Re: [ilugd] un-gpl, gpl++ howto?
ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] = mobile:9818148844 __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Re: [ilugd] un-gpl, gpl++ howto?
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:46:01 -0700 (PDT), satyakam goswami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] huh? am sure others have answers here. c'mon... LL ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Re: [ilugd] August meet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vivek == vivek khurana [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Vivek HI! all This is regarding the date of august meet. Since Vivek 3rd sunday is 15th august, i request that we prepond or Vivek postpone this months meeting. Vivek I belive we can do any of the following Vivek 1)prepond the meeting to 8th august (2nd sunday) 2)postpone Vivek teh meeting to 29th august (5th sunday) 3)conduct meeting Vivek on a saturday. mostly 2nd and 4th saturdays are off days so Vivek we can do the meet on any of them. Vivek 4th sunday i.e 22nd will cause a clash with dev meet as Vivek sarai is booked for 22nd august in advance. Vivek So guyz lets discuss out which is a more suitable date. Uh, at the ILUGD meet we already discussed this, and came up with Sunday 22nd as the date since it's also Linux's birthday. Can we postpone the Dev meet to 5th Sunday, that'll cause minimal disruption all around. Regards, - -- Raju - -- Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F It is the mind that moves -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iD8DBQFBBIPtyWjQ78xo0X8RAl63AJ4hdGSbVRoSLZAaGgqduFuf10U8QgCcDz8D eGIL7MuWECsQ/wGSI9dQ+ME= =FCRC -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Re: [ilugd] Query reg. LTSP Installation
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 13:49, Kunal Singhal (Linux) wrote: 1. I want to do a fresh installation of Linux. So, for LTSP should I use Fedora Core 1 or 2 OR a stable version like Red Hat 8/9. Either will do. But for your office work it is recommended that you go for stable RH9 etc... 2. I tried booting 5 different systems in my office using LTSP. 4 of them succesfully booted, but none of them booted to the GUI screen. All gave an error that XFree86 is not able to load the driver. I used auto and the screen type in settings. Out of those 2 have Intel 810 graphics and remaining 2 have SiS 6326 and Cirrus Logic Displays. Settings for X (GUI) are difficult. Try setting the line for display driver for the workstation in /opt/ltsp/i386/etc/lts.conf to: XSERVER = vesa Secondly running X is matter of display card, monitor and vid-memory. Tell more about hardware for solutions. SiS are notorious for no support to Linux. -- Sudev Barar Learning Linux ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
