[PHP-DEV] PHP 4 Bug Summary Report
PHP 4 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net Num Status Summary (634 total including feature requests) ===[*Programming Data Structures]= 40496 Assigned Test bug35239.phpt still fails (works in PHP 5) ===[*Regular Expressions]= 42283 Open problem in regular expressions ===[Apache2 related]== 38670 Open Whole 4.4.x branch has problem with open_basedir option nested from Apache2 ===[Arrays related]=== 31114 Assigned foreach modify array (works with PHP 5.1) 37451 Open array_multisort fails to trigger by val copy of data (works in PHP = 5.1) 39764 Suspended array_key_exists inconsistent behavior 42177 Open Warning array_merge_recursive(): recursion detected comes again... ===[CGI related]== 42180 Open php in fastcgi environment periodicaly get 90% of CPU 42701 Open php4-cgi under fastcgi does not respect -d argument ===[Class/Object related]= 39254 Open Refcount error with static variables and object references (PHP4 only) 39681 Open this assignment outside class breaks static function call (PHP4 only) ===[Compile Failure]== 42807 Open Can't find php_session.h if using non-standard location. ===[Date/time related] 42671 Open ext/standard/tests/time/002.phpt fails due to AIX not supporting TZ=US/Eastern ===[Documentation problem] 29045 Suspended gzopen for URL 36663 Open unexpected difference between zlib.output_compression and ob_gzhandler ===[FDF related]== 34811 Assigned fdf_get_value max size ===[Feature/Change Request]=== 3066 Open Parameter for dns functions to select different DNS 3799 Suspended default_charset brings small incompatibility 3830 Open Function to timeout/break off a function 5007 Analyzed enable no-resolve mode for here docs 5169 Open Missing recursive behavior 5311 Analyzed implement checkdnsrr() and getmxrr() on windows 5575 Open open_basedir to ~ 5601 Analyzed @function() should not turn of error reporting for critical errors 5804 Open parser error if any spaces follow indentifier in with here doc syntax 5883 Assigned --enable-trans-sid modification request 5954 Open Informix can't reliably figure if a text result column is NULL 5975 Open version of strip_tags() that specifies tags to strip (instead of tags to keep) 6118 Open Can not supress runtime warnings on foreach 6268 Open ternary op return only by value 6399 Open checkdate should be able to validate a time as well as a date (timestamp) 6427 Open func_get_arg() does not support references 6503 Open no support for multiple resultset query? 6512 Analyzed sort() Does not sort stings as expected 6574 Open SMTP functions via IMAP c-client library 6680 Open regexps (ereg*) ignores locale settings 6911 Open Problem with array_merge(_recursive) 6927 Suspended 6932 Open Filesize / File_exists and include_path 6993 Open uninstalling is a pain in the ass 7006 Open preg_replace ( string pattern, array replacement, string subject ); 7028 Analyzed xml=shared and wddx do not work together 7132 Assigned fsockopen doesn't report dns lookup failure 7398 Open Stored procedure error return values not passed through 7507 Open Better ODBC error reporting/fetching 7541 Open please consider also support HPUX shl_* 7553 Open RFC: Uplevel Block structure 7559 Open zend_hash_get_current_key_ex returning persistent strings 7578 Open next() and current() do not return referenceing arrays 7808 Open variable value triggerd by function 7923 Analyzed htmlentities doesn't work for ISO 8859-2 7930 Open List() constructor reference assignment 8100 Assigned extract(), extra feature 8108 Analyzed implement trans-sid as output handler 8295 Open absolute path in extension= directive in php.ini not recognized 8395 Open register_shutdown_function() error 8397 Open Multi-results sets are not suppported 8427 Analyzed Unwanted references 8428 Open continue doesn't pass thru a switch statement 8595 Open More effective parsing of list() (+other) 8640 Open enumeration type 8685 Open heredoc: remove column 1 closing identifier requirement 8809 Open Cookieless session with Header redirects 8827 Open PHP_AUTH_PW stores password when using External Authentication 8855 Open
[PHP-DEV] PHP 6 Bug Summary Report
PHP 6 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net Num Status Summary (62 total including feature requests) ===[*General Issues]== 26771 Suspended register_tick_funtions crash under threaded webservers ===[*Unicode Issues]== 42163 Open fgetcvs gives different output with and without Unicode 42731 Open strcspn() gives incorrect output with mask as empty string with unicode on 42746 Open '\u' char in single quotes gets interepreted. ===[Apache2 related]== 42209 Open fail on make for sapi/apache2handler/apache_config.lo ===[Arrays related]=== 35277 Suspended incorrect recursion detection 41758 Assigned SORT_LOCALE_STRING broken for sort() in PHP6 ===[Class/Object related]= 33595 Assigned recursive references leak memory 41461 Assigned E_STRICT notice when overriding methods not defined by an Interface in hierarchy ===[Compile Failure]== 42606 Open unicode/constants.c relies on ICU draft api ===[Feature/Change Request]=== 20377 Open php_admin_value affects _only_ .htaccess 27618 Open curl_multi_info_read does not appear to work 29479 Suspended changing current process name 34211 Open PDO_OCI: Allow for data type TIMESTAMP(0) WITH LOCAL TIME ZONE 34252 Open Base functions extension and refactoring 34527 Open trim functions extension 34775 Open parse_url() provide better error description on failure 34882 Open Unable to access *original* posted variable name with dot in 35309 Open Database connection pooling 37081 Open Make the include-errors mention faulty permissions 37380 Open DOMDocument-createAttribute[NS] can't set value 37546 Open DOMDocumentFragment-appendXML namespace support 37796 Open t_is_not_identical for ? 38622 Open Proposed new security scheme for shared hosting (safe mode substitute) 38946 Open pecl/docblock should be merged into ext/tokenizer 40013 Open php_uname() doesnt return nodename 40499 Open filter sapi does not register any highlightning filter 40713 Open set_magic_quotes_runtime(0) causes Fatal Error 41019 Assigned auto update feature for FastCGI for IIS 41119 Open range() function behavior different on PHP6 and PHP5 41602 Open POSIX functions on Windows using Cygwin Library 42262 Open get_magic_quotes_gpc() should be there and return false ===[Filesystem function related]== 27792 Assigned Functions fail on large files (filesize,is_file,is_dir) 42037 Open fgetc() retuns one char when fails to read on php6 42057 Open fwrite() writes data into file when length is given as a negative value 42110 Open fgetcsv doesn't handle \n correctly in multiline csv record 42125 Open fgetss reads an extra char from file created using file_put_content() 42126 Open size of the file differ, when created using file_put_content() on php6 42167 Open fgetcsv gives different output on php6 compared to php5 42219 Open length argument of fgetcsv() is not effective/working in PHP6 42229 Open fgetcsv() behaves differently for a file containing '\n' with php5 and php6. ===[GD related]=== 34670 Assigned imageTTFText for Indian scripts (Devanagari) 34992 Assigned imageconvolution does not respect alpha ===[I18N and L10N related] 42471 Open locale_set_default returns true on invalid locales ===[ODBC related]= 39756 Assigned Crashes in fetching resultsets with LONG ASCII columns from MaxDB ===[OpenSSL related]== 25614 Suspended openssl_pkey_get_public() fails when given a private key ===[Other web server]= 26495 Suspended Using WebSite Pro 2.5 with ISAPI, cookies are not working ===[PDO related]== 35368 Suspended PDO query does not work properly with serialize 39171 Assigned pdo_mysql configure script sets empty default socket 42079 Open pdo_mysql always links to 3.x libraries ===[Performance problem]== 42528 Open Out of char(8-bit) range value doesn't roll back, with uni-code ON. ===[Program Execution] 39992 Open proc_terminate() leaves children of child running
Re: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: ab5602
On 01.10.2007 07:29, Robert Thompson wrote: Help debug and fix continuing issues with respect to PHP + Solaris. In the position of debugging and fixing Solaris + PHP issues almost exclusively for my job. In particular, I would like to contribute to code fixes and configuration checks for the many issues PHP is facing with respect to Solaris's shifty getcwd() and realpath() bugs. While I absolutely appreciate your effort to improve PHP's Solaris support (which is not in the best shape atm), I have to say that we usually do not give CVS accounts right away. CVS account is not necessary for sending patches and discussing them in the list, which is the best way to make yourself known to the community. Btw, I believe discussion would be required in most cases since Solaris problems affect quite major parts of PHP. So please send you patches to internals@lists.php.net, we'd be happy to discuss and apply them. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Re: Compiled variables and backpatching
Hi, Stanislav wrote me a very useful reply to my CV questions. I wonder if anyone has time to give me a quick note on backpatching, and what that is? On 9/23/07, Paul Biggar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is backpatching? Is it related to compiled variables, or are they different concepts? Why was backpatching necessary? Is this performance related, and what performance impact does backpatching have? Thanks a lot, Paul -- Paul Biggar [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] T_IMPORT vs. T_USE
Hi Sebastiann et al., On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 18:06 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: When we removed the namespace implementation that was scheduled for PHP 5.0 before PHP 5.0's release we kept the T_NAMESPACE and T_USE tokens for forward-compatibility. T_NAMESPACE is new, only T_USE wasn't removed back then. afaik. ;-) The new namespace implementation in HEAD and PHP_5_3 uses the the new T_IMPORT token instead of T_USE thus breaking code as import is now a reserved word. We should, IMHO, drop T_IMPORT and change the namespace implementation to use T_USE. Thoughts? Well, import seems to be a word used quite often in PHP for method names, after I found some code breaking I did a short test using Google's Codesearch[1] to look for method calls using -import( and got about 300 results including major apps like horde, tikiwiki, typo3 and wordpress. Therefor I think it's worth to at least think about using the already reserved, but not used, keyword use. From taking a look at the language (the English one in this case ;-)) a sentence like use Namespace::SomeClass as SomeClass makes perfect sense to me - but I don't know much about the concept of Perl's (and other language's) meaning of use, BUT, we're neither Java nor Perl but PHP so we should use the keyword fitting best to PHP... If we can agree on the change I can write a patch changing the token and renaming the internal stuff accordingly. johannes [1] http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=lang%3Aphp+%22-%3Eimport%28% 22hl=enbtnG=Search+Code -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP-DEV] [patch] Late static bindings (LSB)
Hi Robin,
Thank you for catching this issue.
static:: make no sense in compile-time constants.
I've just forbidden it there.
Thanks. Dmitry.
-Original Message-
From: Robin Fernandes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 6:45 PM
To: internals@lists.php.net
Cc: Stanislav Malyshev; Baptiste Autin; Zoe Slattery; Dmitry
Stogov; Marcus Boerger; Lukas Kahwe Smith; Michael Lively;
Etienne Kneuss; Andi Gutmans
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [patch] Late static bindings (LSB)
Sorry to persist with this, but I think it could be really
useful to clarify the meaning of static:: outside of method
bodies... particularly since parent:: and self:: can already
behave very strangely in such scenarios (see
http://news.php.net/php.internals/32443 ).
For example, I find the following behaviour with the current patch
counter-intuitive:
?php
// NOTE: X is not related to A.
class X {
const MY_CONST = I am completely unrelated to class A.;
static function createA() {
new A; // triggers initialiser evaluation
}
}
class A {
const MY_CONST = const A;
public $p = static::MY_CONST;
static function getInstance() {
return new A;
}
}
// First instantiate A inside X. This causes A's properties'
// default values to be evaluated within X's scope. X::createA();
// Now that A's default values have been evaluated,
// behaviour is as if any new instance of A treats
// the occurrence of static:: on line 12 to mean X.
// Instantiate A inside A:
$a = A::getInstance();
var_dump($a-p);// has value of X::MY_CONST.
// Instantiate A at global scope:
$a = new A();
var_dump($a-p);// has value of X::MY_CONST.
?
Actual output:
string(37) I am completely unrelated to class A.
string(37) I am completely unrelated to class A.
Some thoughts:
- static:: could simply be forbidden in all class
property/constant default values.
- Any occurrences of static:: in instance property default
values could behave as if they were in the constructor, but
be forbidden in static property and constant initialisers.
- Other ideas?
Also, there are some questions around reflection. All of the following
A::reflect*() calls cause a fatal error like:
PHP Fatal error: Undefined class constant 'MY_CONST' in %s
on line %d
?php
class A {
const MY_CONST = const A;
const C1 = static::MY_CONST;
static function f($a = static::MY_CONST) {
return $a;
}
static function f2() {
static $x = static::MY_CONST;
}
static function reflectConst() {
$rc = new ReflectionClass('A');
var_dump($rc-getConstant('C1'));
}
static function reflectArg() {
$rm = new ReflectionMethod('A::f');
$rps = $rm-getParameters();
var_dump($rps[0]-getDefaultValue());
}
static function reflectStat() {
$rm = new ReflectionMethod('A::f2');
var_dump($rm-getStaticVariables());
}
}
A::reflectConst(); // fatal error
A::reflectArg(); // fatal error
A::reflectStat(); // fatal error
?
Is this desirable? One could argue that the reflection calls
emanate from A::, so static:: could be resolved accordingly.
This test case suggests that static:: is in fact being bound
to the ReflectionClass class itself (since
ReflectionClass::IS_FINAL===64) :
?php
class A {
const IS_FINAL = This string is not integer sixty-four;
const C1 = static::IS_FINAL;
}
$rc = new ReflectionClass('A');
$rc-getConstant('C1'); // trigger evaluation of A::C1
var_dump(A::C1);
?
Actual output:
int(64)
Kind regards,
Robin
On 27/09/2007, Jingcheng Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
static methods seem exactly like dynamic binded methods now, is
there any chance that abstract static function being
restored from
E_STRICT limitation? Currently it is allowed in interfaces, but
forbidden in abstract class, I don't know why php
implements static
method in this way, this seems strange.. Thanks!
On 9/27/07, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if I understand you well, Stanislas, you are personally not
much
into
static:: but more into making that sort of code working :
interface iC {
public $structure;
}
abstract class A implements iC {
public function display() {
echo self::$structure;
}
}
class B extends A {
static public $structure = This is a string.;
}
$b = new B();
$b-display();
No, I don't think we should make interfaces with
variables, I'm just
telling that the code before had API that not allowed correctly
enforce its requirements.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
(408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] substr/array_slice in []
Here http://www.php.net/~derick/meeting-notes.html#cleanup-for-vs is a phrase For both strings and arrays, the [] operator will support substr()/array_slice() functionality will it appear in php5.x (php 5.3)? -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] substr/array_slice in []
This was not on the table and the time of the 5.3 discussion, I for one think its a bit too much magic. On 1-Oct-07, at 7:30 AM, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: Here http://www.php.net/~derick/meeting-notes.html#cleanup-for-vs is a phrase For both strings and arrays, the [] operator will support substr()/array_slice() functionality will it appear in php5.x (php 5.3)? -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php Ilia Alshanetsky -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] substr/array_slice in []
On 01.10.2007 16:32, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: This was not on the table and the time of the 5.3 discussion, I for one think its a bit too much magic. Yeah, too Perl-ish for me. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Getopt with longopts and windows support - part 2
Patch applied to HEAD / PHP_5_3. --Jani On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:57 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote: Hi internals, so based on a discussion of php.pecl we thought about using the php_getopt for the PHP_FUNCTION(getopt) instead of the system provided getopt. Here is the patch for that. Hopefully someone is reviewing and commiting the patch as i don't have karma. It addes main/getopt.c main/php_getopt.h to the build system and uses the php_getopt function in the ext/standard/basic_functions.c. Furthermore it removes all HAVE_GETOPT and HARTMUT_0 switches. it also enable longopts for both win and linux in the form $opt = getopt(a, array(param:, param2)); Where : in the longopts marks that the parameter takes an argument. The main/getopt.c and main/php_getopt.h is in fact taken from sapi/cli/getopt.c and sapi/cli/php_getopt.h but is slightly modified. http://experimentalworks.net/~dsp/getopt.patch.tar.gz It also runs on windows. To apply the patch: 1) remove sapi/cli/getopt.c sapi/cli/php_getopt.h sapi/cgi/getopt.c sapi/cgi/php_getopt.h 2) add main/getopt.c and main/php_getopt.h frm the archive 3) apply the patch. -- Patches/Donations: http://pecl.php.net/~jani/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] substr/array_slice in []
Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: Here http://www.php.net/~derick/meeting-notes.html#cleanup-for-vs is a phrase For both strings and arrays, the [] operator will support substr()/array_slice() functionality will it appear in php5.x (php 5.3)? I think since we do have substr/array_slice there's no need to overload [] operator. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Compiled variables and backpatching
Stanislav wrote me a very useful reply to my CV questions. I wonder if anyone has time to give me a quick note on backpatching, and what that is? I think backpatching refers to updating past opcodes (i.e. opcodes for code that was already parsed) when they need something that would be known only in the future. E.g., if you have if/else statement, then when if condition is false you need to jump to else, but else was not parsed yet - so when we parse if, we create opcode, but then update it when we parse else so that it jumps to the right place. Also backpatching is used to compose variable expressions - like $foo[$bar]-x-$y-z. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] substr/array_slice in []
It's on my TODO list. -Andrei Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: Here http://www.php.net/~derick/meeting-notes.html#cleanup-for-vs is a phrase For both strings and arrays, the [] operator will support substr()/array_slice() functionality will it appear in php5.x (php 5.3)? -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP-DEV] T_IMPORT vs. T_USE
Hi Johannes, Our preference would be to stick to import because I think the perception many will have of use is that it also includes files (just based on some other languages). That said I agree that compatibility would be an issue here. In fact it's even somewhat of an issue with namespace which is probably also used quite a bit esp. in relation to XML. What I'd like to do is see if it's feasible to support reserved words as identifiers. It should be possible but we need to see if it makes sense, how it affects consistency, and if we do it what identifiers we'd do it for (or all?). We probably won't get to this until after our conference next week so my suggestion is to keep it as-is for now and then revisit it. We're still far enough off from the release so that we don't need to finalize today. Thx. Andi -Original Message- From: Johannes Schlüter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 4:24 AM To: Sebastian Bergmann Cc: internals@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] T_IMPORT vs. T_USE Hi Sebastiann et al., On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 18:06 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: When we removed the namespace implementation that was scheduled for PHP 5.0 before PHP 5.0's release we kept the T_NAMESPACE and T_USE tokens for forward-compatibility. T_NAMESPACE is new, only T_USE wasn't removed back then. afaik. ;-) The new namespace implementation in HEAD and PHP_5_3 uses the the new T_IMPORT token instead of T_USE thus breaking code as import is now a reserved word. We should, IMHO, drop T_IMPORT and change the namespace implementation to use T_USE. Thoughts? Well, import seems to be a word used quite often in PHP for method names, after I found some code breaking I did a short test using Google's Codesearch[1] to look for method calls using -import( and got about 300 results including major apps like horde, tikiwiki, typo3 and wordpress. Therefor I think it's worth to at least think about using the already reserved, but not used, keyword use. From taking a look at the language (the English one in this case ;-)) a sentence like use Namespace::SomeClass as SomeClass makes perfect sense to me - but I don't know much about the concept of Perl's (and other language's) meaning of use, BUT, we're neither Java nor Perl but PHP so we should use the keyword fitting best to PHP... If we can agree on the change I can write a patch changing the token and renaming the internal stuff accordingly. johannes [1] http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=lang%3Aphp+%22-%3Eimport%28% 22hl=enbtnG=Search+Code -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] substr/array_slice in []
Sorry to bother, I have a few questions on this matter. How will this impact on the SPL ArrayAccess and related interfaces and objects? Will there be an interface to this functionality? If so, how will ranges be passed through to this interface? Will this be consistent with substr() and array_slice() if used with an ArrayAccess implementation? Thank you and sorry for the bother. Regards, Martin Alterisio 2007/10/1, Alexey Zakhlestin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Here http://www.php.net/~derick/meeting-notes.html#cleanup-for-vs is a phrase For both strings and arrays, the [] operator will support substr()/array_slice() functionality will it appear in php5.x (php 5.3)? -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] substr/array_slice in []
Sorry to bother, I have a few questions on this matter. How will this impact on the SPL ArrayAccess and related interfaces and objects? That's the problem with such syntax - one would expect it works with ArrayAccess and it starts to be complicated... -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] T_IMPORT vs. T_USE
Andi Gutmans wrote: Hi Johannes, Our preference would be to stick to import because I think the perception many will have of use is that it also includes files (just based on some other languages). That said I agree that compatibility would be an issue here. In fact it's even somewhat of an issue with namespace which is probably also used quite a bit esp. in relation to XML. What I'd like to do is see if it's feasible to support reserved words as identifiers. It should be possible but we need to see if it makes sense, how it affects consistency, and if we do it what identifiers we'd do it for (or all?). This would be pretty easy, in a hackish way, by adding a whole bunch of duplicate rules T_FUNCTION T_STRING, T_FUNCTION T_IMPORT, T_FUNCTION T_NAMESPACE and so on. A more robust way would be to move to lemon/re2c but I'm not volunteering to do this (yet?) :) Greg -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] T_IMPORT vs. T_USE
This would be pretty easy, in a hackish way, by adding a whole bunch of duplicate rules T_FUNCTION T_STRING, T_FUNCTION T_IMPORT, T_FUNCTION T_NAMESPACE and so on. A more robust way would be to move to lemon/re2c but I'm not volunteering to do this (yet?) probably better something like keyword_as_identifier - T_IMPORT | T_NAMESPACE | etc. and then T_FUNCTION keyword_as_identifier, T_CLASS keyword_as_identifier etc. But we have to watch out for expressions - there could be conflicts... That's what we should check. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP-DEV] T_IMPORT vs. T_USE
Andi Gutmans schrieb: Our preference would be to stick to import because I think the perception many will have of use is that it also includes files (just based on some other languages). That said I agree that compatibility would be an issue here. In fact it's even somewhat of an issue with namespace which is probably also used quite a bit esp. in relation to XML. You mean like import includes files in python? ;) Regards, Stefan -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Proposal for fixing bug #40501
Hi internals, once again a proposal for a bugfix. This time concerning http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=40501. As the standard escape character is \\ , but the RFC says , I added a optional escape character to the function call as a last parameter. Furthermore, when the escape character is the same as the enclosure character (e.g. ), a string will be escape, while a single will be enclosured. the patch and the according updated and added testfiles can be found at http://experimentalworks.net/downloads/bug40501.patch.tar.gz opinions? greets David -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Re: RE : [PHP-DEV] Re: RE : [PATCH] zend-multibyte unicode detection vs. __halt_compiler()
Changing 'detect_unicode' disabled as default is a possible solution.
But, it might cause some backward incompatibility issues.
If no one gives any objection within a coupled of days,
I will commit the change ('detect_unicode' will be disabled by default).
Rui
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:37:57 +0200
LAUPRETRE François (P) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Rui Hirokawa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.set detect_unicode = Off
2.adding declare(encoding=encoding_name) on the first line
of script can be your solution ?
The 'declare' statement is not a solution because unicode detection is done
before it is seen. So, PHK and PHAR remain incompatible with zend_multibyte.
Can you confirm that unicode detection does not exist in PHP 6 (keeping only
'declare' statements) ?
As a workaround in PHP 5, would it be possible to add a 'detect_unicode=off'
line in php.ini-dist and php.ini-recommended ?
Regards
Francois
--
Rui Hirokawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] bug 42818
Hi internals,
another small patch. This time concerning
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=42818. As I'm not a ZendEngine expert I'm
not sure if this is the right place and the right way to fix the bug, but
at least for me this small fix works fine. Maybe somebody who is really
into depth with the engine can use it as a small hint.
The problem is that in ZEND_INIT_ARRAY_SPEC_UNUSED_UNUSED_HANDLER the op
code tmp_var is initialized but never freed by the clone op handler.
patch is against PHP_5_3
greets
david
Index: zend_vm_execute.h
===
RCS file: /repository/ZendEngine2/zend_vm_execute.h,v
retrieving revision 1.62.2.30.2.49.2.5
diff -u -r1.62.2.30.2.49.2.5 zend_vm_execute.h
--- zend_vm_execute.h 1 Oct 2007 10:37:13 - 1.62.2.30.2.49.2.5
+++ zend_vm_execute.h 1 Oct 2007 23:24:33 -
@@ -4661,7 +4661,9 @@
zend_error(E_WARNING, __clone method called on non-object);
EX_T(opline-result.u.var).var.ptr = EG(error_zval_ptr);
EX_T(opline-result.u.var).var.ptr-refcount++;
-
+ if (obj) {
+ zval_dtor(obj);
+ }
ZEND_VM_NEXT_OPCODE();
}
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Re: Solaris and getcwd()
BTW: Here is the bug that I am referring to: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=41822 correction: getcwd() is not an stdio function ;) Rob Thompson wrote: Hi everyone, I just subscribed to this list in hopes of working out some PHP bugs that have to do with Solaris. I've been trying to find out some reason why the getcwd() PHP function fails under some situations under Solaris. Particularly, when some component of the file path looks like: d--x--x--x (no read perms). This appears to be a security feature that Solaris implements that is not there in Linux. Here is what I found out: If you are not root AND you want to get your current working directory that has parents with without 'r' permissions, you must do one of two things: a) Execute a getcwd() program that is suid-root. OR: And this is the strange one... b) Tell Solaris that you already know where you are!! You can accomplish (b) by doing a 'cd /mydir/mysubdir/' where mydir has the permissions (d--x--x--x). Without changing directories with a fully-qualified path, getcwd() will return NULL. Here are my questions for the list: 1) Is there any way for a running non-root instance of PHP under Apache or another web server to know where it is in the directory tree already, in hopes of implementing (b) above? 2) I'm assuming that the current functionality of PHP include() requires stdio's getcwd() in order to function with relative paths. Is this really the case? 3) If #1 is possible and #2 is the case, would it be reasonable to implement a fix for this with doing a chdir(), followed by a getcwd() if your architecture is Solaris? I could try and attempt a fix, but my knowledge of the PHP source is sorely lacking at this time. I'm working on bettering it! Thanks! -Rob -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] link to exceptions in autoload thread?
Hi all, Could someone point me to the message(s) explaining why the executor is unstable when an exception is thrown in __autoload()? Thanks, Greg -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
