CA7 with service now

[Nathan Astle]

Hi,


Is there anyone in the List who have integrated CA7 with Service
Now(Ticketing Tool). Basically whenever the CA7 jobs Abend it must
automatically create a incident in service now.

Could you please share your experience  ? So that It can help me to build a
similar Solution in my Shop.

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Searching PMR

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Is it possible to search PMR number opened by others. This is to check the
status and see if the PMR is resolved

Apology this might dummy but I am logged not able to see.

Could someone please help me with the correct URL ?

Regards
Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Sample JCL for file transfer using NJE/TCPIP

[Nathan Astle]

Hi Ed

Apologies

I was trying to understand if XMIT is used versus FTP then  I will have to
run a TSO RECEIVE command from the target LPAR to ensure the file is
available in Target LPAR





On May 20, 2017 2:38 PM, "Edward Finnell" <
000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> What have you tried?
>
> //JOBCARD JOB
> //STEP1   EXEC  PGM=IKJEFT01,REGION=4096K,DYNAMNBR=16
> //SYSTSPRT  DD SYSOUT=A
> //SYSTSIN   DD *
> TRANSMIT nodename.userid  DSN('my.big.honkin.smf')
> //*
>
>
> In a message dated 5/20/2017 1:38:12 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> tcpipat...@gmail.com writes:
>
> Could  someone please help me with the sample JCL for transferring a
> file(SMF)  Using NJE TCPIP link.
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Sample JCL for file transfer using NJE/TCPIP

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Could someone please help me with the sample JCL for transferring a
file(SMF) Using NJE TCPIP link.


Regards
Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: IXGLOGR internal function

[Nathan Astle]

Thank you so much. I will go through it.

Just curious if IXGLOGR is the only way to fetch the data for some.of the
products or there any other way ?

On Apr 26, 2017 8:36 PM, "Leonardo Vaz" <leonardo@cn.ca> wrote:

> Hello Nathan!
>
> It's through the macros IXGCONN, IXGBRWSE, IXGDELET or IXGWRITE.
>
> IBM's Authorized assembler guide is pretty clear on how to use them.
>
> Regards,
> Leo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Nathan Astle
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 12:45 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: IXGLOGR internal function
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there any Documentation on how DB2 or any address space within z/OS are
> making use of IXGLOGR ?
>
> I Mean internally how are they making the use of IXGLOGR ?
>
> The question is just for the knowledge sake and wanted to understand how
> Logstream structures created are making use of IXGLOGR.
>
> Regards,
> Nathan Astle
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

IXGLOGR internal function

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

Is there any Documentation on how DB2 or any address space within z/OS are
making use of IXGLOGR ?

I Mean internally how are they making the use of IXGLOGR ?

The question is just for the knowledge sake and wanted to understand how
Logstream structures created are making use of IXGLOGR.

Regards,
Nathan Astle

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

AT-TLS replace ICF processor ?

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Cross posted

Not trying to.resolve anything.

Recently had a discussion with a TCPIP/SNA person and he feels that most of
the task offloaded to ICF processor can be handled by AT-TLS.

I was not.able to make any sense out of it.

Aren't ICF processor independent of AT-TLS ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Error message lookup help

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Cross posted

For some reason the IBM sites are not opening

Can someone please help me out with the below error explanation

EZZ6011I TELNET1 BPX1SOC FAILED, RC = 0070 RSN = 12CA00B6


Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Looking for z/OS system programmer - Australia

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

I am posting this Job opening behalf of my colleague who is looking for
z/OS system programmer(Contract Position) also with some experience in
CICS,DB2,MQ,IMS for Australia, Melbourne with the contract of 1 year.

If interested please contact me directly

Regards,
Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Capacity planning and Performance opening

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Are there anyone in the group who is looking for a capacity planning Job
role in USA ?

Please contact me on my email address if you are Interested ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Sample ACS routine

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Would someone help me with a sample STOGROUP, DATACLAS and STORCLAS.

I.am trying to create ACS routine for one of my sandbox.

Just trying to push a USERID allocation to a SMS volume


Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

FDRDSF question

[Nathan Astle]

Hello

Good morning

What would be syntax to restore with a new name using FDR ?

Currently I have

RESTORE TYPE=DSF -
SELECT DSN='A.B.C'

Can someone point me the correct syntax ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Block Chain

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

I was just reading through about block chain. If I understand correct it
said once block chain comes then payment authorizing party won't be There.
Does that mean this would bypass MasterCard or Visa processing ?


Apology if my understanding is not correct

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Freeware SMP/E installable product

[Nathan Astle]

Just for my new team member practice purpose

On Jan 11, 2017 4:22 PM, "Binyamin Dissen" <bdis...@dissensoftware.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:46:35 +0530 Nathan Astle <tcpipat...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> :>Are there any freeware product which uses SMP/E to install.
>
> What is the purpose of your question?
>
> --
> Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com>
> http://www.dissensoftware.com
>
> Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
>
>
> Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
> you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
>
> I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
> especially those from irresponsible companies.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Freeware SMP/E installable product

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

There was a freeware scheduler which uses SMP/E but I don't remember.

Does anyone know ?

On Jan 10, 2017 9:56 PM, "R.S." <r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl> wrote:

> W dniu 2017-01-10 o 17:16, Nathan Astle pisze:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Are there any freeware product which uses SMP/E to install.
>>
> There are several IBM products which are free of charge.
> While it's not the same as freeware, every legal z/OS user can download it
> and install.
> Majority of the products are available through ShopzSeries, but on the
> "z/OS downloads" page you'll find also some packages. The last one still
> require registration, but AFAIK nothing more.
>
> So, if you want something to play with SMP/E, voila. If not - what is your
> need?
>
> Of course some CBT free tools can also use SMP/E, but I don't remember any
> at the time.
>
> HTH
>
> Regards
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Lodz, Poland
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku
> przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być
> jedynie jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś
> adresatem niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej
> przekazania adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie,
> rozprowadzanie lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie
> zabronione i może być karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo,
> prosimy niezwłocznie zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale
> usunąć tę wiadomość włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub
> zapisane na dysku.
>
> This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is
> intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be
> received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If
> you are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee
> authorized to forward it to the addressee, be advised that any
> dissemination, copying, distribution or any other similar activity is
> legally prohibited and may be punishable. If you received this e-mail by
> mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in
> your e-mail software and delete permanently this e-mail including any
> copies of it either printed or saved to hard drive.
>
> mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa,
> www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl
> Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego
> Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP:
> 526-021-50-88. Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2016 r. kapitał zakładowy mBanku
> S.A. (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 168.955.696 złotych.
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Freeware SMP/E installable product

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Are there any freeware product which uses SMP/E to install.

Please point me

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Two IEASYSxx ?

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Can we have two IEASYSXX members in an LPAR ?

Since one of our LPAR has 1 IEASYSxx but it has only page dataset coded and
the LOADxx member too shows the sysparm value which has the IEASYSXX
containing page dataset.

How do I find the second IEASYSXX member since the   IPLINFO is not showing
up

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

LE option for a product

[Nathan Astle]

Hello

Does LE(language Environment) always required for any product or any
product can handle any function that basically a  LE does it ?

I am here not trying to resolve anything but just trying to understand the
LE functionality for any product to work in z/OS.


Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Address space

[Nathan Astle]

Can you paste the display ?

On Nov 15, 2016 9:41 AM, "saurabh khandelwal" <
sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello group,
> In our shop, In sdsf I can see many jobs running with owner and some of
> them running without owner.
>
> I am unable to find difference in this. Can anybody help me to understand
> this process.
>
> Regards
>
> On Nov 14, 2016 20:02, "Farley, Peter x23353"  >
> wrote:
>
> I went to the usual page that I start my z/OS publication research today,
> and the link to the z/OS V2.1 page points instead to the V1.13 pages:
>
> Bookmark is:
>
> http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/
>
> Starting page reached by that link is:
>
> http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/index.html
>
> z/OS V2.1 link under the heading "Search z/OS information in IBM Knowledge
> Center:" points here:
>
> https://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/
> SSLTBW_1.13.0/com.ibm.zos.r13/en/Homepage.html
>
> Can someone from IBM who monitors this list please get that link on the web
> page fixed?
>
> Peter
>
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
> If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized
> representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Cancel STARTING

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Apology for asking a dummy question.

When we have multiple STC in starting status. We issue C STARTING,A=

Does it mean we are cancelling just based on Cancel status ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

PDSE supported for product dataset z/OS version

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

Are there any information starting from which version of z/OS, the Product
load modules datasets can be created as PDSE ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Db2 8.1 on z/OS 2.1

[Nathan Astle]

Hello

Is there anyone who has db2 8.1 running on zOS 2.1 ?

Any significant change in db2 performance with respect to the above ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: SAD testing in sysplex

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

Is there a IPCS commands that can show me that SAD was written completely ?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Elardus Engelbrecht <
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote:

> Nathan Astle wrote:
>
> >I am creating a SAD test for one of our sandbox system which is part of
> sysplex shared with other production LPAR.
> >So as a SAD testing, I am bringing down the LPAR and leaving with just
> few task up.
>
> Just a few tasks? This is not SAD.
>
> >My question is when I load the SAD IPL and once I confirm the SAD IPL
> with the VOLUMES used for SAD datasets.
>
> >Can I remove the sandbox LPAR from sysplex prior to confirming the SAD
> datasets or after completing the SAD process I can remove the SANDBOX lpar
> from sysplex ?
>
> Mark Jacobs gave you a serious warning, but I have one question: Do you
> want that LPAR to stay inside or outside the Sysplex after IPL? In other
> words, when are you planning to vary it out of Sysplex?
>
> Another nasty thing to consider, is your LPAR using XCF?
>
> Oh, things like shared JES2/3 spool, shared HSM, RACF, etc. may make your
> attempt futile.
>
> But, if you take some precautions, your attempt to do a SAD may work.
>
> Good luck.
>
> Groete / Greetings
> Elardus Engelbrecht
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

SAD testing in sysplex

[Nathan Astle]

Hello

I am creating a SAD test for one of our sandbox system which is part of
sysplex shared with other production LPAR.

So as a SAD testing, I am bringing down the LPAR and leaving with just few
task up.

My question is when I load the SAD IPL and once I confirm the SAD IPL with
the VOLUMES used for SAD datasets.

Can I remove the sandbox LPAR from sysplex prior to confirming the SAD
datasets or after completing the SAD process I can remove the SANDBOX lpar
from sysplex ?

Are there any difference?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Controlling allocation in IDCAMS IMPORT operation

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

I am trying to search it in IDCAMS manual if the IDCAM import operation can
control the OUTDATASET allocation. Still not able to see any clue in the FM.

Does anyone has any suggestions ? Meanwhile I am still searching in the
manual

z/OS 1.13

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Syncsort step running too long

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

We have upgraded our syncsort from 1.4.2 to 2.1

Post the upgrade there some batch jobs running too long which used complete
within 5min prior to upgrade.

So to diagnose I have taken the dump of the batch job to pursue the issue
with syncsort.

The Job was doing I/O but not sure why it was running too long without
completing.

