FTPS using zVM FTP client ?

2011-04-20 Thread Bill Pettit
We have a vendor that we need to ftp files to from our zVM 5.4 system.   The 
vendor says we need to use FTPS over IMPLICIT TLS/SSL.

I have been reading the TCPIP Users Guide and it appears the this is possible 
from our zVM 5.4 system if I configure and use the SECURECONTROL and SECUREDATA 
statements in a FTP DATA file, which I have done.   So far I have not had any 
luck connecting to them.   If anyone else has done something similar can you 
tell me if I am missing something?

Thank you in advance...

Bill Pettit


Re: MAILIT question

2011-01-25 Thread Bill Pettit
Unfortunately I am not any more than an entry level PIPE's person.  I am 
guessing though that inside pipes it must be using CSL routines for it's SFS 
access to get to my PDF files to attach, and I would really like to see the 
return codes from those CSL routines (if that's how it's done).

Anyone know if that's possible?

Bill

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 1:27 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: MAILIT question


I tested MAILIT today with an ATTACH of a not existing file, and in such a case 
nothing gets sent.

I just looked at the code. the actual sending to SMTP happens in 
SendNetDataFile:

 'PIPE (Name PunchMail end ~) STEM HEAD.', /* take the header info   */
 SmtpPrefFil,  /* Maybe attach SMTP files */
 SmtpBodyHdr,  /* Maybe insert header for body */
 '|APPEND VAR PrefaceText||Deblock Linend', /* The preface   */
 '|APPEND VAR Contents||Deblock Linend', /* The body of the file */
 '|APPEND VAR AppendText||Deblock Linend', /* The preface*/
 left('|CONSOLE',8*console),
 SmtpAttFil,   /* Maybe attach SMTP files */
 FixDotLineForSmtp,/* Maybe fix a line with . only */
  ApndMailTrail,   /* take the trailer info  */
  padding, /* pad with blanks if FIXED file  */
 '|CHANGE //'||'00'x||'/', /* Tell it are data records   */
 '|PREFACE VAR INMR03',/* add INMR header record */
 '|PREFACE VAR INMR02',/* add INMR header record */
 '|PREFACE VAR INMR04',/* add INMR user parms */
 '|PREFACE VAR INMR01',/* add INMR header record */
 '|APPEND VAR INMR06', /* add INMR trailer record */
'|CT1: COUNT bytes',
 '|BLOCK 80 NETDATA',  /* Make NETDATA punch format */
'|CT2: COUNT bytes',
 '|PUNCH',
'~CT1:|VAR CT1 ~CT2:|VAR CT2'
 if rc0 then do
call diag 8,'SPOOL D PURGE' /* remove unfinished spool file */
return 405 'PIPE had problems with PUNCH'
 end

The SMTPATTFIL Rexx variable -used above- contains a  stage to read the files 
to attach, and that should set this PIPE's rc to non-zero when it fails, and 
the punched file would get purged.

What MAILIT also does is purging any unclosed spool file data on 000D before it 
starts to punch itself with the above PIPE.


2011/1/21 Hughes, Jim jim.hug...@doit.nh.govmailto:jim.hug...@doit.nh.gov


Have you looked at these spool files containing 4 records?  If so, what do they 
look like?




James R. Hughes
TSG, Problem Solver
NH Department of Information Technology
603-271-5586(w); 603-491-3071(c)
www.nh.gov/doithttp://www.nh.gov/doit

Statement of Confidentiality: The contents of this message are confidential. 
Any unauthorized disclosure, reproduction, use or dissemination (either whole 
or in part) is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message from your 
system.

It is fun to do the impossible.


  _


From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
[mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Bill Pettit
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 12:42 PM

To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: MAILIT question





Kris;



I have verified the PDF files that MAILIT is attempting to send as attached 
files are not empty PDF files.  And for several weeks I have been displaying 
the return code from the MAILIT call in my EXEC.  Below are snippets of the 
console files from my exec calling MAILIT and my SMTP server.



This only happens once in a while and never for all of the files/emails being 
sent during a particular call to the process.  On this night (1/18) there were 
176 emails sent with attached PDF files, and 7 were rejected by SMTP as being 
null.  I read in one of the files that got rejected to my reader by SMTP, I can 
tell it's a file from MAILIT but that is about it.



IF my SFS server rejected the request from MAILIT to access the PDF file I am 
trying to attach to my the email, would MAILIT report that rejection in it's 
return code when it comes back to my exec?



===
From my exec calling MAILIT
===
13612  Send_attached_file:
13613dfer...@serinc.netmailto:dfer...@serinc.net23 
PDF R1 22:20:53
13614  Mailit-rc= 0
13615  * From SMTP: Received Spool File 3875
===
From my SMTP machine
===
04451  RDR FILE 3874 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6954 RECS 0191 CPY  001 A 
NOHOLD NOKEEP
- 04452  RDR FILE 3875 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6955 RECS 0004 CPY  001 A 
NOHOLD NOKEEP
- 04453  DTCSMT1227E 01/18/11 22:20:53 Null Spool File: 3875  transferred 
to BILLP
04454  RDR FILE 3876 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6956 RECS 0200 CPY  001 A 
NOHOLD NOKEEP
04455  RDR FILE 3877 SENT FROM

Re: MAILIT question

2011-01-25 Thread Bill Pettit
Thank you!!
I will get a copy of the file on the way this morning.
Bill

 -Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 7:15 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: MAILIT question



PIPE doesn't always use CSL call to read SFS files.  It depends on what is 
specified in the parameters coded on the  stage.  MAILIT passes a filemode, so 
PIPE will use the classic driver mdsk and not SFS.
And, indeed, I have some vague memories having encountered some problem where 
PIPE gave RC=0 with a problem in SFS.  When using SFS, PIPE did indeed display 
the correct CSL reasoncodes and ended with a non-zero returncode.

With the following change, you can instruct MAILIT to use to use SFS if 
possible:
Go to subroutine:
  SMTP_MimeFiles: /* Handle MIME headers for SMTP attached files.*/
Some 25 lines down, make it read as follows, the red lines are new.
   if MimeOpt.at#.0TXT then do
  mRead='VAR MIMEOPT.'at#'.0STR direct!Deblock Linend
  'PIPE' mRead'!COUNT bytes MaxLine!VAR T'
  parse var t siz lrecl
   end; else do
  t=left(strip(fm),1)
  call csl 'DMSQFMOD retc reas t buffer flag'
  Select
   When reas0  then mRead='' fn ft fm
   when flag=3!flag=4 then mRead='' fn ft fm
   Otherwise mRead='SFS' fn ft fm 'WORKUNIT PRIVATE'
  end
  /*say 'mRead='mread */
  parse var MimeOpt.at#.0SIZE siz lrecl
   end
If that indeed cures the problem, I could make that change to MAILIT for 
everyone. (cure is not the right word here, better is make the SFS problem 
visible).
You could also send me such a small, 4 records, file s that I can have a look 
at it:
  - transfer such a file to your reader
  - PIPE READER FILE | RDRFILE  A
  - VMARC PACK RDRFILE  A MAILPRB VMARC A
and send me the VMARC


2011/1/25 Bill Pettit 
bill.pet...@ormutual.commailto:bill.pet...@ormutual.com


Unfortunately I am not any more than an entry level PIPE's person.  I am 
guessing though that inside pipes it must be using CSL routines for it's SFS 
access to get to my PDF files to attach, and I would really like to see the 
return codes from those CSL routines (if that's how it's done).

Anyone know if that's possible?

Bill


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
[mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Kris Buelens

Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 1:27 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: MAILIT question


I tested MAILIT today with an ATTACH of a not existing file, and in such a case 
nothing gets sent.

I just looked at the code. the actual sending to SMTP happens in 
SendNetDataFile:

 'PIPE (Name PunchMail end ~) STEM HEAD.', /* take the header info   */
 SmtpPrefFil,  /* Maybe attach SMTP files */
 SmtpBodyHdr,  /* Maybe insert header for body */
 '|APPEND VAR PrefaceText||Deblock Linend', /* The preface   */
 '|APPEND VAR Contents||Deblock Linend', /* The body of the file */
 '|APPEND VAR AppendText||Deblock Linend', /* The preface*/
 left('|CONSOLE',8*console),
 SmtpAttFil,   /* Maybe attach SMTP files */
 FixDotLineForSmtp,/* Maybe fix a line with . only */
  ApndMailTrail,   /* take the trailer info  */
  padding, /* pad with blanks if FIXED file  */
 '|CHANGE //'||'00'x||'/', /* Tell it are data records   */
 '|PREFACE VAR INMR03',/* add INMR header record */
 '|PREFACE VAR INMR02',/* add INMR header record */
 '|PREFACE VAR INMR04',/* add INMR user parms */
 '|PREFACE VAR INMR01',/* add INMR header record */
 '|APPEND VAR INMR06', /* add INMR trailer record */
'|CT1: COUNT bytes',
 '|BLOCK 80 NETDATA',  /* Make NETDATA punch format */
'|CT2: COUNT bytes',
 '|PUNCH',
'~CT1:|VAR CT1 ~CT2:|VAR CT2'
 if rc0 then do
call diag 8,'SPOOL D PURGE' /* remove unfinished spool file */
return 405 'PIPE had problems with PUNCH'
 end

The SMTPATTFIL Rexx variable -used above- contains a  stage to read the files 
to attach, and that should set this PIPE's rc to non-zero when it fails, and 
the punched file would get purged.

What MAILIT also does is purging any unclosed spool file data on 000D before it 
starts to punch itself with the above PIPE.


2011/1/21 Hughes, Jim jim.hug...@doit.nh.govmailto:jim.hug...@doit.nh.gov


Have you looked at these spool files containing 4 records?  If so, what do they 
look like?




James R. Hughes
TSG, Problem Solver
NH Department of Information Technology
603-271-5586(w); 603-491-3071(c)
www.nh.gov/doithttp://www.nh.gov/doit

Statement of Confidentiality: The contents of this message are confidential. 
Any unauthorized disclosure, reproduction, use or dissemination (either whole 
or in part) is prohibited. If you

Re: MAILIT question

2011-01-21 Thread Bill Pettit
Kris;

I have verified the PDF files that MAILIT is attempting to send as attached 
files are not empty PDF files.  And for several weeks I have been displaying 
the return code from the MAILIT call in my EXEC.  Below are snippets of the 
console files from my exec calling MAILIT and my SMTP server.

This only happens once in a while and never for all of the files/emails being 
sent during a particular call to the process.  On this night (1/18) there were 
176 emails sent with attached PDF files, and 7 were rejected by SMTP as being 
null.  I read in one of the files that got rejected to my reader by SMTP, I can 
tell it's a file from MAILIT but that is about it.

IF my SFS server rejected the request from MAILIT to access the PDF file I am 
trying to attach to my the email, would MAILIT report that rejection in it's 
return code when it comes back to my exec?

===
From my exec calling MAILIT
===
13612  Send_attached_file:
13613dfer...@serinc.netmailto:dfer...@serinc.net23 
PDF R1 22:20:53
13614  Mailit-rc= 0
13615  * From SMTP: Received Spool File 3875
===
From my SMTP machine
===
04451  RDR FILE 3874 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6954 RECS 0191 CPY  001 A 
NOHOLD NOKEEP
- 04452  RDR FILE 3875 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6955 RECS 0004 CPY  001 A 
NOHOLD NOKEEP
- 04453  DTCSMT1227E 01/18/11 22:20:53 Null Spool File: 3875  transferred 
to BILLP
04454  RDR FILE 3876 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6956 RECS 0200 CPY  001 A 
NOHOLD NOKEEP
04455  RDR FILE 3877 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6957 RECS 0004 CPY  001 A 
NOHOLD NOKEEP
04456  DTCSMT1227E 01/18/11 22:21:13 Null Spool File: 3877  transferred to 
BILLP
04457  RDR FILE 3878 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6958 RECS 0192 CPY  001 A 
NOHOLD NOKEEP
04458  RDR FILE 3879 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6959 RECS 0192 CPY  001 A 
NOHOLD NOKEEP
04459  RDR FILE 3880 SENT FROM ARPTSRVR PUN WAS 6960 RECS 0004 CPY  001 A 
NOHOLD NOKEEP
04460  DTCSMT1227E 01/18/11 22:21:43 Null Spool File: 3880  transferred to 
BILLP
===

Thank you
Bill

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:41 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: MAILIT question


No, no-oneever told me about such problems.  Note that there are no timeout 
mechanisms in SFS, so a slow SFS server can only cause a slowdown of MAILIT.  
At the other hand, if the SMTP server on VM is slowed down, maybe the mail 
server it is sending mail too gets impatient?
MAILIT can not know if SMTP dislikes a mail file: it doesn't communicate with 
SMTP: it simply creates a spool file and send that to SMTP.
If you suspect MAILIT gives RC 0 when a file to attach isn't found, simply try 
it out?  Like this
   MAILIT TEST TO( at ) subject test attach(notexist file) text this is 
a test


2011/1/20 Bill Pettit 
bill.pet...@ormutual.commailto:bill.pet...@ormutual.com


I have been using MAILIT to send emails with attached PDF files for several 
months now. 99.5% of the time it works like a champ, no errors.

But, every now and then I find a few of the emails rejected by SMTP, he says it 
he rejecting them because they are NULL files.

I have nailed this down I think to periods when my SFS server is very busy 
receiving files from other processes that are running at the same time, it just 
depends where we are in our nightly batch cycle if this happens to coincide 
with the sending of the emails with the attached PDF files.

The problem is MAILIT always returns me a zero return code, whether the files 
are rejected by SMTP or not.  I am suspecting (and hoping) that MAILIT is 
getting a return code from SFS saying it cannot provide the file for MAILIT to 
attach when MAILIT is building the email, but I have not been able to verify 
that yet.

Anyone else that is using MAILIT have a similar experience?

Thank you
Bill Pettit





--
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support




MAILIT question

2011-01-20 Thread Bill Pettit
I have been using MAILIT to send emails with attached PDF files for several 
months now. 99.5% of the time it works like a champ, no errors.

But, every now and then I find a few of the emails rejected by SMTP, he says it 
he rejecting them because they are NULL files.

I have nailed this down I think to periods when my SFS server is very busy 
receiving files from other processes that are running at the same time, it just 
depends where we are in our nightly batch cycle if this happens to coincide 
with the sending of the emails with the attached PDF files.

The problem is MAILIT always returns me a zero return code, whether the files 
are rejected by SMTP or not.  I am suspecting (and hoping) that MAILIT is 
getting a return code from SFS saying it cannot provide the file for MAILIT to 
attach when MAILIT is building the email, but I have not been able to verify 
that yet.

Anyone else that is using MAILIT have a similar experience?

Thank you
Bill Pettit


Modifying the SFS Log Backup Threshold ?

2010-10-22 Thread Bill Pettit
Does anyone know if there is a way to modify to reduce the SFS Log Backup 
Threshold from 80%?

I have been searching the CMS File Pool manual and cannot find any reference to 
being able to alter it.


TIA

Bill


Re: Modifying the SFS Log Backup Threshold ?

2010-10-22 Thread Bill Pettit
Thank you Richard!  We came to the same conclusion.

Bill

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 2:03 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Modifying the SFS Log Backup Threshold ?


I asked the same question a few months ago. There is no way other than having a 
service machine monitor the file pool and issue the backup command at a lower %.

Regards,
Richard Schuh



 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
 [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Pettit
 Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 1:28 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Modifying the SFS Log Backup Threshold ?

 Does anyone know if there is a way to modify to reduce the
 SFS Log Backup Threshold from 80%?

 I have been searching the CMS File Pool manual and cannot
 find any reference to being able to alter it.


 TIA

 Bill



Re: Sending files from CMS as Attachments

2010-08-26 Thread Bill Pettit
Does anyone out there have a copy of the SMTPNOTE EXEC that has been modified 
to send attached PDF files without destroying the format of the PDF files?  My 
old copy from 1999 is hammering the  PDF attachment.

Thank you
Bill Pettit

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of peter.w...@ttc.ca
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 11:14 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Sending files from CMS as Attachments



I use SMTPNOTE EXEC to do this.



-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Davis, Larry
Sent: June 20, 2007 09:10
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Sending files from CMS as Attachments



Is there any method to send a CMS file as an attachment in an email?

We have applications which produce formatted documents like PDF's and the user 
wants to send them to their clients, but sendfile incorporates the files into 
the email, rather than attaching the file.

Any Help would be greatly appreciated.

Larry Davis


  _

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review retransmission dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in 
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient or delegate is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error 
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The 
integrity and security of this message cannot by guaranteed on the Internet. 
The Sender accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail or for the 
consequences of any actions taken on basis of the information provided. The 
recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The sender accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this e-mail. This disclaimer is the property of the TTC and must 
not be altered or circumvented in any manner.





Re: Sending files from CMS as Attachments

2010-08-26 Thread Bill Pettit
I'll give it a try.  Thank you.

Bill

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Lionel Dyck
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 1:57 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Sending files from CMS as Attachments


What about the MAILIT from the IBM z/VM Download page

http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/mailit.vmarc

It can handle binary attachments.

Lionel

  _

Lionel B. Dyck 
z/Linux Specialist
IBM Corporation
Global Technology Services - Kaiser Account
Work: 925-926-5332
Cell: 925-348-0237
E-Mail: ld...@us.ibm.com
AIM: lbdyck | Yahoo IM: lbdyck | GTalk: lbdyck  http://www.ibm.com/ibm/values/





From:Bill Pettit bill.pet...@ormutual.com
To:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:08/26/2010 01:53 PM
Subject:Re: Sending files from CMS as Attachments
Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

  _




Does anyone out there have a copy of the SMTPNOTE EXEC that has been modified 
to send attached PDF files without destroying the format of the PDF files?  My 
old copy from 1999 is hammering the  PDF attachment.

Thank you
Bill Pettit
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of peter.w...@ttc.ca
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 11:14 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Sending files from CMS as Attachments

I use SMTPNOTE EXEC to do this.

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Davis, Larry
Sent: June 20, 2007 09:10
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Sending files from CMS as Attachments


Is there any method to send a CMS file as an attachment in an email?

We have applications which produce formatted documents like PDF's and the user 
wants to send them to their clients, but sendfile incorporates the files into 
the email, rather than attaching the file.

Any Help would be greatly appreciated.

Larry Davis


  _

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review retransmission dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in 
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient or delegate is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error 
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The 
integrity and security of this message cannot by guaranteed on the Internet. 
The Sender accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail or for the 
consequences of any actions taken on basis of the information provided. The 
recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The sender accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this e-mail. This disclaimer is the property of the TTC and must 
not be altered or circumvented in any manner.





Re: Sending files from CMS as Attachments

2010-08-26 Thread Bill Pettit
Yep, I had finally broke down and pulled up the CMS manual and found the mime 
binary-attach option that I was missing.  It helps to practice what you 
preach...

Thank you all

Bill

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 3:00 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Sending files from CMS as Attachments


On Thursday, 08/26/2010 at 05:00 EDT, Lionel Dyck/Oakland/i...@ibmus wrote:
 What about the MAILIT from the IBM z/VM Download page

 http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/mailit.vmarc

 It can handle binary attachments.

Anything wrong with SENDFILE?
SF MY PDF TO user AT domain.com (MIME BINARY-ATTACH SUBJECT 'Here is the
PDF you wanted'

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: VM DB2 7.3 question

2010-01-29 Thread Bill Pettit
Thank you Roland.  This was the information I have been looking for.

Bill Pettit

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Roland P. Chung
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 8:38 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM DB2 7.3 question


Hi Bill, This means the agent wants to read a directory block from disk, but 
there are no available directory buffers, so the agent waits for another agent 
to free up a buffer.  When a buffer is freed, this agent will be un-waited so 
it can try to get the buffer again.   This indicates an increase in the number 
of Directory buffers is needed.
There is also an out of page wait state for when page buffers are all 
in use.

I hope this helps.

...Roland


--- On Thu, 1/28/10, Bill Pettit bill.pet...@ormutual.com wrote:



--- snipped ---

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
[mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUhttp://ca.mc881.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ib...@listserv.uark.edu]
 On
Behalf Of Bill Pettit
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 5:20 PM
To: 
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUhttp://ca..mc881.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ib...@listserv.uark.edu
Subject: VM DB2 7.3 question

We encountered several slow running batch jobs last night and the only
thing that stood out was the following entry when the operator command
SHOW ACTIVE was entered:

User Agent: 4 User ID: ONLINE   is R/O  APPL  2431F6FE
   Agent is processing and is in out of block  wait.

I have been searching off and on through the manuals today and I still
cannot find any reference to the
Agent is processing and is in out of block wait
condition, and what it is attributed to.

I suspect it has something to do with a shortage of the lock request
blocks allowed and available for an active user, but I cannot find
anything that actually tells me that..

Anyone have any knowledge about what this message means?

Thank you
Bill Pettit




Re: VM DB2 7.3 question

2010-01-28 Thread Bill Pettit
Unfortunately no monitor. Not since CA pulled the rug out from under the 
DBMonitor product Sterling had.
Thank you Nora.
Bill


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Graves Nora E
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 6:46 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM DB2 7.3 question


Do you run a User Locking monitor?  If so, you can view the report at
any time from the Control Center Monitor List function. That will show
you the number of User and System blocks allocated and used.

I do not see any references to this condition either.


Nora Graves
nora.e.gra...@irs.gov
Main IRS, Room 6531
(202) 622-6735
Fax (202) 622-3123

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Bill Pettit
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 5:20 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: VM DB2 7.3 question

We encountered several slow running batch jobs last night and the only
thing that stood out was the following entry when the operator command
SHOW ACTIVE was entered:

User Agent: 4 User ID: ONLINE   is R/O  APPL  2431F6FE
   Agent is processing and is in out of block  wait.

I have been searching off and on through the manuals today and I still
cannot find any reference to the
Agent is processing and is in out of block wait
condition, and what it is attributed to.

I suspect it has something to do with a shortage of the lock request
blocks allowed and available for an active user, but I cannot find
anything that actually tells me that.

Anyone have any knowledge about what this message means?

Thank you
Bill Pettit


VM DB2 7.3 question

2010-01-27 Thread Bill Pettit
We encountered several slow running batch jobs last night and the only thing 
that stood out was the following entry when the operator command SHOW ACTIVE 
was entered:

User Agent: 4 User ID: ONLINE   is R/O  APPL  2431F6FE
   Agent is processing and is in out of block  wait.

I have been searching off and on through the manuals today and I still cannot 
find any reference to the
Agent is processing and is in out of block wait
condition, and what it is attributed to.

I suspect it has something to do with a shortage of the lock request blocks 
allowed and available for an active user, but I cannot find anything that 
actually tells me that.

Anyone have any knowledge about what this message means?

Thank you
Bill Pettit


Re: Unofficial DB2 Servr for VSE VM survey

2009-10-13 Thread Bill Pettit
Please send me a copy.

Bill Pettit
Systems Programming Manager
Oregon Mutual Insurance Co






 -Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Roland P. Chung
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 11:44 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Unofficial DB2 Servr for VSE  VM survey



** CROSS POSTED to VSE-L **

Hello Listers, if you are interested, please let me know, I will send the 
survey to you off the List. There may be some surprises if you complete the 
survey and return the survey to 
db2vs...@ca.ibm.comhttp://ca.mc881.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=db2vs...@ca.ibm.com.
 Thanks.

...Roland

P.S. Found out in a hard way that the List rejects the posting with MS/WORD 
attachement. Umm



Re: DB2 Problem

2009-06-16 Thread Bill Pettit
Do you have the REXX SQL option available to you?

Bill

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Tom Duerbusch
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 10:38 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: DB2 Problem


I don't believe that this is a DB2 Server code problem, just how I'm coding it, 
is a problem G.

I have a table, that a process adds records to it.

On an hourly basis, I kick off a job that copies all the records in that table, 
inserts them into another table, and then deletes all records in the first 
table, all within the same LUW.

However, if the process that adds records to the table, is adding records 
during this merge/purge process, some records are deleted without being merged. 
 I didn't think that was suppose to happen.

After stripping out all the other code, and coding the remaining code in a DB2 
Batch Utility step, I see that I do have a problem.

I don't know if I'm confusing DB2, as the table I insert from, is a View.  The 
table I delete from, is the real table.

ARI0801I DBS Utility started: 06/16/09 10:29:35.
 AUTOCOMMIT = OFF ERRORMODE = OFF
 ISOLATION LEVEL = REPEATABLE READ
-- CONNECT SYSA IDENTIFIED BY ;
ARI8004I User SYSA connected to server STLDB01.
ARI0500I SQL processing was successful.
ARI0505I SQLCODE = 0 SQLSTATE = 0 ROWCOUNT = 0
--
-- COMMENT 'PAYROLL SYSTEM'
--
-- LOCK DBSPACE PERSHIST IN EXCLUSIVE MODE;=== lock the 
dbspace of ershist_xx
ARI0500I SQL processing was successful.
ARI0505I SQLCODE = 0 SQLSTATE = 0 ROWCOUNT = 0
-- INSERT INTO STL01.ERS_HISTORY_A
--SELECT * FROM ASN.ERSHIST_X;
ARI0500I SQL processing was successful.
ARI0505I SQLCODE = 0 SQLSTATE = 0 ROWCOUNT = 3  === I've inserted 
3 records
--
-- DELETE FROM   ASN.CDERS_HISTORY
-- ;
ARI0501I An SQL warning has occurred.
 Database manager processing is completed.
 Warning may indicate a problem.
ARI0505I SQLCODE = 0 SQLSTATE = 01504 ROWCOUNT = 30705   === I'ved deleted 
30705 records
ARI0502I Following SQL warning conditions encountered:
 NULLWHERE

-- COMMIT WORK;
ARI0500I SQL processing was successful.
ARI0505I SQLCODE = 0 SQLSTATE = 0 ROWCOUNT = 0
-- SET ERRORMODE OFF;
ARI0899I ...Command ignored.
--
ARI0802I End of command file input.
ARI8997I ...Begin COMMIT processing.
ARI0811I ...COMMIT of any database changes successful.
ARI0809I ...No errors occurred during command processing.
ARI0808I DBS processing completed: 06/16/09 10:30:31.


I don't really have a good option for stopping the process that adds records.  
99.99% of the time, no records are added during the merge/purge process.   
However, if a batch job add/chg/deleted a lot of records in a signal LUW, as in 
100,000 or more, it is possible that the merge/purge runs while records were 
still being added, which then I might loose some records.

I thought locking the DBSPACE that I'm doing the merge/purge from, would do the 
trick.  I thought that the process that was adding records, would be held on a 
LOCK, and wait (perhaps till -911, in which case it will delay and restart), 
but the lock didn't seem to do the trick.

Between Repeatable Read and Locking the DBSPACE didn't do what I needed.  Is 
there another option, without taking down the database to Single User Mode, or 
terminating the process that is adding records, not to loose records in the 
merge/purge process?

Thanks

Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting


Re: DB2 Problem

2009-06-16 Thread Bill Pettit
Can you add another select statement with the same where clause as your 
select-insert roll, and write a temporary control file with each record 
containing enough information to identify the selected row, then after the 
select-insert roll read back the file and use it to do the deletes using rxsql?

Bill

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Tom Duerbusch
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:55 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: DB2 Problem


Perhaps.

This is on VSE which doesn't have REXX SQL from IBM.  However, we do have 
REXXSQL from SPR which does the same thing.

BTW, the original program was written in REXXSQL.  I tore everything out and 
put it in the DB2 Batch Utility to eliminate the possibility of a commit 
being accidently put in by the product developers.

Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting

 Bill Pettit bi...@ormutual.com 6/16/2009 1:59 PM 
Do you have the REXX SQL option available to you?

Bill

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Tom Duerbusch
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 10:38 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: DB2 Problem


I don't believe that this is a DB2 Server code problem, just how I'm coding it, 
is a problem G.

I have a table, that a process adds records to it.

On an hourly basis, I kick off a job that copies all the records in that table, 
inserts them into another table, and then deletes all records in the first 
table, all within the same LUW.

However, if the process that adds records to the table, is adding records 
during this merge/purge process, some records are deleted without being merged. 
 I didn't think that was suppose to happen.

After stripping out all the other code, and coding the remaining code in a DB2 
Batch Utility step, I see that I do have a problem.

I don't know if I'm confusing DB2, as the table I insert from, is a View.  The 
table I delete from, is the real table.

ARI0801I DBS Utility started: 06/16/09 10:29:35.
 AUTOCOMMIT = OFF ERRORMODE = OFF
 ISOLATION LEVEL = REPEATABLE READ
-- CONNECT SYSA IDENTIFIED BY ;
ARI8004I User SYSA connected to server STLDB01.
ARI0500I SQL processing was successful.
ARI0505I SQLCODE = 0 SQLSTATE = 0 ROWCOUNT = 0
--
-- COMMENT 'PAYROLL SYSTEM'
--
-- LOCK DBSPACE PERSHIST IN EXCLUSIVE MODE;=== lock the 
dbspace of ershist_xx
ARI0500I SQL processing was successful.
ARI0505I SQLCODE = 0 SQLSTATE = 0 ROWCOUNT = 0
-- INSERT INTO STL01.ERS_HISTORY_A
--SELECT * FROM ASN.ERSHIST_X;
ARI0500I SQL processing was successful.
ARI0505I SQLCODE = 0 SQLSTATE = 0 ROWCOUNT = 3  === I've inserted 
3 records
--
-- DELETE FROM   ASN.CDERS_HISTORY
-- ;
ARI0501I An SQL warning has occurred.
 Database manager processing is completed.
 Warning may indicate a problem.
ARI0505I SQLCODE = 0 SQLSTATE = 01504 ROWCOUNT = 30705   === I'ved deleted 
30705 records
ARI0502I Following SQL warning conditions encountered:
 NULLWHERE

-- COMMIT WORK;
ARI0500I SQL processing was successful.
ARI0505I SQLCODE = 0 SQLSTATE = 0 ROWCOUNT = 0
-- SET ERRORMODE OFF;
ARI0899I ...Command ignored.
--
ARI0802I End of command file input.
ARI8997I ...Begin COMMIT processing.
ARI0811I ...COMMIT of any database changes successful.
ARI0809I ...No errors occurred during command processing.
ARI0808I DBS processing completed: 06/16/09 10:30:31.


I don't really have a good option for stopping the process that adds records.  
99.99% of the time, no records are added during the merge/purge process.   
However, if a batch job add/chg/deleted a lot of records in a signal LUW, as in 
100,000 or more, it is possible that the merge/purge runs while records were 
still being added, which then I might loose some records.

I thought locking the DBSPACE that I'm doing the merge/purge from, would do the 
trick.  I thought that the process that was adding records, would be held on a 
LOCK, and wait (perhaps till -911, in which case it will delay and restart), 
but the lock didn't seem to do the trick.

Between Repeatable Read and Locking the DBSPACE didn't do what I needed.  Is 
there another option, without taking down the database to Single User Mode, or 
terminating the process that is adding records, not to loose records in the 
merge/purge process?

Thanks

Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting


Re: whitehouse email

2008-05-07 Thread Bill Pettit
I was there and I don't remember any of our Operators being fired or
re-assigned.  Who are you referring to that was fired?
 
Bill Pettit

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Phillip Parmelee
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 7:54 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: whitehouse email



Yes, but the operator who suggested to the FBI that they look at the
backups ended up being fired.

Phil Parmelee
IBM Global Services
VM/VSE Team
Harrisburg, PA
717-526-1250 T/L 239-1250
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Inactive hide details for August Carideo [EMAIL PROTECTED]August
Carideo [EMAIL PROTECTED]






August Carideo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 

05/05/2008 10:40 AM 



Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU




To

IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 



cc





Subject

Re: whitehouse email


he was using PROFS
so it was MF based and of course it was backed up



 

Edward M.

Martin

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To 
com  IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

Sent by: The IBM
cc 
z/VM Operating

System
Subject 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: whitehouse email

ARK.EDU

 

 

05/05/2008 09:20

AM

 

 

Please respond to

  The IBM z/VM

Operating System

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

ARK.EDU

 

 





Seems that Oliver North got in trouble because there were off-site
backups.  Seems like that minor problem (having off-site backups) got
fixed.

Ed Martin
330-588-4723
ext 40441

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 7:18 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: whitehouse email

The backups are kept safe and sound, right next to the Iraqi weapons of
mass destruction.

But yeah, compared to the Clintons, the Bush regime has been remarkably
scandal-free.

  Dennis

It's 10:00 PM.  Do you know where your backup tapes are?

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 16:13
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] whitehouse email

No backups are needed. They have done nothing wrong or illegal, and not
much of historical importance. :-)

Regards,
Richard Schuh





Re: MONWRITE files

2008-03-13 Thread Bill Pettit
Ohh... This could get interesting

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of barton
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 11:45 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: MONWRITE files


Alan, look at what he's collecting. If you don't think that is
miscollecting, you should 
take the class too.



Alan Altmark wrote:

 On Wednesday, 03/12/2008 at 01:09 EDT, barton 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
MONWRITE was not even very well accepted 20 years ago when it became 
 
 available 
 
because of the volume of data and mis-collection of data.
 
 
 Eh?  MONWRITE is a tool for collecting raw monitor data.  It was not, 
 perhaps, accepted 20 years ago as a good way to MANAGE your raw 
 performance data.  That hasn't changed.  What is there to
mis-collect in 
 a tool that is supposed to write to disk every monitor record the
system 
 generates?
 
 Alan Altmark
 z/VM Development
 IBM Endicott
 
 


IS Organization question

2008-03-05 Thread Bill Pettit
We have been working with a consultant that has made several
organizational change suggestions regarding Information Systems at our
company.  One of those suggestions is moving our Computer Operations
section be part of and managed by the Systems Programming manager.

I am curious about how the other mainframe organizations that are
watching this list are organized, and what their approximate overall
company size is. Along with any other details or pros and cons you want
to throw in. 

We are a VM  VSE shop with five Computer Operators and three Systems
Programmers. 

Thank you