Re: IPv6

2001-06-27 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

 1.  Which operating systems currently support it?  I irun RedHat linux, =
 and it does not, to my knowlege.

RedHat Linux 7.1 supports it just fine - am running a 2.4.5 kernel with
the USAGI IPv6 patches and it works.  Some Assembly Required though.

You have the option during install to provide IPv6 support in Solaris 8, also.

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell




Re: I-D archives available anywhere?

2001-06-18 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

And *NO*, this is *NOT* a 'we need to use XML/HTML/etc' - we haven't waited
the requisite 6 months before re-starting that flame war. ;)

Ah, but what about the Should we keep archives of expired drafts 
war?

;-)

Cheers,

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP
Information Systems Security Officer
National Business Center
U. S. Dept. of the Interior
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: press release: new IETF WG: Drunk Driving on the Internet

2001-05-08 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

IETF also promised to establish liasons with other standards organizations
which have groups tasked with standardizing driving while blind, under the 
influence of hallucinogens, and with railroad spikes through the driver's head.

Not to mention driving while talking on a cell phone.

;-)

RGF




Re: Carrier Class Gateway

2001-04-25 Thread Robert G. Ferrell


what type of media do you propose to run ISBP over?

Sailor-to-Sailor Relay, or maybe a specialized version of avian 
carriers (RFC 1149 et al.) using albatrosses or seagulls.

RGF




Re: Carrier Class Gateway

2001-04-25 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

However, those of us who choose to use asynchronous protocols can 
more easily make use of powerful, space saving message compression --

  http://www.anbg.gov.au/flags/signal-meaning.html

If there is ever an IETF held at sea, I nominate the flag for 
Y - I am carrying mails as a conference logo.

Oh, I don't know, the flag for G (I require a pilot) seems to describe 
us pretty well, also...

RGF




RE: MIME Format

2001-03-23 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

I want to give you the benefit of the doubt.  So, a gentle reminder.  There
are women out here too.

He doesn't appear to be a native English speaker; I doubt that he 
meant to exclude women.  He probably meant "people" or "folks" 
rather than "men."

I expect he speaks English better than most of us speak French.  

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: Deja Vu

2001-03-20 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

Even with Spring in MN, this is probably still a good idea.  Or New 
Orleans, at least it is warm and centrally located.

How about San Antonio?  We're a pretty serious convention city, and 
I'd actually be able to attend a meeting for once. Plus, we have no 
winter to speak of (although summer gets a little, um, intemperate)...

;-)

Cheers,

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP
Information Systems Security Officer
National Business Center
U. S. Dept. of the Interior
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: FanPageGuide is looking for guides

2001-03-01 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

Dear "Backbone" fan,
While evaluating your website at 
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/internet/mbone-faq.html we thought that it 
might be interesting for you to maintain for instance the 
http://backbone.fanpageguide.com guide about Backbone.

Heh.  I think we have a new frontrunner for the 2001 
"Unclear on the Concept" Award.

;-)

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: HTML better for small PDAs

2001-02-23 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

Actually, it *is* a valid argument - consider that hieroglyphs were
unreadable until they found the Rosetta Stone.  The media lasted, but the
ability to parse didn't.

If we're going to stray onto the treacherous ice of logic here, 
then I feel constrained to point out that ASCII, XML, and so 
on are merely ways of formatting characters, not languages 
in and of themselves.  The clay tablet vs paper comparison really 
isn't applicable either, because the basic storage and display media 
do not change in our example, regardless of which format we adopt. 
A more precise analogy would be something along the lines of 
'shall we use ink, paint, chisels, or chalk?'  I'm afraid that even 
this construct isn't particularly useful in our context.  

There are times when analogies can shine a bright light on a dark 
debate, but they may also be the last refuge of the obfuscator.  

I say ASCII source documents are fine; if someone wants to convert their 
personal copies of the docs into XML, PDF, HTML, or Morse Code, they're 
perfectly welcome to do so.

Cheers,

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh

2001-02-22 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

just a sec.  traditionally, we have this discussion every six months.  it
has not been six months yet.

If this trend keeps up, eventually all IETF discussions 
will be centered on this one subject, which, ironically 
enough, has nothing to do with actual engineering.  

Who says the universe has no sense of humor?

;-)

Cheers,

RGF




Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh

2001-02-22 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

these are the same people with archaic browsers and 
e-mail clients that can't handle recent advances in technology - even to 
the point of using "dumb" devices that can only handle ASCII?

"On the other hand," he said, drawing himself up to his full height  
and putting on his 'serious' face, "what real sense is there in 
adopting every new technological innovation that comes along, 
merely for the sake of appearing to be "on the cutting edge?  
ASCII is certainly a lot safer than HTML or binary formats 
where embedded malicious code may be quietly nestling. 

As I see it, the purpose of IETF documents is communication 
among professionals and providing easily and widely accessible 
reference materials.  Isn't it a bit arrogant and, more importantly, 
self-limiting of us to assume that only those folks who have access 
to enhanced Web/email capabilities should be included in the 
documentation loop?" He paused for effect, and adjust his glasses.

"Offering different formats merely as an option, however, seems 
perfectly acceptable to me, so long as the concomitant administrative 
overhead is within reason."  Time for his big finale, an oblique 
reference to popular culture.

"This entire thread reminds me of Yogi Berra's most widely attributed  
comment." 

He glanced around the room, eager for the crowd's reaction. No reaction 
was forthcoming, however. 

They were all playing Quake III across their 11MB 802.11 wireless LAN.

Cheers,

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables

2001-02-15 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

Such views, I submit, are a form of religion.

Religion is a belief in a power higher than oneself. 
NAT-mania is a form of mass delusion.

Cheers,

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: Media Access Control list

2001-02-13 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

Does anyone have a link for a listing of assigned vendor MAC addresses?
Someone said the IEEE has a list, but I was unable to find it on their
website.

If you mean OUIs, the original database is at 

http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/oui.txt

there's a searchable version on my site:

http://rgfsparc.cr.usgs.gov:8090/sysadmin/oui.html

although it might be a bit out of date (I'll try to update it soon).

Cheers,

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: To whom is ICANN answerable?

2001-02-08 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

I found this news report of some concern, not because of what ICANN is 
supposed to have done or not done, but because it seems there is a 
presumption by some that ICANN is answerable to US Congress.  I understood 
that the whole purpose of setting up ICANN was to provide Internet 
governance that was trans-national, not answerable to US Government.

If you look at the corporate charter and articles of incorporation for 
ICANN, it is a California-based nonprofit public benefit corporation. 
There is no mention that I can find of ICANN being subject to the control 
of laws or policies of any governmental entities outside the U.S. 

The prevailing view seems to be "the Commerce Department giveth, and the 
Commerce Department can taketh away."

Deep down, the U.S. still thinks it owns the Internet.  Sigh.

Cheers,

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: Technical Internet Advancements for White House Internet Strategies

2001-01-04 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

the next thing it should do is apply for membership of the European
Union

I'm unclear on this concept.  Wouldn't it rather make a mockery 
of the EU (or at least of the name) if countries from outside Europe start 
joining up?  

Sort of like admitting Japan into NATO. 

RGF 

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP
Information Systems Security Officer
National Business Center
U. S. Dept. of the Interior
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Virus Notice Deluge

2001-01-03 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

Virus Notification: A virus has been detected in a message in which you
where a recipient!
Check the original message.
If the attachment could not be repaired it was Deleted from the message.

Folks, I don't want to seem intolerant, but this has got to stop. I'll take 
spurious 'vaction' messages any day compared with this brain-dead auto-spam 
behavior.  I've gotten  60 of these since 12/26.  

Aaargh.

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP
Information Systems Security Officer
National Business Center
U. S. Dept. of the Interior
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: Welcoming newcomers

2000-12-22 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

I can imagine, without much trouble, a scenario
in which, e.g., someone showed up and claimed to "represent" a
company with considerable IETF experience (and other employees
as long-term participants), started pushing a technically
unviable idea and justifying it on the basis of his or her
company's market position.  

Unfortunately, this is exactly the sort of thing the IETF is 
periodically accused of doing.  Just look through the archives 
and you'll see that every so often someone (usually but not 
always from 'outside') will pop up in public
and claim that the IETF is run solely by and for the benefit 
of large corporations.  It isn't a particularly difficult 
argument to counter, but the damage to the organization's 
image is still there.

Cheers,

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP
Information Systems Security Officer
National Business Center
U. S. Dept. of the Interior
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: Bottom feeders

2000-12-20 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

We *should* worry about people
who come to the IETF once and never come back - because they probably came
to the wrong meeting, and went home unhappy. 

Well, you've certainly convinced me never to attend a meeting.

The attitude being promulgated by the majority of these posts, 
whether justified or not, is most likely to lead (IMO) 
to IETF meetings populated by two distinct groups of people: 

1) Old timers
2) The clueless masses 

Everyone else will be afraid to show up.

When the old timers are gone, all that will be left are the clueless;  
down that path lurks madness and anarchy.


Cheers,

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: Internationalization and the IETF

2000-12-07 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

Keith Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

The notion that use of languages other than English can or should be 
'localized' strikes me as both shockingly arrogant and hopelessly naive.  

It strikes me that the underlying assumption that people can't or won't 
deal with numeric addresses may no longer be a valid one, once full  
internationalization of canonical names is a reality.  It would be a lot 
easier for me to handle pure numeric addresses than, for example, 
Chinese characters.  I would hazard a guess that the vast majority 
of Internet message addressing is done automatically through the use of 
bookmarks/hyperlinks or email address books, anyway.  It might be a hassle in 
the original contact to have to type in a sequence of numbers, but 
after that it's back to point and click.

Maybe in the long run we just won't need domain name translation.

Cheers,

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP
Information Systems Security Officer
National Business Center
U. S. Dept. of the Interior
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: Diacritical application in the DNS

2000-12-06 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

p.s. the lawyers wouldn't give up so easily...they would simply
insist that we support IP addresses with octet values greater than 255.

Perhaps it would save us all a lot of grief if we just gave in and 
assigned them that address space now.  How about moving all lawyers to the 
666.0.0.0 subnet?

;-)

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP
Information Systems Security Officer
National Business Center
U. S. Dept. of the Interior
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: Will Language Wars Balkanize the Web?

2000-12-04 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

Wasn't there a Dilbert cartoon regarding sending a page to a pager number
containing a caret? ;)

It was a tilde.

;-)

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP
Information Systems Security Officer
National Business Center
U. S. Dept. of the Interior
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: [Re: Standartization of User Input for find\search engines]

2000-10-16 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

The common users will benefit from the things like the obvious-ness of
Boolean operations (always being OR\AND\NOT) and simplicity.

I think this proposal has merit, although I'm not sure what, if any, role the 
IETF has to play in its implementation.

I get really tired of having to switch syntax for every search engine.  It would 
be nice if we had a standard that all engines could adopt (or at least offer 
compliance with).

Cheers,

RGF 

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP
Information Systems Security Officer
National Business Center
U. S. Dept. of the Interior
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: Please Call the FBI and other gibberish

2000-08-07 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

what is all of this crap?

Oh, it's just an episode of this weird form of Tourette's Syndrome 
that Casey has that causes him periodically to post reams of completely 
unrelated material to various mailing lists.  Sad, really, not to mention 
monumentally annoying. Just put him and his various aliases in your kill file.

Cheers,

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

2000-07-18 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

Wrong I'm reading it :P  Leave AOL alone.  
AOlers also know that AOL
isnt top class but we like easy listening once in a while

Um, I guess this isn't one of those 'whiles.'

Received: from [4.33.131.234] by web4601.mail.yahoo.com

;-)

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





RE: If you think you've heard it all check this

2000-07-17 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

If there is any truth in this and it continues like this I wonder how many
people will stay connected to the 'Net".

This is just sort of a corporate version of 'Echelon.'  There's nothing that I 
can see in this technology that any ordinary person couldn't do using Deja.com 
and other search engines.  A bit more organized, and conducted, apparently, on a 
grand scale, but nothing new.  

I think people need to realize that sending unencrypted email over the Internet 
is a little like tacking a message to a public bulletin board in a city park.  
You can fold it over and write "personal for Bill only" on it, but if someone 
decides they want to read it before Bill does, there's not much you can do about 
it (unless you stand there and guard it, but that's not really practical with 
SMTP traffic).   This may not be moral, ethical, or legal, but it's going to 
happen nonetheless.  And it won't just be "Big Brother," either.

Caveat Scriptor, if you know what I mean.

RGF  

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: Thanks for visiting MP3.com

2000-07-07 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

OK, I'll bite now. I know what a two-by-four is, but what's a clue-by-four?

A clue-by-four is a large, heavy, blunt object used to forcibly inject clues 
into those who have proven otherwise clue-resistant.

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: RFC 2862 on RTP Payload Format for Real-Time Pointers

2000-06-30 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


RFC 2862

Title: RTP Payload Format for Real-Time Pointers
Author(s):  M. Civanlar, G. Cash
Status: Standards Track
   Date:   June 2000
Mailbox:[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Pages:  7
Characters: 12031
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:None

I-D Tag:draft-ietf-avt-pointer-02.txt


This document describes an RTP [1] payload format for transporting the

Um, there doesn't seem to be a "URL" field for this announcement.

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: IETF Wireless LAN history

2000-06-29 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

Or you can use *one* bullet, and watch the other 99 devices get disconnected
very quickly ;)

For some reason, my manager hasn't approved this technique as a cost-cutting
move - I'm not sure why... ;)

I think the ammo manufacturers have a pretty strong lobby.

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: IP over MIME

2000-06-22 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

Consider the possibilities of a neutrino beam -- no media costs and
lower latency than direct point-to-point fiber.

I think IP over Human Alpha Waves (IP-HAW) might be promising, too.

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: Best Toner Cartridge Prices Ever

2000-06-20 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

 --LASER, FAX AND COPIER PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGES--


I submit this as a candidate for the in situ definition of irony (not to 
mention pristine timing).

;-)

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail

2000-06-19 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

 It is also impossible to differentiate between so-called
 spam and expressions of a personal political, social or
 artistic nature. 

Herein lies one of the major issues that ought to be sorted out before 
anyone takes any steps to regulate spam.  What is spam, exactly?  There seems  
to be a wide variety of notions as to what constitutes a spam.  Some 
people define it in its original context; i.e., unsolicited commercial 
email.  Others broaden the definition to include offensive or off-topic 
remarks on a public or private list.  Still others would include *any* email 
they didn't want to receive as 'spam.'  It would be extremely challenging and 
largely useless to attempt to regulate what you can't even categorize, methinks.

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell

 Who goeth without humor goeth unarmed.





Re: remove me from list

2000-06-12 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 07:14:45 CDT, Honey Rand [EMAIL PROTECTED]  said:
 I am on one of your e-mail lists. i promise i will NEVER buy anything from
 you. Please remove me immediately or i will forward the e-mail to the
 appropriate agency for pursuit as nuisance spam. This is the second request
 I have made.

The IETF sells stuff?  News to me... I thought we just had flame wars and
occasionally went into feline-emulation mode and cough up a hairb^H^H^H^H^HRFC.

Well, she didn't actually say we *sold* stuff.  She just said that she wouldn't 
buy anything from us.  Heck, neither would I. 

As to forwarding it to the "appropriate agency for pursuit...,"  good luck.  
If you find one that does any sort of pursuit, let me know, would you?

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP
Information Systems Security Officer
National Business Center, US DoI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Not an official statement by any entity of the US Government





Re: RFCs in print

2000-06-02 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

 I am particularly interested in hearing about whether such collections are
 helpful or not. And if not, what would be more helpful.

Perhaps a collection of RFCs would be a good candidate for an eBook.  Easier 
to accomodate the continual evolution of the documents than with 
traditional print.

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP
Information Systems Security Officer
National Business Center, US DoI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Not an official statement by any entity of the US Government





Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

2000-04-20 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

By the way, just out of interest, don't the tops of your knees get kind of
bruised every time to you see the word "NAT", or have you learned to scoot
back from your desk in time?

Looks to me like knees are getting bruised all around.

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP
Information Systems Security Officer
National Business Center, US DoI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nothing I have ever said should be construed as even vaguely
representing an official statement by the NBC or DoI.





Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attacks

2000-02-24 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

You can't, because you died in 1980.

Existentialists don't "die," they just go from being to nothingness.

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell, CISSP
Information Security Officer
National Business Center, US DoI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nothing I have ever said should be construed as even vaguely
representing an official statement by the NBC or DoI.




Re: Confirmation for subscribe ietf

2000-01-12 Thread Robert G. Ferrell

Someone (possibly you) has requested that your email address be added
to or deleted from the mailing list "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".

Pretty slick trick: a mailing list asking to be added to itself.

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell
Internet Technologist
National Business Center, US DoI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Email messages: How large is too large?

1999-12-17 Thread Robert G. Ferrell


No, it would be an old protocol.  See RFC1440, from July 1993.

Is there sufficient interest to create a working group to overhaul RFC1440
into something more usable in today's Internet?

People using SMTP for large file transfer has been a pet peeve of mine for 
several years, having been tasked with administering email for a large federal 
agency (I don't do that anymore, thankfully, but I sympathize with admins who 
do), so I for one would be quite interested in participating in such an effort 

RGF

Robert G. Ferrell
Internet Technologist
National Business Center, US DoI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]