[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/skl: Restructured the gen6_set_rps_thresholds function

2015-02-26 Thread akash . goel
From: Akash Goel akash.g...@intel.com

Prior to SKL, the time period programmed in Up/Down EI  Up/Down
threshold registers was in units of 1.28 micro seconds. But for
SKL, the units have changed (1.333 micro seconds).
Have generalized the implementation of gen6_set_rps_thresholds function,
by removing the hard coding done in it as per 1.28 micro seconds.

v2: Renamed the local variables  removed superfluous comments (Chris)

Signed-off-by: Akash Goel akash.g...@intel.com
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 68 +++--
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 339a034..e094e5d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3677,6 +3677,8 @@ static u32 gen6_rps_limits(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv, u8 val)
 static void gen6_set_rps_thresholds(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val)
 {
int new_power;
+   u32 threshold_up = 0, threshold_down = 0; /* in % */
+   u32 ei_up = 0, ei_down = 0;
 
new_power = dev_priv-rps.power;
switch (dev_priv-rps.power) {
@@ -3709,59 +3711,53 @@ static void gen6_set_rps_thresholds(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val)
switch (new_power) {
case LOW_POWER:
/* Upclock if more than 95% busy over 16ms */
-   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_EI, 12500);
-   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_THRESHOLD, 11800);
+   ei_up = 16000;
+   threshold_up = 95;
 
/* Downclock if less than 85% busy over 32ms */
-   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_EI, 25000);
-   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD, 21250);
-
-   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_CONTROL,
-  GEN6_RP_MEDIA_TURBO |
-  GEN6_RP_MEDIA_HW_NORMAL_MODE |
-  GEN6_RP_MEDIA_IS_GFX |
-  GEN6_RP_ENABLE |
-  GEN6_RP_UP_BUSY_AVG |
-  GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_AVG);
+   ei_down = 32000;
+   threshold_down = 85;
break;
 
case BETWEEN:
/* Upclock if more than 90% busy over 13ms */
-   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_EI, 10250);
-   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_THRESHOLD, 9225);
+   ei_up = 13000;
+   threshold_up = 90;
 
/* Downclock if less than 75% busy over 32ms */
-   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_EI, 25000);
-   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD, 18750);
-
-   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_CONTROL,
-  GEN6_RP_MEDIA_TURBO |
-  GEN6_RP_MEDIA_HW_NORMAL_MODE |
-  GEN6_RP_MEDIA_IS_GFX |
-  GEN6_RP_ENABLE |
-  GEN6_RP_UP_BUSY_AVG |
-  GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_AVG);
+   ei_down = 32000;
+   threshold_down = 75;
break;
 
case HIGH_POWER:
/* Upclock if more than 85% busy over 10ms */
-   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_EI, 8000);
-   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_THRESHOLD, 6800);
+   ei_up = 1;
+   threshold_up = 85;
 
/* Downclock if less than 60% busy over 32ms */
-   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_EI, 25000);
-   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD, 15000);
-
-   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_CONTROL,
-  GEN6_RP_MEDIA_TURBO |
-  GEN6_RP_MEDIA_HW_NORMAL_MODE |
-  GEN6_RP_MEDIA_IS_GFX |
-  GEN6_RP_ENABLE |
-  GEN6_RP_UP_BUSY_AVG |
-  GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_AVG);
+   ei_down = 32000;
+   threshold_down = 60;
break;
}
 
+   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_EI,
+   GT_INTERVAL_FROM_US(ei_up));
+   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_THRESHOLD,
+   GT_INTERVAL_FROM_US((ei_up * threshold_up / 100)));
+
+   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_EI,
+   GT_INTERVAL_FROM_US(ei_down));
+   I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD,
+   GT_INTERVAL_FROM_US((ei_down * threshold_down / 100)));
+
+I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_CONTROL,
+   GEN6_RP_MEDIA_TURBO |
+   GEN6_RP_MEDIA_HW_NORMAL_MODE |
+   GEN6_RP_MEDIA_IS_GFX |
+   GEN6_RP_ENABLE |
+   GEN6_RP_UP_BUSY_AVG |
+   GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_AVG);
+
dev_priv-rps.power = new_power;
dev_priv-rps.last_adj = 0;
 }
-- 
1.9.2

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/skl: Restructured the gen6_set_rps_thresholds function

2015-02-26 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:19:41PM +0530, akash.g...@intel.com wrote:
 From: Akash Goel akash.g...@intel.com
 
 Prior to SKL, the time period programmed in Up/Down EI  Up/Down
 threshold registers was in units of 1.28 micro seconds. But for
 SKL, the units have changed (1.333 micro seconds).
 Have generalized the implementation of gen6_set_rps_thresholds function,
 by removing the hard coding done in it as per 1.28 micro seconds.
 
 v2: Renamed the local variables  removed superfluous comments (Chris)
 
 Signed-off-by: Akash Goel akash.g...@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx