Re: [ilugd] [LIH]NAS idea

2006-01-14 Thread Raj Mathur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

 Suresh == Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Suresh On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 05:00:19AM -0800, Mithun
Suresh Bhattacharya wrote:
 If my understanding is correct a simple NAS is: 1. A storage
 space available over the network 2. Fault tolerant
 3. Expandable 4. Transparent 5. Compatible across OSes

Suresh add

Suresh 1. rack space costs (NAS / SAN devices typically have far
Suresh lower form factor than if you try to run a bunch of
Suresh fileservers across to a datacenter)

Suresh 2. out of the box and just works - most of the time. you
Suresh dont have to sacrifice white chickens and mutter
Suresh incantations all the time like you would with a homecooked
Suresh solution

Suresh 3. hot swappable modules in your NAS / SAN

Suresh 4. lots and lots more redundancy and failover built in

Suresh 5. A SLA with your vendor that you can enforce if things
Suresh turn out bad

Add:

6. Dual hot-swappable power supplies in the disk enclosure.

7. Dual SCSI paths to the enclosure with dual-ported drives inside.

High availability mandates no single point of failure, so you want to
make sure that your shared disk enclosure doesn't become the
bottleneck.

BTW, the correct term is ``High Availability''; ``Fault tolerant'' is
only achievable by spending crores upon crores.

Regards,

- -- Raju
- -- 
Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://kandalaya.org/
   GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5  0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F
  It is the mind that moves
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/

iD4DBQFDydD/yWjQ78xo0X8RAlZVAJ91B6TylHJS17r0SjBoPOBhZaMXUACXSHc+
4SzmJ+UP2KKhZfC62bvyLA==
=eZSr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/



Re: [ilugd] [LIH]NAS idea

2006-01-13 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 05:00:19AM -0800, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
If my understanding is correct a simple NAS is:
1. A storage space available over the network
2. Fault tolerant
3. Expandable
4. Transparent
5. Compatible across OSes

add

1. rack space costs (NAS / SAN devices typically have far lower form factor
than if you try to run a bunch of fileservers across to a datacenter)

2. out of the box and just works - most of the time. you dont have to
sacrifice white chickens and mutter incantations all the time like you
would with a homecooked solution

3. hot swappable modules in your NAS / SAN

4. lots and lots more redundancy and failover built in

5. A SLA with your vendor that you can enforce if things turn out bad

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/