Re: [Ilugc] Open source and business

2012-07-29 Thread ஆமாச்சு
On Wednesday 25 July 2012 01:07 PM, Arun Venkataswamy wrote:
 I am talking about people who are
 creative and made stuff from scratch. Off late I have started to have these
 conflicting thoughts in my mind whether this entire open source movement is
 made up of a small bunch of charitable people (the creators) and a huge
 bunch of leeches who monetize the charity.

to my knowledge many such foundations are Section 25 kind of 
organizations - not typical charitable organizations.
corporates revolve around such foundations - donating - deploying their 
staff to work directly on upstream projects  they in turn offer 
services as well as device their creations based out of them.
such foundations are also driven by corporates in some cases.
there are corporates that does it in right spirit and set as an example 
 there are corporates/ leeches that violates the spirit.

 This is not an excuse, as I would have found time if I believed
 that it was my responsibility. Anybody/Organization associated with this
 group have a give-back policy?

Well one thing that I insisted so seriously among my colleagues is to 
become developer/ contributor to the projects upon which we offer our 
services, which is so important in my opinion as an Open Source 
Organization. Few realised it.

Have given back  contributed few modules too off late, privately. Hope 
it grows down the line.

--

ஆமாச்சு
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc


Re: [Ilugc] Open source and business

2012-07-29 Thread ஆமாச்சு
On Wednesday 25 July 2012 01:07 PM, Arun Venkataswamy wrote:
 This is not an excuse, as I would have found time if I believed
 that it was my responsibility. Anybody/Organization associated with this
 group have a give-back policy?

another thing that I have started doing is, go with creations that are 
truly open - not those with dual licensing model.

at the same time, we insist the customer to pay for the subscription to 
the project originator (RedHat/ OpenERP for examples)  to us for the rest.

I can choose to implement without these contributions going up (with 
CentOS  customizing OpenERP through acquired expertise), but these days 
I have started speaking to customers to pay for 1) us  2) originator, 
telling them the reasons and have succeeded too.

--

ஆமாச்சு




___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc


[Ilugc] Open source and business

2012-07-25 Thread Arun Venkataswamy
Hi,

Has anybody in this list or people you know - have made money by creating
open source products? I am not talking about people who earn money by
providing services around someone else's effort of creating the primary,
core product (say the LAMP stack).  I am talking about people who are
creative and made stuff from scratch. Off late I have started to have these
conflicting thoughts in my mind whether this entire open source movement is
made up of a small bunch of charitable people (the creators) and a huge
bunch of leeches who monetize the charity.

I personally feel like a leach and have used brilliant open source apps
free of cost to my benefit. I never had the time to participate seriously
in giving back content to the open source pool (apart from a few
donations). This is not an excuse, as I would have found time if I believed
that it was my responsibility. Anybody/Organization associated with this
group have a give-back policy?

This is not a troll or to start a flame war. Just want to know about how
you guys think.

Regards,
Arun
http://wondroussky.blogspot.in/

கற்றது கைமண் அளவு, கல்லாதது உலகளவு - ஔவையார்
Known is a drop, Unknown is an ocean
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc


Re: [Ilugc] Open source and business

2012-07-25 Thread Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Arun Venkataswamy arun...@gmail.com wrote:

 Has anybody in this list or people you know - have made money by creating
 open source products? I am not talking about people who earn money by
 providing services around someone else's effort of creating the primary,
 core product (say the LAMP stack).

A significant part of the 'open source' is the concept of open a
restaurant but give away the menu. In effect, the availability of the
source code of the product enables two distinct streams of revenue -
feature driven and support/services driven. And, in either case you
are helping to increase the share of the product.


-- 
sankarshan mukhopadhyay
https://twitter.com/#!/sankarshan
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc


Re: [Ilugc] Open source and business

2012-07-25 Thread satyaakam goswami
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Arun Venkataswamy arun...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 Has anybody in this list or people you know - have made money by creating
 open source products? I am not talking about people who earn money by
 providing services around someone else's effort of creating the primary,
 core product (say the LAMP stack).  I am talking about people who are
 creative and made stuff from scratch. Off late I have started to have these
 conflicting thoughts in my mind whether this entire open source movement is
 made up of a small bunch of charitable people (the creators) and a huge
 bunch of leeches who monetize the charity.

this is a very common thought and question is most of the people in this field.

 I personally feel like a leach and have used brilliant open source apps
 free of cost to my benefit. I never had the time to participate seriously
 in giving back content to the open source pool (apart from a few
 donations).

do not procrastinate this is also good way of contributing back .

This is not an excuse, as I would have found time if I believed
 that it was my responsibility. Anybody/Organization associated with this
 group have a give-back policy?

Giving is ones personal conscious thing nobody can force or  demand it :-)

 This is not a troll or to start a flame war. Just want to know about how
 you guys think.

i give this simple analogy to students as what they want to be , there
are gold rush people ( the guys with one idea and want to make it big
through product or service )  and people who will be making spades (
the guys who actually build things )  for the gold rush , may be
mostly you have seen and interacted with people who are into  making
spades.

anyway what is that big idea you have on your mind?

-Satya
fossevents.in
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc


Re: [Ilugc] Open source and business

2012-07-25 Thread Arun Venkataswamy
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay 
sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com wrote:


 A significant part of the 'open source' is the concept of open a
 restaurant but give away the menu. In effect, the availability of the
 source code of the product enables two distinct streams of revenue -
 feature driven and support/services driven. And, in either case you
 are helping to increase the share of the product.


Increase share of the product meaning?
I am talking from a business perspective. It is one thing to
feel exhilarated when hundreds of thousands of people use your app. But
does this realize into making money?

Regards,
Arun
http://wondroussky.blogspot.in/

கற்றது கைமண் அளவு, கல்லாதது உலகளவு - ஔவையார்
Known is a drop, Unknown is an ocean
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc


Re: [Ilugc] Open source and business

2012-07-25 Thread Arun Venkataswamy
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:20 PM, satyaakam goswami satyaa...@gmail.comwrote:

 i give this simple analogy to students as what they want to be , there
 are gold rush people ( the guys with one idea and want to make it big
 through product or service )  and people who will be making spades (
 the guys who actually build things )  for the gold rush , may be
 mostly you have seen and interacted with people who are into  making
 spades.


Nice analogy.
But... The spades are free as in free beer!
How many people even look at the names of the authors of `that` brilliant
little library under LGPL which saved you a few days of coding? :)


 anyway what is that big idea you have on your mind?


My post was more to do with a feeling of being a leech :)

Regards,
Arun
http://wondroussky.blogspot.in/

கற்றது கைமண் அளவு, கல்லாதது உலகளவு - ஔவையார்
Known is a drop, Unknown is an ocean
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc


Re: [Ilugc] Open source and business

2012-07-25 Thread satyaakam goswami
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Arun Venkataswamy arun...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay 
 sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com wrote:


 A significant part of the 'open source' is the concept of open a
 restaurant but give away the menu. In effect, the availability of the
 source code of the product enables two distinct streams of revenue -
 feature driven and support/services driven. And, in either case you
 are helping to increase the share of the product.


 Increase share of the product meaning?

more user base , ultimately there is hope that there will be streams
of revenues from support and customization ( like adding features)

 I am talking from a business perspective. It is one thing to
 feel exhilarated when hundreds of thousands of people use your app. But
 does this realize into making money?

yes that is where business sense kicks in how to get a dollar out of
customer or it could be the other way round  too when the product is
so good he willingly starts paying what you demand , this risk and
reward scenarios is what any business is all about , and an
entrepreneurs you live with it .

-Satya
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc


Re: [Ilugc] Open source and business

2012-07-25 Thread Sriram Karra
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Arun Venkataswamy arun...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 Has anybody in this list or people you know - have made money by creating
 open source products? I am not talking about people who earn money by
 providing services around someone else's effort of creating the primary,
 core product (say the LAMP stack).  I am talking about people who are
 creative and made stuff from scratch.


Two examples that come to mind straight away:

HasGeek: http://jace.zaiki.in/2012/06/26/technology-outsource-vs-open-source
Fusion Charts:
http://www.fusioncharts.com/goodies/fusioncharts-free/product-licensing/

Different personalities, and different motivations for opening up the
source, but both are worth a look.

-Karra
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc


Re: [Ilugc] Open source and business

2012-07-25 Thread satyaakam goswami
 Nice analogy.
 But... The spades are free as in free beer!
 How many people even look at the names of the authors of `that` brilliant
 little library under LGPL which saved you a few days of coding? :)

Does not matter know from years of working like this in the end the
skill of making will  get paid than the spade itself, since they
invariably want something which they think is unique idea or product
and hence they pay for making it.

as far as sharing the bounty is concerned you can share from what you
have or  you do not have any or one becomes greedy over time , so this
behavior is once social currency which also comes into play.

-Satya
fossevents.in
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc


Re: [Ilugc] Open source and business

2012-07-25 Thread satyaakam goswami
 Two examples that come to mind straight away:

 HasGeek: http://jace.zaiki.in/2012/06/26/technology-outsource-vs-open-source
 Fusion Charts:
 http://www.fusioncharts.com/goodies/fusioncharts-free/product-licensing/

 Different personalities, and different motivations for opening up the
 source, but both are worth a look.

i could think of two , i am sure there are more than few like these

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cygnus_Solutions
http://www.gluster.org/

-Satya
fossevents.in
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc


Re: [Ilugc] Open source and business

2012-07-25 Thread kenneth gonsalves
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 13:07 +0530, Arun Venkataswamy wrote:
 Has anybody in this list or people you know - have made money by
 creating
 open source products? 

I have. Not much money, but money. My model is like this:

I offer to build applications for the client, charge what I feel is a
reasonable sum and convince them that if the software is open source
from the start it is easier to get people to contribute to it, the code
is available if I drop dead and it is easy for them to upgrade and debug
errors. My costs are cut because whenever I am stuck I can always find
people who are willing to write some code for free (although sometimes I
pay) because it is open source. I also insist on my clients learning the
basics of issue management and refuse to do anything unless a proper
ticket is filed. I do not have to lie to the client about progress and
never give progress reports. I tell them to look at the repo to see if I
am doing work or not. The model often fails because the client cannot
get used to the way I do things. When it succeeds, it works great. The
client as a co-developer. Note that all my work is web apps (not
websites).

Some things I have learned:

1. The person I interact with on the client side *must* be the person
who takes the decisions in the client concern. It does not work if I
have to interact with an underling.

2. The development must be module by module and should go into
production immediately - if the guy wants the whole thing ready before
going into production, I decline to do it.

3. One has to be extremely flexible with regard to design changes and
new feature requests. The client may think he knows what he wants, but
once in production, he may realise he needs something else. One must be
prepared to rip the guts out of the app and rewrite - without losing
data.

4. I push as much of the work as possible on to the client - he has to
enter the data (I may make a script to load the data from a spreadsheet,
but he has to actually get everything ready and run the script). I show
him how to back up, but he has to do it. Likewise simple upgrades like
doing hg pull, hg update and restarting the server is his job. Like wise
for database migration, I give the script - he has to run it.

5. Design - he has to hire someone for that. In one case the guy learned
css and html and did it himself. (it looked horrible, but he was happy).
There are two reasons why I do this - 1. I am not capable of drawing a
straight line even with the aid of a computer and 2. design is the one
field in which the open source methodology does not work. No committee
or group of people can do good design - one guy has to do it. If he
needs help, the helpers have to do what they are told - no vote.

6. Last and most important - make proper agreements and make sure the
schedule of payment is met. No pay, no work. The flip side is that when
they see I am flexible with regard to doing mid course changes and
adding new features they do not quibble about paying more.

One of my big successes was building an app for a Finnish NGO working in
Mumbai. We started with one site and soon several sites in 7 countries
in the region. The lady in charge of Asia then took a year or two off to
take a course on how to get things done by IT people. She was shifted to
Africa and we have now covered 4 countries there. The course she took
did not help her at all as it was to do with how to extract work from M$
Weenies. But she has learned issue management - you may look at the
discussions in the open and closed issues in this project here:

https://bitbucket.org/lawgon/kenyakids/

now her bug/feature reporting is as good as most professionals.

We are soon going worldwide, and quite a few other NGOs are lining up -
my client is doing the marketing for me (and not asking for commission).

I have had one spectacular flop also - some members of our LUG will
remember as they were involved. The flop was due to the fact that I
ignored most of the principles mentioned above - especially point No 1. 

One last comment - do not write code unless 1. some one pays you or 2.
you need it for something you want to achieve. You can think of some
fantastic idea that you think will be the next facebook or will fulfill
a need that people will pay for - ok, if you must, do it, but do not
expect to make money from it. As some one said, if people will not pay
for something, they certainly will take it if it is free.

-- 
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves

___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc


Re: [Ilugc] Open source and business

2012-07-25 Thread kenneth gonsalves
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 16:56 +0530, kenneth gonsalves wrote:
 One last comment - do not write code unless 1. some one pays you or 2.
 you need it for something you want to achieve. You can think of some
 fantastic idea that you think will be the next facebook or will
 fulfill
 a need that people will pay for - ok, if you must, do it, but do not
 expect to make money from it. As some one said, if people will not pay
 for something, they certainly will take it if it is free.
 
 

oops - that should read 'they certainly will not take it if it is free'
-- 
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves

___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc


Re: [Ilugc] Open source and business

2012-07-25 Thread Girish Venkatachalam
Very nice points KG

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:56 PM, kenneth gonsalves
law...@thenilgiris.com wrote:
 On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 13:07 +0530, Arun Venkataswamy wrote:
 Has anybody in this list or people you know - have made money by
 creating
 open source products?

 I have. Not much money, but money. My model is like this:

 I offer to build applications for the client, charge what I feel is a
 reasonable sum and convince them that if the software is open source
 from the start it is easier to get people to contribute to it, the code
 is available if I drop dead and it is easy for them to upgrade and debug
 errors. My costs are cut because whenever I am stuck I can always find
 people who are willing to write some code for free (although sometimes I
 pay) because it is open source. I also insist on my clients learning the
 basics of issue management and refuse to do anything unless a proper
 ticket is filed. I do not have to lie to the client about progress and
 never give progress reports. I tell them to look at the repo to see if I
 am doing work or not. The model often fails because the client cannot
 get used to the way I do things. When it succeeds, it works great. The
 client as a co-developer. Note that all my work is web apps (not
 websites).

 Some things I have learned:

 1. The person I interact with on the client side *must* be the person
 who takes the decisions in the client concern. It does not work if I
 have to interact with an underling.

 2. The development must be module by module and should go into
 production immediately - if the guy wants the whole thing ready before
 going into production, I decline to do it.

 3. One has to be extremely flexible with regard to design changes and
 new feature requests. The client may think he knows what he wants, but
 once in production, he may realise he needs something else. One must be
 prepared to rip the guts out of the app and rewrite - without losing
 data.

 4. I push as much of the work as possible on to the client - he has to
 enter the data (I may make a script to load the data from a spreadsheet,
 but he has to actually get everything ready and run the script). I show
 him how to back up, but he has to do it. Likewise simple upgrades like
 doing hg pull, hg update and restarting the server is his job. Like wise
 for database migration, I give the script - he has to run it.

 5. Design - he has to hire someone for that. In one case the guy learned
 css and html and did it himself. (it looked horrible, but he was happy).
 There are two reasons why I do this - 1. I am not capable of drawing a
 straight line even with the aid of a computer and 2. design is the one
 field in which the open source methodology does not work. No committee
 or group of people can do good design - one guy has to do it. If he
 needs help, the helpers have to do what they are told - no vote.

 6. Last and most important - make proper agreements and make sure the
 schedule of payment is met. No pay, no work. The flip side is that when
 they see I am flexible with regard to doing mid course changes and
 adding new features they do not quibble about paying more.

 One of my big successes was building an app for a Finnish NGO working in
 Mumbai. We started with one site and soon several sites in 7 countries
 in the region. The lady in charge of Asia then took a year or two off to
 take a course on how to get things done by IT people. She was shifted to
 Africa and we have now covered 4 countries there. The course she took
 did not help her at all as it was to do with how to extract work from M$
 Weenies. But she has learned issue management - you may look at the
 discussions in the open and closed issues in this project here:

 https://bitbucket.org/lawgon/kenyakids/

 now her bug/feature reporting is as good as most professionals.

 We are soon going worldwide, and quite a few other NGOs are lining up -
 my client is doing the marketing for me (and not asking for commission).

 I have had one spectacular flop also - some members of our LUG will
 remember as they were involved. The flop was due to the fact that I
 ignored most of the principles mentioned above - especially point No 1.

 One last comment - do not write code unless 1. some one pays you or 2.
 you need it for something you want to achieve. You can think of some
 fantastic idea that you think will be the next facebook or will fulfill
 a need that people will pay for - ok, if you must, do it, but do not
 expect to make money from it. As some one said, if people will not pay
 for something, they certainly will take it if it is free.

 --
 regards
 Kenneth Gonsalves

 ___
 ILUGC Mailing List:
 http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc



-- 
Gayatri Hitech
http://gayatri-hitech.com
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc


Re: [Ilugc] Open source and business

2012-07-25 Thread sivakumar bharadhwaj
Dear Mr. Kenneth.

forgive me (and bear with me too) I always think that your replies are very
egostic (forget the word - It just came to my mind. take the meaning only).

but this one explanation gives you as a person a totally different
perspective.

superb guideline, and did not wasted even one word.  every startup (let
alone a FOSS developer) should go through this with respect to his work.

thanks sir.

with warm regards
s.sivakumar
___
ILUGC Mailing List:
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc


[Ilugc] Open source for business users

2009-03-14 Thread varadarajan narayanan
Hi !

Here is another hiccup when trying to user Open source for business.

Has anyone successfully  implemented dual screen in Ubuntu ?
I am trying to bring up a teleconferencing solution .A laptop running Ubuntu
connected to 60 TV through s-video.
Xp with ATi drivers has no problem though.
I see lot of postings in Ubuntu forums . But not able to succeed mainly
because of my incapacity.
 But would like to know about some first hand experience here.

Cheers
Varadarajan

www.cloudversity.com
___
To unsubscribe, email ilugc-requ...@ae.iitm.ac.in with 
unsubscribe password address
in the subject or body of the message.  
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc