Re: [secdir] Secdir review comments for draft-ietf-pim-bidir-08

2007-02-14 Thread Sam Hartman
 Steven == Steven M Bellovin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Steven On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 21:14:35 -0800
Steven Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I would like to understand better why ...  no automated key
 management is specified.
 
Steven Do they cite any of the reasons listed in RFC 4107?

No.

Bill gave me a heads up about this a while back because I'd indicated
I would hold a discuss on the next document to do this.  I could not
get together the energy to engage with the WG and cause them to design
a security architecture for PIM.

I at least am planning to abstain on this document because the AD
tried to engage and I failed.  I don't think it's good technology for
this not to have automated key management though.

___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


Re: [secdir] Secdir review comments for draft-ietf-pim-bidir-08

2007-02-07 Thread Steven M. Bellovin
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 21:14:35 -0800
Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I would like to understand better why ...
 no automated key management
 is specified.   
 
Do they cite any of the reasons listed in RFC 4107?



--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb

___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


RE: [secdir] Secdir review comments for draft-ietf-pim-bidir-08

2007-02-07 Thread Joseph Salowey \(jsalowey\)
 -Original Message-
 From: Steven M. Bellovin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:21 PM
 To: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
 Cc: iesg@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
 Isidor Kouvelas (kouvelas); Tony Speakman (speakman); 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ietf@ietf.org
 Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review comments for 
 draft-ietf-pim-bidir-08
 
 On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 21:14:35 -0800
 Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I would like to understand better why ...
  no automated key management
  is specified.   
  
 Do they cite any of the reasons listed in RFC 4107?
 
[Joe] No, but some of them may apply.  Thanks for the reference
reminder.


 
 
   --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
 

___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf