Restrictions in FCP point-to-point topology
We are planning to use FCP disk with a z/Linux under z/VM system,
running under z/VM 5.4. To reduce cost, we are planning to use the
point-to-point topology.
Are there any restriction in using this topology?
I seem to remember some restrictions mentioned in the presentation given
at SHARE when the point-to-point support first appeared in z/VM.
The load (write) volume will be high (the higher the better), but only
occasionally and for less than a day at a time. Another reason to use
point-to-point is that we think it will perform better without the
switch.
We want to have a 4TB LVM, spread across 8 LUNs.
Picture:
+---++---+
| LPAR 1 || LPAR 2 |
| +---+| +---+
| | z/VM 1 |-FCP--4TB---FCP-| | z/VM 2 |
| | +---+ disk | | +---+
| | | Linux 1 || | | Linux 2 |
+---+---+---++---+---+---+
A wider picture is
z/OS--Hipersocket--Linux--FCP--Hipersocket--z/OS
DB2 disk
I found a presentation Introduction to SCSI over FCP for Linux on
System z at http://www.vm.ibm.com/education/lvc/lvc1020c.pdf. It
mentions (on foil 6) the two topologies, point-to-point and switched
fabric, but gives no restrictions.
Thanks!
Alan Ackerman
Alan (dot) Ackerman (at) Bank of America (dot) com