Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-11 Thread Stephen Frazier

Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!
The most beautiful and well written web page I ever saw.
Should be required reading for everyone who ever allocates VM dasd.

Alan Altmark wrote:
By the way, the VTOC page is done.  Please see 
http://www.vm.ibm.com/devpages/altmarka/vtoc.html for information about 
the VTOC on a CP-owned volume.


Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
  

--

Stephen Frazier
Information Technology Unit
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
3400 Martin Luther King
Oklahoma City, Ok, 73111-4298
Tel.: (405) 425-2549
Fax: (405) 425-2554
Pager: (405) 690-1828
email:  stevef%doc.state.ok.us


Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Kris Buelens
Has it been suggested already that the sample CP directory would
contain, for each userid, a one sentence description?

I find that the number of predefined users (many SVM's) is growing
more quickly than I can remember them
(and I mostly forget the userids I don't use)
Some users are selfexplanatory, others are not.  Examples
 5684042J
 SYSADMIN
 CBDIODSP
The first one is obviously a product install user, but I can't
remember these product numbers (5VMTCP40 is something userfriendly).
To find out what they are used for, most of the time I link to their
191 to get a clue. (happily for me I've got an XEDIT prefix command to
LINK,ACCESS, FILELIST and DETACH the MDISK wheer I enter the commend)


I'd include the product ID in the short description.  Yielding:
USER 5684052J 
* 5684042J ICKDSF installation userid
..
USER SYSADMIN
* 5VMRAC40 RACF ?
.
USER CBDIODSP
* 5VMHCD40 HCD ???
.


--
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support


Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Scott Rohling
Excellent idea..   I just recently ran through the directory at a customer
site, coming up with an explanation for the security folks of what the
purpose of each IBM supplied user was.  I took the same approach, linking to
their 191, or searching through manuals to figure it out.

Having a single line comment with a description would be a simple way to
help keep things documented.

Scott

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Kris Buelens kris.buel...@gmail.comwrote:

 Has it been suggested already that the sample CP directory would
 contain, for each userid, a one sentence description?

 I find that the number of predefined users (many SVM's) is growing
 more quickly than I can remember them
 (and I mostly forget the userids I don't use)
 Some users are selfexplanatory, others are not.  Examples
  5684042J
  SYSADMIN
  CBDIODSP
 The first one is obviously a product install user, but I can't
 remember these product numbers (5VMTCP40 is something userfriendly).
 To find out what they are used for, most of the time I link to their
 191 to get a clue. (happily for me I've got an XEDIT prefix command to
 LINK,ACCESS, FILELIST and DETACH the MDISK wheer I enter the commend)


 I'd include the product ID in the short description.  Yielding:
 USER 5684052J 
 * 5684042J ICKDSF installation userid
 ..
 USER SYSADMIN
 * 5VMRAC40 RACF ?
 .
 USER CBDIODSP
 * 5VMHCD40 HCD ???
 .


 --
 Kris Buelens,
 IBM Belgium, VM customer support



Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Thomas Kern
It can be even better. DIRMAINT, IBM's directory management product had a

feature that understood TAGs in comments in a directory entry. So you cou
ld
have real parsable data in these comments.
 
USER 5699XXX NOLOG
* PRODUCT: 5699-XXX
* LEVEL: 5.3.42
* DESCRIPTION: This is some sort of product.
SPOOL 0009 3215 T
...

These TAGS are/were queryable, searchable, displayable. 

IBM should require them from ALL of their VM developers.

/Tom Kern


On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:20:46 -0700, Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.co
m
wrote:

Excellent idea..   I just recently ran through the directory at a custom
er
site, coming up with an explanation for the security folks of what the
purpose of each IBM supplied user was.  I took the same approach, linkin
g to
their 191, or searching through manuals to figure it out.

Having a single line comment with a description would be a simple way to

help keep things documented.

Scott


Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Wandschneider, Scott
Here is what I use;

USER RSCS RSCS  32M 32M BG  
 *NAME: ENABLED - RSCS FL530 USING SFS  
 


Scott R Wandschneider

Senior Systems Programmer|| Infocrossing, a Wipro Company || 11707 Miracle 
Hills Drive, Omaha, NE, 68154-4457|| ': 402.963.8905 || Ë:847.849.7223  || :: 
scott.wandschnei...@infocrossing.com **Think Green  - Please print responsibly**


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 8:11 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Short user description in sample CP directory

Has it been suggested already that the sample CP directory would contain, for 
each userid, a one sentence description?

I find that the number of predefined users (many SVM's) is growing more 
quickly than I can remember them (and I mostly forget the userids I don't use) 
Some users are selfexplanatory, others are not.  Examples  5684042J  SYSADMIN  
CBDIODSP The first one is obviously a product install user, but I can't 
remember these product numbers (5VMTCP40 is something userfriendly).
To find out what they are used for, most of the time I link to their
191 to get a clue. (happily for me I've got an XEDIT prefix command to 
LINK,ACCESS, FILELIST and DETACH the MDISK wheer I enter the commend)


I'd include the product ID in the short description.  Yielding:
USER 5684052J 
* 5684042J ICKDSF installation userid
..
USER SYSADMIN
* 5VMRAC40 RACF ?
.
USER CBDIODSP
* 5VMHCD40 HCD ???
.



Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may contain 
material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or Protected Health 
Information, within the meaning of the regulations under the Health Insurance 
Portability  Accountability Act as amended.  If it is not clear that you are 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of 
this e-mail, including any attachment to it, is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender 
and delete it from your system. Thank you.

--
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support


Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 02/10/2009 at 09:12 EST, Kris Buelens kris.buel...@gmail.com 
wrote:
 Has it been suggested already that the sample CP directory would
 contain, for each userid, a one sentence description?

Yes.  (It was suggested here previously so that RACF initialization can 
associate a name/purpose with a user ID.)  I have some concerns about 
storing metadata in comments in the directory, but I guess I can get over 
it.

I prefer to have such data stored in the object directory where it can be 
interrogated, updated, and supported by a wide variety of Interested 
Parties.  However, in the case of Sooner v. Later, more complex solutions 
always side with Later.  Though maybe, with apologies to Voltaire, I 
shouldn't allow the Perfect to become the enemy of Good Enough?

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Kris Buelens
Even though it was in my mind, I didn't dare asking for a full fledged
solution: a comment record doesn't require extra coding.
At my former customer's installation, the first record following USER
had the name of the person (or role if SVM), and was indeed carried
over to RACF as well.

2009/2/10 Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com:
 On Tuesday, 02/10/2009 at 09:12 EST, Kris Buelens kris.buel...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Has it been suggested already that the sample CP directory would
 contain, for each userid, a one sentence description?

 Yes.  (It was suggested here previously so that RACF initialization can
 associate a name/purpose with a user ID.)  I have some concerns about
 storing metadata in comments in the directory, but I guess I can get over
 it.

 I prefer to have such data stored in the object directory where it can be
 interrogated, updated, and supported by a wide variety of Interested
 Parties.  However, in the case of Sooner v. Later, more complex solutions
 always side with Later.  Though maybe, with apologies to Voltaire, I
 shouldn't allow the Perfect to become the enemy of Good Enough?

 Alan Altmark
 z/VM Development
 IBM Endicott




-- 
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support


Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Marcy Cortes
Would be nice if there was some consistent key like IBM Supplied or
z/VM Component in the description.
That way we can make a list from the new install and compare it to the
list on the current system.  That'd allow us to more easily identify
ones that went away as well so we're not carrying them to infinity.


Marcy 
 
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 7:42 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Short user description in sample CP directory

On Tuesday, 02/10/2009 at 09:12 EST, Kris Buelens
kris.buel...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Has it been suggested already that the sample CP directory would 
 contain, for each userid, a one sentence description?

Yes.  (It was suggested here previously so that RACF initialization can
associate a name/purpose with a user ID.)  I have some concerns about
storing metadata in comments in the directory, but I guess I can get
over it.

I prefer to have such data stored in the object directory where it can
be interrogated, updated, and supported by a wide variety of Interested
Parties.  However, in the case of Sooner v. Later, more complex
solutions always side with Later.  Though maybe, with apologies to
Voltaire, I shouldn't allow the Perfect to become the enemy of Good
Enough?

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Mike Walter
We had that desire, too.  So years ago I wrote an ADDUSER EXEC for our 
Security Admins (who have a strong z/OS RACF bias and rarely issues 
VM:Secure commands manually).  Aside from the usual 'stuff' needed to 
enter a new userid, it included a record in one of the formats:
*UI= lastname, firstname,  EN= employee number
or:
*UI= ownerid, SVM usage

Were I to do it again today, the format might be more along the lines of:
*UI= userid, contactid, lastname, firstname, EN= employee number

Including the actual userid in the record is redundant with the USER 
userid ...  record above, but it is simpler to search in XEDIT without 
using a Pipe and juxtapose stage; just issue: ALL /*UI= /

In the above wish list, 'contactid' would usually match the 'userid', 
except for service virtual machines.  'Contactid' gives a clue who to 
contact for an application svm.  Installed product svms would probably 
have a 'contactid' of MAINT.

Mike Walter 
Hewitt Associates 
Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily 
represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates. 



Kris Buelens kris.buel...@gmail.com 

Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
02/10/2009 10:19 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU



To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: Short user description in sample CP directory






Even though it was in my mind, I didn't dare asking for a full fledged
solution: a comment record doesn't require extra coding.
At my former customer's installation, the first record following USER
had the name of the person (or role if SVM), and was indeed carried
over to RACF as well.

2009/2/10 Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com:
 On Tuesday, 02/10/2009 at 09:12 EST, Kris Buelens 
kris.buel...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Has it been suggested already that the sample CP directory would
 contain, for each userid, a one sentence description?

 Yes.  (It was suggested here previously so that RACF initialization can
 associate a name/purpose with a user ID.)  I have some concerns about
 storing metadata in comments in the directory, but I guess I can get 
over
 it.

 I prefer to have such data stored in the object directory where it can 
be
 interrogated, updated, and supported by a wide variety of Interested
 Parties.  However, in the case of Sooner v. Later, more complex 
solutions
 always side with Later.  Though maybe, with apologies to Voltaire, I
 shouldn't allow the Perfect to become the enemy of Good Enough?

 Alan Altmark
 z/VM Development
 IBM Endicott




-- 
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support





The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may 
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from 
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this 
message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender 
by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any 
dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by 
anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. All messages 
sent to and from this e-mail address may be monitored as permitted by 
applicable law and regulations to ensure compliance with our internal policies 
and to protect our business. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to 
be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or 
contain viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate 
with us by e-mail. 




Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 02/10/2009 at 11:38 EST, Marcy Cortes 
marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
 Would be nice if there was some consistent key like IBM Supplied or
 z/VM Component in the description.
 That way we can make a list from the new install and compare it to the
 list on the current system.  That'd allow us to more easily identify
 ones that went away as well so we're not carrying them to infinity.

Being able to easily pick the, fly-, uh, droppings out of the pepper, as 
it were, is part of the justification for putting a owner/name/description 
with a user ID.
- Who does this user ID belong to?
- Is it an animal, vegetable, or mineral? (person, SVM, data repository)
- What is it for?
- Why does it need class C?
- Is it required or optional?
- How can I associate it with a unique identifier in my own business 
process?

All with an eye to:
- Ease directory migration from release to release
- Avoid having to read 30 books to answer What's this for?
- Making auditors/security people happier

A simple comment in the directory may be able to achieve those objectives, 
but as a software designer it gives me the cold pricklies.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Marcy Cortes
 
Oh, and while we are at it, how about some consistentcy in the ACCOUNT
statement.  Something that a pipe change all could fix.
There's a wild variety of things in there today, if they do indeed have
an account statement at all.


Marcy 

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 9:54 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Short user description in sample CP directory

On Tuesday, 02/10/2009 at 11:38 EST, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
 Would be nice if there was some consistent key like IBM Supplied or 
 z/VM Component in the description.
 That way we can make a list from the new install and compare it to the

 list on the current system.  That'd allow us to more easily identify 
 ones that went away as well so we're not carrying them to infinity.

Being able to easily pick the, fly-, uh, droppings out of the pepper, as
it were, is part of the justification for putting a
owner/name/description with a user ID.
- Who does this user ID belong to?
- Is it an animal, vegetable, or mineral? (person, SVM, data repository)
- What is it for?
- Why does it need class C?
- Is it required or optional?
- How can I associate it with a unique identifier in my own business
process?

All with an eye to:
- Ease directory migration from release to release
- Avoid having to read 30 books to answer What's this for?
- Making auditors/security people happier

A simple comment in the directory may be able to achieve those
objectives, but as a software designer it gives me the cold pricklies.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Mary Anne Matyaz
I prefer to have such data stored in the object directory where it can be
interrogated, updated, and supported by a wide variety of Interested
Parties
Except Humans, of course. :)
MA

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.comwrote:

 On Tuesday, 02/10/2009 at 09:12 EST, Kris Buelens kris.buel...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Has it been suggested already that the sample CP directory would
  contain, for each userid, a one sentence description?

 Yes.  (It was suggested here previously so that RACF initialization can
 associate a name/purpose with a user ID.)  I have some concerns about
 storing metadata in comments in the directory, but I guess I can get over
 it.

 I prefer to have such data stored in the object directory where it can be
 interrogated, updated, and supported by a wide variety of Interested
 Parties.  However, in the case of Sooner v. Later, more complex solutions
 always side with Later.  Though maybe, with apologies to Voltaire, I
 shouldn't allow the Perfect to become the enemy of Good Enough?

 Alan Altmark
 z/VM Development
 IBM Endicott



Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Ron Schmiedge
Alan,

Would it at least be possible for the information contained in those
30 IBM manuals recording the various userids included by IBM in z/VM,
be gathered into one manual? Say the Guide for Automated Installation
and Service, which already has Appendix E: Contents of the z/VM
System (or whereever you like). Would that result in warm fuzzies
instead of cold pricklies? :-)

On my system, each new userid gets a file on his A disk when created,
containing his name, location, department and title. Sure, it could be
erased, but its more accessible than the directory for someone trying
to figure out whose id this is.

Ron

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
 On Tuesday, 02/10/2009 at 11:38 EST, Marcy Cortes
 marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
 Would be nice if there was some consistent key like IBM Supplied or
 z/VM Component in the description.
 That way we can make a list from the new install and compare it to the
 list on the current system.  That'd allow us to more easily identify
 ones that went away as well so we're not carrying them to infinity.

 Being able to easily pick the, fly-, uh, droppings out of the pepper, as
 it were, is part of the justification for putting a owner/name/description
 with a user ID.
 - Who does this user ID belong to?
 - Is it an animal, vegetable, or mineral? (person, SVM, data repository)
 - What is it for?
 - Why does it need class C?
 - Is it required or optional?
 - How can I associate it with a unique identifier in my own business
 process?

 All with an eye to:
 - Ease directory migration from release to release
 - Avoid having to read 30 books to answer What's this for?
 - Making auditors/security people happier

 A simple comment in the directory may be able to achieve those objectives,
 but as a software designer it gives me the cold pricklies.

