[IRCA] 1215

[Nick Hall-Patch]

After  taking a breather last night, 1215 carrier is back 0435UT, 
pretty fair at times, but no audio (yet).   1089 and 1107 only other 
carriers at present and quite a bit weaker.


best wishes,

Nick


Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada 


___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

[IRCA] TP 15 April Victoria version

[Nick Hall-Patch]

A big fall back today, practically all were big guns, and there was 
more evidence of down under than there has been recently.


pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native speaker, 
at least briefly):


not today



Reasonable audio  at  times during the period (much of it 
understandable by a native speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise):


594 JOAK man in Japanese 1249UT
612 4QR woman  and man talking, "ABC radio" mention by man 1305UT
792 woman, then man talking, DU English inflection 1257UT, then 790 
splash, and all bone by the hour

1566 HLAZ woman in Japanese 1301UT



not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or 
noise could be understood by a native speaker:


567 JOIK  man in Japanese  1259UT, then pips, then talk //594
774  JOUB woman in English, talking about learning Japanese, man 
replying in slow Japanese, "dozo" etc.

828 JOBB woman in English, man in Japanese; Portuguese lessons listed 1247UT





Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be 
guessed at by cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in 
talk or music)


585 JOPG  man talking //594 1301UT
747 JOIB vocal music //774 1255UT




Strongish het, no or "near imaginary" audio (either undermodulated or 
ravaged by splatter)


621 (off channel) 1242   1287 1593seemed to be Asian;
 891 909 1098 seemed DU


best wishes,

Nick



Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada  


___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

[IRCA] WWV Solar Report

[NOAA WWV]

:Product: Geophysical Alert Message wwv.txt
:Issued: 2017 Apr 16 0005 UTC
# Prepared by the US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center
#
#  Geophysical Alert Message
#
Solar-terrestrial indices for 15 April follow.
Solar flux 73 and estimated planetary A-index 6.
The estimated planetary K-index at  UTC on 16 April was 1.
No space weather storms were observed for the past 24 hours.
No space weather storms are predicted for the next 24 hours.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Trends -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Date 14   14   14   14   14   15   15   15   15   15   15   15   15   16
UTC  0900 1200 1500 1800 2100  0300 0600 0900 1200 1500 1800 2100 
SFlx 74   74   74   74   73   73   73   73   73   73   73   73   73   73
A-in 555513   14   14   14   14   14   14   14   86
K-in 32323232211111
Current Solar information available at http://www.am-dx.com/wwv.htm



___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

Re: [IRCA] WFLI-1070.

[Ira Elbert New III]

Time to buy a lottery ticket. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 15, 2017, at 7:36 PM, Paul B. Walker, Jr. 
>  wrote:
> 
> One source told me..$150,000 for the land, equipment and license
> 
> That should tell you something right there
> 
> 
>> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 3:35 PM Ira Elbert New III  wrote:
>> 
>> How much is it going for?
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Apr 15, 2017, at 7:12 PM, Paul B. Walker, Jr. <
>> walkerbroadcast...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm a broadcaster and a DX'er.. been DXing since I was 12 or 13. Been a
>>> broadcaster for nearly 15 years (i'm 33)
>>> 
>>> They could drop a few towers and go with lower power, which would make
>> this
>>> a potentially viable option. THere's just not alot you can do with an AM
>>> signal that has high operating expenses, especially as a standalone in a
>>> market where everything is already being done 2-3-4 times over.
>>> 
>>> Paul
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:07 PM, DXer  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Nice job of putting words in my mouth and assuming what I meant.
 
 I'm not a mind reader, I can only go by what you wrote. Since I did not
 understand, I thought I would ask.
 
 When you seemed to be discouraging potential buyers, I was even more
 confused.
 
>>> Alot of DX'ers don't seem to realize that nor do they understand
 the business side of radio.
 
 A lot of DXers want stations to DX. Communities want service.
 
 Now, if a person, or a group wants to buy an "old rotting RF heap of a
 radio station", what's wrong with that? Maybe they have an idea nobody
 thought of. Maybe they will change the technical parameters. Maybe...Do
>> you
 want the 'channel' to remain vacant?
 
 Regards,
 
 Vince
 Ottawa, ON
 ___
 IRCA mailing list
 IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
 http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
 
 Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
 original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
 IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
 
 For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
 
 To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
 
 
>>> ___
>>> IRCA mailing list
>>> IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
>>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>> 
>>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>> 
>>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>> 
>>> To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
>>> 
>> ___
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> 
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> 
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> 
>> To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
>> 
>> 
> ___
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
> editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
> 
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

Re: [IRCA] WFLI-1070.

[Paul B. Walker, Jr.]

One source told me..$150,000 for the land, equipment and license

That should tell you something right there


On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 3:35 PM Ira Elbert New III  wrote:

> How much is it going for?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Apr 15, 2017, at 7:12 PM, Paul B. Walker, Jr. <
> walkerbroadcast...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm a broadcaster and a DX'er.. been DXing since I was 12 or 13. Been a
> > broadcaster for nearly 15 years (i'm 33)
> >
> > They could drop a few towers and go with lower power, which would make
> this
> > a potentially viable option. THere's just not alot you can do with an AM
> > signal that has high operating expenses, especially as a standalone in a
> > market where everything is already being done 2-3-4 times over.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:07 PM, DXer  wrote:
> >
> > Nice job of putting words in my mouth and assuming what I meant.
> >>
> >> I'm not a mind reader, I can only go by what you wrote. Since I did not
> >> understand, I thought I would ask.
> >>
> >> When you seemed to be discouraging potential buyers, I was even more
> >> confused.
> >>
> > Alot of DX'ers don't seem to realize that nor do they understand
> >> the business side of radio.
> >>
> >> A lot of DXers want stations to DX. Communities want service.
> >>
> >> Now, if a person, or a group wants to buy an "old rotting RF heap of a
> >> radio station", what's wrong with that? Maybe they have an idea nobody
> >> thought of. Maybe they will change the technical parameters. Maybe...Do
> you
> >> want the 'channel' to remain vacant?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Vince
> >> Ottawa, ON
> >> ___
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
> >>
> >>
> > ___
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
> >
> ___
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
>
>
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

Re: [IRCA] WFLI-1070.

[Ira Elbert New III]

How much is it going for? 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 15, 2017, at 7:12 PM, Paul B. Walker, Jr. 
>  wrote:
> 
> I'm a broadcaster and a DX'er.. been DXing since I was 12 or 13. Been a
> broadcaster for nearly 15 years (i'm 33)
> 
> They could drop a few towers and go with lower power, which would make this
> a potentially viable option. THere's just not alot you can do with an AM
> signal that has high operating expenses, especially as a standalone in a
> market where everything is already being done 2-3-4 times over.
> 
> Paul
> 
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:07 PM, DXer  wrote:
> 
> Nice job of putting words in my mouth and assuming what I meant.
>> 
>> I'm not a mind reader, I can only go by what you wrote. Since I did not
>> understand, I thought I would ask.
>> 
>> When you seemed to be discouraging potential buyers, I was even more
>> confused.
>> 
> Alot of DX'ers don't seem to realize that nor do they understand
>> the business side of radio.
>> 
>> A lot of DXers want stations to DX. Communities want service.
>> 
>> Now, if a person, or a group wants to buy an "old rotting RF heap of a
>> radio station", what's wrong with that? Maybe they have an idea nobody
>> thought of. Maybe they will change the technical parameters. Maybe...Do you
>> want the 'channel' to remain vacant?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Vince
>> Ottawa, ON
>> ___
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> 
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> 
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> 
>> To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
>> 
>> 
> ___
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
> editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
> 
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

Re: [IRCA] WFLI-1070.

[Russ Edmunds]

The world of broadcasting today is not what it was. Energy costs are much 
higher. There are more stations in every market, and more stations listenable 
from outside.  Formats have been condensed and with more stations and fewer 
formats there's more duplication.


Add to that the fact that AM's audience has eroded, not just from FM, but from 
all sorts of other media and devices.


So more stations, fewer formats, fewer listeners and higher costs aren't a good 
formula for success. That in turn leads to neglect of maintenance due to lac of 
funds.


Paul is telling it like it is.


Russ Edmunds

WB2BJH

Blue Bell, PA

Grid FN20id


From: IRCA  on behalf of Paul B. Walker, Jr. 

Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 7:11:56 PM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
Subject: Re: [IRCA] WFLI-1070.

I'm a broadcaster and a DX'er.. been DXing since I was 12 or 13. Been a
broadcaster for nearly 15 years (i'm 33)

They could drop a few towers and go with lower power, which would make this
a potentially viable option. THere's just not alot you can do with an AM
signal that has high operating expenses, especially as a standalone in a
market where everything is already being done 2-3-4 times over.

