreciated. On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 6:45 PM Sam Golob wrote: Dear Folks, Sorry for the mixup, but I moved my System Programming articles on the CBT Tape Web Site (www.cbttape.org) to their own directory. The CBT Tape home page has been changed to reflect this. To find my articles now, please go to www.cbttape.org/articles . There are about 230 articles, which we hope, will benefit everyone. You can also get there from the home page by scrolling down to "Sam Golob's Articles...". Kindly look at the several short members at the beginning, which describe the naming convention of the file names (by publication or composition date), and which describe any copyright notices, etc. with other stuff you should also know. Thanks very much for bearing with me. All the best of everything to all of you. Sincerely, Sam -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Sam Golob articles are now directly online
Thank you for this and everything else you do! It is truly appreciated. On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 6:45 PM Sam Golob wrote: > Dear Folks, > > Sorry for the mixup, but I moved my System Programming articles on > the CBT Tape Web Site (www.cbttape.org) to their own directory. The CBT > Tape home page has been changed to reflect this. > > To find my articles now, please go to www.cbttape.org/articles . > There are about 230 articles, which we hope, will benefit everyone. You > can also get there from the home page by scrolling down to "Sam Golob's > Articles...". > > Kindly look at the several short members at the beginning, which > describe the naming convention of the file names (by publication or > composition date), and which describe any copyright notices, etc. with > other stuff you should also know. > > Thanks very much for bearing with me. > > All the best of everything to all of you. > > Sincerely, Sam > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Comparing WLM Service Definitions
In a past life, I used the MXg REXXWLM to convert the old and new policy definitions to SAS data bases and compared the two, Another is to just print the old and new and Super-C the two. Michael At 05:50 AM 2/22/2023, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote: Hi, Is there a way to compare two WLM Service Definitions? Thanks Gadi -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: How long for an experiened z/OS sysprog to come up to speed on a new environment?
Hi Brian, "... Originally ..." maybe 30 or more years ago? (Incidentally, I started with SMP4 (before 1983). I don't remember any ISPF Panels for that.) I do RACF in Batch so that it (almost) self-documents and is repeatable. ISPF Panels are not (easily) repeatable. Regards, David On 2023-02-22 19:58, Brian Westerman wrote: I never really thought about it. I use the ISPF panels (for racf and smp/e) a lot, and I know pretty much all of the commands to do it otherwise. Actually, I think I built my SMPe jobs originally from the panels. :) Brian -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: How long for an experiened z/OS sysprog to come up to speed on a new environment?
I never really thought about it. I use the ISPF panels (for racf and smp/e) a lot, and I know pretty much all of the commands to do it otherwise. Actually, I think I built my SMPe jobs originally from the panels. :) Brian -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Sam Golob articles are now directly online
Dear Folks, Sorry for the mixup, but I moved my System Programming articles on the CBT Tape Web Site (www.cbttape.org) to their own directory. The CBT Tape home page has been changed to reflect this. To find my articles now, please go to www.cbttape.org/articles . There are about 230 articles, which we hope, will benefit everyone. You can also get there from the home page by scrolling down to "Sam Golob's Articles...". Kindly look at the several short members at the beginning, which describe the naming convention of the file names (by publication or composition date), and which describe any copyright notices, etc. with other stuff you should also know. Thanks very much for bearing with me. All the best of everything to all of you. Sincerely, Sam -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: FW: OPS/MVS
Another consideration is that OPS/MVS can also be configured to make SAF calls for specific access. This can be all SAF or a mix of SAF and OPS )SEC rules. On Wed, Feb 22, 2023, 11:25 AM Steve Beaver wrote: > Thanks Bill > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of William J Bishop > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 10:24 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: FW: OPS/MVS > > It has been a while since I supported OPS/MVS, but where I was, there was a > security environment built with OPS Rules. It was based upon the userid of > the requestor and was set to allow or disallow functions with OPS/MVS. > > I think the rules dataset we used ended in 'security.rules'. > > We would update the appropriate member(s) and then deactivate and > reactivate them. Make sure you reset them to auto-enable. > > You may have to enable them via console commands as you may not have all > the authority to work within the SPF application. > > Bill Bishop > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:16 AM Steve Beaver > wrote: > > > I'm in a shop that the person that setup OPS/MVS is gone. > > > > > > > > So I went looking and found that the SYSTEM is using FACILITY. > > > > > > > > What am I missing? It's has to be something minor and stupid > > > > > > > > From: Beaver, Steve > > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 10:07 AM > > Subject: OPS/MVS > > > > > > > > Current OPSVIEW command not authorized - ATTEMPTED OPSMVS SYSVIEW PANEL > > ACCESS BY A819822 REJECTED, > > > > > > > > Also since I am the SYSPROG and have SPECIAL. I have added myself to > with > > READ > > > > > > > > FACILITY OPSAOF > > > > FACILITY OPSBRW > > > > FACILITY OPSCMD > > > > FACILITY OPSCTL > > > > FACILITY OPSDOM > > > > FACILITY OPSEPI > > > > FACILITY OPSGLOBAL > > > > FACILITY OPSHFI > > > > FACILITY OPSLOG > > > > FACILITY OPSOSF > > > > FACILITY OPSPARM > > > > FACILITY OPSREPLY > > > > FACILITY OPSREQ > > > > FACILITY OPSRMT > > > > FACILITY OPSSMTBL > > > > FACILITY OPSSSMTBL > > > > FACILITY OPSWTO > > > > > > > > What am I missing, and I also the logoff/Logon > > > > > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Marist Email Issues
They are looking at the problem. It appears one of their MX records is bad. They made a change and now my email gets to the list server. Steve Thompson -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: VS Pascal documentation on ibm.com?
An offline email I received also pointed me to this IBM documentation portal: https://www.ibm.com/resources/publications Where search term "VS PASCAL" gets you to all but one of the program product VS Pascal manuals (the licensed material manual "VS PASCAL DIAGNOSIS GUIDE AND REFERENCE" is listed on the IBM site but is not available for download). Interestingly, the IBM portal downloads appear to be OCR-scanned copies like those at bitsavers.org rather than PDF's constructed from the original paper documentation sources. Thanks to all for your help. Peter -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Farley, Peter Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 9:08 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: VS Pascal documentation on ibm.com? Thanks Mark, I actually found those too after I posted my earlier request. Peter -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 8:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: VS Pascal documentation on ibm.com? Or this? http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/370/OS_VS/vs_pascal/ Mark Jacobs --- Original Message --- On Tuesday, February 21st, 2023 at 8:24 PM, Mark Jacobs wrote: > Does this help? > > http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/370/OS_VS/pascal/ > > Mark Jacobs > > --- Original Message --- > On Tuesday, February 21st, 2023 at 8:03 PM, Farley, Peter > 031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > I have access to a development z/OS system with the full VS Pascal product > > installed (not just the runtime library), and would like to experiment with > > it just for fun, but I cannot find any VS Pascal documentation anywhere on > > ibm.com. Even starting at ibm.com/docs fails with a timeout, though I can > > get to bookmarked COBOL and PL1 ibm.com documentation sites without a > > problem. > > > > Note, this is the OCO IBM program product VS Pascal, not the FDP Pascal/VS > > from an earlier IBM incarnation (which came with full runtime and compiler > > sources; , those were the days . . .). > > > > If anyone has a link to the documentation or can find one please share it. > > > > Regards, > > > > Peter -- This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: FW: OPS/MVS
Thanks Bill -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of William J Bishop Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 10:24 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: FW: OPS/MVS It has been a while since I supported OPS/MVS, but where I was, there was a security environment built with OPS Rules. It was based upon the userid of the requestor and was set to allow or disallow functions with OPS/MVS. I think the rules dataset we used ended in 'security.rules'. We would update the appropriate member(s) and then deactivate and reactivate them. Make sure you reset them to auto-enable. You may have to enable them via console commands as you may not have all the authority to work within the SPF application. Bill Bishop On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:16 AM Steve Beaver wrote: > I'm in a shop that the person that setup OPS/MVS is gone. > > > > So I went looking and found that the SYSTEM is using FACILITY. > > > > What am I missing? It's has to be something minor and stupid > > > > From: Beaver, Steve > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 10:07 AM > Subject: OPS/MVS > > > > Current OPSVIEW command not authorized - ATTEMPTED OPSMVS SYSVIEW PANEL > ACCESS BY A819822 REJECTED, > > > > Also since I am the SYSPROG and have SPECIAL. I have added myself to with > READ > > > > FACILITY OPSAOF > > FACILITY OPSBRW > > FACILITY OPSCMD > > FACILITY OPSCTL > > FACILITY OPSDOM > > FACILITY OPSEPI > > FACILITY OPSGLOBAL > > FACILITY OPSHFI > > FACILITY OPSLOG > > FACILITY OPSOSF > > FACILITY OPSPARM > > FACILITY OPSREPLY > > FACILITY OPSREQ > > FACILITY OPSRMT > > FACILITY OPSSMTBL > > FACILITY OPSSSMTBL > > FACILITY OPSWTO > > > > What am I missing, and I also the logoff/Logon > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: FW: OPS/MVS
It has been a while since I supported OPS/MVS, but where I was, there was a security environment built with OPS Rules. It was based upon the userid of the requestor and was set to allow or disallow functions with OPS/MVS. I think the rules dataset we used ended in 'security.rules'. We would update the appropriate member(s) and then deactivate and reactivate them. Make sure you reset them to auto-enable. You may have to enable them via console commands as you may not have all the authority to work within the SPF application. Bill Bishop On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:16 AM Steve Beaver wrote: > I'm in a shop that the person that setup OPS/MVS is gone. > > > > So I went looking and found that the SYSTEM is using FACILITY. > > > > What am I missing? It's has to be something minor and stupid > > > > From: Beaver, Steve > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 10:07 AM > Subject: OPS/MVS > > > > Current OPSVIEW command not authorized - ATTEMPTED OPSMVS SYSVIEW PANEL > ACCESS BY A819822 REJECTED, > > > > Also since I am the SYSPROG and have SPECIAL. I have added myself to with > READ > > > > FACILITY OPSAOF > > FACILITY OPSBRW > > FACILITY OPSCMD > > FACILITY OPSCTL > > FACILITY OPSDOM > > FACILITY OPSEPI > > FACILITY OPSGLOBAL > > FACILITY OPSHFI > > FACILITY OPSLOG > > FACILITY OPSOSF > > FACILITY OPSPARM > > FACILITY OPSREPLY > > FACILITY OPSREQ > > FACILITY OPSRMT > > FACILITY OPSSMTBL > > FACILITY OPSSSMTBL > > FACILITY OPSWTO > > > > What am I missing, and I also the logoff/Logon > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: How long for an experiened z/OS sysprog to come up to speed on a new environment?
> the assumption that soneone starting work > at a new site could expect to bring their > own tools with them, with impunity. I can, because I ask for permission. Doing it when you know it's not allowed, OTOH, is, shall we say, ill considered. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Jeremy Nicoll Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 11:09 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: How long for an experiened z/OS sysprog to come up to speed on a new environment? On Sun, 19 Feb 2023, at 23:27, Beverly Caldwell wrote: > I would answer your questions if knew who you were and why you were asking! > But yes it has never been a problem for me. Sometimes takes a little > deviousness to make the transfer work. These people think they are > so smart but there is usually a way round their little schemes. I do not see why you'd to know who I am - how does that affect the answer? I've been reading and posting on IBM-mainframe mail lists/newsgroups for - I think - about 25 years. Before ill-health forced me to stop work I was an MVS sysprog at a UK bank for a while, then led a small programming team who (amongst other things) worked on SA/390 automation. If you don't believe it, search for me on LinkedIn. I'm asking because I've been following the thread and was somewhat amazed at the assumption that soneone starting work at a new site could expect to bring their own tools with them, with impunity. When you refer to "These people think they are so smart...", who do you mean? -- Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
FW: OPS/MVS
I'm in a shop that the person that setup OPS/MVS is gone. So I went looking and found that the SYSTEM is using FACILITY. What am I missing? It's has to be something minor and stupid From: Beaver, Steve Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 10:07 AM Subject: OPS/MVS Current OPSVIEW command not authorized - ATTEMPTED OPSMVS SYSVIEW PANEL ACCESS BY A819822 REJECTED, Also since I am the SYSPROG and have SPECIAL. I have added myself to with READ FACILITY OPSAOF FACILITY OPSBRW FACILITY OPSCMD FACILITY OPSCTL FACILITY OPSDOM FACILITY OPSEPI FACILITY OPSGLOBAL FACILITY OPSHFI FACILITY OPSLOG FACILITY OPSOSF FACILITY OPSPARM FACILITY OPSREPLY FACILITY OPSREQ FACILITY OPSRMT FACILITY OPSSMTBL FACILITY OPSSSMTBL FACILITY OPSWTO What am I missing, and I also the logoff/Logon -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: How long for an experiened z/OS sysprog to come up to speed on a new environment?
On Sun, 19 Feb 2023, at 23:27, Beverly Caldwell wrote: > I would answer your questions if knew who you were and why you were asking! > But yes it has never been a problem for me. Sometimes takes a little > deviousness to make the transfer work. These people think they are > so smart but there is usually a way round their little schemes. I do not see why you'd to know who I am - how does that affect the answer? I've been reading and posting on IBM-mainframe mail lists/newsgroups for - I think - about 25 years. Before ill-health forced me to stop work I was an MVS sysprog at a UK bank for a while, then led a small programming team who (amongst other things) worked on SA/390 automation. If you don't believe it, search for me on LinkedIn. I'm asking because I've been following the thread and was somewhat amazed at the assumption that soneone starting work at a new site could expect to bring their own tools with them, with impunity. When you refer to "These people think they are so smart...", who do you mean? -- Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Sam Golob articles are now directly online
Dear Folks, Recently I received a request to put my (over 230) articles about MVS Systems Programming, directly online. They had previously resided (and still reside) on CBT Tape Files 014 and 120, which are in zipped XMIT-format, and therefore they are not so readily accessible. So I finally did it. The older articles also had outdated email addresses and URL's, which I tried to correct as well (as much as possible). So these articles can now be found on www.cbttape.org/xephon (sorry about that), and then you click on sgolob.articles to see them all. I certainly hope that these articles will contribute to people's system programming knowledge, at all levels, and I'm grateful to Shmuel Metz, who suggested that I do this. All the best of everything to all of you. Sincerely, Sam -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Comparing WLM Service Definitions
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/listing-wlm-couple-policy-definitions Then use diff Colin On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 11:51, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote: > Hi, > Is there a way to compare two WLM Service Definitions? > > Thanks > > Gadi > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Comparing WLM Service Definitions
Hi, Is there a way to compare two WLM Service Definitions? Thanks Gadi -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
