Re: [IPsec] Informal poll on IKEv2 { over TCP | fragmentation }

2013-03-14 Thread Valery Smyslov 
- I would prefer the WG to stop working on IKEv2 over TCP and instead work 
on standardizing IKEv2 fragmentation


I vote for this option.

Valery.

___
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Re: [IPsec] Informal poll on IKEv2 { over TCP | fragmentation }

2013-03-14 Thread Paul_Koning 
Our answer:

- I would prefer the WG to stop working on IKEv2 over TCP and instead work on 
standardizing IKEv2 fragmentation

paul

On Mar 14, 2013, at 7:33 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:

 chair-hat on
 
 It is seeming that consensus is trending towards let's document the 
 fragmentation method some vendors are already doing instead of finishing 
 IKEv2-over-TCP, but I would like to check that. Please respond to the 
 informal poll below.
 
 --Paul Hoffman
 
 
 - I would prefer the WG to continue working on IKEv2 over TCP
 
 - I would prefer the WG to stop working on IKEv2 over TCP and instead work on 
 standardizing IKEv2 fragmentation
 
 - I would prefer the WG to continue working on IKEv2 over TCP and also work 
 on standardizing IKEv2 fragmentation
 
 ___
 IPsec mailing list
 IPsec@ietf.org
 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

___
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Re: [IPsec] Informal poll on IKEv2 { over TCP | fragmentation }

2013-03-14 Thread Brian Weis 
My answer:

- I would prefer the WG to continue working on IKEv2 over TCP

If this is not the consensus, I agree with Yoav: I would prefer that we clear 
up the situation with Microsoft's IPR before working on standardizing IKEv2 
fragmentation.

Brian
___
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec