This is the second reply that implies that .rhosts is superior to pserver - can someone explain why?
I had to make this decision recently and concluded that pserver was the prefered way...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg A. Woods)
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/11/2002 21:56
Please respond to info-cvs
To:Mahantesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Moving to Pserver from .rhosts
[ On Tuesday, November 12, 2002 at 19:28:49 (+0530), Mahantesh wrote: ]
Subject: Moving to Pserver from .rhosts
we have working repository running right now. Currently the mode of
authentication is .rhosts.
We are planning to migrate the mode of authentication to pserver. Also
after moving to pserver mode we should be
able have all the versions we have right now.
Why would you ever even dream of doing that?
Why not upgrade to SSH (and ~/.shosts :-) instead?
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Planix, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs