Re: z/OS and SIGNAL SHUTDOWN

2010-05-26 Thread David Boyes
 as i know the signal is ignored. If you deactivate a running z/OS Lpar, the 
 z/OS in this LPAR does just die.

Well, boo. That seems to be an integrity issue -- if that signal appears and if 
the time remaining is non-zero, z/OS ought to at least TELL you that it 
happened, even if it doesn't let you do something about it.  It shouldn't just 
die horribly, it should try to do something if it can.  

Guess it's time to pull out my requirement pen. 

z/OS and SIGNAL SHUTDOWN

2010-05-25 Thread David Boyes
In another discussion, the question of what z/OS does with a LPAR shutdown 
signal (the hardware equivalent of SIGNAL SHUTDOWN) by default came up. Does 
anyone know? Does it generate a message or  trigger a START command or does it 
just die horribly? Can it be trapped and used to initiate some useful action?




Re: z/OS and SIGNAL SHUTDOWN

2010-05-25 Thread Riedel, Alexander
Hi David,

as i know the signal is ignored. If you deactivate a running z/OS Lpar, the 
z/OS in this LPAR does just die.

Alexander


From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of David Boyes
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 10:54 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: z/OS and SIGNAL SHUTDOWN

In another discussion, the question of what z/OS does with a LPAR shutdown 
signal (the hardware equivalent of SIGNAL SHUTDOWN) by default came up. Does 
anyone know? Does it generate a message or  trigger a START command or does it 
just die horribly? Can it be trapped and used to initiate some useful action?