Did anyone face this issue at your shop ?

Well Job log didn't show any errors using which I can research further.

We are at zOS 2.1.

SYSLOG or logrec too didn't give any much information

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Sysplex Timer issue

[Nathan Astle]

Hi,

It turned out that the CTN-ID value was coded in Upper case and what we
used to build the CF was in Lower case.

I am still trying to see if CTN-ID values are case sensitive.

Does anybody know if CTN-ID has such constraints ?

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Kieron D Hinds <kdhi...@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> It sounds like you have a situation where the CF you're attempting to IPL
> is running on a CPC with a different CTNID than the CTNID of the CPC[s]
> where other images are already active (z/OS and CFs).
> I'd have to compare the CTNID in the output of the IXL160E as well as the
> IEA386I from the D ETR of active system[s] in the sysplex to know for
> sure, but if it the case then you'll need to get the CTNIDs to match.
>
> Is this the first attempt to activate the CF - if so was STP configured on
> the CF CPC? Versus if it was after a configuration change made to an
> existing CF, do you expect the STP configuration or the CTNID to change?
>
> Changing CTNIDs *can* be disruptive so please check with your local or IBM
> hardware support if you don't understand this already.
>
>
> Kieron Hinds
> z/OS Integration Test / System z Platform Evaluation Test
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:   Nathan Astle <tcpipat...@gmail.com>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date:   06/13/2016 01:54 PM
> Subject:Sysplex Timer issue
> Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We are receiving the error message on CF, while IPling .
>
> IXL160E CF REQUEST TIME ORDERING: REQUIRED AND NOT-ENABLED 194
>
> REASON: CTNID MISMATCH
>
>
> The ETR I displayed in the Console is different from the error message.
>
>
> Does it mean i have to correct that in the IOGEN ?
>
>
> Jake
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Re cataloging IODF jcl

[Nathan Astle]

Thank you so much to all.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Edgard Balter Jr. <edgard.bal...@ibge.gov.br
> wrote:

> Nathan,
>
> //RECATALG EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
> //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
> //SYSINDD *
>  DEFINE CLUSTER(NAME(SYS1.IODF00.CLUSTER)-
> RECATALOG-
> LINEAR)  -
>DATA(NAME(SYS1.IODF00)-
> VOLUME(xx)   -
> TRACKS(7 0)  -
> CONTROLINTERVALSIZE(4096))
> /*
>
> Best regards,
> Edgard
>
>
> IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> gravou em
> 09/06/2016 06:02:53:
>
> > De: Nathan Astle <tcpipat...@gmail.com>
> > Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
> > Data: 09/06/2016 06:03
> > Assunto: Re cataloging IODF jcl
> > Enviado por: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Can someone please share me a sample JCL on recataloging the IODF
> dataset ?
> >
> > Regards
> > Nathan
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
>
>
> Esta mensagem é reservada. Sua divulgação, distribuição, reprodução ou
> qualquer forma de uso é proibida e depende de prévia autorização desta
> Instituição. O remetente utiliza o correio eletrônico no exercício do seu
> trabalho ou em razão dele, eximindo esta Instituição de qualquer
> responsabilidade por utilização indevida. Se você recebeu esta mensagem
> por engano, favor eliminá-la imediatamente.
>
> This message is reserved. Its disclosure, distribution, reproduction, or
> any other form of use is prohibited and shall depend upon previous proper
> authorization. The sender uses electronic mail in the exercise of his/her
> work or by virtue thereof, and the Institution accepts no liability for
> its undue use. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please delete
> it immediately.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re cataloging IODF jcl

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

Can someone please share me a sample JCL on recataloging the IODF dataset ?

Regards
Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

ADRDSSU renamunconditional

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

I am using the below control card to change Just the 4th level qualifier to
have the System name alone while restoring from the PS backup dataset, but
I am not getting any dataset created after the 4th level Qualifier and the
Log says the Dataset already exist.

RESTORE INDDNAME(BACKUPDS)  -
DATASET(INCLUDE(**.**)) -
STORCLAS(MAINFRAME)-
RENAMEU(SYSPROG.SYM.R14P2.**,SYSPROG.SYM.R14P2.SYSD.**) -
FORCE -
ADMIN -
CATALOG SHR TOL(ENQF)

Is there any change that I need to be making on the above control where I
can get all the dataset restored with SYSNAME SYSD added to all the
restored dataset ?


Regards,
Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: How to add volumes on z/VM

[Nathan Astle]

Did you have a look at the z/VM primer guide ?

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Veerendra Haluvadandimath <
kumarsyste...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Can somebody give me procedure about adding volumes to guests hosted on
> z/VM lpars.
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

TSO receive on MultiVolume PS error

[Nathan Astle]

Hi,

I am trying to receive an XMI file to a PS with Fomat U, but I receive a
message as


 INMR108I RECEIVE command terminated.  Trailer record missing
 ***

I am not sure if my target pre-allocated file has any problem.

Could someone please clarify me on the above ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: GDG retention

[Nathan Astle]

Hi,

Since these GDG were defined with No days Parmeter, So i assume this can be
deleted can be anytime. Is there a way to determine the retentions of this
GDG ? I hope My storage administrators can answer ?

Any suggestions ?

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM <
kees.verno...@klm.com> wrote:

> No, 14 versions/members. When G0015v00 is created, G0001V00 is deleted.
>
> Kees.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Nathan Astle
> Sent: 19 May, 2016 11:33
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: GDG retention
>
> Hello,
>
> We have some GDG getting created during the SMF processing. Is there a way
> to determine its retention ?
>
> I see the value for GDG as LIM 14. Does that mean the retention would be 14
> days ?
>
> Nathan
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If
> you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or
> any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other
> action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may
> be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the
> sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its
> employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission
> of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch
> Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered
> number 33014286
> 
>
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

GDG retention

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

We have some GDG getting created during the SMF processing. Is there a way
to determine its retention ?

I see the value for GDG as LIM 14. Does that mean the retention would be 14
days ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

ADRDSSU message Keywords Clarification

[Nathan Astle]

Hi,

During a restore of a Dataset I see the below keywords along with the
ADR Messages :

RI01
RI01
PRIME
STEND
TDDS
NEWDS
TDNVS
TDLOG
NEWDS
TDNVS
TDLOG
TDLOG
STEND
CLTSK
DSSU

Could someone please point me to a manual where I can get the explanation
for the above keywords ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Concatenation order in LPALST

[Nathan Astle]

Hi,

Apology for asking dummy question.

Is there a reason on why we need to place Security product LPALIB after the
System LPALIB in LPALST00 ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

DYNDISP in XCF

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Are there in group who have enabled DYNDISP in coupling facility ?

What advantages are enabling this feature ?

Any comments or thoughts ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: IXGLOGR on RSM usage

[Nathan Astle]

Hi Andrew

Thank you for the pointer which helped me in tuning up the SMF logstream.

So when it comes to other logstream structures for DB2,CICS. Is there a way
to limit their RSM usage as well ?

Nathan


On Wednesday 23 December 2015, Elardus Engelbrecht <
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote:

> Andrew Metcalfe wrote:
>
> >Do you have SMF in Logstream mode?
>
> The OP said he has SMF in Logstream in thread 'Re: S00C Slip trap for any
> Stc'.
>
> He wrote: "Our SMF logstream has been defined in IXGLOGR with dasdonly. "
>
>
> >If so how many logstreams are defined? Each logstream has its own
> dataspace/buffers. There are some parameters which govern Logstream/SMF
> real storage requirements that you may need to tune.
>
> Good questions. Thanks for asking.
>
> Groete / Greetings
> Elardus Engelbrecht
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu  with the message:
> INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

IXGLOGR on RSM usage

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Are there any best practices documented to reduce real storage usage of
IXGLOGR ?

We are in base sysplex.

z/OS 2.1

Regards
Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: S00C Slip trap for any Stc

[Nathan Astle]

Hi


The 'a' is invalid in the slip trap

On Friday 18 December 2015, nitz-ibm  wrote:

> abend00C always means some problem with coupling services. If you don't
> know which connector will be hit for which structure/group, I suggest to
> set the slip trap rather generically as
>
> sl set,c=00c,a=(cu,h,s),dspname=('xcfas'.*),id=s00C,e
>
> Not having tested this for correctness, the a=(cu,h,p,s) should ensure
> that the current address space along with any home or secondary address
> space get dumped. And you may want to include XCFs data spaces, and maybe
> other data spaces (depending on the problem). Just make sure that your
> maxspace is large enough, especially if you're dealing with DB2. Maxspace
> needs to get set beforehand.
>
> Barbara
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu  with the message:
> INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: S00C Slip trap for any Stc

[Nathan Astle]

Hi Group

Basically I am trying to capture the SLIP for the XCF signal failure in our
base sysplex environment.

Our SMF logstream has been defined in IXGLOGR with dasdonly. Does that mean
IXGLOGR will Buffer SMF records in memory if it cannot write to DASD ?

What might be happening here, is that the S00C abend affects XCF services,
which in turn effect the users of XCF which are: WLM, JES2, GRS, and
MASTER. At this point GRS becomes unresponsive, and won’t permit the ENQ of
a dataset, if that dataset is the IFASMF logstream, the records start to
backup, where does IXGLOGR put them.  Would allowing IXGLOGR to use
structures in the CF help prevent IXGLOGR from stealing real storage to
buffer SYS EVENTs in the event of the S00C abend of XCF?

Any suggestions ?

Regards
Nathan



On Saturday 19 December 2015, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net> wrote:

> In
> <0601332775752188.wa.elardus.engelbrechtsita.co...@listserv.ua.edu
> >,
> on 12/18/2015
>at 03:23 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht  >
> said:
>
> >I know, many IBM-MAIN members post sample syntax, sometimes
> >omitting crucial info for brevity, but it is up to the actual user
> >to verify/modify the command and all its parameters for accuracy.
>
> And for relevance; even if the command is correct for the responders
> installation it may not be quite what you need.
>
> >Similar with the other thread where I said, use a program, I did
> >not say how the JCL + input should look like.
>
> That's better than a lot of IBM manuals that spell out how to code JCL
> and REXX, incorrectly.
>
> --
>  Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
>  ISO position; see 
> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
> (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu  with the message:
> INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

S00C Slip trap for any Stc

[Nathan Astle]

Hi Group

Apology for a dummy question

Can I set slip trap for abend s00c for any failing Address space ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: S00C Slip trap for any Stc

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

To be precise to set a slip trap irrespective of any failing address space
when we are not sure of address space which is going to fail

On Thursday 17 December 2015, Nathan Astle <tcpipat...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Group
>
> Apology for a dummy question
>
> Can I set slip trap for abend s00c for any failing Address space ?
>
> Nathan
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Adding Real memory Dyanamically

[Nathan Astle]

Thank you all for the valuable response.

Apology, It could be slightly Off-topic - Is there a way to track the Real
storage Frame Allocation ? Are there any monitoring solutions that can be
kept especially for tracking Real Storage Frame Allocation ?

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Tom Marchant <
000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:36:50 +, Adams, Anne (DTI) wrote:
>
> >Really? We were told by IBM that we couldn't add memory, with our
> >without downtime to the z10. In fact, we were warned by a number of
> >people, both inside and outside IBM not to do that. It's why we went
> >to the z12.
>
> Probably because it was withdrawn from marketing 3 years ago.
> Otherwise, concurrent upgrades may have been possible, depending on
> the configuration.
>
> --
> Tom Marchant
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Adding Real memory Dyanamically

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

We are having z10 box with z/OS 2.1 LPAR running. Is it possible to add a
Real Memory Dynamically without any outage.

I am searching for Real Memory addition dynamically but I am not getting
hit especially for z10 box.

Any Suggestions ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: MVS systrace size

[Nathan Astle]

Hi,

Thank you so much. I was able to set the trace table to 4M.

I have modified in the Parmlib to get this value in the Next IPL as well.

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Anthony Thompson <
anthony.thomp...@nt.gov.au> wrote:

> System command:  TRACE ST,4M
>
> And put that in a PARMLIB COMMNDxx to set the system trace size after an
> IPL.
>
> Ant.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Nathan Astle
> Sent: Thursday, 10 December 2015 5:40 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: MVS systrace size
>
> Hello,
>
> I am looking at the Manual to modify the MVS system trace table size.
> Currently It is using 1MG per CPU.
>
> Is there a command to dynamically enlarge systrace to 4mg per CPU ?
>
> Could someone please point to any manuals which shows the steps to modify
> the MVS system trace table size ?
>
> Nathan
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

MVS systrace size

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

I am looking at the Manual to modify the MVS system trace table size.
Currently It is using 1MG per CPU.

Is there a command to dynamically enlarge systrace to 4mg per CPU ?

Could someone please point to any manuals which shows the steps to modify
the MVS system trace table size ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

SADMP Allocation factor

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Could someone point me on what are the factor does a SADMP allocation size
matters ?

Regards
Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

HMC certificate SHA-2

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

Could someone point me the procedure for upgrading the SHA-1 certificate to
SHA-2 in HMC ?

I searched with the keyword "SHA-2 certificate HMC + z/OS" from the Google
but not getting a correct document to follow on.

Could someone shed light on the above ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

IDG 9074 secure console bypass

[Nathan Astle]

Hi All

We access our mainframe console using IDG 9074. Right now when the LPAR is
loaded we get success message in HMC. But the Console doesn't show the z/OS
Msssage be loaded and we get X mark at the bottom of console window.

Is there a way to route the console bypassing IDG 9074 ?

Has anyone tried a similar way to access the console ?

Another Challenge is that our HMC operating message console is not opening
for some reason failing with APPLETS.

Any suggestions or pointers would help ?

Regards
Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

IPL wait state

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

I did applied some maintenance to my sandbox system. When i loaded with the
LPAR with the new address.

i got the below message in the HMC,

Central processor (CP) 0 is looping due to switching between program status
words (PSWs) that are not valid. The program status word (PSW) is
.

The IPLTEXT was not written to the newly cloned RES Volume. Could that be a
reason ?


I am not getting a correct explanation about x'000' on my search about the
above PSW in MVS manual codes.

Any suggestions ?

z/OS 1.11

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

CATALOG merge APAR

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Does anyone has a information on when we can expect the published PTF for
the APAR *OA48993 ?*

*Nathan*

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

DLIB volume for SAD

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Apology for asking a dummy question. Why do we use Distribution library
volume dataset while taking a SAD for a z/OS ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Unicode Query

[Nathan Astle]

Hello Group,

I am Going to Apply UNICODE Conversion PTF to our sandbox system. If
Understand correct the UNICODE PTF changes the SYS1.LPALIB,SYS1.LINKLIB and
SYS1.NUCLEUS alone.

So after Applying the Fix Instead of Cloning the Whole SYSRES volume, Can i
Just copy the above three dataset and Just an IPLTEXT ?

Will there be any Problem If I dont copy the Whole SYSRES ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Parmlib syntax check macro

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

In some of the older threads somebody mentioned that there is a Lionel
Dycks Macro which does this Check. Not sure which macro it is ?



On Sunday 27 September 2015, Lizette Koehler <stars...@mindspring.com>
wrote:

> Each parmlib member has different syntax rules  -  That is why there is
> probably not a general parm checker.
>
> I have not looked a z/OSMF to see if it helps with these members.
>
> The best I do is use the HILITE function in ISPF to see if there is
> anything obvious, like missing commands or parenthesis mismatches.
>
> You can also use ISPF 3.14 to compare a previous working parmlib member
> with the new one you have altered.  This can be run in batch.  Use the
> panel to create the process then select at the bottom Run in Batch.
> Create a staging PARMLIB dataset called SYS1.STAGE.PARMLIB
> Then run the batch job against SYS1.PARMLIB vs. SYS1.STAGE.PARMLIB
>
> That will do a decent job if you have the options setup correctly.
>
> //SUPERC  EXEC PGM=ISRSUPC,
> //PARM=(DELTAL,LINECMP,
> //'LOCS ALLMEMS',
> //'')
> //NEWDD  DD DSN=SYS1.PARMLIB,
> //  DISP=SHR
> //OLDDD  DD DSN=SYS1.STAGE.PARMLIB,  <-- if uncataloged,
> use volser
> //  DISP=SHR,UNIT=SYSALLDA,VOLUME=SER=MYSRES
> //OUTDD  DD SYSOUT=(*)
>
> Lizette
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> <javascript:;>] On
> > Behalf Of Nathan Astle
> > Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 6:42 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <javascript:;>
> > Subject: Re: Parmlib syntax check macro
> >
> > LPALSTXX PROGXX
> >
> > On Sunday 27 September 2015, Lizette Koehler <stars...@mindspring.com
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I am not aware of any parmlib checkers.
> > >
> > > Some members I use the HILITE function for REXX to try and observe
> > > what might be incorrect.
> > >
> > > What member or members are you interested in?
> > >
> > > Lizette
> > >
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>] On
> > > > Behalf Of Nathan Astle
> > > > Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:29 AM
> > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > > > Subject: Parmlib syntax check macro
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Is there anyone on the list who are using parmlib syntax checker ?
> > > > Especially a isredit macro freeware ?
> > > >
> > > > Is there someone who can share the macro ?
> > > >
> > > > Nathan
> > >
> > > --
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu <javascript:;> <javascript:;> with
> the message:
> > > INFO IBM-MAIN
> > >
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email to
> > lists...@listserv.ua.edu <javascript:;> with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu <javascript:;> with the message:
> INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Parmlib syntax check macro

[Nathan Astle]

LPALSTXX PROGXX

On Sunday 27 September 2015, Lizette Koehler <stars...@mindspring.com>
wrote:

> I am not aware of any parmlib checkers.
>
> Some members I use the HILITE function for REXX to try and observe what
> might be incorrect.
>
> What member or members are you interested in?
>
> Lizette
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> <javascript:;>] On
> > Behalf Of Nathan Astle
> > Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:29 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <javascript:;>
> > Subject: Parmlib syntax check macro
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Is there anyone on the list who are using parmlib syntax checker ?
> > Especially a isredit macro freeware ?
> >
> > Is there someone who can share the macro ?
> >
> > Nathan
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu <javascript:;> with the message:
> INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Parmlib syntax check macro

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Is there anyone on the list who are using parmlib syntax checker ?
Especially a isredit macro freeware ?

Is there someone who can share the macro ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: FC8 abend Master Scheduler

[Nathan Astle]

I was missing SVC 200 from the IEASVC.. I just added and it came

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Staller, Allan <allan.stal...@kbmg.com>
wrote:

> 09.48.28 CTS1  *CAS2030E CA SAF interface initialization--load
>  failed for module CSNBSYE
>
> Is the CA loadlib in lnklst, apflist, lpalist, steplib,…..
>
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Nathan Astle
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 9:54 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: FC8 abend Master Scheduler
>
> …snippage
> 9.48.26 CTS1   IEA848I DUMP SUPPRESSED - ABDUMP MAY NOT DUMP
> STORAGE FOR KEY 0-7 JOB MSTJCL00
>
> 09.48.28 CTS1  *CAS2030E CA SAF interface initialization--load
>  failed for module CSNBSYE
>
> 09.48.28 CTS1  *IEE479W MASTER SCHEDULER ABEND FC8, DUMPED, REIPL
>  - CODE 27
> 09.48.28 CTS1  IEA794I SVC DUMP HAS CAPTURED:
> DUMPID=002 REQUESTED BY JOB (*MASTER*)
> DUMP TITLE=COMPON=MSTR-REGION,COMPID=SC1B8,ISSUER=IEEMB860,MAST
>ER SCHEDULER REGION INITIALIZATION DUMP
>
> Any suggestions what might be causing the above message.
> 
>
>
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

FC8 abend Master Scheduler

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

I am trying to IPL a sandbox system but it is abending with the below
message :


SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=FC8
 TIME=09.48.24  SEQ=5  CPU=  ASID=001A
 PSW AT TIME OF ERROR  070C1000   81930492  ILC 2  INTC 0D
   NO ACTIVE MODULE FOUND
   NAME=UNKNOWN
   DATA AT PSW  0193048C - 00181610  0A0D9102  713BA784
   AR/GR 0: 006FF6C8/8000   1: /80FC8000
 2: /006FF940   3: /00FDEA40
 4: /006FF6C8   5: /006FFA58
 6: /8193046C   7: /00F55880
 8: /   9: /01930D60
 A: /006FFB18   B: /7FFE1948
 C: /01226F30   D: /00C80C38
 E: /00FE4600   F: 0102/00C7B060


9.48.26 CTS1   IEA848I DUMP SUPPRESSED - ABDUMP MAY NOT DUMP
STORAGE FOR KEY 0-7 JOB MSTJCL00

09.48.28 CTS1  *CAS2030E CA SAF interface initialization--load
 failed for module CSNBSYE

09.48.28 CTS1  *IEE479W MASTER SCHEDULER ABEND FC8, DUMPED, REIPL
 - CODE 27
09.48.28 CTS1  IEA794I SVC DUMP HAS CAPTURED:
DUMPID=002 REQUESTED BY JOB (*MASTER*)
DUMP TITLE=COMPON=MSTR-REGION,COMPID=SC1B8,ISSUER=IEEMB860,MAST
   ER SCHEDULER REGION INITIALIZATION DUMP

Any suggestions what might be causing the above message.

The manual says for FC8 as :

Explanation:  The system detected an error while processing a Supervisor
Call (SVC) instruction. The last 2 digits of this completion code, nn, are
the operand of the SVC instruction in hexadecimal. For example, completion
code X'F0D' means that the error occurred while the system was processing
SVC X'0D', that is, SVC 13.


Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

SYMUP - Umod

[Nathan Astle]

Hello All,

I am in a process of customizing for z/OS upgrade. So one Item which came
to my list was applying SYMUP UMOD.

I was referring : http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247328.pdf

++USERMOD(umod_name) REWORK(2005001). ++VER(Z038) FMID(HBB7709) . ++JCLIN .
//LKED EXEC PGM=IEWL,PARM='LIST,MAP,XREF,NCAL,LET' //SYSLMOD DD
DSN=LINKLIB,DISP=SHR //SAMPLIB DD DSN=SAMPLIB //SYSLIN DD * INCLUDE
SAMPLIB(IEASYMUP) SETCODE AC(1) ENTRY IEASYMUP NAME IEASYMUP(R)
++MOD(IEASYMUP) DISTLIB(SAMPLIB) LKLIB(SAMPLIB). $$ //SMPCNTL DD * SET
BDY(GLOBAL) . RECEIVE S(umod_name) . SET BDY(MVST100) . APPLY CHECK
S(umod_name) REDO RC(RECEIVE=0) . APPLY S(umod_name) REDO RC(APPLY=0) .
UCLIN RC(APPLY=4) . REP SAMP(IEASYMUP) RMID(umod_name) . ENDUCL . /*


Sorry if the above information scrambled. I was just wondering what could
be Ideal value for REWORK on the USERMOD statement.

Could someone please clarify or guide ? I am going from z/OS 1.13 to z/OS
2.1


Regards,
Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Catalog entry not visible

[Nathan Astle]

Hi John,

I do have the Product libraries in the APF,LPALST00,LINKLIST. This are VSAM
files which are not allocating though the catalog are shared.



On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:42 PM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com
wrote:

 On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Nathan Astle tcpipat...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Hi,
 
  The IKJ message what I am getting is :
 
  IKJ56228I DATA SET QWS.SEC.RULES NOT IN CATALOG
   OR CATALOG CAN NOT BE ACCESSED
 
  Explanation:  DISP=OLD was specified. The dynamic allocation error code
 is
  1708, 5708, or 5710. For a description of the dynamic allocation
  return, informational, and error codes, see z/OS Programming:
  Authorized Assembler Services Guide.
 
  Detected by:  CALLER
 
  Program:  DAIRFAIL
 
  Could someone please point on what needs to be done from the Product
  perspective.
 
  Nathan
 

 ​This is interesting. I was thinking it was the 1708 return, that is data
 set not catalogued. However, if it is the 5708 return, then a possibility
 would be if the dynamic allocation did something, such as setting any bit
 on in the S99FLAG2 field. This would be to do something like wait for
 DSN if not immediately available instead of failing, wait for volumes
 (as in tape mount, I think) ​, do not serialize DSN (don't issue SYSDSN
 enq), and so on'
 ref:

 http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2A8C0/26.1.5.1

 Could it be that your product is supposed to be APF authorized but isn't on
 the new system? I.e. the DSN is not in the APF list. Or it is in the
 LINKLIST on the old system with LNKAUTH=LNKLST whereas on the new system,
 you have LNKAUTH=APFTAB ?

 Just a thought.


 --

 Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a
 restore is attempted.

 Yoda of Borg, we are. Futile, resistance is, yes. Assimilated, you will be.

 He's about as useful as a wax frying pan.

 10 to the 12th power microphones = 1 Megaphone

 Maranatha! 
 John McKown

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Catalog entry not visible

[Nathan Astle]

Hi John,

The System is not yet fully up and it is failing at the Security product
start up. I can see the Catalog services are available.

Nathan

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:15 PM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com
wrote:

 On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Andrew Rowley 
 and...@blackhillsoftware.com
  wrote:

  Stretching my memory, isn't there something about VSAM files can only be
  cataloged in 1 catalog, unless they are SYS1.* datasets? I think there is
  some information in the VVDS?
 

 ​This is correct. There are special dispensations for VSAM data sets
 which start with SYS1. _or_ are PAGESPACE data sets. But, in this case, the
 VSAM data set in question is said to be in a _shared_ catalog. Which is
 certainly allowed. The OP can see it in a 3.4 listing on both systems. I
 don't remember reading what else has been tried. Personally, on the new
 system, I think that I'd try a simple TSO ALLOCATE of the DSN in my TSO
 session. I don't recall if the OP has done this or not. ​



 
  Regards
 
  Andrew Rowley
 
 

 --

 Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a
 restore is attempted.

 Yoda of Borg, we are. Futile, resistance is, yes. Assimilated, you will be.

 He's about as useful as a wax frying pan.

 10 to the 12th power microphones = 1 Megaphone

 Maranatha! 
 John McKown

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Catalog entry not visible

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

The SHAREOPTN is (1,3) for VSAM file. Are there a reason for behind the
failure ? Some of the google hits for the error message says improper
catalog sharing.

Nathan

On Thursday 27 August 2015, Nathan Astle tcpipat...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 The IKJ message what I am getting is :

 IKJ56228I DATA SET QWS.SEC.RULES NOT IN CATALOG
  OR CATALOG CAN NOT BE ACCESSED

 Explanation:  DISP=OLD was specified. The dynamic allocation error code is
 1708, 5708, or 5710. For a description of the dynamic allocation
 return, informational, and error codes, see z/OS Programming:
 Authorized Assembler Services Guide.

 Detected by:  CALLER

 Program:  DAIRFAIL

 Could someone please point on what needs to be done from the Product
 perspective.

 Nathan

 On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:43 PM, retired mainframer 
 retired-mainfra...@q.com
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','retired-mainfra...@q.com'); wrote:

 Does the catalog entry point to the correct volume?

  -Original Message-
  From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU');] On
  Behalf Of Nathan Astle
  Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 9:56 PM
  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU');
  Subject: Re: Catalog entry not visible
 
  Hi
 
  Even when I try to put the fully qualified in the PROC dd statement it
  fails with device allocation error. Other datasets in the same volume
 are
  being read.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lists...@listserv.ua.edu'); with the
 message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Catalog entry not visible

[Nathan Astle]

Hi,

The IKJ message what I am getting is :

IKJ56228I DATA SET QWS.SEC.RULES NOT IN CATALOG
 OR CATALOG CAN NOT BE ACCESSED

Explanation:  DISP=OLD was specified. The dynamic allocation error code is
1708, 5708, or 5710. For a description of the dynamic allocation
return, informational, and error codes, see z/OS Programming:
Authorized Assembler Services Guide.

Detected by:  CALLER

Program:  DAIRFAIL

Could someone please point on what needs to be done from the Product
perspective.

Nathan

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:43 PM, retired mainframer 
retired-mainfra...@q.com wrote:

 Does the catalog entry point to the correct volume?

  -Original Message-
  From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
  Behalf Of Nathan Astle
  Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 9:56 PM
  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
  Subject: Re: Catalog entry not visible
 
  Hi
 
  Even when I try to put the fully qualified in the PROC dd statement it
  fails with device allocation error. Other datasets in the same volume are
  being read.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Catalog entry not visible

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

I have built a new z/OS image where one of our product fails with a IKJ
message saying that the dataset is not found. I can still see the usercat
where the dataset is catalogued is connected to the master catalog of the
new z/OS image

The listcat with entry of those alias are defined to the MCAT of xOS image

Not sure why it is not visible though I have put the datasets in the
CATALOG volume of the new z/OS images.

Could someone please shed some light on it

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Catalog entry not visible

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Even when I try to put the fully qualified in the PROC dd statement it
fails with device allocation error. Other datasets in the same volume are
being read.

On Thursday 27 August 2015, Nathan Astle tcpipat...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi

 yes because we have another set of two level aliases which are being read.



 On Thursday 27 August 2015, retired mainframer retired-mainfra...@q.com
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','retired-mainfra...@q.com'); wrote:

 Is the system in question configured for two-level aliases?

  -Original Message-
  From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On
  Behalf Of Nathan Astle
  Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 8:55 PM
  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
  Subject: Re: Catalog entry not visible
 
  Hi
 
  I can view the failing dataset using 3.4 from the driving system.
 
  The failing dataset are VSAM file
 
  Initially these VSAM file were pointing to driving master catalog then I
  did the repromergcat from a master catalog to a user catalog
 
  Then defined the two level alias
 
  The usercat is import connected to the IPLing system mastercat
 
  When I do F11 I can see them they are correct usercat
 
  It has alias defined to driving master catalog and also to the driving
  master catalog.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Catalog entry not visible

[Nathan Astle]

Hi Lizzette

The VSAM file belongs to ACF2. The system is getting IPLed but it fails to
start ACF2 while it tries to read the VSAM datasets.

Nathan

On Thursday 27 August 2015, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:

 Unless you created a process (SYSTEM REXX Comes to mind), no native way to
 display a dataset from the console.

 On your new system
 1) Does your system IPL?
 2) What VSAM datasets are missing?
 3) Does TSO come UP.  Can you logon to the system?

 I am not sure what your next steps are.

 Lizette

 -Original Message-
 From: Nathan Astle tcpipat...@gmail.com javascript:;
 Sent: Aug 26, 2015 8:55 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU javascript:;
 Subject: Re: Catalog entry not visible
 
 Hi
 
 I can view the failing dataset using 3.4 from the driving system.
 
 The failing dataset are VSAM file
 
 Initially these VSAM file were pointing to driving master catalog then I
 did the repromergcat from a master catalog to a user catalog
 
 Then defined the two level alias
 
 The usercat is import connected to the IPLing system mastercat
 
 When I do F11 I can see them they are correct usercat
 
 It has alias defined to driving master catalog and also to the driving
 master catalog.
 
 Is there a way to do list cat command from the console ?
 
 Any suggestions ?
 
 Nathan
 
 On Thursday 27 August 2015, Dan Little dwlit...@gmail.com javascript:;
 wrote:
 
  Yes it is.
 
  On Wednesday, August 26, 2015, michelbutz michealb...@comcast.net
 javascript:;
  javascript:; wrote:
 
   Is IKJ tso ?
  
   Sent from my iPhone
  
On Aug 26, 2015, at 3:53 PM, Lizette Koehler 
 stars...@mindspring.com javascript:;
  javascript:;
   javascript:; wrote:
   
Can you do 3.4 on the dataset?  If so, when you press PF11 - does it
   show any details?
   
Is there more than one LPAR involved?  Is the Alias and ucat
 connected
   if there is more than one MCAT?
   
Can you present the IKJ message (complete text)?
   
There a some reasons a dataset is not found,
The JCL is running on a system where the ALIAS does not exist
The Data is a catalog entry only and not a physical file.
The dataset was cataloged in a MCAT not a UCAT and the MCAT is
  different
   from where the dataset was cataloged to where the job ran.
   
Lizette
   
   
   
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Astle tcpipat...@gmail.com javascript:;
 javascript:;
  javascript:;
Sent: Aug 26, 2015 11:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU javascript:; javascript:;
 javascript:;
Subject: Catalog entry not visible
   
Hi
   
I have built a new z/OS image where one of our product fails with a
  IKJ
message saying that the dataset is not found. I can still see the
   usercat
where the dataset is catalogued is connected to the master catalog
 of
   the
new z/OS image
   
The listcat with entry of those alias are defined to the MCAT of
 xOS
   image
   
Not sure why it is not visible though I have put the datasets in
 the
CATALOG volume of the new z/OS images.
   
Could someone please shed some light on it
   
Nathan
   

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; with the message:
 INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Catalog entry not visible

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

yes because we have another set of two level aliases which are being read.



On Thursday 27 August 2015, retired mainframer retired-mainfra...@q.com
wrote:

 Is the system in question configured for two-level aliases?

  -Original Message-
  From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 javascript:;] On
  Behalf Of Nathan Astle
  Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 8:55 PM
  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU javascript:;
  Subject: Re: Catalog entry not visible
 
  Hi
 
  I can view the failing dataset using 3.4 from the driving system.
 
  The failing dataset are VSAM file
 
  Initially these VSAM file were pointing to driving master catalog then I
  did the repromergcat from a master catalog to a user catalog
 
  Then defined the two level alias
 
  The usercat is import connected to the IPLing system mastercat
 
  When I do F11 I can see them they are correct usercat
 
  It has alias defined to driving master catalog and also to the driving
  master catalog.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; with the message:
 INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Catalog entry not visible

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

I can view the failing dataset using 3.4 from the driving system.

The failing dataset are VSAM file

Initially these VSAM file were pointing to driving master catalog then I
did the repromergcat from a master catalog to a user catalog

Then defined the two level alias

The usercat is import connected to the IPLing system mastercat

When I do F11 I can see them they are correct usercat

It has alias defined to driving master catalog and also to the driving
master catalog.

Is there a way to do list cat command from the console ?

Any suggestions ?

Nathan

On Thursday 27 August 2015, Dan Little dwlit...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yes it is.

 On Wednesday, August 26, 2015, michelbutz michealb...@comcast.net
 javascript:; wrote:

  Is IKJ tso ?
 
  Sent from my iPhone
 
   On Aug 26, 2015, at 3:53 PM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
 javascript:;
  javascript:; wrote:
  
   Can you do 3.4 on the dataset?  If so, when you press PF11 - does it
  show any details?
  
   Is there more than one LPAR involved?  Is the Alias and ucat connected
  if there is more than one MCAT?
  
   Can you present the IKJ message (complete text)?
  
   There a some reasons a dataset is not found,
   The JCL is running on a system where the ALIAS does not exist
   The Data is a catalog entry only and not a physical file.
   The dataset was cataloged in a MCAT not a UCAT and the MCAT is
 different
  from where the dataset was cataloged to where the job ran.
  
   Lizette
  
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Nathan Astle tcpipat...@gmail.com javascript:;
 javascript:;
   Sent: Aug 26, 2015 11:52 AM
   To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU javascript:; javascript:;
   Subject: Catalog entry not visible
  
   Hi
  
   I have built a new z/OS image where one of our product fails with a
 IKJ
   message saying that the dataset is not found. I can still see the
  usercat
   where the dataset is catalogued is connected to the master catalog of
  the
   new z/OS image
  
   The listcat with entry of those alias are defined to the MCAT of xOS
  image
  
   Not sure why it is not visible though I have put the datasets in the
   CATALOG volume of the new z/OS images.
  
   Could someone please shed some light on it
  
   Nathan
  
   --
   For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
   send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; javascript:;
 with the message:
  INFO IBM-MAIN
 
  --
  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
  send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; javascript:;
 with the message:
  INFO IBM-MAIN
 

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; with the message:
 INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

DASD status read

[Nathan Astle]

Hello All,

I am writing up a small program to build a small tool(ISV) to read the
Number of Offline and Online DASD devices. Right Now I am using RMF and SMF
to read the number of DASD.

Is there an alternative way to read the number of DASD present in
Datacentre. I am mostly looking from the Programming point of view.

Basically We have a written a Java program to read from SMF, but is there a
way without using SMF or RMF to get the status of DASD ?

Any suggestion would be highly appreciated.

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Upgrade preparation

[Nathan Astle]

Hi Tom

Thanks

I will try to ERRSYSMOD report to watch out any missing hiper between 1.13
and 2.1.

On Sunday 16 August 2015, Tom Marchant 
000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:

 On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 17:45:18 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:

 APPLY FMID(fmid list) FORFMID(fmid list).

 Sorry, that should be
 APPLY SELECT(fmid list) FORFMID(fmid list).

 --
 Tom Mrchant

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; with the message:
 INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Upgrade preparation

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Should I be looking into the PE or HIPER for z/OS ? If so what should be
looking into it especially?

Nathan

On Saturday 15 August 2015, David Purdy 
00ac4b1d56b3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:

 Everything is well documented. One overlooked documented item was the
 return code change from LISTCAT of a GDG base with no entries. V1R13 gave
 RC = 4. V2R1 RC = 0.  Documented workaround as well.

 David

 -Original Message-
 From: Nathan Astle tcpipat...@gmail.com javascript:;
 To: IBM-MAIN IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU javascript:;
 Sent: Sat, Aug 15, 2015 11:53 AM
 Subject: Upgrade preparation



 div id=AOLMsgPart_1_c7b04757-9643-4fae-bf76-6b5f934fc1ab style=margin:
 0px;font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, Sans-Serif;font-size: 12px;color:
 #000;background-color: #fff;

 pre style=font-size: 9pt;ttHi

 We are upgrading our operating system from 1.13 to 2.1.

 So apart from
 toleration maintenance are there any other Things to be
 looked from the OS
 perspective?

 Would somebody share the steps taken at your shop
 ?

 Nathan

 --
 For
 IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to
 a href=mailto:lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:;
 lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:;/a with the message: INFO
 IBM-MAIN
 /tt/pre
  !-- end of AOLMsgPart_1_c7b04757-9643-4fae-bf76-6b5f934fc1ab --
 /div

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; with the message:
 INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Upgrade preparation

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

We are upgrading our operating system from 1.13 to 2.1.

So apart from toleration maintenance are there any other Things to be
looked from the OS perspective?

Would somebody share the steps taken at your shop ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Dump Failing - Aux Shortage

[Nathan Astle]

Hi Liz,

Value for MAXSPACE is set : MAXSPACE=00015000M

Nathan

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
wrote:

 Could you post the D D,O command (Dump Options?)

 I would like to see what your MAXSPACE is set at

 Lizette


  -Original Message-
  From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
  On Behalf Of Nathan Astle
  Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 2:27 AM
  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
  Subject: Re: Dump Failing - Aux Shortage
 
  Hi,
 
  PageIOTotal  120m  Active 0
  Datasets  Total40  Used  11
  SCM   Size   128G  Used120G  94.02%
  LOCAL Size  61.9G  Used   3.45G   5.57%
NONVIO   Used   3.32G   5.36%
VIO  Used133M   0.21%
 
 
  Type   Status   Size  UsedPct% VIO
  PLPA   ACTIVE  70.3M 60.9M  86.62%
  COMMON ACTIVE   703M  320K   0.04%
  SCMACTIVE   128G  120G  94.02%
  LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  386M   5.49% VIO
  LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  388M   5.51% VIO
  LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  394M   5.60% VIO
  LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  402M   5.71% VIO
  LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  399M   5.67% VIO
  LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  401M   5.70% VIO
  LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  385M   5.48% VIO
  LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  402M   5.72% VIO
  LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  383M   5.45% VIO
 
  Regards,
  Nathan
 
  On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
 
  wrote:
 
   The clue could be in SCM 94% full but it still seems odd to me. Can
   you fill us in on page data set sizes?
  
   Thanks, Martin
  
   Martin Packer,
   zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Banking Center of
   Excellence, IBM
  
   +44-7802-245-584
  
   email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
  
   Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
   Blog:
  
  https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPa
  cker
  
  
  
   From:   Nathan Astle tcpipat...@gmail.com
   To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
   Date:   17/07/2015 10:20
   Subject:Dump Failing - Aux Shortage
   Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-
  m...@listserv.ua.edu
  
  
  
   Hello,
  
   I am trying to take a dump of NET address space but it fails with CODE
   08 REASON X'46'.
  
   Manual says that there is shortage of AuxillIary Storage.
  
   When I did D ASM
  
   TYPE FULL STAT   DEV  DATASET NAME
   PLPA  86%   OK  4D4C  PAGE.VMVPZ33.PLPA
   COMMON 0%   OK  4D4C  PAGE.VMVPZ33.COMMON
   LOCAL  5%   OK  9902  PAGE.VMVZ331.LOCAL1
   LOCAL  5%   OK  9903  PAGE.VMVZ332.LOCAL2
   LOCAL  5%   OK  9904  PAGE.VMVZ333.LOCAL3
   LOCAL  5%   OK  9905  PAGE.VMVZ334.LOCAL4
   LOCAL  5%   OK  9906  PAGE.VMVZ335.LOCAL5
   LOCAL  5%   OK  9907  PAGE.VMVZ336.LOCAL6
   LOCAL  5%   OK  9908  PAGE.VMVZ337.LOCAL7
   LOCAL  5%   OK  9909  PAGE.VMVZ338.LOCAL8
   LOCAL  5%   OK  991A  PAGE.VMVZ339.LOCAL9
   SCM   94%   OK   N/A   N/A
  
  
   I dont see a shortage and there were no IRA related error message in
   the syslog.
  
   Also, from RMF, I see :
  
   ECSA  73%
   ESQA  88%
SQA  52%
CSA  74%
  
   I did AUXMGMT=OFF but again the Dump fails with same error message.
  
   z/OS 2.1
  
   Could someone please provide me your guidance.
  
   Nathan
  

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Dump Failing - Aux Shortage

[Nathan Astle]

Hi,

PageIOTotal  120m  Active 0
Datasets  Total40  Used  11
SCM   Size   128G  Used120G  94.02%
LOCAL Size  61.9G  Used   3.45G   5.57%
  NONVIO   Used   3.32G   5.36%
  VIO  Used133M   0.21%


Type   Status   Size  UsedPct% VIO
PLPA   ACTIVE  70.3M 60.9M  86.62%
COMMON ACTIVE   703M  320K   0.04%
SCMACTIVE   128G  120G  94.02%
LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  386M   5.49% VIO
LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  388M   5.51% VIO
LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  394M   5.60% VIO
LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  402M   5.71% VIO
LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  399M   5.67% VIO
LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  401M   5.70% VIO
LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  385M   5.48% VIO
LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  402M   5.72% VIO
LOCAL  ACTIVE  6.88G  383M   5.45% VIO

Regards,
Nathan

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
wrote:

 The clue could be in SCM 94% full but it still seems odd to me. Can you
 fill us in on page data set sizes?

 Thanks, Martin

 Martin Packer,
 zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
 Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM

 +44-7802-245-584

 email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

 Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
 Blog:
 https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker



 From:   Nathan Astle tcpipat...@gmail.com
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Date:   17/07/2015 10:20
 Subject:Dump Failing - Aux Shortage
 Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



 Hello,

 I am trying to take a dump of NET address space but it fails with CODE 08
 REASON X'46'.

 Manual says that there is shortage of AuxillIary Storage.

 When I did D ASM

 TYPE FULL STAT   DEV  DATASET NAME
 PLPA  86%   OK  4D4C  PAGE.VMVPZ33.PLPA
 COMMON 0%   OK  4D4C  PAGE.VMVPZ33.COMMON
 LOCAL  5%   OK  9902  PAGE.VMVZ331.LOCAL1
 LOCAL  5%   OK  9903  PAGE.VMVZ332.LOCAL2
 LOCAL  5%   OK  9904  PAGE.VMVZ333.LOCAL3
 LOCAL  5%   OK  9905  PAGE.VMVZ334.LOCAL4
 LOCAL  5%   OK  9906  PAGE.VMVZ335.LOCAL5
 LOCAL  5%   OK  9907  PAGE.VMVZ336.LOCAL6
 LOCAL  5%   OK  9908  PAGE.VMVZ337.LOCAL7
 LOCAL  5%   OK  9909  PAGE.VMVZ338.LOCAL8
 LOCAL  5%   OK  991A  PAGE.VMVZ339.LOCAL9
 SCM   94%   OK   N/A   N/A


 I dont see a shortage and there were no IRA related error message in the
 syslog.

 Also, from RMF, I see :

 ECSA  73%
 ESQA  88%
  SQA  52%
  CSA  74%

 I did AUXMGMT=OFF but again the Dump fails with same error message.

 z/OS 2.1

 Could someone please provide me your guidance.

 Nathan

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



 Unless stated otherwise above:
 IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
 741598.
 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Dump Failing - Aux Shortage

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

I am trying to take a dump of NET address space but it fails with CODE 08
REASON X'46'.

Manual says that there is shortage of AuxillIary Storage.

When I did D ASM

TYPE FULL STAT   DEV  DATASET NAME
PLPA  86%   OK  4D4C  PAGE.VMVPZ33.PLPA
COMMON 0%   OK  4D4C  PAGE.VMVPZ33.COMMON
LOCAL  5%   OK  9902  PAGE.VMVZ331.LOCAL1
LOCAL  5%   OK  9903  PAGE.VMVZ332.LOCAL2
LOCAL  5%   OK  9904  PAGE.VMVZ333.LOCAL3
LOCAL  5%   OK  9905  PAGE.VMVZ334.LOCAL4
LOCAL  5%   OK  9906  PAGE.VMVZ335.LOCAL5
LOCAL  5%   OK  9907  PAGE.VMVZ336.LOCAL6
LOCAL  5%   OK  9908  PAGE.VMVZ337.LOCAL7
LOCAL  5%   OK  9909  PAGE.VMVZ338.LOCAL8
LOCAL  5%   OK  991A  PAGE.VMVZ339.LOCAL9
SCM   94%   OK   N/A   N/A


I dont see a shortage and there were no IRA related error message in the
syslog.

Also, from RMF, I see :

ECSA  73%
ESQA  88%
 SQA  52%
 CSA  74%

I did AUXMGMT=OFF but again the Dump fails with same error message.

z/OS 2.1

Could someone please provide me your guidance.

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Dump Failing - Aux Shortage

[Nathan Astle]

Jim

Even after trying SDUMP,AUXMGMT=OFF
it failed with the same error code

On Friday 17 July 2015, Jim Mulder d10j...@us.ibm.com wrote:

  From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com javascript:;
  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU javascript:;
  Date: 07/17/2015 12:31 PM
  Subject: Re: Dump Failing - Aux Shortage
  Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 javascript:;
 
  Jim,
 
  I forgot to ask.
 
  Is there a link to  That is over the %(aux used) threshold for allowing
 a
  dump to start that was stated?
 
  Lizette
 


 https://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieag100/c3set.htm

 See the discussion of SDUMP,AUXMGMT=ON or OFF


 Jim Mulder   z/OS System Test   IBM Corp.  Poughkeepsie,  NY

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu javascript:; with the message:
 INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: CF level z/OS 2.1

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

I was looking for CFCC level required to run z/OS 2.1 running on z196.



On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM 
kees.verno...@klm.com wrote:

 Probably correct. Machines have their maximum supported CFCC level. z/OS
 functions often require a specific CFCC level. Below that level that
 specific function will not be available, but that is all.

 Kees.

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
 Behalf Of Christopher Mason
 Sent: 08 June, 2015 21:01
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: CF level z/OS 2.1

 I would think since it runs on a z9 or higher I would say it would be the
 CFCC level of a z9 processor. The link is below for processor CFCC levels.

 http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/advantages/pso/cftable.html




 Thanks,


 *Chris Mason ▪ Mainframe Systems Engineer ▪ Technical Services Group** ▪ *

 *Sungard Availability Services*

 401 North Broad Street Mezz Floor ▪ Office: *215-351-3688* ▪ Fax:
 *215-351-0708* ▪

 christopher.ma...@sungardas.com ▪ www.sungardas.com

 http://www.sungardas.com/

 http://blog.sungardas.com/  http://www.youtube.com/SunGardAS
 https://plus.google.com/102459878242108588663/about
 http://www.facebook.com/SunGardAS
 http://www.linkedin.com/company/sungard-availability-services


 *CONFIDENTIALITY:*  This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain
 confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized
 disclosure or use is prohibited.  If you received this e-mail in error,
 please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system.

 On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Nathan Astle tcpipat...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi
 
  I am trying find the CF level required for z/OS 2.1?
 
  Is there any minimum CF Level required for z/OS 2.1?
 
  Where can I find the required information.
 
  Nathan
 
  --
  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
  send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
 confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If
 you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or
 any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other
 action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may
 be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the
 sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message.

 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its
 employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission
 of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch
 Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered
 number 33014286
 



 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

CF level z/OS 2.1

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

I am trying find the CF level required for z/OS 2.1?

Is there any minimum CF Level required for z/OS 2.1?

Where can I find the required information.

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Security vulnerability for RSU updates

[Nathan Astle]

Hi

Are any relationship for security vulnerability with having recent RSU ?
Precisely is there a dependency for security on every RSU updates ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Challenge with DFSORT

[Nathan Astle]

During IPL ICEOPT procedure didn't start. So now it's resolved.

Thank you for all the help.
On 30 Apr 2015 01:01, Sri h Kolusu skol...@us.ibm.com wrote:

 Nathan,

 Just checking to see if you are able to fix the problem. It would be nice
 if you can update IBM-Main with the solution you came up with

 Thanks,
 Sri Hari Kolusu
 DFSORT Development
 IBM Corporation
 Email: skol...@us.ibm.com
 Phone: 408-927-2187 Tie Line: 457-2187



 From:Nathan Astle tcpipat...@gmail.com
 To:Sri h Kolusu/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS
 Date:04/27/2015 09:40 AM
 Subject:Re: Challenge with DFSORT
 --



 Hi Kolusu

 Yes after IPL it started giving problem.  Is it possible that S ICEOPTS
 didn't start during IPL ?

 On 27 Apr 2015 21:57, Sri h Kolusu *skol...@us.ibm.com*
 skol...@us.ibm.com wrote:
 Nathan,

 The DEFAULTS job will list all the parmlib overrides.  If you had Z33=YES
 on both systems, was an IPL performed on LPAR2 too?

 Thanks,
 Sri Hari Kolusu
 DFSORT Development
 IBM Corporation
 Email: *skol...@us.ibm.com* skol...@us.ibm.com
 Phone: 408-927-2187 Tie Line: 457-2187



 From:Nathan Astle *tcpipat...@gmail.com* tcpipat...@gmail.com
 To:Sri h Kolusu/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS
 Date:04/27/2015 09:09 AM
 Subject:Re: Challenge with DFSORT
  --



 Hi Kolusu,

 I see Z33=YES on both. Is there a way to find if ICEOPT was started ? Any
 display commands to confirm ?

 On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Sri h Kolusu *skol...@us.ibm.com*
 skol...@us.ibm.com wrote:
 Nathan,

 I am guessing that your shop has migrated from CA-SORT and you have
 Z33=YES on LPAR1 which will perform a COPY application instead of
 terminating when SORT, MERGE or COPY is not specified. LPAR 2 is missing
 that parm.

 You can check the defaults using the following. Run this job on both LPARS
 and compare the output. Look for Z33 in particular.

 //STEP0100 EXEC PGM=ICETOOL
 //TOOLMSG   DD SYSOUT=*
 //DFSMSGDD SYSOUT=*
 //OUT   DD SYSOUT=*
 //TOOLINDD *
   DEFAULTS LIST(OUT)
 /*

 Thanks,
 Kolusu
 DFSORT Development

 IBM Mainframe Discussion List *IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU*
 IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on
 04/27/2015 04:41:11 AM:

  From: Nathan Astle *tcpipat...@gmail.com* tcpipat...@gmail.com
  To: *IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU* IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
  Date: 04/27/2015 04:41 AM
  Subject: Challenge with DFSORT
  Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List *IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU*
 IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 
  Hello,
 
  The DFSORT are not generating a DEFAULT value in 1 lpar but the other
 lpar
  are able to Generate though they use the same Respack.
 
  The JCL :
 
  //SORTDATE EXEC PGM=SORT,REGION=1024K,PARM='CORE=1024K',COND=(0,NE)
  //*
  //SYSOUT   DD SYSOUT=*
  //SORTIN   DD DSN=NATHAN.DATE,DISP=SHR
  //SORTOUT  DD DSN=NATHAN.DATE1,DISP=SHR
  //SORTWK01 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SORTWK02 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SORTWK03 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SORTWK04 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SORTWK05 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SORTWK06 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SYSINDD  *
OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
  /*
 
  Result from the Working LPAR :
 
  ICE201I H RECORD TYPE IS F - DATA STARTS IN POSITION 1
 
  ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 C7-K58148 C8-K67572 E9-K60824 C9-BASE
  E5-K72040
  ICE143I 0 BLOCKSET COPY  TECHNIQUE SELECTED
 
  ICE250I 0 VISIT *http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort*
 http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort FOR DFSORT PAPERS,
  EXAMPLES AN
  ICE000I 1 - CONTROL STATEMENTS FOR 5694-A01, Z/OS DFSORT V1R12 - 01:56
 ON
  MON AP
  OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
 
  ICE201I H RECORD TYPE IS F - DATA STARTS IN POSITION 1
 
  ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 C7-K58148 C8-K67572 E9-K60824 C9-BASE
  E5-K72040
  ICE193I 0 ICEAM1 INVOCATION ENVIRONMENT IN EFFECT - ICEAM1 ENVIRONMENT
  SELECTED
  ICE252I 1 PARMLIB OPTIONS WERE MERGED WITH INSTALLATION MODULE DEFAULTS
 
 
 
  Result from the Non-working LPAR :
 
  ICE805I 1 JOBNAME: TEST120W , STEPNAME: SORTDATE
 
  ICE802I 0 BLOCKSET TECHNIQUE IN CONTROL
 
  ICE000I 1 - CONTROL STATEMENTS FOR 5694-A01, Z/OS DFSORT V1R12 - 01:07
 ON
  MON AP
 OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
 
  ICE010A 0 NO SORT OR MERGE CONTROL STATEMENT
 
  ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 E7-K70685
 
  ICE052I 3 END OF DFSORT
 
 
 
  Both the LPAR are in same Sysplex, Use the same SORT loadlibs, Share the
  DASD too. Not sure why the results are differents and the Defaults are
 not
  generated.
 
  Could someone please share your thoughts.
 
  z/OS : 1.12
 
  Nathan
 
  --
  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
  send email to *lists...@listserv.ua.edu* lists...@listserv.ua.edu
 with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

RSU problem

[Nathan Astle]

Hi,

I am going to roll out RSU1503 to our z/OS 1.13. Did someone ran into any
problem like a memory or any storage overlay ?

Any experiences ?

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Challenge with DFSORT

[Nathan Astle]

Hi liz,

I do not find any other module apart from LINKLIST or LPALIST.

What kind of difference is between LPALIST or LINKLIST when it comes to
SORT ? I see them in both. No dynamic addition.

I am going to OPEN a SR but Just wanted to give a try in IBM MAIN.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
wrote:

 First, could you post all of the DFSORT messages from both LPARs.
 Sometimes there are clues in other messages.

 Second, have you used ISRDDN under ISPF to see if there are any other
 DFSORT modules other than where you expect them in the LINKLST or LPALIST?

 Third, have you verified that the linklst and lpalst are identical?  No
 one has done a dynamic change to the linklst or lpalst on either system?

 Lastly, why no open an SR with IBM.  It will probably be faster for the
 DFSORT team to assist you.

 Lizette


  -Original Message-
  From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
  On Behalf Of Nathan Astle
  Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 4:41 AM
  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
  Subject: Challenge with DFSORT
 
  Hello,
 
  The DFSORT are not generating a DEFAULT value in 1 lpar but the other
 lpar
  are able to Generate though they use the same Respack.
 
  The JCL :
 
  //SORTDATE EXEC
  PGM=SORT,REGION=1024K,PARM='CORE=1024K',COND=(0,NE)
  //*
  //SYSOUT   DD SYSOUT=*
  //SORTIN   DD DSN=NATHAN.DATE,DISP=SHR
  //SORTOUT  DD DSN=NATHAN.DATE1,DISP=SHR
  //SORTWK01 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SORTWK02 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SORTWK03 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SORTWK04 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SORTWK05 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SORTWK06 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SYSINDD  *
OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
  /*
 
  Result from the Working LPAR :
 
  ICE201I H RECORD TYPE IS F - DATA STARTS IN POSITION 1
 
  ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 C7-K58148 C8-K67572 E9-K60824 C9-BASE
  E5-K72040
  ICE143I 0 BLOCKSET COPY  TECHNIQUE SELECTED
 
  ICE250I 0 VISIT http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort FOR DFSORT PAPERS,
  EXAMPLES AN ICE000I 1 - CONTROL STATEMENTS FOR 5694-A01, Z/OS
  DFSORT V1R12 - 01:56 ON MON AP
  OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
 
  ICE201I H RECORD TYPE IS F - DATA STARTS IN POSITION 1
 
  ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 C7-K58148 C8-K67572 E9-K60824 C9-BASE
  E5-K72040
  ICE193I 0 ICEAM1 INVOCATION ENVIRONMENT IN EFFECT - ICEAM1
  ENVIRONMENT SELECTED ICE252I 1 PARMLIB OPTIONS WERE MERGED WITH
  INSTALLATION MODULE DEFAULTS
 
 
 
  Result from the Non-working LPAR :
 
  ICE805I 1 JOBNAME: TEST120W , STEPNAME: SORTDATE
 
  ICE802I 0 BLOCKSET TECHNIQUE IN CONTROL
 
  ICE000I 1 - CONTROL STATEMENTS FOR 5694-A01, Z/OS DFSORT V1R12 - 01:07
  ON MON AP
 OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
 
  ICE010A 0 NO SORT OR MERGE CONTROL STATEMENT
 
  ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 E7-K70685
 
  ICE052I 3 END OF DFSORT
 
 
 
  Both the LPAR are in same Sysplex, Use the same SORT loadlibs, Share the
  DASD too. Not sure why the results are differents and the Defaults are
 not
  generated.
 
  Could someone please share your thoughts.
 
  z/OS : 1.12
 
  Nathan
 

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Challenge with DFSORT

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

The DFSORT are not generating a DEFAULT value in 1 lpar but the other lpar
are able to Generate though they use the same Respack.

The JCL :

//SORTDATE EXEC PGM=SORT,REGION=1024K,PARM='CORE=1024K',COND=(0,NE)
//*
//SYSOUT   DD SYSOUT=*
//SORTIN   DD DSN=NATHAN.DATE,DISP=SHR
//SORTOUT  DD DSN=NATHAN.DATE1,DISP=SHR
//SORTWK01 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
//SORTWK02 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
//SORTWK03 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
//SORTWK04 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
//SORTWK05 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
//SORTWK06 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
//SYSINDD  *
  OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
/*

Result from the Working LPAR :

ICE201I H RECORD TYPE IS F - DATA STARTS IN POSITION 1

ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 C7-K58148 C8-K67572 E9-K60824 C9-BASE
E5-K72040
ICE143I 0 BLOCKSET COPY  TECHNIQUE SELECTED

ICE250I 0 VISIT http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort FOR DFSORT PAPERS,
EXAMPLES AN
ICE000I 1 - CONTROL STATEMENTS FOR 5694-A01, Z/OS DFSORT V1R12 - 01:56 ON
MON AP
OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)

ICE201I H RECORD TYPE IS F - DATA STARTS IN POSITION 1

ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 C7-K58148 C8-K67572 E9-K60824 C9-BASE
E5-K72040
ICE193I 0 ICEAM1 INVOCATION ENVIRONMENT IN EFFECT - ICEAM1 ENVIRONMENT
SELECTED
ICE252I 1 PARMLIB OPTIONS WERE MERGED WITH INSTALLATION MODULE DEFAULTS



Result from the Non-working LPAR :

ICE805I 1 JOBNAME: TEST120W , STEPNAME: SORTDATE

ICE802I 0 BLOCKSET TECHNIQUE IN CONTROL

ICE000I 1 - CONTROL STATEMENTS FOR 5694-A01, Z/OS DFSORT V1R12 - 01:07 ON
MON AP
   OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)

ICE010A 0 NO SORT OR MERGE CONTROL STATEMENT

ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 E7-K70685

ICE052I 3 END OF DFSORT



Both the LPAR are in same Sysplex, Use the same SORT loadlibs, Share the
DASD too. Not sure why the results are differents and the Defaults are not
generated.

Could someone please share your thoughts.

z/OS : 1.12

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Challenge with DFSORT

[Nathan Astle]

Steplib didn't helped much
On 27 Apr 2015 19:03, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:

 You can try to steplib the DFSORT library and run on both lpars.  See if
 the issue remains.

 Lizette


  -Original Message-
  From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
  On Behalf Of Nathan Astle
  Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:57 AM
  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
  Subject: Re: Challenge with DFSORT
 
  Hi liz,
 
  I do not find any other module apart from LINKLIST or LPALIST.
 
  What kind of difference is between LPALIST or LINKLIST when it comes to
  SORT ? I see them in both. No dynamic addition.
 
  I am going to OPEN a SR but Just wanted to give a try in IBM MAIN.
 
  On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Lizette Koehler
  stars...@mindspring.com
  wrote:
 
   First, could you post all of the DFSORT messages from both LPARs.
   Sometimes there are clues in other messages.
  
   Second, have you used ISRDDN under ISPF to see if there are any other
   DFSORT modules other than where you expect them in the LINKLST or
  LPALIST?
  
   Third, have you verified that the linklst and lpalst are identical?
   No one has done a dynamic change to the linklst or lpalst on either
 system?
  
   Lastly, why no open an SR with IBM.  It will probably be faster for
   the DFSORT team to assist you.
  
   Lizette
  
  
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Nathan Astle
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 4:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Challenge with DFSORT
   
Hello,
   
The DFSORT are not generating a DEFAULT value in 1 lpar but the
other
   lpar
are able to Generate though they use the same Respack.
   
The JCL :
   
//SORTDATE EXEC
PGM=SORT,REGION=1024K,PARM='CORE=1024K',COND=(0,NE)
//*
//SYSOUT   DD SYSOUT=*
//SORTIN   DD DSN=NATHAN.DATE,DISP=SHR
//SORTOUT  DD DSN=NATHAN.DATE1,DISP=SHR
//SORTWK01 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
//SORTWK02 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
//SORTWK03 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
//SORTWK04 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
//SORTWK05 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
//SORTWK06 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
//SYSINDD  *
  OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
/*
   
Result from the Working LPAR :
   
ICE201I H RECORD TYPE IS F - DATA STARTS IN POSITION 1
   
ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 C7-K58148 C8-K67572 E9-K60824 C9-BASE
E5-K72040
ICE143I 0 BLOCKSET COPY  TECHNIQUE SELECTED
   
ICE250I 0 VISIT http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort FOR DFSORT
  PAPERS,
EXAMPLES AN ICE000I 1 - CONTROL STATEMENTS FOR 5694-A01, Z/OS
  DFSORT
V1R12 - 01:56 ON MON AP
OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
   
ICE201I H RECORD TYPE IS F - DATA STARTS IN POSITION 1
   
ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 C7-K58148 C8-K67572 E9-K60824 C9-BASE
E5-K72040
ICE193I 0 ICEAM1 INVOCATION ENVIRONMENT IN EFFECT - ICEAM1
ENVIRONMENT SELECTED ICE252I 1 PARMLIB OPTIONS WERE MERGED
  WITH
INSTALLATION MODULE DEFAULTS
   
   
   
Result from the Non-working LPAR :
   
ICE805I 1 JOBNAME: TEST120W , STEPNAME: SORTDATE
   
ICE802I 0 BLOCKSET TECHNIQUE IN CONTROL
   
ICE000I 1 - CONTROL STATEMENTS FOR 5694-A01, Z/OS DFSORT V1R12 -
01:07 ON MON AP
   OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
   
ICE010A 0 NO SORT OR MERGE CONTROL STATEMENT
   
ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 E7-K70685
   
ICE052I 3 END OF DFSORT
   
   
   
Both the LPAR are in same Sysplex, Use the same SORT loadlibs, Share
the DASD too. Not sure why the results are differents and the
Defaults are
   not
generated.
   
Could someone please share your thoughts.
   
z/OS : 1.12
   
Nathan
   

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Challenge with DFSORT

[Nathan Astle]

We share the PARMLIB and maintains the same ICEPRM00(It is common between
two LPAR in the sysplex)

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Richard Pinion rpin...@netscape.com
wrote:

 Perhaps you could check x.PARMLIB(ICEPRM00).  This could be different for
 each system based on selection of ICEPRMxx by system symbols for each LPAR.



 --- rosalen.lu...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Lucas Rosalen rosalen.lu...@gmail.com
 To:   IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: Challenge with DFSORT
 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:12:17 -0300

 Hey Nathan,

 Do these system use the same security software (RACF?) base? Have you
 checked SYSLOG for any authorization error? I don't really think this would
 be the case, but such a weird behavior could come from many different
 setups.
 As Lizette pointed out, a complete job output might give us some more
 usefull infos.

 Regards,


 ---
 *Lucas Rosalen*
 Emails: rosalen.lu...@gmail.com / *lrosa...@br.ibm.com
 lrosa...@br.ibm.com*
 LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/in/lrosalen
 Phone: +55 19 9-8146-7633


 2015-04-27 10:46 GMT-03:00 Nathan Astle tcpipat...@gmail.com:

  Steplib didn't helped much
  On 27 Apr 2015 19:03, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
 
   You can try to steplib the DFSORT library and run on both lpars.  See
 if
   the issue remains.
  
   Lizette
  
  
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 ]
On Behalf Of Nathan Astle
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Challenge with DFSORT
   
Hi liz,
   
I do not find any other module apart from LINKLIST or LPALIST.
   
What kind of difference is between LPALIST or LINKLIST when it comes
 to
SORT ? I see them in both. No dynamic addition.
   
I am going to OPEN a SR but Just wanted to give a try in IBM MAIN.
   
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Lizette Koehler
stars...@mindspring.com
wrote:
   
 First, could you post all of the DFSORT messages from both LPARs.
 Sometimes there are clues in other messages.

 Second, have you used ISRDDN under ISPF to see if there are any
 other
 DFSORT modules other than where you expect them in the LINKLST or
LPALIST?

 Third, have you verified that the linklst and lpalst are identical?
 No one has done a dynamic change to the linklst or lpalst on either
   system?

 Lastly, why no open an SR with IBM.  It will probably be faster for
 the DFSORT team to assist you.

 Lizette


  -Original Message-
  From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
  [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Nathan Astle
  Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 4:41 AM
  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
  Subject: Challenge with DFSORT
 
  Hello,
 
  The DFSORT are not generating a DEFAULT value in 1 lpar but the
  other
 lpar
  are able to Generate though they use the same Respack.
 
  The JCL :
 
  //SORTDATE EXEC
  PGM=SORT,REGION=1024K,PARM='CORE=1024K',COND=(0,NE)
  //*
  //SYSOUT   DD SYSOUT=*
  //SORTIN   DD DSN=NATHAN.DATE,DISP=SHR
  //SORTOUT  DD DSN=NATHAN.DATE1,DISP=SHR
  //SORTWK01 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SORTWK02 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SORTWK03 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SORTWK04 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SORTWK05 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SORTWK06 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
  //SYSINDD  *
OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
  /*
 
  Result from the Working LPAR :
 
  ICE201I H RECORD TYPE IS F - DATA STARTS IN POSITION 1
 
  ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 C7-K58148 C8-K67572 E9-K60824
 C9-BASE
  E5-K72040
  ICE143I 0 BLOCKSET COPY  TECHNIQUE SELECTED
 
  ICE250I 0 VISIT http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort FOR DFSORT
PAPERS,
  EXAMPLES AN ICE000I 1 - CONTROL STATEMENTS FOR 5694-A01, Z/OS
DFSORT
  V1R12 - 01:56 ON MON AP
  OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
 
  ICE201I H RECORD TYPE IS F - DATA STARTS IN POSITION 1
 
  ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 C7-K58148 C8-K67572 E9-K60824
 C9-BASE
  E5-K72040
  ICE193I 0 ICEAM1 INVOCATION ENVIRONMENT IN EFFECT - ICEAM1
  ENVIRONMENT SELECTED ICE252I 1 PARMLIB OPTIONS WERE MERGED
WITH
  INSTALLATION MODULE DEFAULTS
 
 
 
  Result from the Non-working LPAR :
 
  ICE805I 1 JOBNAME: TEST120W , STEPNAME: SORTDATE
 
  ICE802I 0 BLOCKSET TECHNIQUE IN CONTROL
 
  ICE000I 1 - CONTROL STATEMENTS FOR 5694-A01, Z/OS DFSORT V1R12 -
  01:07 ON MON AP
 OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
 
  ICE010A 0 NO SORT OR MERGE

Re: Challenge with DFSORT

[Nathan Astle]

Is there a way to check if ICEOPT was started successfully during IPL ?
Nathan,

Since you are sharing the PARMLIB and DASD, you should have the right parms
to set up the LPAR2 to also use the ICEPRMxx. I am not a systems
programmer, so I am not sure how you code them. May be you can ask on
IBM-MAIN as to how to make sure that both LPARS use the same ICEPRMxx
members with different IPL times.

Thanks,
Sri Hari Kolusu
DFSORT Development
IBM Corporation
Email: skol...@us.ibm.com
Phone: 408-927-2187 Tie Line: 457-2187



From:Nathan Astle tcpipat...@gmail.com
To:Sri h Kolusu/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS
Date:04/27/2015 09:40 AM
Subject:Re: Challenge with DFSORT
--



Hi Kolusu

Yes after IPL it started giving problem.  Is it possible that S ICEOPTS
didn't start during IPL ?

On 27 Apr 2015 21:57, Sri h Kolusu *skol...@us.ibm.com*
skol...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Nathan,

The DEFAULTS job will list all the parmlib overrides.  If you had Z33=YES
on both systems, was an IPL performed on LPAR2 too?

Thanks,
Sri Hari Kolusu
DFSORT Development
IBM Corporation
Email: *skol...@us.ibm.com* skol...@us.ibm.com
Phone: 408-927-2187 Tie Line: 457-2187



From:Nathan Astle *tcpipat...@gmail.com* tcpipat...@gmail.com
To:Sri h Kolusu/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS
Date:04/27/2015 09:09 AM
Subject:Re: Challenge with DFSORT
 --



Hi Kolusu,

I see Z33=YES on both. Is there a way to find if ICEOPT was started ? Any
display commands to confirm ?

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Sri h Kolusu *skol...@us.ibm.com*
skol...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Nathan,

I am guessing that your shop has migrated from CA-SORT and you have
Z33=YES on LPAR1 which will perform a COPY application instead of
terminating when SORT, MERGE or COPY is not specified. LPAR 2 is missing
that parm.

You can check the defaults using the following. Run this job on both LPARS
and compare the output. Look for Z33 in particular.

//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=ICETOOL
//TOOLMSG   DD SYSOUT=*
//DFSMSGDD SYSOUT=*
//OUT   DD SYSOUT=*
//TOOLINDD *
  DEFAULTS LIST(OUT)
/*

Thanks,
Kolusu
DFSORT Development

IBM Mainframe Discussion List *IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU*
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on
04/27/2015 04:41:11 AM:

 From: Nathan Astle *tcpipat...@gmail.com* tcpipat...@gmail.com
 To: *IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU* IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Date: 04/27/2015 04:41 AM
 Subject: Challenge with DFSORT
 Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List *IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU*
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

 Hello,

 The DFSORT are not generating a DEFAULT value in 1 lpar but the other
lpar
 are able to Generate though they use the same Respack.

 The JCL :

 //SORTDATE EXEC PGM=SORT,REGION=1024K,PARM='CORE=1024K',COND=(0,NE)
 //*
 //SYSOUT   DD SYSOUT=*
 //SORTIN   DD DSN=NATHAN.DATE,DISP=SHR
 //SORTOUT  DD DSN=NATHAN.DATE1,DISP=SHR
 //SORTWK01 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
 //SORTWK02 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
 //SORTWK03 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
 //SORTWK04 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
 //SORTWK05 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
 //SORTWK06 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
 //SYSINDD  *
   OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
 /*

 Result from the Working LPAR :

 ICE201I H RECORD TYPE IS F - DATA STARTS IN POSITION 1

 ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 C7-K58148 C8-K67572 E9-K60824 C9-BASE
 E5-K72040
 ICE143I 0 BLOCKSET COPY  TECHNIQUE SELECTED

 ICE250I 0 VISIT *http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort*
http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort FOR DFSORT PAPERS,
 EXAMPLES AN
 ICE000I 1 - CONTROL STATEMENTS FOR 5694-A01, Z/OS DFSORT V1R12 - 01:56
ON
 MON AP
 OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)

 ICE201I H RECORD TYPE IS F - DATA STARTS IN POSITION 1

 ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 C7-K58148 C8-K67572 E9-K60824 C9-BASE
 E5-K72040
 ICE193I 0 ICEAM1 INVOCATION ENVIRONMENT IN EFFECT - ICEAM1 ENVIRONMENT
 SELECTED
 ICE252I 1 PARMLIB OPTIONS WERE MERGED WITH INSTALLATION MODULE DEFAULTS



 Result from the Non-working LPAR :

 ICE805I 1 JOBNAME: TEST120W , STEPNAME: SORTDATE

 ICE802I 0 BLOCKSET TECHNIQUE IN CONTROL

 ICE000I 1 - CONTROL STATEMENTS FOR 5694-A01, Z/OS DFSORT V1R12 - 01:07
ON
 MON AP
OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)

 ICE010A 0 NO SORT OR MERGE CONTROL STATEMENT

 ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 E7-K70685

 ICE052I 3 END OF DFSORT



 Both the LPAR are in same Sysplex, Use the same SORT loadlibs, Share the
 DASD too. Not sure why the results are differents and the Defaults are
not
 generated.

 Could someone please share your thoughts.

 z/OS : 1.12

 Nathan

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to *lists...@listserv.ua.edu* lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: SMP/e FTP receive error - Help

[Nathan Astle]

Liz

You were right and IBM site did had some hiccup.
On 17 Apr 2015 18:39, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:

 What are the control cards for SMP/E you are using?
 Have you checked to see if the IBM website is having issues?  Sometimes
 when doing Network receives, IBM FTP Website where you down load from is
 having an issue.  You usually have to open an SR to SMP/E for assistance.

 Lizette


  -Original Message-
  From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
  On Behalf Of Nathan Astle
  Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 3:52 AM
  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
  Subject: SMP/e FTP receive error - Help
 
  Hello,
 
  Cross Posted to TCPIP-L
 
  While Downloading the latest RSU from IBM site, I have received the below
  error message :
 
  Connection to server interrupted or timed out. Receiving data
 
  recv error from receive_data - EDC5120I Interrupted function call.
  (errno2=0x766
  50291)
 
  Connection with 181.302.248.51 terminated
 
  Transfer aborted due to receive error (-2)
 
  Std Return Code = 16150, Error Code = 00010
 
 
 
  GIM69234I FTP FAILED, ATTEMPT 10 OF 10.
 
  The overall transfer rate is 533.78 KB/sec. So is it a problem with a
 bandwidth
  ?
 
 
  I am unable to get the clarification on the above error message in
 manuals.
  Could someone please help me with the  above.
 
  Nathan
 

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

SMP/e FTP receive error - Help

[Nathan Astle]

Hello,

Cross Posted to TCPIP-L

While Downloading the latest RSU from IBM site, I have received the below
error message :

Connection to server interrupted or timed out. Receiving data

recv error from receive_data - EDC5120I Interrupted function call.
(errno2=0x766
50291)

Connection with 181.302.248.51 terminated

Transfer aborted due to receive error (-2)

Std Return Code = 16150, Error Code = 00010



GIM69234I FTP FAILED, ATTEMPT 10 OF 10.

The overall transfer rate is 533.78 KB/sec. So is it a problem with a
bandwidth ?


I am unable to get the clarification on the above error message in manuals.
Could someone please help me with the  above.

Nathan

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN