[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16145626#comment-16145626
]
Alexandre Vermeerbergen commented on STORM-1757:
Hello,
Yes, I am still interested in Beam Runner for Storm because I think that this
feature would help comparing the various stream processing engines against a
same application (without any need to rewrite the application).
Such comparison could benefit to Storm community because I feel that Storm is
appropriate for lots of throughput-driven use cases.
But maybe it could also be an incentive for Storm developers to try matching
other engines' capacities, as proposed in Beam's Runners matrix at:
https://beam.apache.org/documentation/runners/capability-matrix.
Alexandre Vermeerbergen
> Apache Beam Runner for Storm
>
>
> Key: STORM-1757
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1757
> Project: Apache Storm
> Issue Type: Brainstorming
>Reporter: P. Taylor Goetz
>Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> This is a call for interested parties to collaborate on an Apache Beam [1]
> runner for Storm, and express their thoughts and opinions.
> Given the addition of the Windowing API to Apache Storm, we should be able to
> map naturally to the Beam API. If not, it may be indicative of shortcomings
> of the Storm API that should be addressed.
> [1] http://beam.incubator.apache.org
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
