Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility
Hi, First, as a comment, I guess there is people who follow more IETF remotely than other in place. Second, I like this idea of changing the threshold. Third, In the other hand, since there are several positions that are fill using this RFC maybe we can place a testbed. 50% can be fill using the current way and 50% using the proposed way, sounds crazy but it might be a good beginning. Thanks, Alejandro, Este mensaje ha sido enviado gracias al servicio BlackBerry de Movilnet -Original Message- From: Olafur Gudmundsson Sender: ietf-boun...@ietf.org Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:06:36 To: S Moonesamy Cc: Internet Whining TF Subject: Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility On Jun 27, 2013, at 5:50 AM, S Moonesamy wrote: > Hello, > > RFC 3777 specifies the process by which members of the Internet Architecture > Board, Internet Engineering Steering Group and IETF Administrative Oversight > Committee are selected, confirmed, and recalled. > > draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility proposes an update RFC 3777 to allow > remote contributors to the IETF Standards Process to be eligible to serve on > NomCom and sign a Recall petition ( > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 ). > > Could you please read the draft and comment? > > Regards, > S. Moonesamy > SM, I read the draft, I think there might be some merit to this proposal but I think the threshold issue should be clarified. What does "one of the last five mean" during an IETF meeting? I think the threshold of having attended one meeting is too low, I would relax the rule to say something like this: "must have attended at least 5 meetings of the last 15 and including one of the last 5". 15 meetings is 5 years, I know that is a long time, t this will allow people that that have been involved for a long time but have limited resources to attend to participate in Nomcom/recall processes. Q: do you want to limit how many "infrequent" attendees can be on Nomcom just like the number of people from a single organization can sign a recall ? Olafur
Re: raw meeting minutes (Re: meetecho praise)
Hi, Just my two cents: The very few times I've been minute taker it worked very well. Probably the problem might be when there is more than one minute taker using Etherpad at the same time. Alejandro, Este mensaje ha sido enviado gracias al servicio BlackBerry de Movilnet -Original Message- From: Lou Berger Sender: ietf-boun...@ietf.org Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:00:31 To: ; Mary Barnes; Dave Crocker Cc: IETF-Discussion list Subject: Re: raw meeting minutes (Re: meetecho praise) Etherpad is an awesome tool and we've found out to be hugely useful over a number of IETFs, but be forewarned that on a couple of rare occasions the notes have disappeared. In the first case, it took a manual step for it to be restored. In the second we had a private copy... Lou On March 18, 2013 12:35:49 PM Dave Crocker wrote: > > On 3/18/2013 9:28 AM, Mary Barnes wrote: > > it seems to take > > a long time for many to get their meeting minutes uploaded. My > > suggestion is for chairs to at least upload the raw minutes as drafts > > > If minutes takers used etherpad, the raw minutes would be available in > real-time, rather than requiring everyone to wait for the polished version. > > It would also allow some crows-sourcing of corrections and additions to the > raw minutes... > > d/ > > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net >
Re: meetecho praise
Hi all, I would like to join Mikael's words. I used to connect using a regular jabber client but the experience with meetecho is much better. Having audio, chat room and the slides is fantastic. I did not use the html5 version so my audio was using vlc, I had to modify our firewall rules becase the destionation port was blocked. Audio was very good (it can always be better of course). Thanks, Este mensaje ha sido enviado gracias al servicio BlackBerry de Movilnet -Original Message- From: Mikael Abrahamsson Sender: ietf-boun...@ietf.org Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:04:06 To: Subject: meetecho praise Hello. I would just like to say I'm very grateful for the WGs that used Meetecho to record their sessions. The HTML5 versions works out of the box with no plugins in Chrome both on my Ubuntu 12.04 machine and Chrome on my Windows7 machine. The sync of sound, slides, picture and jabber room is excellent and makes it very easy top follow what's going on. Some other recordings focus too much on the video of the speaker, where I'm of the opinion that it's the slides and the sound that is most important, and current incarnation of Meetecho solves this very nicely. I applaud these efforts and hope we can end up in a situation where all meetings at the IETF is recorded in this way. Thanks. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
