Re: HMC security (was: zvm directions)

2011-06-02 Thread Philip Tully
My reason to start the zvm directions thread was to start people talkin
g.  


Re: HMC security (was: zvm directions)

2011-06-02 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 06/02/2011 at 08:30 EDT, Philip Tully tull...@optonline.net 
wrote:
 My reason to start the zvm directions thread was to start people 
talking.

And that's a Good Thing, Phil.  Having an awareness that the model of 
mainframe management begun in the 60s (and still in place today) is 
changing will help to ensure that people aren't surprised by the change. 
It will also help raise awareness of the challenges (both to you and to 
IBM) waiting in the wings.

For those who want to talk online about zEnterprise generally, IBM-MAIN 
and [really?] Systemz Mainframe on Facebook probably have better 
visibility within the relevant circles in IBM that does IBMVM.

Of course, if you want to specifically talk about how z/VM management is 
affected zEnterprise ensemble management using Unified Resource Manager, 
then there's no better place than here!  :-)

Alan Altmark

z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
IBM System Lab Services and Training 
ibm.com/systems/services/labservices 
office: 607.429.3323
mobile; 607.321.7556
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
IBM Endicott


Re: HMC security (was: zvm directions)

2011-06-02 Thread Tom Huegel
And the new soon to be launched 'Destination Z Community'.

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.comwrote:

 On Thursday, 06/02/2011 at 08:30 EDT, Philip Tully tull...@optonline.net
 wrote:
  My reason to start the zvm directions thread was to start people
 talking.

 And that's a Good Thing, Phil.  Having an awareness that the model of
 mainframe management begun in the 60s (and still in place today) is
 changing will help to ensure that people aren't surprised by the change.
 It will also help raise awareness of the challenges (both to you and to
 IBM) waiting in the wings.

 For those who want to talk online about zEnterprise generally, IBM-MAIN
 and [really?] Systemz Mainframe on Facebook probably have better
 visibility within the relevant circles in IBM that does IBMVM.

 Of course, if you want to specifically talk about how z/VM management is
 affected zEnterprise ensemble management using Unified Resource Manager,
 then there's no better place than here!  :-)

 Alan Altmark

 z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
 IBM System Lab Services and Training
 ibm.com/systems/services/labservices
 office: 607.429.3323
 mobile; 607.321.7556
 alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
 IBM Endicott



Re: PROBLEMS WITH DEDICATE DASD IN z/VM 6.1

2011-06-02 Thread Victor Ochoa Avila
I'm migrating from version of  z/VM 5.3  to  z/VM 6.1 and I have virtual
machines on dedicated disks, In the process of migrating a person of a
foreign company mentioned that there are problems with dasd's dedicates in z
/VM 6.1

This assertion does not convince me and so my question.

Thanks for your help Mike.

Victor Hugo Ochoa Avila


2011/6/2 Mike Walter mike.wal...@aonhewitt.com

 z/VM is pretty much always upward compatible, so dedicated DASD should work
 the same.

 Can you explain what you are attempting to do, and what happens when you
 try which makes you ask?

 Mike Walter
 Aon Corp.

 (Sent from the wee keyboard of a Blackberry.)


 - Original Message -
 From: Victor Hugo Ochoa [vhoa...@gmail.com]
 Sent: 06/02/2011 08:23 PM EST
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: PROBLEMS WITH DEDICATE DASD IN z/VM 6.1



 Anyone know if exist any limitation on the use of dasd's DEDICATED in z/VM
 6.1
 and/or is there some kind of problem by using dedicated DASD's in z/VM 6.1

 Thanks to all

 Greetings
 Victor Hugo Ochoa Avila
 BBVA CCR America




 The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may
 contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
 disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
 this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
 the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any
 attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of
 this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
 prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be
 monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure
 compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails
 are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be
 intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed
 to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.




-- 
Victor Hugo Ochoa Avila
z/OS  z/VM systems programmer
Mexico, City.


Re: PROBLEMS WITH DEDICATE DASD IN z/VM 6.1

2011-06-02 Thread Rogério Soares
Victor, recently i have migrated from 5.4 to 6.1, no problem with dedicated
dasd. All works like a charm :)

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Victor Ochoa Avila vhoa...@gmail.comwrote:

 I'm migrating from version of  z/VM 5.3  to  z/VM 6.1 and I have virtual
 machines on dedicated disks, In the process of migrating a person of a
 foreign company mentioned that there are problems with dasd's dedicates
  in z/VM 6.1

 This assertion does not convince me and so my question.

 Thanks for your help Mike.

 Victor Hugo Ochoa Avila


 2011/6/2 Mike Walter mike.wal...@aonhewitt.com

 z/VM is pretty much always upward compatible, so dedicated DASD should
 work the same.

 Can you explain what you are attempting to do, and what happens when you
 try which makes you ask?

 Mike Walter
 Aon Corp.

 (Sent from the wee keyboard of a Blackberry.)


 - Original Message -
 From: Victor Hugo Ochoa [vhoa...@gmail.com]
 Sent: 06/02/2011 08:23 PM EST
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: PROBLEMS WITH DEDICATE DASD IN z/VM 6.1



 Anyone know if exist any limitation on the use of dasd's DEDICATED in z/VM
 6.1
 and/or is there some kind of problem by using dedicated DASD's in z/VM 6.1

 Thanks to all

 Greetings
 Victor Hugo Ochoa Avila
 BBVA CCR America




 The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents
 may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
 disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
 this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
 the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any
 attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of
 this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
 prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be
 monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure
 compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails
 are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be
 intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed
 to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.




 --
 Victor Hugo Ochoa Avila
 z/OS  z/VM systems programmer
 Mexico, City.