Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-17 Thread Scott Fagen
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:25:52 -0800, Janet Sun <4jl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi Steve,
>
>Kristine Harper created that video some years ago.
>
>Hope you're doing well.
>
>-- Janet
>

Kristine _Bastin_ nee Harper - wife of SHARE President, Justin Bastin.  Sadly 
(for us), she's no longer "working for a mainframe ISV."

Scott Fagen
21st Century Software

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-14 Thread Anne & Lynn Wheeler
z.sch...@gmail.com (z/OS scheduler) writes:
> IMHO TCP/ip is part and parcel of this new "Open Source / Written by
> Hackers" we are living in.
> I cannot believe that C.C.I.T.T.would have recommended to IBM to make their
> product more hack-able - unless Microsoft or SUN had big influence on
> C.C.I.T.T.

The original mainframe TCP/IP implementation was done in VS/PASCAL which
had none of the typical exploits found commonly in C-language TCP/IP
implementatins. The communication group fought fierce battle to prevent
its release. When they lost the battle, they then changed their story
and said that since it was "communication" it had to be released through
the communication group. What shipped would used nearly a whole 3090
processor to get 44kbytes/sec aggregate throughput.

I then did the enhancements to support RFC044 and in tuning tests at
Cray Research between a Cray and 4341 ... got channel speed sustained
throughput using only modest amount of 4341 processor (something like
500 times improvement in bytes moved per instruction executed).

Later the communication group hired a silicon valley contractor to
implement TCP/IP support directly in VTAM. He initially demonstrated
TCP/IP running significantly faster than LU6.2. He was then told that
*everybody* knows that a *valid* TCP/IP implementation runs
significantly slower than LU6.2 and they would only be paying for a
*valid* TCP/IP implementation.

After leaving IBM, I was brought in as consultant to small client/server
startup that wanted to do payment transactions on their server (two
Oracle people that I had worked with at IBM when we were doing IBM's
HA/CMP product were then at startup responsible for something called
"commerce server). The startup had invented this technology they called
"SSL" they wanted to use, the result is now frequently called
"electronic commerce". I had complete responsibility for the server to
payment networks ... but could only make recommendations on the
client/server side ... some of which were almost immediately violated
... continues to account for some number of exploits.

At the time, internet exploits were about half C-language related
programming problems and half social enginnering ... with a few
misc. other items. Then at 1996 m'soft moscone MDC conference, all the
banners said "Internet" ... but the constant refrain in every session
was "protect your investment" ... aka Visual Basic applications embedded
in data files that would be automagically executed. They were going to
transition from the safe, small closed LANs network environments to the
wild anarchy of the Internet w/o any additional countermeasures. By the
end of the decade over 1/3rd of "internet" exploits were these
automagically executed code snippets (the numbers of the other exploits
didn't decrease, there was just an explosion of this new category of
exploits).

Early part of the century I did some work on categorizing exploits in
the NIST CVE exploit database ... and tried to get MITRE to require
additional information in exploit reports. At the time MITRE said that
they had hard enough time getting reports to have any information
... and additional requirements would just inhibit people writting
anything.

Some archived posts about CVE exploit categrizing
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004e.html#43
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2005d.html#0
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2005d.html#67
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2005k.html#3
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007q.html#20

old posts about IBM evaluation of the 30yr old gov. MULTICS security
evaluation ... implemented in PLI and having none of the 
exploitable bugs typical in C-lanugage implementations.
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002l.html#42
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002l.html#44

The copy of the IBM paper was originally on IBM website ... but all such
websites have since disappeared and I had to find copy at other
locations.

-- 
virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-14 Thread z/OS scheduler
IMHO TCP/ip is part and parcel of this new "Open Source / Written by
Hackers" we are living in.
I cannot believe that C.C.I.T.T.would have recommended to IBM to make their
product more hack-able - unless Microsoft or SUN had big influence on
C.C.I.T.T.

Op di 14 jan. 2020 om 09:51 schreef Dave Wade :

> Folks,
>
> Its easy to target TCPIP but IMHO the issues are to do with its universal
> use, and the libraries used to implement it.
>
> So I will just remind you all that what I think was one of the first nasty
> programs, the "CHRISTMA EXEC" worm, was actually spread over BITNET and
> VNET which at the time had no TCPIP. I wonder if any one still has filters
> in their RSCS user exists to block such files?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas_Tree_EXEC
>
> Also while the Morris worm
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_worm
>
> did spread over TCPIP the holes it exploited did not require TCPIP and the
> systems it infected, BSD based systems, are generally thought to be
> "secure" but in this case were poorly configured.
>
> Lastly, many years ago when I was working on the SUCOMMS X.25 package for
> UK universities we did find a buffer overrun problem in the VM/SP SNA CCS
> code. That is the code that VTAM uses (well I think it still uses) to
> present terminals to VM.
>
> So, if we were using SNA or X25 or BiSync as universal transports, then I
> believe we could be finding security holes in them.
>
> Dave Wade
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-14 Thread Dave Wade
Folks,

Its easy to target TCPIP but IMHO the issues are to do with its universal use, 
and the libraries used to implement it.

So I will just remind you all that what I think was one of the first nasty 
programs, the "CHRISTMA EXEC" worm, was actually spread over BITNET and VNET 
which at the time had no TCPIP. I wonder if any one still has filters in their 
RSCS user exists to block such files? 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas_Tree_EXEC

Also while the Morris worm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_worm

did spread over TCPIP the holes it exploited did not require TCPIP and the 
systems it infected, BSD based systems, are generally thought to be "secure" 
but in this case were poorly configured. 

Lastly, many years ago when I was working on the SUCOMMS X.25 package for UK 
universities we did find a buffer overrun problem in the VM/SP SNA CCS code. 
That is the code that VTAM uses (well I think it still uses) to present 
terminals to VM. 

So, if we were using SNA or X25 or BiSync as universal transports, then I 
believe we could be finding security holes in them. 

Dave Wade

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-13 Thread Seymour J Metz
IBM supported TCP/IP for the same reason that it earlier supported the ISO OSI 
and ITU (nee C.C.I.T.T.) recommendations; that where the market, especially the 
US Federal Government market, seemed to be going.

> The most concerning security problems on the mainframe are not caused by 
> TCP/IP but by Apathy, laziness, false confidence and ignorance. 

IOW, just like the rest of the tech industry.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3



From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Knutson, Samuel 
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 11:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is a mainframe?

In my opinion IBM helped to save the mainframe when they included a built-in 
highly performant TCP/IP stack in the operating system.Making the mainframe 
a more mainstream hardware server and more importantly a mainstream software 
server that communications, API implementations and development practices as 
any other makes it viable for another 50 years.  The alternative path was for 
it to become a truly niche isolated platform or for this core capability to be 
supplied by third party software.  We saw that same evolution on other 
platforms if anyone remembers "Trumpet Winsock"😊

The mainframe remains the most securable platform today.   z/OS in particular 
handles TCP/IP in a securable way allowing very granular controls of which 
application containers can connect to which ports.  IBM has a published 
integrity policy which is applicable to the entire OS including TCP/IP.   The 
most concerning security problems on the mainframe are not caused by TCP/IP but 
by Apathy, laziness, false confidence and ignorance.  OEM TCP/IP stacks would 
have provided this capability and already were when IBM introduced TCP/IP in 
z/OS.  You can make a reasoned argument that by incorporating TCP/IP as part of 
the operating system IBM has insured it has security and integrity equal to the 
balance of the operating system.

Best Regards,
Sam Knutson

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
z/OS scheduler
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2020 3:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is a mainframe?

Welll, in my opinion the mainframe died when IBM allowed tcpip on their 
servers. From that point onwards it just became another server that could be 
hacked via TCPIP ports.

James O'Leary

Op vr 10 jan. 2020 om 21:05 schreef Steve Smith :

> Well, it is Friday:
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dd0-pLcgq-2M&data=02%7C01%7CSamuel.Knutso
> n%40COMPUWARE.COM%7C609bd2dd893148044b3a08d796d83cc4%7C893e9ba31b7844d
> 8aca9105fab957fed%7C0%7C0%7C637143727850910523&sdata=qQqJNcO62gXdN
> DUZwk8U0IjSGLtPFgD4dlS2pJIQdY8%3D&reserved=0
>
> It's also about a bank :-)
>
> --
> sas
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It 
contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named 
addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it 
to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and 
then destroy it

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-13 Thread Seymour J Metz
There have been vulnerabilities in some of the protocols. That said, the 
community has been fairly good about fixing them.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3



From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
zMan 
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 11:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is a mainframe?

Eh? That's silly. There's nothing inherent about TCP/IP that makes things
hackable. Any connectivity creates potential exposures, whether it's
TCP/IP, SNA, bisync...

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 3:53 PM z/OS scheduler  wrote:

> Welll, in my opinion the mainframe died when IBM allowed tcpip on their
> servers. From that point onwards it just became another server that could
> be hacked via TCPIP ports.
>
> James O'Leary
>
> Op vr 10 jan. 2020 om 21:05 schreef Steve Smith :
>
> > Well, it is Friday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0-pLcgq-2M
> >
> > It's also about a bank :-)
> >
> > --
> > sas
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-13 Thread Seymour J Metz
I remember that IBM supported X.25, APPN corrected a lot of the issues of SNA, 
and IMHO the industry would have been better off going to the ITU (nee 
C.C.I.T.T.) X.foo recommendations.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3



From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
ITschak Mugzach 
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 11:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is a mainframe?

tcpip stack on z is just a proof that IBM recognized that the 70's passed.
some of you may remember that while the industry standard was x.25, IBM
decided that if you want to connect to a mainframe, you need to play IBM's
game of SNA. If IBM was rolling the market, these days, we might be still
stack with SNA...

ITschak

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 6:40 PM Knutson, Samuel <
samuel.knut...@compuware.com> wrote:

> In my opinion IBM helped to save the mainframe when they included a
> built-in highly performant TCP/IP stack in the operating system.Making
> the mainframe a more mainstream hardware server and more importantly a
> mainstream software server that communications, API implementations and
> development practices as any other makes it viable for another 50 years.
> The alternative path was for it to become a truly niche isolated platform
> or for this core capability to be supplied by third party software.  We saw
> that same evolution on other platforms if anyone remembers "Trumpet
> Winsock"😊
>
> The mainframe remains the most securable platform today.   z/OS in
> particular handles TCP/IP in a securable way allowing very granular
> controls of which application containers can connect to which ports.  IBM
> has a published integrity policy which is applicable to the entire OS
> including TCP/IP.   The most concerning security problems on the mainframe
> are not caused by TCP/IP but by Apathy, laziness, false confidence and
> ignorance.  OEM TCP/IP stacks would have provided this capability and
> already were when IBM introduced TCP/IP in z/OS.  You can make a reasoned
> argument that by incorporating TCP/IP as part of the operating system IBM
> has insured it has security and integrity equal to the balance of the
> operating system.
>
> Best Regards,
> Sam Knutson
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf
> Of z/OS scheduler
> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2020 3:52 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: What is a mainframe?
>
> Welll, in my opinion the mainframe died when IBM allowed tcpip on their
> servers. From that point onwards it just became another server that could
> be hacked via TCPIP ports.
>
> James O'Leary
>
> Op vr 10 jan. 2020 om 21:05 schreef Steve Smith :
>
> > Well, it is Friday:
> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> > youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dd0-pLcgq-2M&data=02%7C01%7CSamuel.Knutso
> > n%40COMPUWARE.COM%7C609bd2dd893148044b3a08d796d83cc4%7C893e9ba31b7844d
> > 8aca9105fab957fed%7C0%7C0%7C637143727850910523&sdata=qQqJNcO62gXdN
> > DUZwk8U0IjSGLtPFgD4dlS2pJIQdY8%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > It's also about a bank :-)
> >
> > --
> > sas
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It
> contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
> addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or
> disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us
> immediately and then destroy it
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


--
ITschak Mugzach
*|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring
for Legacy **|  *

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-13 Thread Seymour J Metz
I disagree. VTAM *was* the center, and remained so with the advent of APPN. 
What changed is that VTAM no longer required centralized administration. ISO 
OSI and TCP/IP became available for MVS much later.

However, I do agree that it was absolutely necessary for IBM to support TCP/IP 
once it won the beauty contest with OSI.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3



From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Gerhard Adam 
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 1:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is a mainframe?

I think you are absolutely correct  There is a reason why VTAM adopted APPN, 
because it was impossible for VTAM to look and behave as if it were the entire 
center for every  communications need.   TCP/IP was inevitable given its large 
penetration into the home consumer market and the cost for enterprise 
implementation.



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Knutson, Samuel
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 8:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is a mainframe?

In my opinion IBM helped to save the mainframe when they included a built-in 
highly performant TCP/IP stack in the operating system.Making the mainframe 
a more mainstream hardware server and more importantly a mainstream software 
server that communications, API implementations and development practices as 
any other makes it viable for another 50 years.  The alternative path was for 
it to become a truly niche isolated platform or for this core capability to be 
supplied by third party software.  We saw that same evolution on other 
platforms if anyone remembers "Trumpet Winsock"😊

The mainframe remains the most securable platform today.   z/OS in particular 
handles TCP/IP in a securable way allowing very granular controls of which 
application containers can connect to which ports.  IBM has a published 
integrity policy which is applicable to the entire OS including TCP/IP.   The 
most concerning security problems on the mainframe are not caused by TCP/IP but 
by Apathy, laziness, false confidence and ignorance.  OEM TCP/IP stacks would 
have provided this capability and already were when IBM introduced TCP/IP in 
z/OS.  You can make a reasoned argument that by incorporating TCP/IP as part of 
the operating system IBM has insured it has security and integrity equal to the 
balance of the operating system.

Best Regards,
Sam Knutson

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
z/OS scheduler
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2020 3:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is a mainframe?

Welll, in my opinion the mainframe died when IBM allowed tcpip on their 
servers. From that point onwards it just became another server that could be 
hacked via TCPIP ports.

James O'Leary

Op vr 10 jan. 2020 om 21:05 schreef Steve Smith :

> Well, it is Friday:
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dd0-pLcgq-2M&data=02%7C01%7CSamuel.Knutso
> n%40COMPUWARE.COM%7C609bd2dd893148044b3a08d796d83cc4%7C893e9ba31b7844d
> 8aca9105fab957fed%7C0%7C0%7C637143727850910523&sdata=qQqJNcO62gXdN
> DUZwk8U0IjSGLtPFgD4dlS2pJIQdY8%3D&reserved=0
>
> It's also about a bank :-)
>
> --
> sas
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The contents of this 
e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that 
may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized 
designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you 
received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-13 Thread Gerhard Adam
I think you are absolutely correct  There is a reason why VTAM adopted APPN, 
because it was impossible for VTAM to look and behave as if it were the entire 
center for every  communications need.   TCP/IP was inevitable given its large 
penetration into the home consumer market and the cost for enterprise 
implementation.



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Knutson, Samuel
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 8:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is a mainframe?

In my opinion IBM helped to save the mainframe when they included a built-in 
highly performant TCP/IP stack in the operating system.Making the mainframe 
a more mainstream hardware server and more importantly a mainstream software 
server that communications, API implementations and development practices as 
any other makes it viable for another 50 years.  The alternative path was for 
it to become a truly niche isolated platform or for this core capability to be 
supplied by third party software.  We saw that same evolution on other 
platforms if anyone remembers "Trumpet Winsock"😊

The mainframe remains the most securable platform today.   z/OS in particular 
handles TCP/IP in a securable way allowing very granular controls of which 
application containers can connect to which ports.  IBM has a published 
integrity policy which is applicable to the entire OS including TCP/IP.   The 
most concerning security problems on the mainframe are not caused by TCP/IP but 
by Apathy, laziness, false confidence and ignorance.  OEM TCP/IP stacks would 
have provided this capability and already were when IBM introduced TCP/IP in 
z/OS.  You can make a reasoned argument that by incorporating TCP/IP as part of 
the operating system IBM has insured it has security and integrity equal to the 
balance of the operating system.

Best Regards,
Sam Knutson

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
z/OS scheduler
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2020 3:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is a mainframe?

Welll, in my opinion the mainframe died when IBM allowed tcpip on their 
servers. From that point onwards it just became another server that could be 
hacked via TCPIP ports.

James O'Leary

Op vr 10 jan. 2020 om 21:05 schreef Steve Smith :

> Well, it is Friday:
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dd0-pLcgq-2M&data=02%7C01%7CSamuel.Knutso
> n%40COMPUWARE.COM%7C609bd2dd893148044b3a08d796d83cc4%7C893e9ba31b7844d
> 8aca9105fab957fed%7C0%7C0%7C637143727850910523&sdata=qQqJNcO62gXdN
> DUZwk8U0IjSGLtPFgD4dlS2pJIQdY8%3D&reserved=0
>
> It's also about a bank :-)
>
> --
> sas
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The contents of this 
e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that 
may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized 
designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you 
received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-13 Thread Charles Mills
Of course!

Charles


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Knutson, Samuel
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 8:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is a mainframe?

In my opinion IBM helped to save the mainframe when they included a built-in 
highly performant TCP/IP stack in the operating system.Making the mainframe 
a more mainstream hardware server and more importantly a mainstream software 
server that communications, API implementations and development practices as 
any other makes it viable for another 50 years.  The alternative path was for 
it to become a truly niche isolated platform or for this core capability to be 
supplied by third party software.  We saw that same evolution on other 
platforms if anyone remembers "Trumpet Winsock"😊

The mainframe remains the most securable platform today.   z/OS in particular 
handles TCP/IP in a securable way allowing very granular controls of which 
application containers can connect to which ports.  IBM has a published 
integrity policy which is applicable to the entire OS including TCP/IP.   The 
most concerning security problems on the mainframe are not caused by TCP/IP but 
by Apathy, laziness, false confidence and ignorance.  OEM TCP/IP stacks would 
have provided this capability and already were when IBM introduced TCP/IP in 
z/OS.  You can make a reasoned argument that by incorporating TCP/IP as part of 
the operating system IBM has insured it has security and integrity equal to the 
balance of the operating system.

Best Regards,
Sam Knutson

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-13 Thread Grant Taylor

On 1/13/20 9:50 AM, zMan wrote:
Eh? That's silly. There's nothing inherent about TCP/IP that makes 
things hackable. Any connectivity creates potential exposures, whether 
it's TCP/IP, SNA, bisync...


I do think there is something to be said about the size of the potential 
pool of attackers via different connectivity methods.


With that in mind, TCP/IP has a *LOT* bigger pool of potential attackers 
than SNA or bisync.




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-13 Thread ITschak Mugzach
tcpip stack on z is just a proof that IBM recognized that the 70's passed.
some of you may remember that while the industry standard was x.25, IBM
decided that if you want to connect to a mainframe, you need to play IBM's
game of SNA. If IBM was rolling the market, these days, we might be still
stack with SNA...

ITschak

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 6:40 PM Knutson, Samuel <
samuel.knut...@compuware.com> wrote:

> In my opinion IBM helped to save the mainframe when they included a
> built-in highly performant TCP/IP stack in the operating system.Making
> the mainframe a more mainstream hardware server and more importantly a
> mainstream software server that communications, API implementations and
> development practices as any other makes it viable for another 50 years.
> The alternative path was for it to become a truly niche isolated platform
> or for this core capability to be supplied by third party software.  We saw
> that same evolution on other platforms if anyone remembers "Trumpet
> Winsock"😊
>
> The mainframe remains the most securable platform today.   z/OS in
> particular handles TCP/IP in a securable way allowing very granular
> controls of which application containers can connect to which ports.  IBM
> has a published integrity policy which is applicable to the entire OS
> including TCP/IP.   The most concerning security problems on the mainframe
> are not caused by TCP/IP but by Apathy, laziness, false confidence and
> ignorance.  OEM TCP/IP stacks would have provided this capability and
> already were when IBM introduced TCP/IP in z/OS.  You can make a reasoned
> argument that by incorporating TCP/IP as part of the operating system IBM
> has insured it has security and integrity equal to the balance of the
> operating system.
>
> Best Regards,
> Sam Knutson
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf
> Of z/OS scheduler
> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2020 3:52 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: What is a mainframe?
>
> Welll, in my opinion the mainframe died when IBM allowed tcpip on their
> servers. From that point onwards it just became another server that could
> be hacked via TCPIP ports.
>
> James O'Leary
>
> Op vr 10 jan. 2020 om 21:05 schreef Steve Smith :
>
> > Well, it is Friday:
> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> > youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dd0-pLcgq-2M&data=02%7C01%7CSamuel.Knutso
> > n%40COMPUWARE.COM%7C609bd2dd893148044b3a08d796d83cc4%7C893e9ba31b7844d
> > 8aca9105fab957fed%7C0%7C0%7C637143727850910523&sdata=qQqJNcO62gXdN
> > DUZwk8U0IjSGLtPFgD4dlS2pJIQdY8%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > It's also about a bank :-)
> >
> > --
> > sas
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It
> contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
> addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or
> disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us
> immediately and then destroy it
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


-- 
ITschak Mugzach
*|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring
for Legacy **|  *

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-13 Thread zMan
Eh? That's silly. There's nothing inherent about TCP/IP that makes things
hackable. Any connectivity creates potential exposures, whether it's
TCP/IP, SNA, bisync...

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 3:53 PM z/OS scheduler  wrote:

> Welll, in my opinion the mainframe died when IBM allowed tcpip on their
> servers. From that point onwards it just became another server that could
> be hacked via TCPIP ports.
>
> James O'Leary
>
> Op vr 10 jan. 2020 om 21:05 schreef Steve Smith :
>
> > Well, it is Friday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0-pLcgq-2M
> >
> > It's also about a bank :-)
> >
> > --
> > sas
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


-- 
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-13 Thread Knutson, Samuel
In my opinion IBM helped to save the mainframe when they included a built-in 
highly performant TCP/IP stack in the operating system.Making the mainframe 
a more mainstream hardware server and more importantly a mainstream software 
server that communications, API implementations and development practices as 
any other makes it viable for another 50 years.  The alternative path was for 
it to become a truly niche isolated platform or for this core capability to be 
supplied by third party software.  We saw that same evolution on other 
platforms if anyone remembers "Trumpet Winsock"😊

The mainframe remains the most securable platform today.   z/OS in particular 
handles TCP/IP in a securable way allowing very granular controls of which 
application containers can connect to which ports.  IBM has a published 
integrity policy which is applicable to the entire OS including TCP/IP.   The 
most concerning security problems on the mainframe are not caused by TCP/IP but 
by Apathy, laziness, false confidence and ignorance.  OEM TCP/IP stacks would 
have provided this capability and already were when IBM introduced TCP/IP in 
z/OS.  You can make a reasoned argument that by incorporating TCP/IP as part of 
the operating system IBM has insured it has security and integrity equal to the 
balance of the operating system.

Best Regards,
Sam Knutson

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
z/OS scheduler
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2020 3:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is a mainframe?

Welll, in my opinion the mainframe died when IBM allowed tcpip on their 
servers. From that point onwards it just became another server that could be 
hacked via TCPIP ports.

James O'Leary

Op vr 10 jan. 2020 om 21:05 schreef Steve Smith :

> Well, it is Friday:
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dd0-pLcgq-2M&data=02%7C01%7CSamuel.Knutso
> n%40COMPUWARE.COM%7C609bd2dd893148044b3a08d796d83cc4%7C893e9ba31b7844d
> 8aca9105fab957fed%7C0%7C0%7C637143727850910523&sdata=qQqJNcO62gXdN
> DUZwk8U0IjSGLtPFgD4dlS2pJIQdY8%3D&reserved=0
>
> It's also about a bank :-)
>
> --
> sas
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It 
contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named 
addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it 
to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and 
then destroy it

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-12 Thread scott Ford
Matt:

I totally agree. A lot of folks dont realize its not always TCPIP and the
Web, there's more to z/OS then those items.
Many aspects that can be developed and used. I spent 15+ yrs in the
VTAM/NCP/NPSI arena including hardware and software and it
provided IMHO an excellent foundation.

Regards,
Scott
z/OS Lead
IDMWORKS

On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 11:21 AM Matt Hogstrom  wrote:

> I was talking to some of our new hires the other day and none of them had
> heard of SNA, APPLIDs or VTAM.  I prefer to think of this as the evolution
> of the mainframe continuing to preserve investment over time :)
>
> Still, cloud continues to try and replicate the scalability of Sysplex and
> TCPIP is a significant barrier so consider it more of a port of entry and
> not the whole story.
>
> Matt Hogstrom
> PGP key 0F143BC1
>
> > On Jan 11, 2020, at 15:53, z/OS scheduler  wrote:
> >
> > Welll, in my opinion the mainframe died when IBM allowed tcpip on their
> > servers. From that point onwards it just became another server that could
> > be hacked via TCPIP ports.
> >
> > James O'Leary
> >
> > Op vr 10 jan. 2020 om 21:05 schreef Steve Smith :
> >
> >> Well, it is Friday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0-pLcgq-2M
> >>
> >> It's also about a bank :-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> sas
> >>
> >> --
> >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >>
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


-- 



*IDMWORKS *

Scott Ford

z/OS Dev.




“By elevating a friend or Collegue you elevate yourself, by demeaning a
friend or collegue you demean yourself”



www.idmworks.com

scott.f...@idmworks.com

Blog: www.idmworks.com/blog





*The information contained in this email message and any attachment may be
privileged, confidential, proprietary or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or
use of this message and any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to
the message and permanently delete it from your computer and destroy any
printout thereof.*

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-12 Thread Matt Hogstrom
I was talking to some of our new hires the other day and none of them had heard 
of SNA, APPLIDs or VTAM.  I prefer to think of this as the evolution of the 
mainframe continuing to preserve investment over time :) 

Still, cloud continues to try and replicate the scalability of Sysplex and 
TCPIP is a significant barrier so consider it more of a port of entry and not 
the whole story.

Matt Hogstrom
PGP key 0F143BC1

> On Jan 11, 2020, at 15:53, z/OS scheduler  wrote:
> 
> Welll, in my opinion the mainframe died when IBM allowed tcpip on their
> servers. From that point onwards it just became another server that could
> be hacked via TCPIP ports.
> 
> James O'Leary
> 
> Op vr 10 jan. 2020 om 21:05 schreef Steve Smith :
> 
>> Well, it is Friday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0-pLcgq-2M
>> 
>> It's also about a bank :-)
>> 
>> --
>> sas
>> 
>> --
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-11 Thread z/OS scheduler
Welll, in my opinion the mainframe died when IBM allowed tcpip on their
servers. From that point onwards it just became another server that could
be hacked via TCPIP ports.

James O'Leary

Op vr 10 jan. 2020 om 21:05 schreef Steve Smith :

> Well, it is Friday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0-pLcgq-2M
>
> It's also about a bank :-)
>
> --
> sas
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-10 Thread Joel C. Ewing
Of course one of the things that makes it amusing is that all highly 
skilled teckies get irritated by people that are too dumb to realize 
they are dumb.


If you continue watching to the end of the video, the next video that 
was selected by YouTube is a serious history of the mainframe "Big Iron: 
The Mainframe Story".

    JC Ewing

On 1/10/20 5:30 PM, Charles Mills wrote:

The words "text-to-video" appeared somewhere, didn't they?

As an AI-type exercise then I guess it is fairly amusing. As far as 
illuminating the mainframe/white box rivalry -- not so much.

Charles


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Steve Smith
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 2:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is a mainframe?

I don't know the provenance... grabbed off an internal IBM forum.  Seems I
heard/saw something about an automatic text-to-video generator.  Which
seems plausible :-).

sas

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:34 PM Charles Mills  wrote:


Was the script written by Watson? Was this animated on a 4341?

Charles


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 1:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: What is a mainframe?

Well, it is Friday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0-pLcgq-2M


...



--
Joel C. Ewing

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-10 Thread Janet Sun
Hi Steve,

Kristine Harper created that video some years ago.

Hope you're doing well.

-- Janet

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:35 PM Steve Smith  wrote:

> I don't know the provenance... grabbed off an internal IBM forum.  Seems I
> heard/saw something about an automatic text-to-video generator.  Which
> seems plausible :-).
>
> sas
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:34 PM Charles Mills  wrote:
>
> > Was the script written by Watson? Was this animated on a 4341?
> >
> > Charles
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> > Behalf Of Steve Smith
> > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 1:05 PM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: What is a mainframe?
> >
> > Well, it is Friday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0-pLcgq-2M
> >
> > It's also about a bank :-)
> >
> > --
> > sas
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
>
> --
> sas
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-10 Thread Charles Mills
The words "text-to-video" appeared somewhere, didn't they?

As an AI-type exercise then I guess it is fairly amusing. As far as 
illuminating the mainframe/white box rivalry -- not so much.

Charles


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Steve Smith
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 2:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is a mainframe?

I don't know the provenance... grabbed off an internal IBM forum.  Seems I
heard/saw something about an automatic text-to-video generator.  Which
seems plausible :-).

sas

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:34 PM Charles Mills  wrote:

> Was the script written by Watson? Was this animated on a 4341?
>
> Charles
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Steve Smith
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 1:05 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: What is a mainframe?
>
> Well, it is Friday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0-pLcgq-2M
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-10 Thread Steve Smith
I don't know the provenance... grabbed off an internal IBM forum.  Seems I
heard/saw something about an automatic text-to-video generator.  Which
seems plausible :-).

sas

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:34 PM Charles Mills  wrote:

> Was the script written by Watson? Was this animated on a 4341?
>
> Charles
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Steve Smith
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 1:05 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: What is a mainframe?
>
> Well, it is Friday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0-pLcgq-2M
>
> It's also about a bank :-)
>
> --
> sas
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


-- 
sas

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-10 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
I'm reassured that--even though I did not go to Harvard--I am actually very 
smart. 

.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Steve Smith
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 1:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):What is a mainframe?

Well, it is Friday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0-pLcgq-2M

It's also about a bank :-)

--
sas

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: What is a mainframe?

2020-01-10 Thread Charles Mills
Was the script written by Watson? Was this animated on a 4341?

Charles


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Steve Smith
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 1:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: What is a mainframe?

Well, it is Friday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0-pLcgq-2M

It's also about a bank :-)

-- 
sas

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


What is a mainframe?

2020-01-10 Thread Steve Smith
Well, it is Friday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0-pLcgq-2M

It's also about a bank :-)

-- 
sas

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN