Re: Controlling TCPIP performance
As long as it is a separate address space, you should be able to throttle performance. FTP client or server? Rob Schramm On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:44 PM Steve Beaver <st...@stevebeaver.com> wrote: > FTP's rarely dominate anything. The only throttle is the speed of the > line and the capacity of the receiver and what is happening > On the LCU > > Steve > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of van der Grijn, Bart (B) > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:34 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Controlling TCPIP performance > > Wouldn't that be determined by the priority of the application rather than > by the TCPIP task? In this case, the FTP client or server. > Bart > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Tracy Adams > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:26 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Controlling TCPIP performance > > For obvious reasons we want to run the TCPIP address at a very high > dispatching priority. There are times though when we want to throttle back > certain functions of the TCPIP stack. I will use FTP as the immediate > example. I really don’t want a file transfer to dominate the system :-) > TIA for your thoughts and ideas. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Rob Schramm -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Controlling TCPIP performance
FTP's rarely dominate anything. The only throttle is the speed of the line and the capacity of the receiver and what is happening On the LCU Steve -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of van der Grijn, Bart (B) Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:34 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Controlling TCPIP performance Wouldn't that be determined by the priority of the application rather than by the TCPIP task? In this case, the FTP client or server. Bart -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tracy Adams Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Controlling TCPIP performance For obvious reasons we want to run the TCPIP address at a very high dispatching priority. There are times though when we want to throttle back certain functions of the TCPIP stack. I will use FTP as the immediate example. I really don’t want a file transfer to dominate the system :-) TIA for your thoughts and ideas. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Controlling TCPIP performance
Wouldn't that be determined by the priority of the application rather than by the TCPIP task? In this case, the FTP client or server. Bart -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tracy Adams Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Controlling TCPIP performance For obvious reasons we want to run the TCPIP address at a very high dispatching priority. There are times though when we want to throttle back certain functions of the TCPIP stack. I will use FTP as the immediate example. I really don’t want a file transfer to dominate the system :-) TIA for your thoughts and ideas. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Controlling TCPIP performance
Class of Service. Check the TCPIP books... HTH, -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tracy Adams Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 2:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Controlling TCPIP performance For obvious reasons we want to run the TCPIP address at a very high dispatching priority. There are times though when we want to throttle back certain functions of the TCPIP stack. I will use FTP as the immediate example. I really don’t want a file transfer to dominate the system :-) TIA for your thoughts and ideas. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN