[Inkscape-docs] vetting ("curating"?) tutorials on website

2017-01-14 Thread brynn
re-titled from "Re: [Inkscape-docs] Update "Video Tutorials" section in website"

Sounds good to me.  Well, thank you for your trust and confidence.  This is the 
perfect size of project that can probably be finished while we're waiting for 
OSUOSL.  I don't expect it will be very much larger than the suggestions I made 
earlier.

(fyi, we already do have 55 tutorials!  Although some are the Example files. 
But still that's not a small amount.)

Just for video tutorials?  Why not extend to all?  Most things could apply to 
both.  (such as making sure it's not outdated, read/watch all the way through, 
doesn't give incorrect info, possibly contacting author, e.g.)  Also,  "vet" or 
"curate"?

I think it would be good to discuss the details on the list, because input from 
others can only make it better, imo.  If something needs a specific response 
from you, we'll specifically ask, and otherwise, I'm sure you'll be reviewing 
the list as usual  :-)

Where should these guidelines be posted?

For example, they could probably be brief enough to fit in the black space 
between the menu and the tutorials (on this page 
https://inkscape.org/en/gallery/=tutorial/ starts with "A collection of 
video").  Although that space generally seems to introduce the page, rather 
than give instructions.

Hhmm, well I guess the Extensions page does give instructions in the black 
area  (ref:  https://inkscape.org/en/gallery/=extension/)

Or it could be a link in the upload form, like the CoC link.oh, I thought I 
saw there was a link there previously.  Aaahh, I must be thinking of Comments. 
Well, it could be a link like that, in the upload form.  Possibly so that it 
only shows when Tutorials category is selected?

(Actually, I wonder why there's not a reference or link to the CoC on the 
upload 
form?  Is just too much maybe?)

Any other ideas about where to put this?  Anyone else with ideas about 
guidelines, please chime in  :-)

I'm about to log off for awhile, but I'll put any suggestions that are posted 
together with the ones I mentioned before, sometime next week, and make a first 
draft.

All best,
brynn
ps - Idea:  Just like the extensions can identify which version it works with 
(if the uploader tags it), can the tutorials be tagged for which version was in 
use by the author, when the tutorial was made?


-Original Message- 
From: Martin Owens
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2017 12:51 PM
To: brynn ; Vardenis Pavardenis ; inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net ; Maren 
Hachmann
Subject: Re: [Inkscape-docs] Update "Video Tutorials" section in website

On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 12:22 -0700, brynn wrote:
> If it's as simple as making a "good" or "vetted" tag, and writing
> guidelines, why not get started?

Why not indeed. I trust you wholly with creating a simple set of
guidelines, I think you made a good start in the previous email.

You may wish to discuss, but I'm happy enough not to.

The videos tutorials will be in two great categories: unvetted (all
video tutorials added by anyone) and vetted (videos checked against
your checklist). Getting a list of vetted videos is not critical, so we
can be patient for your guidance and help sorting the content when the
time is right.

In the mean time, anyone is free to add tutorial links to the website.

Best Regards, Martin Owens 


--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
___
Inkscape-docs mailing list
Inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-docs


Re: [Inkscape-docs] Update "Video Tutorials" section in website

2017-01-14 Thread Martin Owens
On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 12:22 -0700, brynn wrote:
> If it's as simple as making a "good" or "vetted" tag, and writing
> guidelines, why not get started?

Why not indeed. I trust you wholly with creating a simple set of
guidelines, I think you made a good start in the previous email.

You may wish to discuss, but I'm happy enough not to.

The videos tutorials will be in two great categories: unvetted (all
video tutorials added by anyone) and vetted (videos checked against
your checklist). Getting a list of vetted videos is not critical, so we
can be patient for your guidance and help sorting the content when the
time is right.

In the mean time, anyone is free to add tutorial links to the website.

Best Regards, Martin Owens

--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
___
Inkscape-docs mailing list
Inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-docs


Re: [Inkscape-docs] Update "Video Tutorials" section in website

2017-01-14 Thread brynn
Haha!

>  it will bear as much responsibility for tagging tutorials
as 'good' or 'vetted' as there are volunteers to do the vetting.

So when we have a tag for "good" or "vetted" should there be guidelines for 
using it?  Because what one sees as good will not necessarily be what all 
consider good.  I couldn't tell you how many not very good tutorials I've seen 
called "good".

In Maren's reply, she said:

>  - The guidelines are in the community CoC. A video is just a resource
like any other one.

I disagree.  The CoC is about personal conduct, not quality of content.

Back to Martin said:
> If
there is no one (or no one that knows what to do yet) then there is no
vetting.

Well, I'm entirely willing to do that, although as I mentioned, I can't start 
on 
it yet.  But if we had guidelines, then anyone else could start.  And plus, 
even 
when I have time, all kinds of other people are still going to be able to 
upload 
links.

> But I'd like to get a collection of tutorials built up before we drive
it to perfection.

Why?

If it's as simple as making a "good" or "vetted" tag, and writing guidelines, 
why not get started?  It shouldn't take any huge amount of effort to discuss 
and 
agree on a few simple guidelines.  Of course, I don't know what it takes to 
create a tag, but it seems like it should be fairy easy (by someone who already 
knows how and has the proper access).

Thanks,
brynn


-Original Message- 
From: Martin Owens
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2017 10:56 AM
To: brynn ; Vardenis Pavardenis ; inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net ; Maren 
Hachmann
Subject: Re: [Inkscape-docs] Update "Video Tutorials" section in website

On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 22:35 -0700, brynn wrote:
> It seems to me like the Inkscape website should bear some
> responsibility for providing quality content (even if it's not its
> own content), especially regarding tutorials.

And it will, it will bear as much responsibility for tagging tutorials
as 'good' or 'vetted' as there are volunteers to do the vetting. If
there is no one (or no one that knows what to do yet) then there is no
vetting.

But that does not mean we do not have a process in mind for tagging and
marking tutorials as 'good' in the future.

But I'd like to get a collection of tutorials built up before we drive
it to perfection.

Martin, 


--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
___
Inkscape-docs mailing list
Inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-docs


Re: [Inkscape-docs] Update "Video Tutorials" section in website

2017-01-14 Thread Martin Owens
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 22:35 -0700, brynn wrote:
> It seems to me like the Inkscape website should bear some
> responsibility for providing quality content (even if it's not its
> own content), especially regarding tutorials.

And it will, it will bear as much responsibility for tagging tutorials
as 'good' or 'vetted' as there are volunteers to do the vetting. If
there is no one (or no one that knows what to do yet) then there is no
vetting.

But that does not mean we do not have a process in mind for tagging and
marking tutorials as 'good' in the future.

But I'd like to get a collection of tutorials built up before we drive
it to perfection.

Martin,

--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
___
Inkscape-docs mailing list
Inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-docs