Re: z/VM I/O Concurrency

2006-04-25 Thread Dave Jones

David, would it be possible for you to collect some performance data on
the i/o improvements you're seeing there? Perhaps some CP MONITOR data
that we could analyze? It would be nice to know if PAV is really 
something that Linux on z/VM sites should really be taking advantage of.


What was that saying again? Can't measure it; not interested? 
Something like that from somebody on the West Coastthat ring any 
bells? ;-)


DJ

David Kreuter wrote:

With PAV support  for attached/dedicated devices you can achieve I/O
concurrency. I have been running some tests from linux guests for
simple I/O driving and the results with PAV are most impressive. I
have gotten as far as 1 base and 2 aliases so far (I'll keep
increasing the # of aliases until break even point). This is with
z/VM 520 and SUSE SLES9.

You need to do some setup in IOCP, z/VM, and linux (EVMS). Works
well.

I look forward to seeing this soon with my Oracle servers. David

-Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on
behalf of Raymond Noal Sent: Tue 4/25/2006 1:45 PM To:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: [IBMVM] z/VM I/O Concurrency

Dear List,

I was following a topic thread on the IBM-MAIN list server where
someone wanted to create multiple Linux LPARs instead of running
Linux under z/VM. One respondent stated that z/VM only allows one I/O
to a disk at a time. Is this really true (Allan??). Does one I/O
per disk only apply to mini disks or to attached disks as well? I
find it hard to believe that z/VM would be this restrictive.

Your thoughts.

HITACHI DATA SYSTEMS

Raymond E. Noal Lab Manager, San Diego Facility Office: (858) 537 -
3268 Cell:   (858) 248 - 1172


Re: z/VM I/O Concurrency

2006-04-25 Thread Schuh, Richard








Do you
also still have a 601?



Regards,

Richard Schuh



-Original
Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating
System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of Bruce Hayden
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006
12:04 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM I/O Concurrency



We still have one in the museum (also
known as the heritage center) here at Endicott... :-)

On 4/25/06, Huegel, Thomas
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



And I thought I was the only one left that remembered the six foot
tall disk drive on the RAMAC 305.






-- 
Bruce Hayden
IBM Global Technology Services System z Linux
Endicott, NY 








Re: z/VM I/O Concurrency

2006-04-25 Thread Jim Bohnsack


Wasn't that the one with the single read/write head on an arm that would
do a seek to the platter before it started going after the rec. If
I remember correctly, CE's would normally keep a big pan underneath to
catch the constant drippings of hydraulic oil. I remember something
like that, altho it may have been the S/360 reincarnation of the 2nd
generation drive, just as the 2311 bore a striking resemblance to a 1311.

Jim 
At 02:34 PM 4/25/2006, you wrote:
This is a multi-part message in
MIME format.
--_=_NextPart_001_01C66896.F17B2D44
X-EC0D2A8E-5CB7-4969-9C36-46D859D137BE-PartID:
A90797A4-37B9-4082-92BE-6647E3C1BC61
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;

charset=iso-8859-1
And I thought I was the only one left that remembered the six foot tall
disk
drive on the RAMAC 305.

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[
mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:13 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM I/O Concurrency



Regards,
Richard Schuh


. Again, this is a HARDWARE restriction that goes back to the dark ages
of
s/360.


Or farther. Anyone remember the disks used by the 1410 (the model
number
escapes me, as do so many things of late) or the RAMAC 305? Besides,
the
S/360 introduced The Age of Enlightenment, didn't it?
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology


 _ 
 ella for Spam Control  has removed 3894 VSE-List
messages and set aside
2216 VM-List for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE!

www.ellaforspam.com

http://www.ellaforspam.com

--_=_NextPart_001_01C66896.F17B2D44
X-EC0D2A8E-5CB7-4969-9C36-46D859D137BE-PartID:
F3A60029-5237-43CE-BF77-570CD74FF5E7
Content-Type: text/html;

charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0
Transitional//EN
And I=20 thought I was the only one left that remembered the six foot
tall disk = drive on=20 the RAMAC 305.



-Original Message-

From: The IBM z/VM = Operating=20 System
[
mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]On Behalf Of Schuh,=20
Richard

Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:13 PM

To:=20 IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

Subject: Re: z/VM I/O=20 Concurrency





Regards,

Richard = Schuh

= SPAN class=3DEmailStyle16 



. Again, this is=20 a HARDWARE restriction that goes back to the dark
ages of=20 s/360.





Or farther. Anyone = remember the disks used=20 by the 1410 (the
model number escapes me, as do so many things of late)=20 or the RAMAC
305? Besides, the S/360 introduced The Age of =
Enlightenment,=20 didn't it?

--

John=20 McKown

Senior Systems Programmer

HealthMarkets

Keeping the = Promise of=20 Affordable Coverage

Administrative Services Group

Information=20 Technology




 ella for = "" Control  has removed=20 3894
VSE-List messages and set aside 2216 VM-List = for="" me
You can use it too - and it's FREE!
www.ellaforspam.com
--_=_NextPart_001_01C66896.F17B2D44-- 

Jim Bohnsack
Cornell Univ.
(607) 255-1760





Re: z/VM I/O Concurrency

2006-04-25 Thread Mike Myers
Title: Message



'fraid not! They had one at John Deere in Atlantic, 
Iowa. I was a field engineer at the time and that was one of my accounts. It was 
glass enclosed and you could watch the access arm move. 

Mike Myers

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Huegel, Thomas 
  
  To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:34 
  PM
  Subject: Re: z/VM I/O Concurrency
  
  And 
  I thought I was the only one left that remembered the six foot tall disk drive 
  on the RAMAC 305.
  
  
-Original Message-From: The IBM z/VM Operating 
System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Schuh, 
RichardSent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:13 PMTo: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUSubject: 
Re: z/VM I/O Concurrency



Regards,
Richard Schuh


.Again, this 
is a HARDWARE restriction that goes back to the dark ages of 
s/360.


Or farther. Anyone remember the disks 
used by the 1410(the model number escapes me, as do so many things of 
late) or the RAMAC 305? Besides, the S/360 introduced "The Age of 
Enlightenment", didn't it?
--John 
McKownSenior Systems ProgrammerHealthMarketsKeeping the Promise 
of Affordable CoverageAdministrative Services GroupInformation 
Technology
  

  


   ella for Spam Control  has removed 
3894 VSE-List messages and set aside 2216 VM-List for 
meYou can use it too - and it's FREE!www.ellaforspam.com