Re: [ilugd] replication between CVS
Thanks for the clarification, Kenneth. On Thursday 01 September 2005 10:49, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: will not be able to do what was required by the OP. A package like subversion, which retains all the best features of CVS while adding new and better features would be more suitable for the requirements of the OP. I should point out that Subversion as released is not designed for distributed RC, but SVK (a third-party tool) effectively adds this feature to it. -Taj. ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] replication between CVS
I have configured CVSup for replication..but its supports in one direction only and i want to configure it bidirection.. any one have Ide about CVSproxy..can any one help me in this issue... -- Manish Popli ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] replication between CVS
On Wednesday 31 August 2005 19:13, Manish Popli wrote: I have configured CVSup for replication..but its supports in one direction only and i want to configure it bidirection.. any one have Ide about CVSproxy..can any one help me in this issue... I have some advice that you won't like: Don't do this. Even if by hook or crook you get it working, it will not work right, at best you'll have a messy repository and will likely lose data. If you really really need distributed revision control I suggest you give up on CVS, it is just not designed for that. Some viable alternatives include GNU Arch, monotone and Subversion/SVK. -Taj. ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] replication between CVS
wat do u mean ?? On 9/1/05, Sirtaj Singh Kang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 31 August 2005 19:13, Manish Popli wrote: I have configured CVSup for replication..but its supports in one direction only and i want to configure it bidirection.. any one have Ide about CVSproxy..can any one help me in this issue... I have some advice that you won't like: Don't do this. Even if by hook or crook you get it working, it will not work right, at best you'll have a messy repository and will likely lose data. If you really really need distributed revision control I suggest you give up on CVS, it is just not designed for that. Some viable alternatives include GNU Arch, monotone and Subversion/SVK. -Taj. ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/ -- Manish Popli ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] replication between CVS
On Thursday 01 Sep 2005 10:37 am, Manish Popli wrote: wat do u mean ?? what he means is that there are many packages for version control. The first and most widespread was CVS. CVS has many limitations and will not be able to do what was required by the OP. A package like subversion, which retains all the best features of CVS while adding new and better features would be more suitable for the requirements of the OP. -- regards kg http://www.livejournal.com/users/lawgon tally ho! http://avsap.org.in ಇಂಡ್ಲಿನಕ್ಸ வாழ்க! ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