 Alan Altmark
 z/VM Development
 IBM Endicott



Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 02/10/2009 at 01:18 EST, Ron Schmiedge 
ron.schmie...@gmail.com wrote:
 Would it at least be possible for the information contained in those
 30 IBM manuals recording the various userids included by IBM in z/VM,
 be gathered into one manual? Say the Guide for Automated Installation
 and Service, which already has Appendix E: Contents of the z/VM
 System (or whereever you like). Would that result in warm fuzzies
 instead of cold pricklies? :-)

Ew!  How low-tech!  ;-)  I got burned a couple of decades ago by 
my attempt to document every CMS command so that application writers (!) 
would know if it were resident in the nucleus, ran in the user area, the 
transient area, or was a nucleus extension.  On the positive side, I can 
say that the information was valid for *several* months!  In a row, even!

I would rather have a solution that doesn't depend on reading Yet Another 
Manual.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Ron Schmiedge
Alan,

Okay. Although this is a manual I am already reading, not GC-YetAnother-09  :-)

In the meantime, who will help me identify what those 91 IBM ids in my
VM directory are for?

Ron

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
 On Tuesday, 02/10/2009 at 01:18 EST, Ron Schmiedge
 ron.schmie...@gmail.com wrote:
 Would it at least be possible for the information contained in those
 30 IBM manuals recording the various userids included by IBM in z/VM,
 be gathered into one manual? Say the Guide for Automated Installation
 and Service, which already has Appendix E: Contents of the z/VM
 System (or where ever you like). Would that result in warm fuzzies
 instead of cold pricklies? :-)

 Ew!  How low-tech!  ;-)  I got burned a couple of decades ago by
 my attempt to document every CMS command so that application writers (!)
 would know if it were resident in the nucleus, ran in the user area, the
 transient area, or was a nucleus extension.  On the positive side, I can
 say that the information was valid for *several* months!  In a row, even!

 I would rather have a solution that doesn't depend on reading Yet Another
 Manual.

 Alan Altmark
 z/VM Development
 IBM Endicott



Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Thomas Kern
If IBM as a software development team put all of that configuration
information into some snazzy database (SQL/DS comes to mind), you could
easily and automatically generate a manual or appendix that gives all of
the current information for the customer as part of the the release
documentation. You could even have some big letters saying that it only
applies to Version x, Release y, Modification z.

/Tom Kern
/ITIL V3 training is making my head spin with crazy ideas.

Alan Altmark wrote:
 On Tuesday, 02/10/2009 at 01:18 EST, Ron Schmiedge 
 ron.schmie...@gmail.com wrote:
 Would it at least be possible for the information contained in those
 30 IBM manuals recording the various userids included by IBM in z/VM,
 be gathered into one manual? Say the Guide for Automated Installation
 and Service, which already has Appendix E: Contents of the z/VM
 System (or whereever you like). Would that result in warm fuzzies
 instead of cold pricklies? :-)
 
 Ew!  How low-tech!  ;-)  I got burned a couple of decades ago by 
 my attempt to document every CMS command so that application writers (!) 
 would know if it were resident in the nucleus, ran in the user area, the 
 transient area, or was a nucleus extension.  On the positive side, I can 
 say that the information was valid for *several* months!  In a row, even!
 
 I would rather have a solution that doesn't depend on reading Yet Another 
 Manual.
 
 Alan Altmark
 z/VM Development
 IBM Endicott
 


Re: Short user description in sample CP directory

2009-02-10 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 02/10/2009 at 05:27 EST, Ron Schmiedge 
ron.schmie...@gmail.com wrote:

 Okay. Although this is a manual I am already reading, not 
GC-YetAnother-09  :-)
 
 In the meantime, who will help me identify what those 91 IBM ids in my
 VM directory are for?

I'm working on it.  Hopefully I'll have it done this week and published on 
my web page.  Also pending is cookbook information on X.509 certificate 
management.

By the way, the VTOC page is done.  Please see 
http://www.vm.ibm.com/devpages/altmarka/vtoc.html for information about 
the VTOC on a CP-owned volume.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott