Re: Maintenance Warnings
tyvm, Scott. I will be able to sleep tonight. Scott Rohling Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System 10/29/2010 07:52 PM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Maintenance Warnings I believe this warning isn't about the files being updated on disk - but about the fact that these sample files have changed from the last maintenance level and you should check them in case you have used them. There may be new options, features, variables, commands, etc etc that are in the sample files and you want to think about applying to any past samples you started with and are now using in production. Scott Rohling On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:15 PM, George Henke/NYLIC < george_he...@newyorklife.com> wrote: I just did PUT2PROD Level 1 and was checking the results. Everything finished clean, but VMFVIEW showed some warnings, DTCPRD3013W and DTCPRD3043W. I have included the message descriptions from TCPIP Messages and Codes below. The 3013 is says there are no entries in 5VMTCP40 CATALOG. I did comment out the LOAD BFS in 5VMTCP40 CATALOG per IBM's recommendation, by putting a hyphen in column 1, to resolve an error at apply time when BFS is not operational.. The other lines after it did seem to get processed. According to $VMFP2P $MSGLOG, they were copied to TCPMAINT's 591 from 5VMTCP40 491 as is. But the 3043 message says they were modified and to check the changes. When I look at the files on 5VMTCP40 491 and TCPMAINT 591 they do not have an updated Date/Time stamp. Yet the system still thinks they have been updated. Did the modification to 5VMTCP40 CATALOG interfere with something? WN:DTCPRD3013W No entries are available for processing WN:DTCPRD3021W TCP2PROD processing completed with RC = 4 WN:DTCPRD3043W File PROFILE STCPIP I has been updated; Its content WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of WN:this file WN:DTCPRD3043W File SCEXIT SAMPASM I has been updated; Its content WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of WN:this file WN:DTCPRD3043W File LDAP-DS SCONFIG I has been updated; Its content WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of WN:this file WN:DTCPRD3043W File MPROUTE SCONFIG I has been updated; Its content WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of WN:this file WN:DTCPRD3043W File SMTPCMDX SAMPEXEC I has been updated; Its content WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of WN:this file WN:DTCPRD3043W File SMTPCMDX SAMPASM I has been updated; Its content WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of WN:this file WN:DTCPRD3021W TCP2PROD processing completed with RC = 4 20.9.8 DTCPRD3013W DTCPRD3013W No entries are available for processing Explanation: The designated TCP/IP product catalog file does not contain any entries that identify files to be processed by the TCP2PROD command, or the designated section contains no such entries. System Action: Command processing stops. System Programmer Response: Verify that the correct CATALOG file name and section name have been specified as part of the command. If correct, review the content of the relevant catalog file and section, and ensure that the entries present exist in proper form; that is, the entries are neither all commentary data nor all marked with the entry-bypass operator (a hyphen). Also, verify that a corresponding end tag is present for the designated catalog section. Correct any problems, then try the command again. DTCPRD3043W This message is formatted as follows: Messages: DTCPRD3043W File file_ID has been updated; its content should be DTCPRD3043W reviewed for changes that may affect your use of this file Explanation: The content of the indicated sample file has been updated by service that has been installed on the system. The changes to this file are associated with functional changes to one or more TCP/IP program components that have likewise been affected by service. System Action: Command processing continues. System Programmer Response: Upon completion of the command, review the content of the indicated file and determine whether the changes that have been introduced affect your use of any customized, production-use counterpart to this file. For more information, consult the descriptions of these changes described in the relevant APAR or other
Re: Maintenance Warnings
I believe this warning isn't about the files being updated on disk - but about the fact that these sample files have changed from the last maintenance level and you should check them in case you have used them. There may be new options, features, variables, commands, etc etc that are in the sample files and you want to think about applying to any past samples you started with and are now using in production. Scott Rohling On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:15 PM, George Henke/NYLIC < george_he...@newyorklife.com> wrote: > > I just did PUT2PROD Level 1 and was checking the results. > > Everything finished clean, but VMFVIEW showed some warnings, DTCPRD3013W > and DTCPRD3043W. > > I have included the message descriptions from TCPIP Messages and Codes > below. > > The 3013 is says there are no entries in 5VMTCP40 CATALOG. > > I did comment out the LOAD BFS in 5VMTCP40 CATALOG per IBM's > recommendation, by putting a hyphen in column 1, to resolve an error at > apply time when BFS is not operational.. > > The other lines after it did seem to get processed. > > According to $VMFP2P $MSGLOG, they were copied to TCPMAINT's 591 from > 5VMTCP40 491 as is. > > But the 3043 message says they were modified and to check the changes. > > When I look at the files on 5VMTCP40 491 and TCPMAINT 591 they do not have > an updated Date/Time stamp. > > Yet the system still thinks they have been updated. > > Did the modification to 5VMTCP40 CATALOG interfere with something? > > WN:DTCPRD3013W No entries are available for processing > WN:DTCPRD3021W TCP2PROD processing completed with RC = 4 > WN:DTCPRD3043W File PROFILE STCPIP I has been updated; Its content > WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of > WN:this file > WN:DTCPRD3043W File SCEXIT SAMPASM I has been updated; Its content > WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of > WN:this file > WN:DTCPRD3043W File LDAP-DS SCONFIG I has been updated; Its content > WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of > WN:this file > WN:DTCPRD3043W File MPROUTE SCONFIG I has been updated; Its content > WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of > WN:this file > WN:DTCPRD3043W File SMTPCMDX SAMPEXEC I has been updated; Its content > WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of > WN:this file > WN:DTCPRD3043W File SMTPCMDX SAMPASM I has been updated; Its content > WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of > WN:this file > WN:DTCPRD3021W TCP2PROD processing completed with RC = 4 > > > *20.9.8 DTCPRD3013W* > > > -- > > > *DTCPRD3013W* *No* *entries* *are* *available* *for* *processing* > > > *Explanation:* The designated TCP/IP product catalog file does not > contain any entries that identify files to be processed by the TCP2PROD > command, or the designated section contains no such entries. > > *System* *Action:* Command processing stops. > > *System* *Programmer* *Response:* Verify that the correct CATALOG file > name and section name have been specified as part of the command. If > correct, review the content of the relevant catalog file and section, and > ensure that the entries present exist in proper form; that is, the entries > are neither all commentary data nor all marked with the entry-bypass > operator (a hyphen). Also, verify that a corresponding end tag is present > for the designated catalog section. Correct any problems, then try the > command again. > > > > > > > > *DTCPRD3043W* *This* *message* *is* *formatted* *as* *follows:* > > > *Messages:* > >- *DTCPRD3043W* *File* *file_ID* *has* *been* *updated;* *its* *content >* *should* *be* >- *DTCPRD3043W* *reviewed* *for* *changes* *that* *may* *affect* *your* >*use* *of* *this* *file* > > *Explanation:* The content of the indicated sample file has been updated > by service that has been installed on the system. The changes to this file > are associated with functional changes to one or more TCP/IP program > components that have likewise been affected by service. > > *System* *Action:* Command processing continues. > > *System* *Programmer* *Response:* Upon completion of the command, review > the content of the indicated file and determine whether the changes that > have been introduced affect your use of any customized, production-use > counterpart to this file. For more information, consult the descriptions of > these changes described in the relevant APAR or other service documentation. > > > In some instances, it might help to compare the updated file with its > base-level counterpart (maintained on the TCPMAINT 2B2 Base Code minidisk), > so you can identify specific changes that might not be apparent in a > customized, production-use file. > > > *Michael Donovan * > Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System > > 10/27/201
Re: Maintenance Warnings
I just did PUT2PROD Level 1 and was checking the results. Everything finished clean, but VMFVIEW showed some warnings, DTCPRD3013W and DTCPRD3043W. I have included the message descriptions from TCPIP Messages and Codes below. The 3013 is says there are no entries in 5VMTCP40 CATALOG. I did comment out the LOAD BFS in 5VMTCP40 CATALOG per IBM's recommendation, by putting a hyphen in column 1, to resolve an error at apply time when BFS is not operational.. The other lines after it did seem to get processed. According to $VMFP2P $MSGLOG, they were copied to TCPMAINT's 591 from 5VMTCP40 491 as is. But the 3043 message says they were modified and to check the changes. When I look at the files on 5VMTCP40 491 and TCPMAINT 591 they do not have an updated Date/Time stamp. Yet the system still thinks they have been updated. Did the modification to 5VMTCP40 CATALOG interfere with something? WN:DTCPRD3013W No entries are available for processing WN:DTCPRD3021W TCP2PROD processing completed with RC = 4 WN:DTCPRD3043W File PROFILE STCPIP I has been updated; Its content WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of WN:this file WN:DTCPRD3043W File SCEXIT SAMPASM I has been updated; Its content WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of WN:this file WN:DTCPRD3043W File LDAP-DS SCONFIG I has been updated; Its content WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of WN:this file WN:DTCPRD3043W File MPROUTE SCONFIG I has been updated; Its content WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of WN:this file WN:DTCPRD3043W File SMTPCMDX SAMPEXEC I has been updated; Its content WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of WN:this file WN:DTCPRD3043W File SMTPCMDX SAMPASM I has been updated; Its content WN:should be reviewed for changes that may affect your use of WN:this file WN:DTCPRD3021W TCP2PROD processing completed with RC = 4 20.9.8 DTCPRD3013W DTCPRD3013W No entries are available for processing Explanation: The designated TCP/IP product catalog file does not contain any entries that identify files to be processed by the TCP2PROD command, or the designated section contains no such entries. System Action: Command processing stops. System Programmer Response: Verify that the correct CATALOG file name and section name have been specified as part of the command. If correct, review the content of the relevant catalog file and section, and ensure that the entries present exist in proper form; that is, the entries are neither all commentary data nor all marked with the entry-bypass operator (a hyphen). Also, verify that a corresponding end tag is present for the designated catalog section. Correct any problems, then try the command again. DTCPRD3043W This message is formatted as follows: Messages: DTCPRD3043W File file_ID has been updated; its content should be DTCPRD3043W reviewed for changes that may affect your use of this file Explanation: The content of the indicated sample file has been updated by service that has been installed on the system. The changes to this file are associated with functional changes to one or more TCP/IP program components that have likewise been affected by service. System Action: Command processing continues. System Programmer Response: Upon completion of the command, review the content of the indicated file and determine whether the changes that have been introduced affect your use of any customized, production-use counterpart to this file. For more information, consult the descriptions of these changes described in the relevant APAR or other service documentation. In some instances, it might help to compare the updated file with its base-level counterpart (maintained on the TCPMAINT 2B2 Base Code minidisk), so you can identify specific changes that might not be apparent in a customized, production-use file. Michael Donovan Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System 10/27/2010 04:30 PM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Maintenance Warnings George, Yes. PUT2PROD will rebuild the NSS/DCSS which were hit by service. Thanks! Mike George Henke---10/27/2010 03:58:36 PM---Here is my NSS and DCSS so far, after Service but before PUT2PROD. It shows GCS has been hit. From: George Henke/NYLIC To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 10/27/2010 03:58 PM Subject: Re: Maintenance Warnings Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System Here is my NSS and DCSS so far, after Service but before PUT2PROD. It shows GCS has been hit. When I put this same maintenance on in Level 2 and PUT2PROD, it showed about 4 other NSS/DCSSes were also hit. Yet the system IPLed ok. Now I am applying the same maintenance at L
Re: DIRMAINT "WHERETO DATADVH" does not exist
Thanks Clovis; I assumed PUT2PROD had already been run when it was installed. Mike On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:23 PM, wrote: > Mike, > Only to synchronize: > Did you run PUT2PROD after enable DIRMAINT? > > __ > Clovis > > [image: Inactive hide details for Mike Atkison ---28/10/2010 > 17:52:50---Attempting to bring up DIRMAINT on z/VM 5.4 for the first time]Mike > Atkison ---28/10/2010 17:52:50---Attempting to bring up DIRMAINT on z/VM 5.4 > for the first time and cannot find the "WHERETO DATADVH" > > > From: > Mike Atkison > To: > IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Date: > 28/10/2010 17:52 > Subject: > DIRMAINT "WHERETO DATADVH" does not exist > Sent by: > The IBM z/VM Operating System > -- > > > > Attempting to bring up DIRMAINT on z/VM 5.4 for the first time and cannot > find the “WHERETO DATADVH” file (see below). Do I need to create this file > and if so, what is the format? > > dirm rlddata > > FPLDSR146E File "WHERETO DATADVH *" does not exist > > FPLSCA004I ... Issued from stage 1 of pipeline 1 name > "Read_WHERETO_DATADVH" > > FPLSCA001I ... Running "< WHERETO DATADVH *" > > DVHXMT1119T Error in CMS command; RC= 146 > > DVHXMT1119T from: PIPE (Name Read_WHERETO_DATADVH End ?) < WHERETO > > DVHXMT1119T DATADVH * | A: FANOUT | TAKE 1 | SPECS WORD 1 1 | VAR > > DVHXMT1119T DIRMMACH ? A: | SPECS WORD 2 1 | JOIN * / / | VAR DIRMNODE ? > > DVHXMT1119T A: | TAKE 1 | SPECS WORD 3 1 | VAR DIRMAUTH > > DVHXMT1119T at line 265. > > DIRMAINT ETPGVBB. - 2010/10/28(01119); T=0.01/0.01 12:13:11 > > Thanks, > > Mike > >
Re: Article: New MF in Italy, Linux on z/VM - cool story
Bari, Apulia, Italy. Bàre is the capital city of the province of Bari and of the Apulia region, on the Adriatic Sea. On 10/28/2010 04:42 PM, Austin, Alyce (CIV) wrote: > Where in Italy? > > Regards, > Alyce > > -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On > Behalf Of Pamela Christina - lovely autumn day @Endicott > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 8:25 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Article: New MF in Italy, Linux on z/VM - cool story > > One virtual machine per fisherman: On IBM, Linux, Mainframe and the > cloud > > Here's the article: > http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2010/10/21/one-virtual-machine-per-fish > erman-on-ibm-linux-mainframe-and-the-cloud/ > > This article delights me for several reasons --- something Italian, > new mainframe, and Linux on z/VM. What's not to like :-) > > Oh and I learned of it from the "System z Mainframe" on Facebook > (fb link - http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=839103432 ) > > Have a great day ! > > Regards, Pam C > -- Dave Jones V/Soft Software www.vsoft-software.com Houston, TX 281.578.7544
