[ilugd] Running Apache context
Hi List, We have a website http://foo.com at IP 172.16.1.1, and a context http://foo.com/somelink where /somelink is at 172.16.1.2 different server. In otherwords user should always see website is at IP 172.16.1.1 (through DNS lookups etc) but when you run http://foo.com/somelink it is running from a different server IP 172.16.1.2 without change in main domain name. Fact is i don't want to reveal users the actual IP where is website (http://foo.com/somelink, 172.16.1.2) hosted. Any pointers etc would be of great help! Regards, Yash ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Running Apache context
Hi, You can do the follwoing two steps to achieve this: 1. create a host in your DNS like somelink.foo.com with ip 172.16.1.2 2. Create a rewrite rule in your apache on 172.16.1.1, where http://foo.com/somelink redirects to http://somelink.foo.com Hope this helps... Sanvir Registered Linux User #163808 at http://counter.li.org ~~~ Just Believe in the Best [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi List, We have a website http://foo.com at IP 172.16.1.1, and a context http://foo.com/somelink where /somelink is at 172.16.1.2 different server. In otherwords user should always see website is at IP 172.16.1.1 (through DNS lookups etc) but when you run http://foo.com/somelink it is running from a different server IP 172.16.1.2 without change in main domain name. Fact is i don't want to reveal users the actual IP where is website (http://foo.com/somelink, 172.16.1.2) hosted. Any pointers etc would be of great help! Regards, Yash ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com Buy The Best In BOOKS at http://www.bestsellers.indiatimes.com Bid for for Air Tickets @ Re.1 on Air Sahara Flights. Just log on to http://airsahara.indiatimes.com and Bid Now! ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [LIH]Re: [ilugd] Running Apache context
Sanvir Singh Jham wrote: You can do the follwoing two steps to achieve this: 1. create a host in your DNS like somelink.foo.com with ip 172.16.1.2 2. Create a rewrite rule in your apache on 172.16.1.1, where http://foo.com/somelink redirects to http://somelink.foo.com something as simple as netstat tends to give this sort of joke away or just hitting view - page properties or whatever in the browser (or = in lynx / w3m) srs ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] Code theft or liberalisation?
[Of course, if SugarCRM had used a GPL-like license to start with none of this could have (legally) happened. I presume the SugarCRM developers chose their own license for a reason, and they can't really complain if someone uses their code under the terms of that same license -- Raju] From: Soenke Zehle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ox-en] Code theft or liberalisation? Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 12:39:48 +0100 Tectonic Africa's Source for open source news www.tectonic.co.za http://www.tectonic.co.za/view.php?id=392 Code theft or liberalisation? December 9 2004 Christiaan Erasmus An interesting row is brewing between SugarCRM and vTiger CRM, which could have a large impact for open source developers. SugarCRM is a brilliant CRM (Client Relationship Management) application that achieved the prestigious award of being SourceForge.net's Project of the Month during October. SugarCRM is released as a free downloadable version and an optimised Professional version that is charged for on an annual per user basis. Recently vTiger took SugarCRM's source code, stripped the logos, added an installer and released it as vTiger CRM. I am not a lawyer but it appears to be legal to do this under the SugarCRM Public Licence (SPL), which is an adapted version of the Mozilla Public Licence. vTiger then went further to ensure that they adhere to the SPL by publicly stating that it is based on SugarCRM code and kept the copyright notices intact. However, on the launch of vTiger a SugarCRM developer named John (it later emerged that it was John Roberts a lead SugarCRM developer) placed the following rant on one of the vTiger forums: vtiger is a lie - the legal product is called SugarSales from SugarCRM Inc. We do not think it very cool of you to claim ownership to something you did not write one line of code for. Best regards, The SugarSales development team. john at sugarcrm.com Within 3 hours the vTiger Team responded in such a brilliant way that you must think that it was premeditated. They posted an open letter to Eric Raymond, President of the Open Source Initiative. vTiger state their case impeccably in this letter and you can see that they consulted a lawyer. Apparently SugarCRM also removed their SPL licence (v1.1.2) from their website but vTiger included a copy in the letter to Raymond. Forking the source code was ingenious on vTigers part, as they became the guardians of a completely open source project. The funny thing is that the vTiger community might now grow quicker because they do not have the conflict of determining which features to place in the free or paid for version. vTiger did not just hijack the project but are actively enhancing the application with added functionality such as an Outlook plug-in, which is only available as a trial version for the free SugarCRM version. Interestingly vTiger says that the Outlook plug-in is their contribution which, if true, might still create a licence conflict. The question that has to be asked is whether a paid-for and free business model can co-exist in the open source world. I am sure there are projects that work successfully on this model but none that I can think of offhand. You are most probably saying hey what about Red Hat, but you can download and compile RHEL yourself, such as done by the White Box Linux project. This is going to become very interesting feud and I look forward to see how SugarCRM will counter this. There are many options available to SugarCRM such as changing their business model or just offering a superior product and service. Only time will tell. -- Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F It is the mind that moves ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] Just two minutes for ur country
Dear friends, People worldwide are casting there votes to elect the New Seven Wonders of the world. Initially, there will be short-listing for 21 monuments till February and then the voting will continue and will be announcing the New SevenWonders of the World on January 1, 2006. The Taj Mahal, for which we are proud to be, is also in the competition. As of yesterday, Great wall of China is leading with higher votes and the Taj is in the seventh place. To bring this china wall to first position, more than 50%of votes are cast from the home country china. Unfortunately, the Taj is in the seventh position because of only 1.9% of votes from Indians. Can we spend sometime to cast our votes ? Just login www.new7wonders.com and cast your vote. Please circulate this to your friends and let us retain the Taj Mahal as one among them. An Indian -- for India Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partner online Go to: http://yahoo.shaadi.com/india-matrimony ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Just two minutes for ur country
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anuj == anuj agarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anuj Dear friends, People worldwide are casting there votes to Anuj elect the New Seven Wonders of the world. Initially, there Anuj will be short-listing for 21 monuments till February and Anuj then the voting will continue and will be announcing the New Anuj SevenWonders of the World on January 1, 2006. I suggest we vote the ``free software'' sellers in Nehru Place as the first wonder of the world. At least that would be slightly relevant to this list. I feel strongly about lots of things but I don't necessarily have to use this list as a platform for promoting all of them. Please take your rantings someplace else. - -- Raju - -- Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F It is the mind that moves -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iD8DBQFBuIGsyWjQ78xo0X8RAqcQAJ40Vf8SWNYlonMPDVZMKEnb+7nPNQCfXCZx ZoHDMSZ3Ao+R1SWsi0f1e34= =lnqv -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] (fwd) [SECURITY] KDE Security Advisory: plain text password exposure
[Please upgrade KDE on all platforms. Vendor packages should be out shortly -- Raju] This is an RFC 1153 digest. (1 message) -- MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: KDE Security Advisory: plain text password exposure Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:07:19 +0100 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 KDE Security Advisory: plain text password exposure Original Release Date: 2004-12-09 URL: http://www.kde.org/info/security/advisory-20041209-1.txt 0. References http://www.sec-consult.com/index.php?id=118 1. Systems affected: All KDE 3.2.x releases, KDE 3.3.0, KDE 3.3.1 and KDE 3.3.2. 2. Overview: Daniel Fabian notified the KDE security team about a possible privacy issue in KDE. When creating a link to a remote file from various applications including Konqueror, the resulting URL may contain the authentication credentials used to access that remote resource. This includes, but is not limited to browsing SMB (Samba) shares. Further investigation revealed unnecessary exposure of authentication credentials by the SMB (Samba) protocol handler. The link reference file, which is a file with the extension .desktop, is a plain text configuration file that is created with default access permissions, depending on the users' umask this could include world read permission. Usually the URL saved in this .desktop file only contains the password if the user manually entered it this way. The SMB protocol handler however unnecessarily exposes authentication credentials by always including this information in the URL that it generates. The KDE team provides patches which will unconditionally remove the password from the authentication credentials before creating the link reference file and that fix the SMB protocol handler to not unnecessarily include passwords in URLs Authentication credentials can then be stored in KWallet instead. 3. Impact: A user may inadvertly expose passwords provided for SMB shares or other passwords that were entered as part of an URL. 4. Solution: Users should verify that links to remote files do not contain password information by right-clicking the link and selecting the Properties option and then selecting the URL tab. The KDE 3.3.2 release contains most fixes already, therefore the patch set to apply to KDE 3.3.2 is less than for other KDE versions. Source code patches have been made available which fix these vulnerabilities. Contact your OS vendor / binary package provider for information about how to obtain updated binary packages. 5. Patch: Patches for KDE 3.3.1 are available from ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/security_patches : 501852d12f82aebe7eb73ec5d96c9e6d post-3.3.1-kdebase-smb.diff 5b9c1738f2de3f00533e376eb64c7137 post-3.3.1-kdelibs-khtml.diff f287c900c637af2452c7a554f2df166f post-3.3.1-kdelibs-kio.diff Patch for KDE 3.3.2 is available from ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/security_patches : d3658e90acec6ff140463ed2fd0e7736 post-3.3.2-kdelibs-kio.diff Patches for KDE 3.2.3 are available from ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/security_patches : d080d9acf4d2abc5f91ccec8fc463568 post-3.2.3-kdebase-smb.diff d79d1717b4bc0b3891bacaaf37deade0 post-3.2.3-kdelibs-khtml.diff 94e76ec98cd58ce27cad8f886d241986 post-3.2.3-kdelibs-kio.diff -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBt618vsXr+iuy1UoRArYpAJ9WwYla1w0zwLZ5h5aC+loKcsYl2wCcCx0y VXT0cntKNdpheNgZcKGYnug= =bTjQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- End of this Digest ** -- Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F It is the mind that moves ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] Re: Code theft or liberalisation?
At 2004-12-09 21:15:50 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course, if SugarCRM had used a GPL-like license to start with none of this could have (legally) happened. Uh, why not? -- ams ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Just two minutes for ur country
anuj agarwal wrote: To bring this china wall to first position, more than 50%of votes are cast from the home country china. Unfortunately, the Taj is in the seventh position because of only 1.9% of votes from Indians. Because we are not trying to stuff the ballot box? Oh, right ... -- Sanjeev ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Re: Code theft or liberalisation?
ams == Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ams At 2004-12-09 21:15:50 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course, if SugarCRM had used a GPL-like license to start with none of this could have (legally) happened. ams Uh, why not? Hmm, you're right -- vTiger is FLOSS too. I mistakenly assumed that vTiger had made a proprietary product out of the SugarCRM sources. Regards, -- Raju -- Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F It is the mind that moves ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Top / bottom / Inline posting
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote: I am not hoping to start a relgious war here but I was wondering how strict should one enforce the idea of bottom or inline posting vs top posting. I understand the idea that we should have the complete context in place but does that really mean I should be forced to bottom post even if I am giving a two line reply to a two line request ? My observation is : 1. top post if you are giving a one line reply to a one line request this is ok if there is only a single reply to a thread. if there are further responses to thread, then this becomes difficult. 2. Bottom post if you are replying to a substantially long request and the complete text is required to understand your reply. Also bottom post only if your reply is short and answers the whole block. this results in what is called full quoting. for a single line reply, the whole message is quoted. 3. Inline post if you are replying to a posting in parts. do i have to say which method *i* like the best. -balaji -- http://balajin.net Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall. - Confucius ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Running Apache context
Sanvir Singh Jham wrote: You can do the follwoing two steps to achieve this: 1. create a host in your DNS like somelink.foo.com with ip 172.16.1.2 2. Create a rewrite rule in your apache on 172.16.1.1, where http://foo.com/somelink redirects to http://somelink.foo.com But somelink.foo.com would have to resolve to a IP, and thus failed. Here let me tell you that application is a finance related application. And idea is to not showing url or letting anyone know the source host. First host is a webserver and then redirected to the application server, sun apps server. Thanks Yash ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Oracle10g/Oracle8i on Fedora1.0[Commercial]
hello there, i can help you regarding this... but i want to know do you have access to this box? i mean to say that can you sit infront of this box? at least you have to change CDs and execute some other commands other than installation commands. regards sibayan On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:23:02 -0800 (PST), mithilesh kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am looking for a person who can install Oracle8i/Oracle 10g On my remote Linux box having flavor of Fedora1.0 Thank You mithilesh 9811623401 - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/ ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[OT] Re: [ilugd] Amendment to Patents Act this month
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 08:49 +0530, Raj Shekhar wrote: Raj Shekhar wrote: http://www.thehindu.com/2004/12/08/stories/2004120805770100.htm Amendment to Patents Act this month And now a small explanation on why if your job is developing software, you should be worried. Firstly have a look at this article to see why software patents are bad More than software patents, there is something very basic that is going to be threatened by this law - medicines. I have blogged about this on http://www.sandipb.net/blog/archives/2004/12/02/brazil-to-break-drug- patents/ The latest Tehelka issue gives some very good figures about this.Some studies have shown that the prices of medicines are going to increase by 250% by the end of January. Whether it is software or medicine, patents by its very concept brings harm to our society far more than the benefits. Imagine an AIDS cure thas been found but because of the patents law, only the very rich can cure themselves in the next 20 years! The medicine world(and I feel in some way the IT world too) also uses the dangerous practicing of evergreening of patents. That is, different components of the patented object have different lifespans, and by changing critical molecules and renewing patents of some, the patent lifespan is increased even beyond 20 years. If this patent law is actually enforced, India is going to see a major social crisis in the years to come. My blog above talks about how Brazil as a country has decided to allow breaking of a few critical patents needed to save the country from such a crisis that they already have in their midst. - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharya*Puroga Technologies * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: http://www.puroga.com* Home: http://www.sandipb.net PGP/GPG Signature: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3 Why are you so hard to ignore? ___ ilugd mailinglist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