Paul

On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:07 PM, DXer  wrote:

> >>>Nice job of putting words in my mouth and assuming what I meant.
>
> I'm not a mind reader, I can only go by what you wrote. Since I did not
> understand, I thought I would ask.
>
> When you seemed to be discouraging potential buyers, I was even more
> confused.
>
> >>> Alot of DX'ers don't seem to realize that nor do they understand
> the business side of radio.
>
> A lot of DXers want stations to DX. Communities want service.
>
> Now, if a person, or a group wants to buy an "old rotting RF heap of a
> radio station", what's wrong with that? Maybe they have an idea nobody
> thought of. Maybe they will change the technical parameters. Maybe...Do you
> want the 'channel' to remain vacant?
>
> Regards,
>
> Vince
> Ottawa, ON
> ___
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
>
>
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

Re: [IRCA] WFLI-1070.

[Paul B. Walker, Jr.]

As a broadcaster first and foremost, Id rather lose a station and have it
go off the air then have a station limping along doing no one any good.
Broadcasting is a business and the only reason this station lasted as long
as it did, was because I think the same family had it , like, forever.



On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:29 PM, DXer  wrote:

> >>I'm a broadcaster and a DX'er.. been DXing since I was 12 or 13. Been
> >>a broadcaster for nearly 15 years (i'm 33)
>
> DXing on/off since about the same age. Around 20 years in telecom, but not
> broadcasting. As for current age, let's say you are young enough to be my
> son. :^)
>
>
> >>They could drop a few towers and go with lower power, which would >>make
> this a potentially viable option. THere's just not alot you can >>do with
> an AM signal that has high operating expenses, especially as >>a standalone
> in a market where everything is already being done 2-3-4 >>times over.
>
> This is a much more interesting reply.
>
> Let's hope somebody buys this "old rotting RF heap of a
> radio station", and implement your sugestions. As a DXer, I much prefer
> low power stations.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Vince
> Ottawa, ON
>
>
> ___
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
>
>
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

Re: [IRCA] WFLI-1070.

[DXer]

>>I'm a broadcaster and a DX'er.. been DXing since I was 12 or 13. Been 
>>a broadcaster for nearly 15 years (i'm 33)


DXing on/off since about the same age. Around 20 years in telecom, but 
not broadcasting. As for current age, let's say you are young enough to 
be my son. :^)



>>They could drop a few towers and go with lower power, which would 
>>make this a potentially viable option. THere's just not alot you can 
>>do with an AM signal that has high operating expenses, especially as 
>>a standalone in a market where everything is already being done 2-3-4 
>>times over.


This is a much more interesting reply.

Let's hope somebody buys this "old rotting RF heap of a
radio station", and implement your sugestions. As a DXer, I much prefer 
low power stations.


Regards,

Vince
Ottawa, ON


___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

Re: [IRCA] WFLI-1070.

[Paul B. Walker, Jr.]

I'm a broadcaster and a DX'er.. been DXing since I was 12 or 13. Been a
broadcaster for nearly 15 years (i'm 33)

They could drop a few towers and go with lower power, which would make this
a potentially viable option. THere's just not alot you can do with an AM
signal that has high operating expenses, especially as a standalone in a
market where everything is already being done 2-3-4 times over.

Paul

On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:07 PM, DXer  wrote:

> >>>Nice job of putting words in my mouth and assuming what I meant.
>
> I'm not a mind reader, I can only go by what you wrote. Since I did not
> understand, I thought I would ask.
>
> When you seemed to be discouraging potential buyers, I was even more
> confused.
>
> >>> Alot of DX'ers don't seem to realize that nor do they understand
> the business side of radio.
>
> A lot of DXers want stations to DX. Communities want service.
>
> Now, if a person, or a group wants to buy an "old rotting RF heap of a
> radio station", what's wrong with that? Maybe they have an idea nobody
> thought of. Maybe they will change the technical parameters. Maybe...Do you
> want the 'channel' to remain vacant?
>
> Regards,
>
> Vince
> Ottawa, ON
> ___
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
>
>
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

[IRCA] WFLI-1070.

[DXer]

>>>Nice job of putting words in my mouth and assuming what I meant.

I'm not a mind reader, I can only go by what you wrote. Since I did not 
understand, I thought I would ask.


When you seemed to be discouraging potential buyers, I was even more 
confused.


>>> Alot of DX'ers don't seem to realize that nor do they understand
the business side of radio.

A lot of DXers want stations to DX. Communities want service.

Now, if a person, or a group wants to buy an "old rotting RF heap of a 
radio station", what's wrong with that? Maybe they have an idea nobody 
thought of. Maybe they will change the technical parameters. Maybe...Do 
you want the 'channel' to remain vacant?


Regards,

Vince
Ottawa, ON
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

Re: [IRCA] WFLI-1070.

[Paul B. Walker, Jr.]

Nice job of putting words in my mouth and assuming what I meant.

No, but this station needs some technical upgrades. (I heard the sign off
aircheck someone made, and it sounded horrible) That combined with monthly
operating costs and maintence make it a losing proposition.

50kw AM's don't necessarily mean lots of money anymore. The station is
pretty directional and is in an over saturated radio market.

I could care less what theyre programming, doesn't bother me.  But the
power bill alone for 50kw day and 2500 watts night is several thousand a
month, minimum.. nevermind maintence and repairs there's already plenty
of religion, talk radio and music on the radio in Chattanooga.

Nostalgia... the old top 40 days, 5 watts on am don't pay the billd
anymore.. Alot of DX'ers don't seem to realize that nor do they understand
the business side of radio.

On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 2:44 PM, DXer  wrote:

> Paul,
>
> I'm not sure I understand. Are you really saying you want this station, or
> any station to close?
>
> Are you maybe mixing programming you don't like, or agree with, with
> having a station on the air?
>
> Regards,
>
> Vince
> Ottawa, ON
>
> >>Anyone who buys this old rotting RF heap of a radio station has more
> >>dollars then sense. The cost of improvements and monthly operating
> >>expenses would make this a losing proposition from the get-go, unless
> >>you have another business that can absorb the costs. This place needs
> >>some serious upgrades.
>
> >>They are apparently on, I'm told, testing in hopes of finding or for a
> >>potential buyer.
>
> >>This one just needs to fade into the sunset. nostalgia doesnt pay the
> >>bills
>
> >>Paul
> ___
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
>
>
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

[IRCA] WFLI-1070.

[DXer]

Paul,

I'm not sure I understand. Are you really saying you want this station, 
or any station to close?


Are you maybe mixing programming you don't like, or agree with, with 
having a station on the air?


Regards,

Vince
Ottawa, ON

>>Anyone who buys this old rotting RF heap of a radio station has more
>>dollars then sense. The cost of improvements and monthly operating 
>>expenses would make this a losing proposition from the get-go, unless 
>>you have another business that can absorb the costs. This place needs 
>>some serious upgrades.


>>They are apparently on, I'm told, testing in hopes of finding or for a
>>potential buyer.

>>This one just needs to fade into the sunset. nostalgia doesnt pay the 
>>bills


>>Paul
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

[IRCA] WWV Solar Report

[NOAA WWV]

:Product: Geophysical Alert Message wwv.txt
:Issued: 2017 Apr 15 1805 UTC
# Prepared by the US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center
#
#  Geophysical Alert Message
#
Solar-terrestrial indices for 14 April follow.
Solar flux 73 and estimated planetary A-index 14.
The estimated planetary K-index at 1800 UTC on 15 April was 1.
No space weather storms were observed for the past 24 hours.
No space weather storms are predicted for the next 24 hours.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Trends -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Date 14   14   14   14   14   14   14   15   15   15   15   15   15   15
UTC  0300 0600 0900 1200 1500 1800 2100  0300 0600 0900 1200 1500 1800
SFlx 74   74   74   74   74   74   73   73   73   73   73   73   73   73
A-in 55555513   14   14   14   14   14   14   14
K-in 34323232322111
Current Solar information available at http://www.am-dx.com/wwv.htm



___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

Re: [IRCA] TP 14 April Victoria early quick look

[R. Colin Newell]

Ah! I meant "Lot's of HETS..."

Gosh darn you auto correcting phone!

Never had that problem back in the 1970's and 1980's...

E-Mailing in DX reports way back in the 1970's was so much easier
without computers! :-)


*"Who'd a thought thirty years ago we'd all be sittin' here drinking
Chateau de Chassilier wine?*

*"Aye. In them days, we'd a' been glad to have the price of a cup o' tea."*

*" A cup ' COLD tea."*

*"Without milk or sugar."*

*" OR tea!"*

*"In a filthy, cracked cup."*

*"We never used to have a cup. We used to have to drink out of a rolled up
newspaper."*

*"The best WE could manage was to suck on a piece of damp cloth."*

*"But you know, we were happy in those days, though we were poor."*

>
>


-- 
Colin Newell - Editor and creator *of *Coffeecrew.com
 and DXer.ca  -
VA7WWV | Twitter @CoffeeCrew | Victoria - Canada
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

Re: [IRCA] TP 14 April Victoria early quick look

[Todd S]

But no hims?

Todd Skaine
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 1:04 PM R. Colin Newell 
wrote:

> 11:30 / 1200 UTC
>
> A TAD early but lively signals from the top tier - 594, 774, 828 Japan and
> 972 Korea.
>
> Lots of hers.
>
> Nothing much above 1000 KHz.
>
> Colin Newell - CoffeeCrew.com - VA7WWV - Victoria - BC
>
> >
> >
> >
> ___
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
>
>
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com