Re: SERVICE and PUT2PROD for Performance tool kit.

2007-02-01 Thread Mike Walter 
 I suppose I should complain to IBM 
Suppose?  Absolutely you should open an IBM Problem Management Report 
(PMR) to report it!  I think... 
we don't run the Performance Tool Kit.  Is there a chance that the FCONX 
$PROFILE is a sample file which is supposed to copied to another 
(production) disk, and perhaps even renamed when following the 
installation procedures for the first time? 

If so, then next step is obvious (copy/update|rename the file).  If it's 
actually a production file located on a production disk, they you **may** 
have an APAR-able problem. 

Mike Walter 
Hewitt Associates 
Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily 
represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates.



Lewis, David (SCI TW) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
02/01/2007 10:24 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU



To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
SERVICE and PUT2PROD for Performace tool kit.






I suppose I should complain to IBM, but I was wondering if anyone else
had seen this. The short description is that when I used the SERVICE and
PUT2PROD execs to apply the service for PTF UM31957 on user 5VMPTK20 the
FCONX $PROFILE on 1CC got replaced.

It took me awhile to figure out why VMCF and WEBSERV were not working
since I had slept since configuring it. I did not notice in any of the
shipped doc that this would happen. So did I miss something or is this
BAD behavior?

Dave (who is eating my CPU) Lewis



 
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may 
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from 
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this 
message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender 
by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any 
dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by 
anyone other than the intended recipient 
is strictly prohibited.

Re: SERVICE and PUT2PROD for Performance tool kit.

2007-02-01 Thread Gregg Reed 
From the FL 4.4 version...
   /* access minidisks
   'ACC  201 B '  /* Production Disk
   'ACC  CCC D '  /* Customized controls disk
   'ACC  1CC E '  /* Sample controls disk
   'ACC  29D F '  /* Help files
I seem to recall, that may have changed with fl52. but I don't recall
how...

Gregg
 No plan survives execution

Re: SERVICE and PUT2PROD for Performance tool kit.

2007-02-01 Thread Lewis, David (SCI TW) 
At 5.2 the active disks are:

 

cms q disk

LABEL  VDEV M  STAT   CYL TYPE BLKSZ   FILES  BLKS USED-(%) BLKS LEFT
BLK TOT

FCN191 191  A   R/W60 3390 4096   12   1997-18   8801
108

FCX201 201  B   R/O10 3390 40969   1212-67588
18

FCX1CC 1CC  D   R/O 1 3390 40969 35-19145
1

FCX29D 29D  F   R/O 8 3390 4096  774   1029-71411
14

MNT190 190  S   R/O   100 3390 4096  687  14539-81   3461
180

MNT19E 19E  Y/S R/O   250 3390 4096 1082  30800-68  14200
450

 

And the sample profile states:

  'ACCESS 201 B '/* Production Disk

  'ACCESS 1CC D '/* Customized controls disk

  'ACCESS 29D F '/* Help files

 

So it seems that the files on 1CC should be left alone once initially
loaded by the install.

 

David Lewis

 

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gregg Reed
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:18 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SERVICE and PUT2PROD for Performance tool kit.

 

From the FL 4.4 version...

   /* access minidisks

   'ACC  201 B '  /* Production Disk

   'ACC  CCC D '  /* Customized controls disk

   'ACC  1CC E '  /* Sample controls disk

   'ACC  29D F '  /* Help files

I seem to recall, that may have changed with fl52. but I don't recall

how...

 

Gregg

 No plan survives execution